Non-Invasive Computer Control Through Brainwaves 433
mikael writes "An article on the BBC website is reporting that U.S. scientists have managed to develop a 'thinking cap' which allows a computer to receive commands from the electrical activity of a person's brain alone. Comprised of 64 electrodes, this cap allowed two users to control a cursor through pure thought alone, rather than through eye movements or other physical gestures." Unlike some previous efforts, this one doesn't require anything to be implanted in your brain.
Woo hoo! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Woo hoo! (Score:2)
Re:Woo hoo! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Woo hoo! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Woo hoo! (Score:2)
Re:Woo hoo! (Score:5, Funny)
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
The Firefox plugin! (Score:3, Funny)
Well, as soon as someone writes the Firefox [scifimoviepage.com] plugin.
Baranovich: "You must think... of Russians!"
Andropov: "Are you enjoyink your ride, Mister Gant? Do you like our new toy?" Gant: "Boy, is this a machine!"
Feh. Lossy both ways. (Score:5, Insightful)
Besides, is drilling a hole in the head of your zombie really THAT bad?
Mal-2
Re:Feh. Lossy both ways. (Score:3, Insightful)
My eyes serve well enough as a signal interface, thank you very much.
Re:Computer Technology, Brainwashing, and China (Score:3, Informative)
First thought... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:First thought... (Score:3, Insightful)
It seems to me that if we want true noninvasive thought reading, we're going to need to use some kind of stimulated emission scanning method to determine firi
Re:First thought... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:First thought... (Score:3, Insightful)
We don't want their mouse to move up when they think creatively, and down when they become tired, and right when they become aggressive, etc. We want it to move on individual t
could this be... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:could this be... (Score:2)
-GWB
Someone making mind control Illegal (Score:2, Flamebait)
I Just Can't Help But Wonder (Score:2, Funny)
Thoughtcrime? (Score:2)
This was a good idea in the 80s (Score:2, Informative)
Re:This was a good idea in the 80s (Score:3, Funny)
Electrodes (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Electrodes (Score:4, Informative)
This is not new, by the way. There were some studies done back in the early 90s using only two electrodes where people learned to move a cursor around on a screen. Just one on the left hemisphere and one on the right, and you hook it up so that different relationships between the activity at the two sights controls the different parameters of movement on the screen.
See Wolpaw, JR., McFarland DJ, Neat GW, Forneris CA. An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Mar;78(3):252-9
What does the person think? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:What does the person think? (Score:3, Informative)
The way these things work, if they're anything like the similar systems I've read about in the past, is that you learn to change your brainwave patterns in a way that the computer can detect.
When you get
Re:What does the person think? (Score:5, Informative)
(Jonathan R. Wolpaw and Dennis J. McFarland. Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. PNAS published December 7, 2004, 10.1073/pnas.0403504101)
From the methods and diagrams in the article looks like the slower mu oscillations moved the cursor in the horrizontal axis and the vaster beta osicllations moved the cursor in the vertical axis.
Re:What does the person think? (Score:2)
Re:What does the person think? (Score:4, Informative)
Have you ever just had fun playing with your brain?
...
If you do it right you can trick your brain into thinking you have another limb or two.
I recall seeing a documentary about a doctor that cured a patient of problems with a "phantom" limb. The patient had lost a hand, had problems with feeling as if it was still there, but in an uncomfortable position. The doctor fixed it by making a simple box that created a mirror image of the missing limb, and telling the patient to place his hands in the box. The mirror image tricked the patient's brain into thinking the hand was still there and allowed him to move it around. Here's a link [pbs.org] I found.
There was also some connection between missing limbs and tactile senses on other parts of the body. Apparently, the human body maps onto the surface of the brain. In some cases, when people lose a limb, the unused sensory area on the brain gets confused with nearby areas that correspond to different parts of the body. Here's a link [pbs.org].
As for what you are talking about - tricking the brain about your limbs - there is some mention [pbs.org] of that as well.
Invasive (Score:5, Funny)
More Evidence? (Score:2)
Good, good.. (Score:5, Funny)
Robots and sharks with lasers on their heads can't do everything, you know.
Re:Good, good.. (Score:4, Funny)
Nevermind.
On NBC Monday Night (Score:2)
Then again, how many
It looked amazing to me. It looked rather like early pong games, the user just learned how to move the small dot onto the large one. Nothing real precise, but imagine 30 years from now...
Re:On NBC Monday Night (Score:2)
Well, to get a truer understanding of what is possible you'd need a measure of information transfer from the surface of the scalp. It's kinda like a 120 baud modem. Controlling, in one dimension (or even two dimensions), a cursor, is not a task requiring massive bandwidth. Could be analogous, though, to piloting a wheelch
bout damn time (Score:4, Funny)
On a real note (though the above is true), imagine playing CS or any FPS game with mind control. Now it will even mean that shooter games will be won by the smartest - not the most physically capable (hand to eye coordination).
Re:bout damn time (Score:2)
I have my vote for intelligence being the bottleneck. I more often outwit my opponents as opposed to out-battle (for lack of better term).
For instance, halo2. Run around them in a circle, get behind their back and melee them (donkey punch). Even in Q3 excessive, in a battle use your
Re:bout damn time (Score:3, Funny)
new type of h4x0r!! (Score:3, Funny)
Imagine the fun in a library or computer lab...mauahaha!
Already in use? (Score:2, Informative)
Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control [sfn.org] at the society for neuroscience annual meeting. There are already paralyzed people using this type of technology (electrode and even EEG(!)) on an experimental basis.
Now if only they could implant it. (Score:2)
Re:Now if only they could implant it. (Score:2)
Re:Now if only they could implant it. (Score:2)
Re:Now if only they could implant it. (Score:2)
Tactile Feedback (Score:3, Insightful)
One of the primary reasons for this is the sensation of tactile feed-back you get from using controllers that require physical interaction. You can feel the mouse scraping against your desk as you move it back and forth. You can feel the microswitches 'catching' when pushing the buttons. You can feel the keyboard keys 'click' into place as the latex compression switches underneath connect.
Remember all the 'touch sensitive' microwaves that came out in the 80's and early 90s? Notice how all the buttons now at least provide some semblance of movement when you touch them, even if it's a small amount?
Even if this tech becomes cheap and wide-spread, there's just no replacing the touch-sensation inherent with using mechanical input devices.
Re:Tactile Feedback (Score:5, Interesting)
So something that removed the need to make many fine grained movement, which we are good at but maybe shouldn't do to the excess that computers require, would be a good thing
Re:Tactile Feedback (Score:2)
"Remember all the 'touch sensitive' microwaves that came out in the 80's and early 90s? Notice how all the buttons now at least provide some semblance of movement when you touch them, even if it's a small amount?"
Like iPod?
Re:Tactile Feedback (Score:2)
Re:Tactile Feedback (Score:2)
People saying "Well, I don't hear a loud-ass click, how am I supposed to know it typed", or "Word doesn't increment the paper up every time I enter a newline, how am I supposed to know it's working?".
This is a pavlov's dog kind of thing, well..maybe..that's what my "kneejerk" reaction is. People have learned to live with this feedback, and use it effectively, but that doesn't mean we can't work well without it. (Call bs on that if you feel i
v2.0 (Score:2)
Re:v2.0 (Score:2)
The porn industry will have an orgy with such a device, regardless of price.
It will be refered to as the "Orgasmatron", just like in the movie.
ZZZzzz... (Score:2)
Extended use... (Score:2)
this could boost use of animal labor in factories (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:this could boost use of animal labor in factori (Score:3, Interesting)
I need one (Score:2)
A cruder version of this is used to treat ADD (Score:3, Informative)
The controller was tied to a machine which monitored the level of a certain brainwave (I don't remember which) and if the levels fell outside predetermined parameters the controller would cease to function properly. This helped teach the kids how to maintain focus while performing a task that required constant attention. The 'brain interface' part looked like a baseball cap with lots of little sensors inside, no neurosurgery required.
I tried it myself (I do not have ADD) and it was interesting how difficult it seemed at first to 'grasp' the required level, and how second hand it became after a few minutes of play (obviously the patients took quite a bit longer). It was a neat alternative / addition to drug therapy. I'd bet there is a lot of value in this more accurate control interface for future treatment.
It will never catch on or be useful (Score:2)
Re:It will never catch on or be useful (Score:2)
First, the "braincap" must be made to be
bi-directional, with a low power RF link
(like BlueTooth). The age old issue of
processing power/bandwidth versus the
power requirements will be a problem.
Without the bi-directional communication,
it would be a non-starter.
Second, those "complex algorythms" mentioned
in the BBC article will need to be improved
for adaptive mapping to the brainwaves. Not
having I/O access to the "pleasure" and "pain"
centers of the brain, as well as to the 5
senses, would be detri
non-invasive? boo! (Score:2, Informative)
Couldn't this be a bad thing? (Score:2, Funny)
And you think... "\rm -r *"
DOH!
This isn't new (Score:2)
Maybe it's an incremental improvement on the technology, and that's great, but don't sell it as something completely new.
Re:This isn't new (Score:2)
Maybe it's an incremental improvement on the technology, and that's great, but don't sell it as something completely new.
Sorry to reply to myself, but I found this in the article:
"It is not the first time researchers have had this sort of success in brain-control experiments. "
I know it's as
So when hackers write a virus for this (Score:2)
The problem with this approach (Score:2)
Not the first, second or third (Score:3, Interesting)
In fact, the article says: It is not the first time researchers have had this sort of success in brain-control experiments.
So even the original cited article claims that this is not new . . . I fail to understand why such "repeats" of similar "discoveries" seem to be so "newsworthy"
I remember playing with a device that connected to electrodes that one connected to the head and measured some level of brain activity when I was in high school. This connected to a PC which would draw a virtual strip chart of measured activity. We would move the stripchart pen with our mind . . . isn't this really quite similar? . . .
Re:Not the first, second or third (Score:2)
Interspecies Communication? (Score:2)
Directional Bias? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Directional Bias? (Score:5, Funny)
Strange Days (Score:2)
wouldn't that require "hard" thinking? (Score:2)
As such, I think it would require a relatively large amount of brain to emit these signals, and it would require yet another amount of surrounding brain to be practically dead -- as not to interfere with the signal. (I guess it's common knowledge that certain thoughts and feelings interfere within the brain because of their close positions. That is, I'm not a researcher, but I've he
odd UI design for thought control (Score:2)
shaved heads? (Score:2)
I mean...hey..if everybody does it then it would'nt be that strange...
I'd imagine the world would look somewhat like THX1138!
Like the first episode of the original Star Trek (Score:2, Informative)
Similar stuff at WorldExpo 2000 (Score:5, Interesting)
The great thing was that the most ambitious people had no chance, because their brain was too active in wanting the victory. Pretty cool, watching two guys relaxing the hell out of each other.
impressive (Score:3, Interesting)
If they could pick up the Medulla Oblongata's output and pass it along to electrodes the diaphram of a tetrapalegic, or from motor control to their arms to allow gross movement.
Imagine typing at 400 words per minute. Of course this tech might suffer from the same class of problems as speech recognition but there's certainly hope.
Would be interesting to be around to see the day that they fully understand what comes out and how to put stuff in to a brain. Those will be exciting. (and potentially dangerous times)
I know these guys (Score:5, Informative)
The work is pretty neat. They put a sock thing on your head and measure your brainwaves. Apparantly not everyone can be trained to use the system. There was a long screening process where they looked for people with brain patterns that they could read. I signed up for the screening but I was never called; I guess they got all the volunteers they needed. My friend went in for the screening; they make you wear the reader thing on your head while you concentrate on a dot moving through a very simple maze. Evenutally you get to try to control the dot; that's as far as my friend reached. I know that eventually they move you up to an actual "Armitron" toy that they wired up to the monitors. It is very cool research.
This stuff isn't geared to replacing your keyboard and mouse. The hook is the promise of developing the technology for better artificial limbs; but think about it. If a disabled person can control their own artificial arm with brainwaves; why not a big crane? Why not a crane on a battleship or out in orbit?
Commercialize It! NOW! (Score:3, Interesting)
This looks like it isn't very complex nor very expensive - 64 electrical sensors in a cap and a PCI card with 64 inputs for A to D conversion- looks like less than $500 in volume, perhaps only $200.
You can do infinite numbers of fun things, first one that comes to mind is a brain wave visualization plugin for XMMS.
Lets hope someone picks this up and runs with it.
Re:Open Source It! NOW! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Mental power (Score:2)
propz 2 GNAA
Re:Mental power (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Mental power (Score:3)
Re:Mental power (Score:4, Insightful)
We don't know what conciousness is made of. Thus we do not know its true limitations. And that's not voodoo talking. That's the scientific community.
Re:Mental power (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Mental power (Score:3, Insightful)
The scientific method is a process for proving something as definitely untrue or possibly true. You observe a phenomenon, form a hypothesis that you believe explains this phenomenon, use that hypothesis to predict the outcome of experiments designed to recreate this phenomenon with a minimum of variables, perform experiments designed to see if your prediction is correct, and thats it.
At no time is anyth
Re:Mental power (Score:4, Insightful)
Um, no. Part of the scientific method is to perform experiments in which measurable results are observed in the real world in a repeatable fashion.
Why these results occur is often explained by a theory, which apparently is what you refer to above. However, why ESP works would be a strictly secondary issue alongside it's actual existence, if observed. Fairly simple experiments should be able to demonstrate telepathy if it exists - see the famous Duke University experiments for example.
I hope that cleared things up a bit for you.
Re:Mental power (Score:2)
but there is still that
Re:Mental power (Score:5, Insightful)
Putting electrodes right next to the brain and using computational power to detect the VERY faint electrical signals within the brain is worlds and worlds apart from someone being able to pick up these electrical signals from the span of -- let's say two feet away to be fair -- THROUGH THE AIR and having it penetrate their skull, and then being able to interpret these electrical signals into meaningful thoughts. Keep in mind that since every mind is different, the electrical signals in one brain that signify a certain thought -- let's say something simple such as "I like cheese." can be fairly different from one person to the next because of the way the synapses are linked and pulse their electrochemical signals to make up said thought. I consider this to be an even greater obstacle than the electrical signals from the brain going through the air. The electrical signals to move a cursor are so much simpler than the simplest of thoughts (I like cheese).
Re:Mental power (Score:2, Interesting)
Wouldn't he also say, "So you are able to detect an object from some distance without being in physical contact or within aural distance of it? I don't believe it. How would the sense come to you? Would it travel through the air and into your brain where you sensed it? It doesn't seem plausible."
T
Re:Mental power (Score:2)
Re:Mental power (Score:2)
Re:Mental power (Score:2)
When we find out how to do this it will turn out that the required accessory makes you look like some sort of anime [google.com] character [google.com]. Skimpy outfits are optional, but did anyone who watched ST:TNG notice that Troi's powers became less effective about the same time as they raised her neckline? Maybe there's some kind of psychic emanation that comes from the breasts and is blocked by clothing.
Re:Mental power (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Mental power (Score:3, Funny)
If we are able to detect and monitor energy waves that are emitted from our brains merely by thinking about things, how much more difficult is it to believe that there are people who are physically tuned to be able to "pick up" those brain waves?
Just wait until the electrodes attached to the skull are not just sensors, but are powered transmitters used to induce right thinking!
I'm already thinking I need to take out a loan at Ditech to buy some more products that will surely ease my anxieties about my p
Re:Mental power (Score:4, Interesting)
I'll come clean and say that I spent 4 enjoyable years studying "energy waves" from the brain, also known as EEGs (Electroencephalograph).
A MSc in Epileptology and a PhD in Clinical Neurophysiology later, my considered opionion is that there is a world of difference between "monitoring" activity in the brain and actually making sense of it. EEGs, MEGs and FMRIs can give you a world of data but the specifics you can attach to this are very limited. Even in epileptology, where EEGs have been used for over a hundred years (since 1897), the clinical power of EEGs is far less than a lay person could imagine.
To receive "useful" signals of peoples thoughts, there would have to be a series of breakthroughs in dipole modelling, brain function mapping, and a whole host of other technologies. Otherwise you are restricted to the gross/obvious signals such as alpha, beta and delta rhythms
Another point against pychic receptivity is that the receiving brain is also giving off its own signals at a far greater amplitude than the "transmitting" one; the equivalent of listening to someone whisper a foriegn language at the end of a football field in a howling gale while you bellow what ever is on your mind.
Re:Non-Invasive computer comtrol (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Oh, come on! Let's cut to the chase... (Score:2)
Re:Oh, come on! Let's cut to the chase... (Score:2)
But that's already been implemented before. See:
www.slashdot.org [slashdot.org]
Re:art (Score:2)
I don't think Monet ever got the hang of using a stylus.
Re:Get your tinfoil hat NOW! (Score:2)
I didn't find any tinfoil hats on that link. I found one that is a regular baseball cap, and it says "Tinfoil hat" on it.
Reminds me of that simpsons episode where they're driving the survelliance van around, and "Ordinary Van" is painted on the side of the van.