Nintendo DS To Allow Free VoIP Calls 195
sm4kxd writes "Gamespot is reporting that the Nintendo DS will use "built-in wireless 802.11b networking capabilities to offer voice-over-IP chat--in effect, allowing gamers to use the DS to make free phone calls at wireless network hotspots." There's also mention of a headset, so you won't look ridiculous while doing so." The article doesn't have much more information, but the "in effect" seems important; this may only allow unit-to-unit conversations, not VoIP calls to the regular telephone network.
Early Adapters tend to look ridiculous (Score:3, Funny)
I'm sorry - but is it just me that thinks the sight of someone talking to their Gameboy would look ridiculous? People using hands free kits already look like dopes IMO.
Re:Early Adapters tend to look ridiculous (Score:3, Funny)
You've never seen somebody play their Gameboy lookin like they're talkin to Al?
Nowhere does it state the DS will support this (Score:3, Informative)
Well, except on Slashot where it gets reported as such...
Re:Early Adapters tend to look ridiculous (Score:2)
When they first came out I'd call handsfrees 'psycho' kits. People would get on the train and be talking to themselves, etc.
I need more though (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I need more though (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I need more though (Score:3, Funny)
It should be able to cook them. Think about it. Kids love nintendo and hot pockets. These things create some heat. I think I see something good here.
Re:I need more though (Score:1)
Re:I need more though (Score:1)
Re:I need more though (Score:1)
Re:I need more though (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I need more though (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I need more though (Score:2)
Except for the stylus interface.
Standards (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Standards (Score:2)
May I suggest ICQ?
This is good (Score:5, Interesting)
not that I'll be buying one yet, however - this idea is very cool.
Re:This is good (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:UNIVERSAL SERVICE FEES ARE A GOOD THING!!! (Score:2, Informative)
Troll. Many european countries have vastly superior phone systems compared to the US. You might want to read up on a little company called Ericsson, what they've done, which country they're from etc.
That said, the former socialist monopoly of Televerket/Telia in Sweden is the reason why that's so.
Re:This is good (Score:5, Insightful)
Nope. (Score:5, Insightful)
I think it's there to allow voice chat when playing against other people wirelessly, ala X-Box Live. I don't see what else it could be used for. Nice that the support is there. I'd like to see what else companies come up with for a way to use it, I certanly can't think of anything.
Now all that said, I fully expect some company to release a piece of software for the DS to let you use it as a phone. I just don't think it will be built in, or that the software will be released by the big N.
Re:Nope. (Score:5, Insightful)
If the hack can be done, it will be done. Otherwise, we can't call ourselves geeks anymore. :)
Re:Nope. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Nope. (Score:2, Offtopic)
a) nonstandard in size
b) spinning the opposite way of virtually every other optical drive out there
just to discourage armchair hacking that much more.
I think in the world of hacks, Nintendo isn't a particularly attractive target for many enthousiasts due to the streamlined and single-purposed nature of their hardware, and as a gamer, I really don't mind. The Gamecube is a game machine and isn't really sui
Re:Nope. (Score:2)
I thought we lost our right to do that when we started modding up people for thinking cell phones shouldn't have cool gizmos on them.
Re:Nope. (Score:2)
Re:Nope. (Score:1)
Re:Nope. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Nope. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Nope. (Score:2, Informative)
"I would be amazed if Nintendo allowed you to use the DS as a phone. It's just not going to happen. I think it's there to allow voice chat when playing against other people wirelessly, ala X-Box Live."
Agreed. There is no way in hell that you will ever make "free phone calls" on your DS. For you to make a telephone call, by definition your call must enter the PSTN at some point or other, and Telco companies are simply not in the habit of letting people terminate calls on their networks for free.
This s
Re:Nope. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Nope. (Score:3, Insightful)
They don't? (Score:2)
Unless you mean that they don't like putting it all in one product because then they can't sell seperate add-ons--in that case, you would be right.
Targetting new customers? (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re:Targetting new customers? (Score:1)
Re:Targetting new customers? (Score:2)
Re:Targetting new customers? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Targetting new customers? (Score:2)
Face it, the marketing scheme doesn't make sense. One day this thing will support watching porn. And parents will realize their kids weren't really playing pokemon for 12 hrs.
Re:Targetting new customers? (Score:2)
Are you saying that Sony fanboys and Microsoft fanboys aren't flaming at random either? If I had a dime for every time I heard someone throw a flame at Nintendo without ever having played a GBA or a GameCube game, I'd be quite rich today.
Just because games like Pokémon and Yu-Gi-Oh exist doesn't mean other good games don't exist. Pokémon is aimed at kids. You're not a kid? then don't play it, but don't say it's shit just because YOU don't l
What The Fish? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: offtopic (Score:2, Funny)
and the games were crap version of GBA games, or PSX games with worse graphics.
That's not likely to come from Nintendo (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:That's not likely to come from Nintendo (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:That's not likely to come from Nintendo (Score:2)
No, it's hardware centric. This is not at all incongruous with Nintendo's views on making 'simply a gaming machine'. The hardware is all about gaming. The wireless connection is for gaming. THe stylus screen is for gaming. ETc. All it takes to make it do something like VOIP is software. If somebody wants to make a 'phone' cartridge for the DS, then by all means! You'll notice, though, that this unit has no MP3 or m
Re:That's not likely to come from Nintendo (Score:2)
Re:That's not likely to come from Nintendo (Score:2)
Re:That's not likely to come from Nintendo (Score:2)
Killer app? (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm just hoping that the DS will have all the appropriate goodies to go with this capability, like wireless multiplayer games, Jabber, maybe even a web browser and media player.
Re:Killer app? (Score:4, Insightful)
The idea of being able to play another person wirelessly is a good one, obviously, but outside of young adults, are there really that many opportunities for the rest of us to use this feature all that often?
Your social group may be different from mine, but rarely do I find myself in situations where I have multiple friends around who want to play a game, but don't have a console or pc LAN involved.
Most of the times I'm using my GBA, it's when on a commute, where I'm not quite convinced I'd fell the need to play random strangers.
Re:Killer app? (Score:2)
Re:Killer app? (Score:2)
Although you might not, maybe lots of people might. After all, when you play a PC game online, or on Xbox live, you'll likely be playing with a bunch of random strangers. What's so different between that and playing on the bus (other than if you drop the connection when you're about to lose the game, the other guy can actually stand up and go punch you in the face...)?
Re:Killer app? (Score:2)
We can play any time if we don't care who we play with.
Re:Killer app? (Score:2, Funny)
I didn't realise that a vacuum was considered a pressure?
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re:VOIP tapping? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:While I could be wrong (Score:2)
Re:VOIP tapping? (Score:2)
THAT'S IT MAN.... GAME OVER MAN! GAME OVER!
IT'S THE *OPINION* OF AN *ANALYST* (Score:5, Informative)
Nintendo representatives have publically stated they think it would be neat if there were a DS web browser that used the DS's built-in wireless ethernet to connect to the internet; however this does not mean that such a browser will ever actually occur, to my knowlege they've said nothing whatsoever about internet voice chat.
Re:IT'S THE *OPINION* OF AN *ANALYST* (Score:2)
And then there was sourceforge, and (deity:God, Allah, Buddha, Linus) said "Holy crap it's good!"
Re:Agreed (Score:3, Informative)
Voice recognition (Score:5, Informative)
A somewhat more directly relevant example of how we might see voice recognition used in the DS might perhaps be teased from the news about Nintendo's upcoming Mario Party 6 [gamespot.com], which will contain about eighty-something multiplayer minigames, all entirely based around the useage of a microphone peripheral that will come with the game, and some of which will incorporate voice recognition.
Multiplayer voip (Score:5, Insightful)
This certainly could be used in conjunction with network play to be able to trash talk to anyone you're playing though :) "omg u hax tetris!"
I thought phones were getting smaller. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I thought phones were getting smaller. (Score:4, Funny)
And possibly Screech.
Re:I thought phones were getting smaller. (Score:2)
Though this might bring us some of that good old fashioned video phone lovin' remember even the orignal gameboy came with a camera.
Sounds pointless without gaming... (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm getting tired of this 'featuritis' where both Sony and Nintendo are adding features like mad. I just want new portable system to play games, play games wirelessly, and play games over IP via Gameboy Live or PS Live.
Re:Sounds pointless without gaming... (Score:4, Informative)
The reason is simple. Let's say you're using a regular (ie: unicast) connection to link everyone to everyone else. For N players, you need N * (N-1) connections to link every player's machine to everyone else's. (Remember, you need to pipe data both ways.) The number of streams is rising almost with the square of the number of users. With that kind of exponential explosion in bandwidth needs, it doesn't take much to saturate even a broadband connection.
For multicast, one person transmits once to a virtual address, and all subscribers receive a copy of that transmission. Growth is therefore linear. N users, N streams and no more. That's at worst, however. Multicasting doesn't duplicate over a LAN, so if you have multiple computers on the same LAN, they don't each need those N streams. The one copy of all of the data will be visible to all of the users' machines.
The day that regular ISPs give everyone native multicast will be the day that multiuser gaming explodes from 2-player or 4-player (on the same high-speed LAN) to being 16-player or 32-player over the entire Internet.
(Ob. Netrek reference: Yes, 16-player games over the entire Internet already exist, and they don't need multicasting. They aren't exactly sophisticated, though. Netrek played with the graphics and gameplay sophistication of Doom 3 would likely chew up rather more bandwidth.)
Re:Sounds pointless without gaming... (Score:5, Informative)
Yes, it's a real pity this is true, or we could create massive IM networks with millions of simultaneous users. That would be so cool.
Wait a minute...
Hey, I've got an idea! Let's designate one of the machines as a server, and have it collect and transmit all the data from a centralized source! Then the overall bandwidth needed still goes up effectively linearly, and only one machine needs a lot of bandwidth! That just might work!
Oh damn, looks like somebody already came up with that general idea.
</sarcasm>
Multicast is cool and all, but let's not overstate the problem it is solving. People play 64-player games of Quake 2 or 3 or various Unreals all the time, today (and I'm not into that scene so there may be even more), because a 64-player game of Unreal is a mere 64 bi-directional connections, not the 4,032 (unidirectional) you are claiming. I think you need to spend some more time studying real networking before pitching obscure solutions that by and large have yet to be needed by the common man. (You do realize that Quake et al doesn't ship the entire graphics load over the network, right? Your last paragraph seems to strongly hint otherwise...)
Re:Sounds pointless without gaming... (Score:2)
It's (supposedly) easy for, say, AOL/TW to start a large-scale chat system with millions of users.
Is it easy for you and me? Of course not. My cable modem's upstream tops out at 384kbps. Multicast would alleviate that bottleneck.
Streaming audio and video is hideously expensive to operate currently. Multicast eliminates that problem.
Even distributing programs or other data is more efficient. BitTorrent is cool, but horri
Re:Sounds pointless without gaming... (Score:2)
You wouldn't because you're not 10 years old and playing with a friend of yours.
Re:Sounds pointless without gaming... (Score:2)
Not a big deal for those with a cell phone but for those who realize that cell phones are ridiculously expensive this is a godsend.
Once this takes off it will have software to quickly switch between hotspots and use ce
Gateways are only a matter of time (Score:5, Interesting)
(This would have meant that you would have paid long-distance rates to dial into dial-up ISPs - possibly more as Mom-and-Pop ISPs just wouldn't have the clout to arrange the kind of deals that most long-distance providers work out with the local telephone companies.)
What really got to the telecos was not the idea of computer-to-computer chat, which had been around for some time, but the gateways linking the Internet to the regular telephone exchanges. A lot of people were buying such exchanges, hooking them up, and basically allowing any Internet user (for a fee the guy with the exchange could set) to dial ANYONE in the local calling area of that gateway.
I'm going to predict that Nintendo geeks'll have similar gateways rigged up (with the cries and screams of telecos & Nintendo ringing in their ears) within a year. It's just a case of breaking the protocol and writing a simple translator for one of the myriad of modular gateways that now exist.
With British Telecom switching to a pure IP-based telephone network (they're abandoning the dedicated switched-circuit approach completely), and where Nintendo's encumbering licenses are largely considered invalid (there are independent software developers for Nintendo in the UK, and Nintendo has failed in efforts to stop them), I am going to predict that the UK will have the greatest interest in such a gateway and will likely see some of the earliest attempts at one.
The US, with its DMCA and other assorted copyright extensions, is simply not friendly to that kind of R&D. The risks are high and the benefits are low.
India and China have a good tech industry, fewer problems with copyright, etc, but don't really have enough high-speed infrastructure to make VoIP realistic, right now.
KISS (Score:3, Insightful)
What will my Nintendo DS phone number be? (Score:4, Interesting)
Let's hope that Nintendo does the "phone thing" better than N-Gage did the "game thing". I wonder if those two markets of portable electronics are ready to merge just yet. Maybe we're close...
so what's the new price with tax? (Score:3, Funny)
Headset? (Score:3, Funny)
Forget the headset! (Score:2)
Anyhow, the DS pics show the microphone (built in) is just under the bottom screen, close to the directional pad. Speakers are next to the top screen.
Yes, you will need a headset.
The DS is shaping up to be pretty rocking. I'm waiting for some word on possible web browsers / IM clients, which would rock pretty hard. Will it run Linux?
Can you say Warboy? (Score:2, Insightful)
How long do you think it will take for people to start wardriving with one of these. Can you say Warboy?
I use the skype (Free VOIP) on my linux box now. (Score:2, Informative)
Skype.com is the only cross platform solution I'm aware of. Free for skype-to-skype PC calls. Also has an IM client built in.
They also sell "phone cards" to dial POTS from your PC. The gui has a typical touchpad interface.
They don't have POTS-to-skype yet, which needs some type of "DYN-dns" infrastructure underneath, but they are planning on offering this add-on for some monthly cost later on.
Re:I use the skype (Free VOIP) on my linux box now (Score:2)
I think it might be the biggest news story this year.
Nintendo have historically had few serious competitors in he mobile gaming market, and they got off very lightly against the N-Gage, but they know that
Wont look ridiculous? (Score:2)
I'm no fashion guru, but I can tell you that people talking using a headset most certainly do look ridiculous. It didn't look cool in the 80's. It doesnt look cool now.
Re:Wont look ridiculous? (Score:2)
Let's take the N-Gage first, since it's a /. favorite. The biggest reason talking into an N-Gage looks ridiculous has nothing to do with how the phone is held (the "taco" side-talking deal). It's because the N-Gage is a crappy device. Bad gaming (controls and content), mediocre phone (there are so damn many better options) and boring old memory card MP3 (there are memory card MP3 pla
Looking ridiculous? (Score:5, Funny)
Actually though this sounds like a really sweet product...
Smart move, although probably not what we expect (Score:5, Informative)
Did anyone really think that this will be done just so we can make free calls in hotspots?
1. Nintendo, gaming, voice chat... rings a bell? The main application will probably be to connect to other unites so people can talk to each other while they play.
2. VOIP to any number will require a gateway to the POTS which costs $$$ (where Vonage makes their money on...).
Nevertheless - pretty slick!
get a free ipod! [freeipods.com] This really works... [iamit.org]
Re:Smart move, although probably not what we expec (Score:2)
Re:Smart move, although probably not what we expec (Score:2)
Who cares what the dummies get the goods will be on
free trade works (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:free trade works (Score:2)
With n-gage starting to appeal to the masses
Does 'appeal' mean something different in your version of English? They were awful devices, not exactly much competition for the GBA SP. Very few people bought them because they were clearly badly designed. A shop near me is trying to get rid of their Ngage game stock at less than half price and still not selling them.
Re:free trade works (Score:2)
I see GBAs daily.
Exposure (Score:2, Interesting)
Holding a 2.4GHz emitter against the side of your skull does not sound like a good idea.
bets until pstn gateway (Score:2, Interesting)
DS Token Features (Score:3, Interesting)
Ok, that's nifty, but nifty doesn't sell consoles or handhelds. I'd wager that 80% (conservatively) of their buyers could care less, especially when Nintendo's target audience has tradionally been pre-teens. Same with the second touch screen. It's as if they're trying to compensate for their lack of innovation and poor market performance lately with nifty features, without realizing their impact on sales will be negilable in lieu of the former and a break from Mario 12.
I'd be more excited if I thought this was actually going to do anything in the course of my regular gaming, but I suspect it'll be more along the lines of gameboy to gamecube connectivity-- Big fat deal. I know some of you will be happy, but most gamers are going to care less unless you see some real application here. That, and I really don't see too many people ditching the cell phones they already have and hunting down a hotspot just to make a free call by dialing down the center with 1-800-leftrightright-downupAB.
With the PSP on the horizon, I smell serious blood in the water because the DS is shaping up to be pretty weak from initial reports.
Re:Actually practically every single (Score:2)
sorry cant find the video (Score:2)
Okay, not the most mind blowing thing in the world, but I can
On an unrelated note... (Score:2)
Re:hell yes (Score:1)
I think a phone is cheaper, unless it's long distance.
Re:hell yes (Score:2)
hmmm... ever tried to play a quality video game on a cell phone? Those games aren't worthy of even being compared to what Nintendo makes with portable games.
VoIP is just an additional cool feature to an already cool device.
Re:Doesn't Xbox Live already have a form of VoIP? (Score:2, Funny)
VOIP Answers (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm currently trying to get SpeakEasy's ONELink DSL service where Covad has their own phone line run to your house to provide DRY pair DSL. You don't have to pay for that line (its inclusive in the
Re:There's also mention of a headset (Score:2)