Brief Review Of Vector Linux SOHO 29
duncan bayne writes "I have just installed Vector Linux SOHO 5.0 RC2 on my old P150 laptop. Overall I was very impressed, and have posted a brief review on my blog. This distro has a lot to offer, especially to schools and other organisations trying to extract more useful life from obsolete hardware."
Schools and other Organisations (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Schools and other Organisations (Score:3, Insightful)
no network install? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:no network install? (Score:2)
A couple of years ago, I put Slackware 8 on an NCR 386SL/25 notebook, for which I had no floppy or CD-ROM.
All you gotta do is pull the hard drive out and connect it to something more suitable. Adapters for attaching 2.5" notebook drives to desktop machines cost less than $5, and make the job easy.
Then just install the OS of your choice, and replace the drive into the notebook once you think you've got enough of it configured that it can access the network.
Re:Old ass linux (Score:3, Informative)
Well, not really. The installation of the operating system per se didn't sound hard. What was hard was getting the particular (somewhat unusual) package selections he wanted running.
The bar for having a wide selection of software easily installable is, I guess, set pretty high these days. Meeting that probably requires either a fairly large contributor base or a commercial backer. However, there are still a number of interesting niches that can bootstrap n
Re:Old ass linux (Score:1)
But surely most distros that target old hardware are also small and fast? I don't see any real inconsistancy here...
Re:Old ass linux (Score:3, Informative)
System requirements
Vector Linux SOHO is relatively heavy compared to the standard version. It is recommended that your system meets these requirements:
* Processor: Pentium III compatible or better (so you may use AMD).
* Hard disk: 3 GB for the system, then you need more for your personal files.
* Memory: 128 MB, spare 256 MB for comfort.
* Video card and Monitor capable of 1024x768 resolution, 24 bits.
* Standard mouse, keyboard, sound card
Re:Old ass linux (Score:1)
Re:Old ass linux (Score:3, Informative)
Then there is the SOHO version that needs a bit heftier requirements.
Re:Old ass linux (Score:2)
Re:Old ass linux (Score:1)
Re:Old ass linux (Score:2)
I like the goal of this disto; it just seems like they aren't necessarily doing it well. I have a PIII 600 system that I would like to put Linux on, but it seems to be hard to find a g
VECTOR? (Score:2, Insightful)
My two cents..
Re:VECTOR? (Score:1)
Few packages? (Score:4, Interesting)
It seems to me that most Linux distributions stand or fall based on the quality and availability of their packaging system.
It's disappointing to see this system doesnt have packages for vim, or lyx. So the reviewer had to install from source.
Sure that's possible, and trivial for small packages without tons of dependencies - but building from source seems to me to be something you'd wish to avoid when installing on a P160 with 64Mb of RAM...
Unfortunate, I guess if the distro becomes more popular the archive will grow, but if it doesn't then there will be a big downside to using it.
Re:Few packages? (Score:1)
Re:Few packages? (Score:2)
Impressed? (Score:5, Insightful)
Not "impressive" or "polished" at all.
There's no mention of what the default KDE is like (beyond "slow") as he uses IceWM. Nothing about hardware detection. No screenshots. Nothing.
Awful, awful article apparently reviewing an awful, awful distro; but he doesn't tell us enough to say how good it is.
Hey Duncan (Score:2, Interesting)
KDE for a Pentium 150? (Score:2, Interesting)
After reading this article, I would rather just set up a standard Slackware system and put in IceWM myself instead of getting a bunch of defaulted KDE cruft. I can't imagine trying out a distribution meant for slow computers on one of my 486's only to find the stupid distro trying to run KDE.
The machines that Vector Linux is supposed to be targetted at are precisely the ones that cannot run KDE or Gnome. What makes this distribution worth anyone's time?
Re:KDE for a Pentium 150? (Score:1)
Article updated with replies to comments (Score:2, Interesting)
And this is better than Slackware because... (Score:2)
Re:Why not FreeBSD? (Score:2)