Transparent Transistors Are Coming 159
Roland Piquepaille writes "Transparent electronics is an emerging technology which aims to produce invisible electronic circuits. Now, researchers from Oregon report they made a major advance in transparent electronics. Their zinc-tin-oxide 'thin-film' materials are amorphous, physically robust, chemically stable and cheap to produce at just above room temperature. These new materials and transistors offer many new possibilities for consumer electronics, transportation, business and the military."
Roland Piquepaille (Score:3, Interesting)
#2: This Roland Piquepaille stuff is getting on my nerves. There is obviously some kind of either backdoor deal, or favoritism for this guy getting stories.
Where is your journalistic integrity?
Hey Slashdot! I feel like having the option to block this guy out on my Edit Home Page [slashdot.org] Page. I mean, he has more submissions than "samzenpus," whoever the hell that is.
Don't force me to write a RSS filter that blocks phrasewords out. I'm feeling too lazy atm.
Re:Roland Piquepaille (Score:3, Interesting)
...oh, wait, you are!
This is definitely not a troll... come on mods.. (Score:1, Offtopic)
It's irritating when that happens especially when you want to submit a story you KNOW hasn't been on slashdot before, but get rejected only to have one of these "frequent" headliners post "dupes" or an ask slashdot that could have easily been looked up on google.
Man, this guy has my sympathies and support. Don't
Re:This is definitely not a troll... come on mods. (Score:1)
you must be new here... Articles are accepted, rejected and posted as fully autonomously as humanly possible... remember Taco get's paid to play video games all day long, not to actually accept or reject pending articles...
when they find someone
well this is a first.. (Score:1, Offtopic)
*laff*
i get the forumula - but expressing for the first itme my irritation.
Re:Roland Piquepaille (Score:2, Insightful)
Me personally, I'm sick of lots of stories Slashdot posts about. Do I filter them? Nah. Do I bitch about them? Admittedly I used to. But life's too short. Now I just scroll on.
Lighten up.
Re:Roland Piquepaille (Score:1)
Re:Roland Piquepaille (Score:2)
If I remember correctly, Piquepaille responded to earlier popular slashdot criticism (correctly, in my view) by placing links to his summaries down low in his submissions.
I don't bother to visit his site because it doesn't usually have anything unique to offer aside from "this is a cool thing" links.
Re:Roland Piquepaille (Score:1, Offtopic)
if he wants to advertise let the asshole post the stories with something insightful to say, or else just filter his crap from it.
hell, here's a novel idea for roland: POST REPLIES TO STORIES THAT GET MODDED UP, and advertise on your fucking sig. or just BUY the adviews from slashdot.
more than that usually they're just some digged up shit with _nothing new_ on the issue.
Re:You are missing the point completely (Score:1, Offtopic)
Complaining about it isn't giving Slashdot any reason to discontinue. If anything, they'll look at the number of comments generated and realize "Hey! We're dishing out more ads because of this guy!"
Re:Roland Piquepaille (Score:1, Flamebait)
I'd rather be a moron than a uppity self-righteous git.
reminds me of jon katz (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:reminds me of jon katz (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:Obligatory comment (Score:1)
Re:Obligatory comment (Score:2)
Re:Obligatory comment (Score:1)
Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connection? (Score:4, Informative)
I think most of you are aware of the controversy surrounding regular Slashdot article submitter Roland Piquepaille. For those of you who don't know, please allow me to bring forth all the facts. Roland Piquepaille has an online journal (I refuse to use the word "blog") located at www.primidi.com [primidi.com] . It is titled "Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends". It consists almost entirely of content, both text and pictures, taken from reputable news websites and online technical journals. He does give credit to the other websites, but it wasn't always so. Only after many complaints were raised by the Slashdot readership did he start giving credit where credit was due. However, this is not what the controversy is about.
Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends serves online advertisements through a service called Blogads, located at www.blogads.com [blogads.com]. Blogads is not your traditional online advertiser; rather than base payments on click-throughs, Blogads pays a flat fee based on the level of traffic your online journal generates. This way Blogads can guarantee that an advertisement on a particular online journal will reach a particular number of users. So advertisements on high traffic online journals are appropriately more expensive to buy, but the advertisement is guaranteed to be seen by a large amount of people. This, in turn, encourages people like Roland Piquepaille to try their best to increase traffic to their journals in order to increase the going rates for advertisements on their web pages. But advertisers do have some flexibility. Blogads serves two classes of advertisements. The premium ad space that is seen at the top of the web page by all viewers is reserved for "Special Advertisers"; it holds only one advertisement. The secondary ad space is located near the bottom half of the page, so that the user must scroll down the window to see it. This space can contain up to four advertisements and is reserved for regular advertisers, or just "Advertisers". Visit Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends (www.primidi.com [primidi.com]) to see it for yourself.
Before we talk about money, let's talk about the service that Roland Piquepaille provides in his journal. He goes out and looks for interesting articles about new and emerging technologies. He provides a very brief overview of the articles, then copies a few choice paragraphs and the occasional picture from each article and puts them up on his web page. Finally, he adds a minimal amount of original content between the copied-and-pasted text in an effort to make the journal entry coherent and appear to add value to the original articles. Nothing more, nothing less.
Now let's talk about money.
Visit http://www.blogads.com/order_html?adstrip_category =tech&politics= [blogads.com] to check the following facts for yourself. As of today, December XX 2004, the going rate for the premium advertisement space on Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends is $375 for one month. One of the four standard advertisements costs $150 for one month. So, the maximum advertising space brings in $375 x 1 + $150 x 4 = $975 for one month. Obviously not all $975 will go directly to Roland Piquepaille, as Blogads gets a portion of that as a service fee, but he will receive the majority of it. According to the FAQ [blogads.com], Blogads takes 20%. So Roland Piquepaille gets 80% of $975, a maximum of $780 each month. www.primidi.com is hosted by clara.net (look it up at http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/whois/index [networksolutions.com]) . Browsing clara.net's hosting solutions, the most expensive hosting service is their Clarahost Advanced (
Re:OT: Re:Roland Piquepaille and /. (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:OT: Re:Roland Piquepaille and /. (Score:2)
You are an AC supporting RP, so you perhaps you are he?
Well written... (Score:2)
My post above [slashdot.org] states similar facts, though more ambiguous than hard data.
Good work, son.
A well written troll... (Score:1)
The post in question was somehow rated a 5-informative when all it really says is "Roland Piquepaille is an asshole". There are at least 10 posts further down that say the same thing but get rated as 1-Troll.
The only difference seems to be that one person took 500 words to say it and the other took 5.
Pseudointellectualism at its best.
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:3, Funny)
You must be new here. Since when do Slashdotters read the arti
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:1, Flamebait)
Said the guy posting in an offensive story, thus providing more eyeballs to the related ads.
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:2)
I don't think that makes sense. Reading and posting to a slashdot article doesn't mean driving traffic to the linked articles. The slashdot articles are the only thing that links to the articles, postings in those threads doesn't necessarily mean more traffic for the linked sites.
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:4, Insightful)
You guys want Slashdot to take him down? Don't comment in his threads. The editors will get the point when they can no longer guarantee that certain topics will get x many pages served with client y's ads..
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:1)
Now, that's useful ad blocking software.
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:2)
The reason Roland's stories get posted is that because he writes good submissions. Nothing more, nothing less.
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:2, Informative)
It does, doesn't it. Yet for the sums in question I don't really think that Slashdot media inc. (OSDN or whatever they're called this week) would be taking a backhander from him in order to get them published. Or, if they are, can they please open the channel up? I know a whole shitload of people that'd pay $100 a pop to put stories on Slashdot. Oh yes.
Dave
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:2)
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:2)
Dave
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:1)
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:1, Insightful)
And how many users get to have their nick / handle linking to their homepage istead of their uid history on
Forget the money issues, i just love the way how the "story" builds up to "many new possibilities " (bold is the link to Roland's site - is he a real person? so that you are tempted to ignore the origin of the story and link straight to the punchline . .
I am sorry, but connexion or no connexion between Rolan and
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:2)
That's standard procedure if you submit a story.
Anyway, this [slashdot.org] will satisfy your curiosity.
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:1)
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:2)
I say we pillory him just because neither his first nor last name is properly pronounced by Americans.
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:2, Interesting)
I think that Roland Piquepaille's biz is entirely legitimate.
His job is to research the web for people who do not have the time to do it, and he is getting $600 for his job.
What's wrong with that?
Ok, he didn't give credits before, but now he do.
So, don't bother him.
It's a differente story the issue about slashdot posting.
--
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:2)
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:1)
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:2)
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:3, Insightful)
Nice conspiracy theory. I don't buy it, but it's very cute.
Some specific problems with your theory:
First, Slashdot itself runs basically the same type of service Roland does; they link to other articles. Hell, Slashdot doesn't even have to go looking for the articles, they expect readers to submit them. Slashdot is sure as hell making more money each month than Roland. Should we hate Slashdot as well?
Second, is Roland (and Slashdot) providing a service? Well, you're here, aren't you? Roland serv
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:1)
Re:Roland Piquepaille and /.: Is there a connectio (Score:2, Informative)
FYI (Score:2, Informative)
Please (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Please (Score:2)
A new form of swindling (Score:5, Funny)
"Really?"
"Sure."
Re:A new form of swindling (Score:3, Funny)
Sounds like just another ITO (Score:5, Informative)
Zinc Tin Oxide sounds alot like indium tin oxide (ITO) which is pretty commonly used, but has commonly known downsides. I don't think this is all that impressive.
Re:Sounds like just another ITO (Score:2, Flamebait)
Or did you have an actual reason (other than similar names) for stating this opinion? If so, would you let us know what it is?
Re:Sounds like just another ITO (Score:4, Informative)
The reason I mention the Japanese work is that they use multiple components molecules which apparently helps maintain the amorphous qualities of the film. In other words, I think this work is not as good as the Japanese work.
Re:Sounds like just another ITO (Score:2)
Apologies for my rather rude reply to your original post.
Re:Sounds like just another ITO (Score:1)
Re:China: Transparent Electronics & Spying (Score:4, Funny)
I could imagine that all other implications of this technology are clear too, transparent in fact.
Re:China: Transparent Electronics & Spying (Score:1)
Does that mean... (Score:1)
Re:Does that mean... (Score:1)
Perfect (Score:2, Funny)
thin-film is the key point? (Score:4, Insightful)
Perfect for a throw-away phone and such?
Re:thin-film is the key point? (Score:2)
So, it being transparent causes it to look "cool" and also be "cheap". win win situation my friend....
Re:thin-film is the key point? (Score:1)
I wonder if it contains... (Score:4, Interesting)
What the (Score:1, Troll)
Re:What the (Score:2)
Easy enough to blacklist 212.43.241.105 at the router for now I guess.
Re:What the (Score:1)
Only 56 transistors per square inch... (Score:3, Funny)
I don't think we'll see much of this implemented.
Re:Only 56 transistors per square inch... (Score:2)
Re:Only 56 transistors per square inch... (Score:1)
what about connecting buildings together and form a huge cluster that run linux?
Re:Only 56 transistors per square inch... (Score:2)
Clearly, I can't see any visible problems with their implementation...
Gee the few visible jokes in this thread are a little plain and obvious.
Re:Only 56 transistors per square inch... (Score:2)
I for one welcome our blue led modding overlords (Score:1)
Just imagine:
Modder - "Pffft. Activity lights on the case are so lame, when my computer is thinking my whole processor lights up!"
Wait a second.. you mean... (Score:2)
Reduced "screen door" effect (Score:3, Interesting)
Currently, the quality and definition of LCD screens and LCD chips used in projectors is due to the fact that the driver circuitry for each cell is in the area around the cell. And the yeild for both is limited by not having redundant driver circuitry for each cell. If these transistors truely are transparent, does this mean that the driver circuitry could be in the middle of each cell, and the area between each cell could be reduced to a bare minimum? And does this mean that they could have additional circuirty so the cells could be self-healing and could eliminate both "burned on" and "burned off" pixels?
Invisible? (Score:2)
Re:Invisible? (Score:1)
I thought this was OLD story. (Score:1, Interesting)
If this is new then I discovered that bananas were shaped like California...
how does this relate to silicon (Score:3, Informative)
Transparent thin-film transistors (TTFTs) with an amorphous zinc tin oxide channel layer formed via rf magnetron sputter deposition are demonstrated. Field-effect mobilities of 5-15 and 20-50 cm^2 V^-1 s^-1 are obtained for devices post-deposition annealed at 300 and 600 C, respectively. TTFTs processed at 300 and 600 C yield devices with turn-on voltage of 0-15 and -5-5 V, respectively. Under both processing conditions, a drain current on-to-off ratio greater than 10^7 is obtained. Zinc tin oxide is one example of a new class of high performance TTFT channel materials involving amorphous oxides composed of heavy-metal cations with (n-1)^d10 ns^0 (n>=4) electronic configurations. ©2005 American Institute of Physics
For comparison pusposes positive carrier mobility in silicon is about 500 cm^2 V^-1 s^-1 and for negative charges (aka electrons) it is about 800. This means that this transparent dvice technology is on the order of 10 - 50 times slower than silicon. Not good for new CPU's
What's of much more interest and is not mentioned in the abstract is what the gain of these devices are and what kind of current density they can handle.
The "drain current on-to-off ratio" is sort of an odd thing to put in the paper. I mean if the off current is 1pA then the on current is 10uA (woo-hoo). If they made an actual transistor they should be able to present very standard benchmark values like gain, cut-off frequency and breakdown voltages.
So I'm not actually convinced they created a bonafide device, but maybe just characterized the films for use as a potential semiconductor, in which case they have a long way to go. They need to dope the material, attach a gate, etc... all things which could cause all sorts of complications.
Contact/Eyeglass Monitor (Score:1)
I'll believe it when I see it! (Score:1, Funny)
You mean "tranparent circuits" (Score:1)
As far as i know, air is invisible, oxigen is invisible, radiation is invisible..Electronic circuits are just tranparent.
Duh (Score:2)
I already have a bunch of these (Score:1, Funny)
regarding the "sins" of Roland Piquepaille (Score:1, Insightful)
His "sins" or breaches of etiquette are many:
1. he is profiting off of getting stories posted, or is at least seeming to. I would imagine that the cost of bandwidth might be close to what he is alleged to make in ads.
2. he is merely reposting stuff from others.
Silicon? (Score:2)
transparent computing (Score:1)
Re:transparent computing (Score:1)
Damn! (Score:1)
One question: (Score:1)
those who ignore history...... yadda yadda yadda (Score:2)
Active TFT LCDs? (Score:2)
In US of America .. (Score:2)
Re:Spying: China and the USA (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:omg... (Score:2)