Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Windows Operating Systems Software

More Details on Cut-Rate Windows OS For Asia 451

glawrie writes "The BBC is carrying a story that Microsoft is to launch a (very) cut down version of Windows XP to combat Linux in Asian countries. According to the story, 'Windows XP Starter Edition' will be limited to low-res graphics, limited networking, and will be hobbled to prevent more than three applications running concurrently. It remains to be seen why anyone in target countries would choose this over Linux, or the widely available pirate copies of 'full' Windows XP." We mentioned this in June.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

More Details on Cut-Rate Windows OS For Asia

Comments Filter:
  • by SYFer ( 617415 ) <syfer AT syfer DOT net> on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:02AM (#9947285) Homepage
    As "Torrents," the BSA Copyright Weasel [slashdot.org] sez, "even absurdly hobbled but copywritten, paid-for software is way cooler than that yucky pirate and OSS stuff, kids!"
    • What are their marketing geniuses going to call this monstrosity? Windows XP Lite?

      How about we call it Windows X-POS?
      • by justforaday ( 560408 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:22AM (#9947540)
        What are their marketing geniuses going to call this monstrosity? Windows XP Lite?

        There already is an XP Lite [litepc.com]...And it's pretty handy too...
      • by Anonymous Coward
        I'd call it "Enterprise Edition Server For Supercomputing". The article says this version can have "three applications running concurrently", which is about two more than your typical MSWindows han handle without crashing!
    • by hcetSJ ( 672210 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:26AM (#9947593)
      I think we need Tux in the classrooms:
      "The only safe Windows is abstinence"
  • Better link (Score:4, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:03AM (#9947292)
    Without crazy colors [slashdot.org]
  • If this is what they offer, only god could help them. They better have something else to offer or it will be DOA.
    • Re:Oh god! (Score:2, Interesting)

      Seriously, they aren't making much of a case for themselves. In fact they are making more of a case for FOSS. By crippling windows, they are giving people an incentive to use FOSS since no Linux or *BSD that I know of is crippled like this. No one has ever attempted Apache-lite or some other equally ridiculous idea for a reason.
    • Re:Oh god! (Score:3, Interesting)

      by xigxag ( 167441 )
      They should've done something simple, like limit the Starter Edition to accessing 256MB RAM and 40GB HDD space. That would give people a way to see how Windows really works, but give them grounds for upgrading the OS when they upgrade their system.

      Imagine: "We have detected a 160GB hard drive on your system. In order to use the full power of your computer, we recommend that you upgrade your software. Would you like to unlock the full power of Windows XP Home Edition for only RS3000?"

      Then they could u
  • by Mysticalfruit ( 533341 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:05AM (#9947326) Homepage Journal
    Lets sell a hobbled, half assed version of an operating system when the person can buy the same thing for less than what they're going to charge for the half assed version.

    Hmm. Suddenly I'm not so worried about the Microsoft marketing machine.
  • my question (Score:5, Interesting)

    by castlec ( 546341 ) <castlecNO@SPAMyahoo.com> on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:05AM (#9947329)
    What defines an application?? If you start something as a service, does this mean it's not an application? Surely there must be more than three services running at time.
  • by flimnap ( 751001 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:06AM (#9947334) Homepage

    Except that you're paying for it...

    This idea is sure to succeed because those horrible, evil, open source zealots would never think of this idea.

    • by Maestro4k ( 707634 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:12AM (#9947411) Journal
      • Except that you're paying for it...
      This fits for a company that has gotten people to pay for beta CDs. Not to mention that most of the releases of Windows have felt like Betas anyway. So this is just business as usual, nothing seems to have changed. Makes you wonder if the whole security focus is just marketing fluff too doesn't it?
  • WTF? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by OxygenPenguin ( 785248 ) <mrunyon@gmail.com> on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:06AM (#9947335) Homepage
    3 Concurrent programs? I don't even think you can successfully update your system on Windows without running more than 3 programs.

    On a side note, laughing my ass off about why anyone would choose this sideshow over better, more robust, and free products. They'll probably lower the price down to $50, which is $50 too much.
    • Re:WTF? (Score:3, Funny)

      by forrestt ( 267374 )
      Actually I think $50 is about $99,950 too much. They would have to pay me to use it.

    • Re:WTF? (Score:2, Insightful)

      by AndroidCat ( 229562 )
      Just think of the fun when some spy/scum/Gator/Clariaware attaches itself. (A number would count under IE, some seperately.) Some of them would probably be trapped in tight loops trying to spawn seperate programs and failing.
    • by MS ( 18681 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:36AM (#9947726)
      3 concurrent applications, results effectively in 4 concurrent programs, if one of those is internet explorer!

      You remember: MSIE is part of the OS, and as such does not count as an application!

      :-)

      But what if you have Quick-Time resident, Norton-Anti-Virus and the Zone-Labs firewall running? Will you be able to start any additional program?

      :-(

    • Re:WTF? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by shawn(at)fsu ( 447153 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:39AM (#9947751) Homepage
      How can this be a good idea? This program is crippleware? How do they expect it to compete with linux or pirated windows? 3 programs only? after a virus program that leaves two. This boggles the mind. It crippels the network services which is one of the keypoints of Linux.

      I keep thinking it's like watching a Histroy Channel show on the last days of Hitler, when his military strategy just went off the deep end.
    • Re:WTF? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by LiquidCoooled ( 634315 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:41AM (#9947782) Homepage Journal
      that is exactly the point.

      If microsoft CAN put out a cheap version of windows, no matter how crippled, then at least *some* people will buy it, and instead of getting $0.00 * 0 revenue from that country, they get $small_amount * x customers.

      However, by limiting the functionality, people in the more developed (read: stupid idiots for paying so much) countries which actually are forced to buy the full sized version will not look on this and say "Hey MS why cant we get OUR windows cheap".

      This kind of cut down OS would appear to me to be perfect for OEM distributers, supply this cut down MS "product" and pay less M$ tax without losing buddy status.

      True, noone on the street who knows the difference would touch it with a bargepole, but for the computer newbie this maybe just the price point they are expecting ("ahhh look, I can save $50 by getting xp-lite").
    • I ... see ... THREE .... lights!!
    • Re:WTF? (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Animats ( 122034 )
      3 Concurrent programs? I don't even think you can successfully update your system on Windows without running more than 3 programs.

      Do adware and spyware count?

  • How much did it cost M$ to hobble it so that only 3 proggies would run? Was that investment really worth the fucking horrible marketing campaign that would have to accompany this gimp? I mean, knowingly, willfully, and outrageously selling a piece of crap like XP-Express would require some serious spin from the PR folks in Redmond.

    If I lived in a country targeted for this release, I would still use a pirated copy of Windows. Why pay money for something nearly useless when I can get something nearly use

  • I wonder how long (Score:4, Interesting)

    by dan dan the dna man ( 461768 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:08AM (#9947353) Homepage Journal
    before some enterprising Asian hacker merely removes the constraints from the crippled software?

    But given the low cost of a pirated copy of Windows I still think this is a strategy doomed to failure!
    • before some enterprising Asian hacker merely removes the constraints from the crippled software?

      I'm thinking that it's nothing more than a few registry keys. Modify the keys, and BAM! Full version.
    • Re:I wonder how long (Score:4, Interesting)

      by arivanov ( 12034 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:37AM (#9947734) Homepage
      6-24h. That has been the case with all MSFT software releases in Eastern Europe. The question is that they are not going to waste their effort anyway. They will simply generate a few more keys for the real XP, XPpro to replace the ones that MSFT has blacklisted in SP2.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:08AM (#9947357)
    'Windows XP Starter Edition' will be limited to low-res graphics, limited networking, and will be hobbled to prevent more than three applications running concurrently.

    That will give new users a taste of how bad XP is, before making the choice between Linux (full res, full net, great multitasking) and XP (low res, limited net, 3 apps).
  • by B2382F29 ( 742174 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:09AM (#9947366)

    Cool, so you just have to open 3 programs and no worm could be executed?

    Aren't there more processes running when windows starts?

  • by Phoenix-IT ( 801337 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:09AM (#9947374)
    Why would you pay for a crippled, low functionality product, regarless of how "cheap" it is? There are full function, feature packed Open Source operating systems available for free. I don't see how lowering the capabilities of their software, regardless of price, will make it MORE attrative. Perhaps the shoe is on the other foot now. Microsoft will know how Netscape felt trying to compete with a "free" competitor in an emerging market.
    • They are truely operating out of their element here. Offering a crippled version is an example of their current business model in a North American market. In Asia they do not have the existing dependence on the product they have here. Offering a crippled version to low income customers may work ONLY if the customer is familiar with the product.

      Over there there is no existing dependence on the product. New computer users will be chosing between a fully functional, feature packed operating system that is fre
  • by Gothmolly ( 148874 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:09AM (#9947375)
    Remember the old registry hack from the NT 4 days? How much do you want to be that all you need is a kernel32.dll from a real XP install, and a suck=no entry in the HLKM\Screw\You\Microsoft key?

    This is dumb on MS' part on so many levels - people will try it, see that it sucks, and go with $Localized-Government-Sponsored-Linux instead.
  • Limited to 800x600? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Lispy ( 136512 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:10AM (#9947383) Homepage
    I also read on heise.de [heise.de] that it will be limited to a screen resolution of 800x600.

    Given the fact that most modern websites are designed for 1024x768 and all the recent games require at least 1024x768 I wonder how useful an OS is that is limited so severe. Your nextdoor Linux distribution is 10 times more powerful than "XP Starter Edition". I would continue to pirate if I would be presented with that kind of joke.
  • there's 25% less chance of virus infection! And significantly less carbs! With same funky acquired taste of XP!
  • Its broken! (Score:2, Redundant)

    by dacarr ( 562277 )
    Why should somebody buy a broken version of a broken OS when they can get the less broken version of it for free anyway over warez channels?
  • Win98? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Pheonix5000 ( 661842 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:12AM (#9947408) Homepage
    "Microsoft's new software - dubbed "XP Lite" - will feature lower resolution graphics and limited options for networking computers together." So basically it's like Windows98?


  • I don't use Wintendo but I see it running here and there. Let me guess on the three apps that'll be running in Asia ...

    AdAware 6.0
    Taskman
    Persistent Java Console from ladyboy pr0n site

  • by Vengeance ( 46019 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:14AM (#9947442)
    You're not going to compete with Linux by crippling your operating system, Bill.

    This is the PCjr. of operating systems, destined to be a laughed-at memory.

    • This is the PCjr. of operating systems, destined to be a laughed-at memory.

      Hmmm...this reminds me of that Ghandi quote that is so often repeated on Slashdot. I wonder if we're nearing the "we win" stage, because not only is the OSS community ramping up a formidable software stack on their own, they are doing it with the help of all of Microsoft's competitors (e.g., Sun, IBM, SGI, Novell, etc.). It's interesting just how few real friends Microsoft has.

  • Mislabelling (Score:3, Interesting)

    by LaCosaNostradamus ( 630659 ) <LaCosaNostradamu ... m minus caffeine> on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:15AM (#9947451) Journal
    Actually, it's "XP Lite".

    I really don't understand why Microsoft is trying to release this crap. No more than 3 apps at a time? Why that hard limit? It's not like they re-built XP for simpler multitasking.

    Microsoft is an enormous corporation with many people trying to get things done. If my experience at DEC and HP in the 1990s is any metric, XP Lite could be some pet project for a VP to gain some brownie or "atta boy" points. If it works out, then good for him. If it doesn't ... well, there's always the Microsoft Bob Memorial Archive.
  • by Xhargh ( 697819 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:15AM (#9947455) Homepage
    There are several ways to reduce the size of a normal version of Windows if you want to do some work yourself.

    Commersial program to remove components from Windows XP http://www.litepc.com/xplite.html [litepc.com]

    Free programs to reduce the size of Windows XP before installation: http://nuhi.msfn.org/ [msfn.org] and http://jdeboeck.msfnhosting.com/ [msfnhosting.com]

    And of course, my project that reduces the size of Windows 98 to less than 5MB http://www.etek.chalmers.se/~e8gus/nano98/ [chalmers.se] ;-)

  • It's a sham (Score:2, Insightful)

    by ykardia ( 645087 )

    One wonders what they are trying to achieve with this. Surely this is not going to stop rampant piracy. If I have the choice of a cheap full version from the blackmarket with next to no probability of being caught, and a (probably more expensive) hobbled version, which one am I going to get?

    In a way, it reminds me of the police raids that they sometimes have in places like Hong Kong, where they seize lots of CDs, and put them in front of a bulldozer. Then the press arrives, takes some photos for the pap

  • I hate it when companies put on double faces to try to get the best of both worlds. Despite the fact that they are offering what appears to be a better version to Asian countries, they are still offering crap here. Does this make my despise-o-meter go up or down? Whatever happened to these components being integral, or was that just BS you made up? What are the Asian countries going to think? You lied to them and said it couldn't be done, and then did it when they chose an alternative. They probably h
  • Nice commentary here (Score:4, Informative)

    by jav1231 ( 539129 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:18AM (#9947491)
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/08/11/winxp_star ter_edition_announced/
  • by blueZhift ( 652272 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:20AM (#9947518) Homepage Journal
    Hmmm, I think that Microsoft is taking a big risk in promoting a cut rate Windows XP in developing countries. First of all, the people in those countries are not any stupider than people anywhere else in the world. They will know that they are getting the dumbed down, brain damaged version of Windows XP. Even if this costs less than a pirated version (which remains to be seen), I think most will opt for the non crippled pirated version. People already knock Windows for its shortcomings as it is, does Microsoft need to add to this? Not only that, even offering this crippled Windows could be taken as an insult.

    A slimmed down version of Windows without some of the extra packages would be a lot better to offer than a crippled version. I think that in the end, Microsoft is going to have to accept the fact that in today's global marketplace, Windows is overpriced. In the face of Linux and free open source software solutions, I really don't know what they can do other than lower the price of admission and add more value and true innovation. There have to be really good killer app sort of reasons that make Windows the thing you want to have. Productivity applications like Office are no longer sufficient reason to stay with Windows. Games might be, but the PC games market is losing out to the console market. So what's left?

    Finally, even a crippled Windows won't be immune to piracy! As we learned from the web browser wars, it's really hard to sell something that's being given away for free! Linux is free and certainly has everything a small business might need in the way of productivity apps. So how can Windows compete with that in places where it is not the dominant player and limited resources and nationalism come into play?
  • by IGnatius T Foobar ( 4328 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:22AM (#9947541) Homepage Journal
    I think consumers will be downright insulted by this. Especially if they're not made well aware ahead of time that this is crippleware.

    Case in point: Windows 2000/2003 Server "Web Edition." It's a cut-rate server they've made available to hosting companies to compete with Linux. Now and then I've had to help customers with this particular crippleware and hit a brick wall because a feature was disabled. For example, you can't make it a domain controller.

    Hopefully this will insult the Asian people and they will redouble their adoption of Linux.
  • hm... (Score:3, Funny)

    by bagel2ooo ( 106312 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:22AM (#9947553)
    Crappy graphics, horrid networking, beyond shitty "multitasking" are they repackaging NT 4? :)
    • The difference between that and regular XP is what?

      Except for the graphics, very little difference.

      If anyone in Redmond knew anything about security or memory management, they might have a decent OS.
  • by hcetSJ ( 672210 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:24AM (#9947566)
    I don't care if it's a Starter Edition or a Missle Defense Edition, I still say, the only safe Windows is abstinence.
  • The pirates always do whatever they can to make more money. That includes going into theaters with camcorders to record a film that includes audience reactions at "no extra charge." So it's "no extra charge" for the bad version of Windows you're running that you bought from me when you thought you were getting the real deal.

    According to Microsoft: the new software [will] also help deter consumers from buying pirated versions of its XP system, widely available in many Asian countries.

    Thus, Microsoft, wh

  • I wonder why.. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by manavendra ( 688020 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:26AM (#9947605) Homepage Journal
    Perhaps the warning bells for proprietary solutions/OS began to ring for MS at least, when the Indian government made public its affection for OSS.

    #1 [indiatimes.com]The Department of Information Technology has already devised a strategy to introduce Linux and open source software as a de-facto standard in academic institutions, especially in engineering colleges through course work that encourages use of such systems.
    #2 [com.com]: Richard Stallman, founder of the Free Software Foundation, met on Thursday with Indian President A.P.J. Abdul Kalam to discuss "the ethical issues related to the use of proprietary software," according to the Free Software Foundation of India. Stallman also met officials in the state of Kerala to discuss the use of nonproprietary software in government initiatives. Last year, Kalam spoke out in favor of open-source software following a meeting with Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates.

    So, there is ample reason to worry. Now wonder why they'd have a strangulated version of OS as a low-cost option?
  • by mr_z_beeblebrox ( 591077 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:27AM (#9947611) Journal
    Why do I always see articles explain Linux as a 'so called' open source software. They make it sound as though Linux isn't really open source and that is the presses gripe about it. My gripe is about the 'so called' industry journalists not know what they are 'so called' writing about.
    • "So-called" has two different meanings. One is derogatory, as in "George W. Bush is the so-called President of the United States." The other is frequently used in journalism to identify terms with which the reader is expected to be unfamiliar; you see this in pop science journalism a lot, as in "DNA is made of of four so-called nucleic acids." (I suspect the non-derogatory meaning may be the original one, but I don't know.) It is unfortunate, I agree. It would probably be better to add an explanatory c
  • by bcarl314 ( 804900 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:28AM (#9947625)
    Here's a sneak preview of the OS... Windows RG [deanliou.com] (Warning - requires flash)
  • Shades of PCjr (Score:3, Insightful)

    by wandazulu ( 265281 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:29AM (#9947638)
    This seems like it's going to be Microsoft's PCjr...give them something that *seems* like a good bargain at first, but you run up against the limitations pretty much immediately. Then you realize you've been had and swear you'll never buy a product from this company again.

    Not that this ever happened to me *cough*.

    It's also very demeaning to the countries involved, piracy issues or not. You can imagine the box as saying: "If you see this box in a store, it's because we have 'issues' with your country as a whole." Frankly, I hope people are offended and swear off MS entirely.

    Viva Linux!
  • Like off disc copy protection and other technologies that lower the quality of the user's experience, this will only encourage pirating of the full version. I can't believe they don't understand that...

    Anyone there paying $50 for this crippled crapware is not only going to be disappointed, they're going to be angry.
  • by igotmybfg ( 525391 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:30AM (#9947646) Homepage
    it seems like they've already been selling this in the US for a few years
  • by scruffy ( 29773 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:32AM (#9947673)
    Now I understand why /. has this horrible color scheme.
  • by BigDogCH ( 760290 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:34AM (#9947701) Journal
    The "Hobbled Version has" been around for years. Here is what my use has been like. If you try to run more than 3 programs, the OS grinds to a near hault, and often crashes. If you badmouth MS at any point, the machine restarts causing you to lose anything you didn't save. The OS is so hobbled, I am always getting messages when on the internet about being insecure, so I click them all. That doesn't seem to help, so I had better click some more. Oh yeah, and the OS now decided that my '88 Chevy Cavilier is no longer compatable, so I have to buy a new Ford. It is very proprietary.
  • How typical of the marketing world. Treat customers as complete idiots that will buy anything as long as you
    • smile while selling it
    • quote professional support of your product
    • present convenient facts in favor of it
    Well no offense to my american nerds, but if it works in US (telemarketers anyone?) it certaintly won't work in China, if you know what I'm saying...
  • by renoX ( 11677 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:44AM (#9947810)
    I think that all Mozilla developpers should thank Microsoft: thanks to the all-in-one concept in Mozilla with one application you can have a web browser, an email client, IRC client.

    Otherwise, users would go mad stopping and starting applications..

    I wonder if this is true or if Windows think that Mozilla web browser and email client count for two application?

  • by JBMcB ( 73720 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:44AM (#9947811)
    I bet it runs faster than Windows XP Pro, with all the extra crap pulled out.

  • by geomon ( 78680 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:49AM (#9947867) Homepage Journal
    I could care less if Microsoft produced a cut-rate version of their software. I could care less if they give it away. They are a competitor and they have to respond to the market. The market now says "OSs are commodity". Microsoft will continue to capture all the revenue they can from that stream as long as they can. Remember, Microsoft initially wanted to be a computer language company. DOS was going to be the cash cow they relied on to continue their development of assembler, fortran, C, etc.

    What pisses me off is that the Thai government is going to HELP [microsoft-watch.com]Microsoft in spreading the deployment of XP Lite. I know that many Microsoft supporters will chime in about Munich's recent decision to move forward with Linux. This is different than a government making a purchasing decision for themselves and coming up with XP or Linux as the OS choice. Instead, the Thai government is helping with the deployment in non-government settings.

    Nothing annoys me more than corporate welfare. The Thai government is supporting one of the richest companies in the world.

    Fuck you Microsoft.

  • MEMO (Score:3, Funny)

    by Chris Tucker ( 302549 ) on Thursday August 12, 2004 @09:50AM (#9947876) Homepage
    FROM:Bill Gates
    TO: MicroSoft Asia
    Subject: Linux/Piracy in Asia

    DAMMIT! Re-arrange those deck chairs FASTER!

    And tell the band to play 'Nearer my God to Thee' LOUDER!

  • Let's examine this a little bit. Microsoft releases a partial version of a (no flames, please) halfway decent OS. Sooner or later consumers of this cut down product are going to want the full thing. They're going to want the full featured product. They have three choices;

    1. Upgrade. We've already acknowledged that these areas are poor, which means they have a limited cash flow. If they weren't willing to pay for the full blown product before, do you think they're going to be more likely to pay AGAIN? I don't think so which leads us to

    2. Piracy. This is the real reason this product is even available. Cracked CD Keys, reg hacks that allow Win Update regardless. I think this move is going to INCREASE piracy. More users. More users wanting more.

    3. Move to Linux. If you are going to shell out some money anyway - why not buy a retail linux distro. You get better support and a full blown product. Not enough $$ to cough up fiddy bucks for a retail copy? Download that mother for free!

    I think MS had a few objectives that this product was supposed to accomplish. I think it won't make as big of an impact as they expect.

Put your Nose to the Grindstone! -- Amalgamated Plastic Surgeons and Toolmakers, Ltd.

Working...