Katie Jones Interviewed 596
scubacuda writes "Greplaw has interviewed Katie Jones (of the real Katie.com). In addition to the details of the dispute regarding Penguin's 'branding' of the book Katie.com (which many /.ers 'reviewed'), she shares the details of her conversation with cyberlawyer Parry Aftab, how she believes Penguin's title change suggests that it thought it could steamroll her without recourse, and the tremendous amount of support the geek community has shown her." Ms. Aftab has several blogs. Ms. Aftab, if you contact us with a response to these allegations, Slashdot will publish your response (we've also written to your email address). Another reader notes: "Yesterday /. ran an article about the book Katie.com. Out of curiosity I just visited the Amazon.com website to see how many more reviews were on the website. Yesterday when I first checked there were over 300 reviews, most of them negative and the book scored only 2 stars total. Today, the book has 81 reviews with an average rating of 3 1/2 stars."
Katie Jones should get paid (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Katie Jones should get paid (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Katie Jones should get paid (Score:5, Insightful)
If anything - the real katie can trademark the name now if she was doing some sort of business and then just say she first used the name in business in 1996. There is no case here. It is 100% bullying.
Re:Katie Jones should get paid (Score:2)
Well, according to an e-mail I received from Katie Tarbox yesterday, Parry isn't her lawyer.
Dinivin
Re:Katie Jones should get paid (Score:3, Informative)
IANAL, but I can read dammit.
Is registration of my mark required? [uspto.gov]
Copyright and Trademark are basically the same thing, at least in the US. UPTO does not need to grant you a trademark for you to have your asset trademarked. You can even use the little superscript TM if you wish. What they do say on their webpages is that _REGISTERED_ trademarks grant you additional rights, and should your trademark come in dispute I imagine it's an easier case. It's an added insurance for just such cases, but by
Re:Katie Jones should get paid (Score:5, Informative)
Titles, names, short phrases, and slogans; familiar symbols or designs; mere variations of typographic ornamentation, lettering, or coloring; mere listings of ingredients or contents
Re:Katie Jones should get paid (Score:3, Insightful)
Give me a break. Katie.com is unique (there IS only one). No one else has Katie.com... how can it be common. Short, maybe but uncommon? IBM is short, but uncommon. K-a-t-i-e may be common as a surname, but katie.com as a unique brand presense is definitely trademarkable.
Re:Katie Jones should get paid (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Katie Jones should get paid (Score:5, Informative)
I'm reminded of Disney at this point. Here we have someone who plunders the public domain, adapts and creates something new from what they found there and then complains when others do the same to their own creations.
Re:Katie Jones should get paid (Score:3, Interesting)
Well, you're right that you can't copyright a title, but the two titles you mention are quite different, and the name "Fahrebheit" belongs to neither Bradbury nor Moore. I'm amazed that Bradbury thought he had a claim on it. Bradbury, like most writers, has often titled his stories with quotes from poems or other literary works. Basically, I t
Re:Katie Jones should get paid (Score:5, Informative)
Yes, since Bradbury didn't want any confusion to lead to him being associated with an extreme political view, he must therefore hold personal hate in his heart for Michael Moore.
Re:Katie Jones should get paid (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Katie Jones should get paid (Score:3, Insightful)
How would you like it if somebody listed your business number as a rape or suicide counselling service?
Re:Katie Jones should get paid (Score:4, Insightful)
#1. Increase in traffic = monetary damages. It's not free advertising, it's misleading people into believing katie.com is something it isn't.
#2. Type of traffic = damage to character. Katie.com is now associated with child abuse, which means that the owner of katie.com has that burden to bear.
#3. Emotional damages, due to the above traffic and the sicko tendencies of the visitors. These people wouldn't have ever visited katie.com without Penguin publishing the book.
Penguin can be blamed for all of these things by publishing the book under the title Katie.com. Prove damages and a civil suit just might go through, and damages seem fairly provable here.
Re:so you cant... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:so you cant... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:so you cant... (Score:3, Informative)
L-O-O-S-E is the antonym of TIGHT. EG: Your mamma is looser than a crack whore.
L-O-S-E is the antonym of WIN. EG: You are a total loser.
if her katie.com website is no longer usable (Score:5, Funny)
Re:if her katie.com website is no longer usable (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:if her katie.com website is no longer usable (Score:3, Funny)
Mike Rowe (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Mike Rowe (Score:2)
Voting her book down is the wrong tactic (Score:2, Insightful)
The author has been a victim once, let us not make her a victim again.
Re:Voting her book down is the wrong tactic (Score:5, Insightful)
Then why is the author's lawyer harassing the owner of the domain?
Re:Voting her book down is the wrong tactic (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Voting her book down is the wrong tactic (Score:4, Informative)
If an author doesn't like that, he or she could self-publish. But self published works are rarely successful.
Re:Voting her book down is the wrong tactic (Score:2, Insightful)
Amazon is censoring its reviews? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Amazon is censoring its reviews? (Score:3, Interesting)
Who actually trusts thos reviews?
Re:Amazon is censoring its reviews? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Amazon is censoring - A simple questionaire (Score:4, Funny)
(x) Gandhi took lessons from me.
( ) George Washington was a lightweight.
( ) I could pass a polygraph with a tack in my shoe.
( ) Waffle maker at the IHOP.
( ) Misson accomplished.
( ) I am not a crook.
( ) I'm an editor for Amazon book reviews.
Your input is very valuable to us,
Sincerely. The editorial staff at Amazon.
Re:Amazon is censoring its reviews? (Score:5, Insightful)
As they should have. The mistakes that an author makes in his or her personal life have ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with the content of the book. Even if the book had been about raising kids, the advice in the book still might have been valid. Judge a book by its content, and nothing more.
I am saddened and shocked that a point this obvious should even have to be discussed.
Re:Amazon is censoring its reviews? (Score:5, Insightful)
Had I worked for Amazon and was in charge of filtering reviews, I would have removed your review as well. Your statement in the review had nothing to do with the merits of the book as pertaining to Java programming, and is thus tantamount to using a smear campaign against the author instead of debating the merits of the work itself.
I suggest you all go to Amazon and rate all the "one star" reviews helpful, and all the others "not helpful" for Katie.comVindictiveness generally does not get you very far.
Ex Amazon Employee (Score:5, Interesting)
After I left, they started removing bad reviews of books all the time... especially when they were overstocked and wanted to sell more. Amazon is not the friendly business it used to be and I try to purchase everything I can through alternate sources.
Re:Ex Amazon Employee (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Ex Amazon Employee (Score:4, Interesting)
The same thing happened to all the glowing reviews of Half Life 2 (iirc) on amazon.co.uk - there were literally dozens of 5 star reviews for it (and Doom3, etc). A few weeks ago, I checked the page to see if they had an updated release date, and all the "reviews" had gone.
Re:Ex Amazon Employee (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:MOD PARENT DOWN. (Score:2)
Crapflood reviewers... (Score:5, Insightful)
It's a shame people do this... becuase actions like these don't gain any ground, and just end up leaving a bad taste in everyone's mouth.
Re:Crapflood reviewers... (Score:5, Funny)
Was the cookbook that bad?
Re:Crapflood reviewers... (Score:5, Interesting)
Not that that stopped amazon from pulling them all anyway...
Cyberlawyer? (Score:5, Funny)
Is that some kind of half-human, half-robot lawyer?
Re:Cyberlawyer? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Cyberlawyer? (Score:5, Funny)
1.) Swerve the public trust
2.) Neglect the innocent
3.) Uproot the law
Identity Theft (Score:5, Interesting)
Parry "Capone" Aftab (Score:3, Funny)
"That's a real nice URL, Ms. Jones. Would be a shame if something happened to it."
Re:Identity Theft (Score:5, Funny)
Not that surprising (Score:4, Insightful)
So what? Most of those negative reviews were posted because of the brouhaha with Penguin and the Katie.com domain; they didn't weigh in on the quality of the book itself. Hell, most of the reviews were from people who had never read the book. If Amazon didn't police their reviews for this kind of abuse, any two-bit asshat with a bone to pick could tank a perfectly good book's reputation with a few hours' work.
Re:Not that surprising (Score:2, Funny)
You underestimate the abilities of your fellow /.ers. Few hours, indeed..
Not a copyright issue (Score:2, Insightful)
The proper way to give a bad review (Score:2, Insightful)
This book royally sucks, August 5, 2004
A Kid's Review
It is poorly written, contradictive, boring in all passages, and written by someone with a sick pendant for the perverse. I have seen better pieces of the litterature in the weekly "Garfield"-strip... and comparing this book to said comic, is even
Site getting slow (Score:5, Interesting)
Copyright Katie Jones (the real Katie.com owner) shares with GrepLaw some of the details of the dispute with Penguin's "branding" of its book, Katie.com.
Katie talks about her conversation with cyberlawyer Parry Aftab, how she believes Penguin's title change (from girl.com [then a porn site] to Katie.com) suggests that Penguin thought it could steamroll her without recourse, and the tremendous amount of support the geek community has shown her.
Katie, you're involved in an interesting dispute over your domain, Katie.com. Tell us more.
In a nutshell, in 2000 a book was published by the name of 'katie.com' - a story by a girl who was molested by a guy she met on the Internet. Katie.com the domain name belongs to me and the first I heard of the book was when I started to receive email from people thinking I was the author.
And when did you first register your domain?
My husband bought the domain for me as a gift in 1996. He registered one each for us (his is gareth.com) and we both felt we were extremely lucky to get our own names with a dot com extension at a time when they were being snapped up very quickly.
So they could have known that Katie.com was registered to you?
They must've known. Early publicity for the book stated that it was going to be called girl.com and at that time girl.com was a porn site. Suddenly it was changed. This is a clear indication that they knew the title of the book would be significant. I imagine that they thought I was a 'nobody' that they could steamroller me without recourse.
How has the Penguin's "branding" of Katie.com restricted the use of your domain?
I originally had links to my business, my resume, and also personal items such as photo's of my son and other family members. Seeing as my business is online chat / community development it was obviously not in my best interests to be linked to the subject matter of this book so I removed that. And of course, I didn't want people who were interested in the subject of pedophilia or molestation viewing pictures of my baby boy.
The Register covered your dispute a few years ago. Anything in particular that made the issue resurface?
I posted an update to my website http://www.katie.com after I had a phone call from Parry Aftab, a lawyer working with Katie Tarbox on a new project. The lawyer asked me to 'donate' my domain name to them, attempted to emotionally blackmail me into doing so, and when I refused then got quite nasty about it and told me things would 'only get worse' if I didn't. The update was picked up by the blog community and then the press.
Have you ever talked to Katie Tarbox? Might she be able to do something about it, if she so wanted?
Never. She's never approached me. I've read responses she's written to other people denying all responsibility and blaming Penguin. But she's continuing to work using the term 'katie.com' for publicity, and apparently about to launch materials for schools using the title too, so regardless of whether she had control over the title of the book (and I'm sure she must have to some extent) she could choose to put an end to this invasion of my privacy and use another marketing tactic, but she doesn't.
Have any lawyers tried to steamroll you? (On your website, you mention an "aggressive lawyer" [and then link to Parry Aftab, the executive director of KatiesPlace.org who is working with Katie Tarbox])
Yes, Parry Aftab called me ostensibly to write an article for 'Information Week'. It transpired during the conversation that she was working with Katie Tarbox on a new project, at which point I began to feel misled about the purpose of the call. She told me that I should donate the domain name to them, or redirect it to their new project/site. I politely refused and she continued to attempt to pe
Re:Site getting slow (Score:4, Funny)
2 issues here... (Score:5, Interesting)
"I appreciate your thoughts and understand them completley. It is not posted on my web site, but this issue is between Katie Jones and Penguin Putnam. They own the name Katie.com as a published book and decided to call it that. I can do nothing in my power to change it. I would suggest if you would like your voice to be heard and a chance that something is done about it, direct your sympathy to Penguin Putnam."
According to her, it's the publishers at fault here. Can anyone verify this?
2) I like the reference to the "hacker movement" supporting Katie Jones. Perhaps we should start spreading the news a-la Kevin Mitnick? Start plastering "FREE KATIE.COM" stickers everywhere!
Re:2 issues here... (Score:4, Interesting)
I can un-verify it. She's the author of the book. Generally speaking the publisher clears the title with the author. If she didn't get the right to veto titles in her contract, then she's at fault just because she's clueless, it's kind of like accidentally shooting someone while checking to see if a gun is loaded. Only less violent.
Re:2 issues here... (Score:3, Informative)
She's not a what?
Re:2 issues here... (Score:4, Insightful)
It's Katie T's lawyer that is harassing Katie J, not Penguin's.
Re:2 issues here... (Score:4, Informative)
Jedidiah.
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
You need a link for a /.ing (Score:5, Informative)
Thus:
http://www.aftab.com/ [aftab.com]
I will now proceed to fire up Opera and set it to reload the page every 30 seconds.
Re:You need a link for a /.ing (Score:3, Interesting)
Why not
$ while true; do curl http://www.aftab.com >
It would seem more efficient.
Jedidiah.
Re:You need a link for a /.ing (Score:3, Insightful)
Now this is a disclaimer... (Score:3, Informative)
Actually, in a perfect world we would have morally responsible lawyers. At least, they would know that a buried agreement without even a front page click is unlikely t
Bad Reviews Still There (Score:2, Informative)
Amazon has an odd sorting scheme, but if you click "view all reviews", you can then further sort by rating or by usefulness. Do the latter. Look for most useful... all are voted useful but one or two stars, mentioning the website bullying. Then click for least useful... those are the five-star ones focusing on the story BEFORE the bullying came out.
You just have to RTF screen.
Write the Penguin Publishing execs. (Score:5, Interesting)
Subject: katie.com book and domain issue
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 12:30:14 -0600
To: david.shanks@us.penguingroup.com, john.makinson@us.penguingroup.com,
doug.whiteman@us.penguingroup.com, nigel.portwood@us.penguingroup.com,
anthony.laurino@us.penguingroup.com,
Gentlemen of the Penguin Group,
After reading today about the katie.com disparity between the book
and the internet domain, it appears that Penguin needs to admit an error
and correct course. As an individual involved in the internet with my
own "untrademarked" domains, I would be highly offended if the same
were to happen to me.
I expect that the internet community will rise to assist Katie Jones
with financial obligations encountered in dealing with this situation.
I for one would also help her if the opportunity arises. Losing
goodwill with the internet community isn't something Penquin
should desire. Please re-evaluate this.
Thank you
so basically... (Score:5, Funny)
Shit, I hope it happens because I already started work on my new novel, slashdot.org. Its novel filled with greed, power, lust, set in the computer hacker underground.
Donations for Katie Jones (Score:3, Interesting)
Another idea (Score:4, Interesting)
Donate to katie (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm personally willing to donate money to help her (this kind of crap angers me soooo much) and I would encourage other
Re:Donate to katie (Score:5, Informative)
reviews (Score:5, Funny)
"Thanks, September 18, 2002
Reviewer: "karen588" (Grand Rapids, michgian) - See all my reviews
Hi my name is karen and I am forteen years old, i like this book very very muchl, my freinds at school told me abowt this book and it taugt me how to rite into a chatroom on the interent and how to meet older man cuz all the boys in my school are boring and thye dont know how to treet a girl good. now I rite on a chatroom every day and i have meet many intresting and good looking men. and all because this book showed me how. I will be more careful then the riter of this book thogh when I meet this men in person, I will not make the same misstakes. I would like to meet an older man cuz then all the girls in my school will be jelous of me.
"
Penguin knows it is screwed (Score:3, Insightful)
Thankfully it looks like the ruse has failed and the true domain owner is not being scared off. A decent attorny would probably love the chance to tear into Penguin on this one.
From Parry Aftab's web site (Score:5, Interesting)
Imagine that. She uses AOL for a while in 94, and all of a sudden she is a "cyber expert" competent enough to decide for all of us that "the Internet" needs to be safe and private and whatever. It is enough to make an engineer's stomach turn inside out. What a repulsive, arrogant, slimy person. The way things are going, I wouldn't be surprised if she were involved in creating "cyberlegislation." Ugh.
Sadly for Katie (Score:3, Informative)
Tell Penguin Publishing USA what you think (Score:4, Informative)
(800) 631-8571.
UPDATE: It's all over - Penguin changes book title (Score:5, Informative)
(text reproduced below)
In an effort to avoid an association between the book originally titled Katie.com and
the website Katie.com, Plume and the author decide to make this title change.
New York, New York, August 6, 2004
called Katie.com by Katie Tarbox, an eye-opening account of one teenager's descent into
the seductive world of the Internet. After the book was released into the market, it was
brought to Dutton's attention that a website of the same name existed on the Internet.
The fact that the book, Katie.com, and the website shared the same name was purely
coincidental. In an effort to avoid any association between the book and the site, when
Plume issued the book in trade paperback in 2001, it printed on the copyright page that
the author of Katie.com and events described in the book have no connection whatsoever
with the website domain owner Katie Jones or her e-mail address.
Trena Keating, Editor-in-chief of Plume, said, "We have made every effort to clarify the
fact that Plume's book, Katie.com, and the website, Katie.com, are not in any way
associated with one another. In addition, it was erroneously reported recently that Plume
had asked its attorney to attempt to buy the web site Katie.com from domain owner Katie
Jones. This is absolutely not true. Ms. Jones confirms this point in a message currently
posted on her web site.
"We are not working in association with author Katie Tarbox or any other individual in
an attempt to assume ownership of the domain name address www.katie.com. Of course,
the personal views of the author are hers and do not represent Plume in any way.
"Going forward, Plume and the author have decided to re-title this book A Girl's Life
Online. This is an important book about predatory pedophiles on the Internet and how
we can protect our children. We changed the title to keep focus on this issue. The newly
titled book will be released next month. We have always taken this situation very
seriously. And we hope that by making this title change, it will demonstrate just how
dedicated Plume is to clarifying this matter."
in context, a STUPID TITLE (Score:3, Insightful)
Given the subject matter, "katie.com" is the frigging stupidest name possible for the book.
The book is about Katie Tarbox being exploited by an "Internet predator" (really, a predator who chose to use the Internet -- it's necessary to make this distinction because there are feebs like Parry Aftab out there). The last impression that Katie T. and Penguin and self-proclaimed protector of children Parry Aftab should want to give is that Katie T. in any way, shape or form encouraged or prompted the exploitation.
Yet, what is the meaning, the implication, of adding the ".com" extension (I mean, besides when it's being used for actual accuracy, which apparently Aftab and Penguin don't give two craps about)? Thanks to the whole dot-com hysteria, "dot-com" has come to mean in the public mind "something's for sale." pencils.com? Pencils for sale! hubcaps.com? Hubcaps for sale! girl.com? Girls for sale!
So basically Penguin and Parry Aftab are fighting hard, and fighting dirty, for the right to use a title that implies Katie Tarbox put herself up for sale on the Internet. Great going, guys!
Re:Nothing for us to see here, move along. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Nothing for us to see here, move along. (Score:5, Insightful)
what a nitpick (Score:5, Insightful)
Just because she doesn't defend herself flawlessly doesn't make her wrong all of a sudden.
Re:Nothing for us to see here, move along. (Score:5, Informative)
At first she didn't tell them what to do with the name. Penguin had demanded she give up the address and all she wanted was to keep her existing domain. So to use your example: you register bill.com, Gate's book comes out, the publisher demands you give them bill.com
Still think this is fair?
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Nothing for us to see here, move along. (Score:4, Informative)
The main problem is that people aren't seeing domain names as a parallel to phone numbers, or anything else identifying.
Re:Nothing for us to see here, move along. (Score:3, Interesting)
Linky here [cbsnews.com]
Re:Nothing for us to see here, move along. (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't think this is about the name, is it? I expect the publisher can call the book whatever they like (including someone's domain name,
Re:Nothing for us to see here, move along. (Score:3, Insightful)
What's more, it reeks of extortion. "Things will only get worse"? That sounds like a threat to me, anyway.
Re:Amazon censoring bastards! (Score:4, Funny)
Dude, there is SO much prior art on that one, even the USPS won't grant a patent on it!
Re:Wait, what? (Score:2)
Amazon, of course, has the right to remove reviews -- it's their site. After all, they're in the business of selling books, not providing a forum for socio-political discourse.
Kind of a shame though. Many of them were funny, especially the one with the lawyer's cellphone number included.
Re:Wait, what? (Score:2)
I've had a few of mine deleted, sometimes several days after they were written.
Re:Wait, what? (Score:2)
Re:Wait, what? (Score:3, Interesting)
Happily, the classic "The Story About Ping" review is still available, though I'm not sure whether the Amazon reviewer plagiarized from the
Katie.com as a porn site (Score:5, Insightful)
Something tells me if the site suddenly wen to a hard core "Barely Legal Teens" site, Penguin's interest would perk up REAL soon.
Any self respecting porn web master should be chomping at the bit for all the guaranteed traffic that such a domain would ensure.
And the owner's argument when Penguin sues her? "I could not longer use the domain and had to finance the process of moving all of my personal and business activity to another domain."
Penguin would either have to spend a lot of cash on a lawsuit or changing the name of the book.
Penguin really is being arrogant and irresponsible.
In the end, this is all good for Penguin (Score:3, Insightful)
Penguin is very happy about all this fuss. The book is getting free publicity, and the longer this goes on, the more sales of this book will be helped, while doing no real damage to the rest of the company.
They may buy the domain down the road, but they're more likely to file a lawsuit to take it, counting on this poor woman not having the cash to stand up to them in court.
As fun as it is to joke about it, I assume Penguin would sue her into oblivion if she were to sell
Re:Katie.com (Score:3, Funny)
As opposed to those non-raunchy porn sites?
Re:Is Parry Aftab Katie Tarbox's lawyer? (Score:5, Insightful)
Some questions I'd like to see him ask are along the lines of :
Katie Tarbox claims you do not represent her, but Katie Jones feels that you did claim to represent K.T. Who do you really represent in the matter of the katie.com book title/domain name issue?
Isn't it hypocritical to present yourself as a defender of rights online while trying to get a valuable domain name for free through threats and intimidation?
I'm sure others of you will have insightful questions as well. And at least making O'Reilly aware of this conflict could also make the show more interesting.
Re:Is Parry Aftab Katie Tarbox's lawyer? (Score:3, Interesting)
Mr. O'Reilly, It has come to my attention that Parry Aftab is claiming she will be on your excellent show this month. I'd like to make sure you are aware of the cyber abuse she is a part of while at the same time claiming to be a "leading expert" on Internet privacy and cyber-abuse. The domain katie.com was registered 1996 by Katie Jones and in the year 2000 Penguin published a book by Katie Tarbox with the title katie.com. The original title of t
Re:Is Parry Aftab Katie Tarbox's lawyer? (Score:4, Interesting)
If you check out Katiesplace.org [katiesplace.org], you see Katie T, and Parry Aftab's name promenantly.
If you check out Katie T's projects page [katiet.com], she also mentions Parry Aftab as being part of these projects.
If you check out Parry's blog [blogspot.com], she talks about katiesplace.com being a collaboration between her and Katie T.
Nope. Sounds like Parry is working with Katie T to me, as shown by publicly available information on the pages "controlled" by the respective folks. Thus, Katie Jones still has the story with more easily verifiable truth to it.
Re:Startling discovery about Ms. Atfab! (Score:3, Funny)
Her name is an ANAGRAM of "A FAT B*"!
Take a look at her photo [aftab.com]. This looks like someone who has never walked past a twinkie without stuffing it into her face. She called and harrassed [katie.com] Katie Jones a week after Jones gave birth. Atfab truly is a fat b*.
Re:Parry Aftab's Sex Confusion (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Parry Aftab's Sex Confusion (Score:3, Interesting)