BBC Writer Tries PC Repair, Finds Poor Software 703
twitter writes "BBC author Paul Rubens tried out amateur computer repair and wrote about it. All of the software was for Windows, and he finds what most of us do: "Most of the problems I've been called to look at have been caused by viruses and spyware, some by strange software [conflicts], and only one by faulty hardware." He then flames the whole world of computer repairmen as 'a bunch of unqualified amateurs.'"
Close Call (Score:5, Insightful)
If we went by his definition of unqualified amateurs, most OSS developers would have been in the same category, but look what these "unqualified amateurs" have done to OSS?
Re:Close Call (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Close Call (Score:5, Interesting)
One box was stepped on, resulting in some connectors ripped out of the motherboard, and was partially fixed by soldering them back on.
The rest of the machines were crippled by malware, which in 70% cases could not be removed automatically and had to be hunted down and exterminated by hand, leaving behind dead pieces of it n many cases. Only one machine had to be reinstalled (I'm sooo good!).
On all those machines I hid IE from the menus and installed firefox, and explained to the users why they should use it. I've only had two repeat calls so far. Both users were web designers who had to have IE available for work, and also had random relatives and friends using their computers for mail, web and itunes. Can't help there:-).
Re:Close Call (Score:5, Informative)
Yes. My sample included 10 computers with hardware failures, about a half of them with cheapo PSUs. 3 of the failures were due to a PSU blowing up, all 3 being of the the cheapo variety.
One of the PSUs took the motherboard with it, and another took a hard drive full of data, and, by some strange fluke, a DIMM socket and a DIMM (the rest of the motherboard still works). This is not real statistics, mind you, but it gives you an idea.
==
A typical failure mechanism is like this. Cheap PSUs can't make it through a brown-out. The H-bridge transistors have to pass higher current to compensate for the lower input voltage, and start to overheat. A good PSU would use heftier transistors, and the controller would shut it down if the voltage dips too low.
In a lousy cheap PSU one of the FETs reaches the point where the silicon starts to melt, and it becomes permanently conductive. Then, the controller switches the bridge, causing a through current that melts the other FET in the same side of the bridge. One of the FETs then vapourizes with a loud bang, leaving a visible crack in the plastic case of the FET. During all this the current through the transformer gets switched chaotically, causing spikes in the secondary windings, and killing the cheap underrated regulators in the secondary circuits, which then pass the spikes to your expensive components. Something like that.
Another problem with poorly built PSUs is that the irregularities in the input sometimes make it to the output, causing crashes and hang-ups. If you want to build a stable system, start with a high quality PSU. It doesn't have to be expensive. Just pick one from a company whose name you (or your friends) recognize.
Re:Close Call (Score:4, Informative)
I can think of a few ways, but they all would be too involved unless you were about to order a 1000 PSUs for a production run.
Cracking it open and looking at the quality of the PCB fabrication (lack of hand soldering) would be my #1. Hand-soldering usually means cold solder joints in some of the units.
A DESTRUCTIVE test for brown-out response would be quite easy - just load the supply to the rated max, then lower the input voltage. The thing should shut down, and not blow up. Of course, this test would only be destructive to a supply that wasn't worth its name in the first place. Vary the speed with which you lower the voltage.
Another test you could do would be to hook up a scope to the output, and look at how it responds to spikes/dips in the input. If there are any spikes at all, especially in the UP direction, it's no good.
Now, IANA-electrical-engineer. Not all electrical engineers can properly design and test PSUs either, even though the PSU design is usually consireded a low-grade job that's given to an out-of-school junior EE as a "training" excercise. The truth is that you never get hailed a hero for designing a good PDU, yet designing one is quite involved.
Re:Close Call (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Close Call (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:5, Insightful)
This is your first mistake. Computers are not inherently complex (even Windows). People have a habbit of making computers more complex than they need to be (i.e. installing whatever whenever and expecting it to remain on there and stable forever). If people would just take the time to understand that they do not need 10000 things in their tray and took the 10 minutes to read exactly what each of those things they installed did they would quickly learn what the Uninstall Program feature is for.
When a domestic appliance goes wrong, you can ring a repair man. When your car breaks down you can call the garage. But when your computer system goes wrong, who do you call?
Google or a manual. Just like I did for my burned out tail-light on my car, the squeaking dryer, and the rattling my engine made when it spun a rod. Now, in the case of the spun rod there was nothing *I* could do without taking it to the dealer to repair but at least I had an idea of what to expect when they told me what was wrong with it.
The simple truth is that although computer systems are sold as consumer goods like fridges or washing machines, there's no computer equivalent of a qualified service engineer who you can get to come around and fix things.
You bought software or your hardware from somewhere I would guess (if you built this stuff on your own you have enough knowledge to fix it on your own). Take it to them. Dell, Gateway, Apple, whoever. If you're talking about software issues, call the company of the software you installed, oooh, it's Spyware problems. You only have yourself to blame for not researching carefully what you put on your computer. Just because you can modify your computer more easily than most pieces of hardware you own does not mean you should be absolved of all responsibility when it breaks. I wish that more people would understand that.
It seems incredible, but millions of families and thousands of businesses have no-one to turn to but a bunch of unqualified amateurs to fix the most complicated pieces of equipment that have probably ever existed. It's a scary thought.
What do you suggest? A school where they teach spyware removal? Or do you propose they learn about securing their networks (wireless and wired), their computers w/firewalls, spyware and virus protection (and frequent scans/updates), and keeping abreast of new news about OS updates and protections to the latest and greatest things out there? Why not spend the 20 minutes reading one of my posts or the 10000000 other posts out there that tell you exactly what you need to know:
1. Get a software firewall (ZoneAlarm) that tells you when an internal software package is calling home.
2. Get AdAware, SpyBot, and SpywareBlaster. Keep them up to date and scan frequently.
3. Install all the latest updates for your OS and keep them up to date.
4. Don't install something that you don't understand. Check with Google first. It's not hard to spend the 5 minutes with a Google search on the name of the program you want to install to find out if it phones home (and if you don't at least you have ZoneAlarm to give you a heads up).
5. Get some sort of virus protection (i.e. NAV or AVG)
6. Realize that regular maintenance is required for ANY piece of hardware (cars, HVAC, etc). Do you not change your oil every ~3000 miles? Do you not check your air filters in your home every month or two? Do you not add water softener salt every month?
I just gave five pieces of software that are free, easily found on reputable/major distribution sites, and that have probably been repeated elsewhere thousands of times. It amazes me that someone who claims that he can fix other people's problems didn't find this software and then had the audacity to claim that the software out there sucks.
If only more people were w
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:5, Insightful)
I know what you mean, but I have seen old computers that use the Intel 8086. They have been running pretty much non-stop for decades and their cases have never been opened once.
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:2, Insightful)
Exactly, and who put them into place when they originally put them online? People who spent the time learning how to properly operate a computer. In this day and age we have a limitless resource of information easily accessed with two clicks.
If people are unwilling to spend the time necessary to learn even the most basic skills
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:5, Insightful)
The means to properly operate a computer is as far beyond the reach of the average person as is the ability to tune their car and replace the fan belt. It's not that their stupid,it's that the concepts are completely alien to them. What seems trivial to you is a goddamned nightmare to most adults who grew up without touching a computer.
And there's also a selection bias, many people who are otherwise smart, just aren't good at dealing with computer-type systems. Those people have avoided computers until they couldn't any longer. Again, not that they're stupid (well not all of them), but everyone is good at some things, and bad at others.
Computers have gotten much harder to use successfully as they have gotten more powerful. It is not that the people who put together that 8086 did it "properly", it's that there were far fewer ways to screw it up.
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:3, Insightful)
Which guy?
He's also never tried to figure out a problem when all the user can tell you is, "It won't work, I don't know what happened,"
At least the user is being honest. Learn to ask the question: "*what* isn't working.", and learn to be nice about it. (Go ahead and strangle the luser in your head if you need to... But even the BOFH [ntk.net] doesn't generally resort to impoliteness.)
So, if the computer kn
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:5, Insightful)
My parents have been working at this hard, for months now. But even the simplest aspects of using a computer have escaped them until recently. These people, god bless them, don't understand that a document, a batch file and a program are the same type of thing on the hard drive. It's just a question of the contents and whether the computer tries to run it or not.
Ditto with so many little things that you and I take for granted.
So what, for you, seems to be a trivial amount of courtesy time, is for them the equivalent of learning to speak a foreign language in terms of time investment. And it's not even as much fun.
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:3)
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:3, Insightful)
If people started fixing their own computers, I'd be out a lot of my spending money.
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:4, Insightful)
The difference between auto mechanics and computer repairmen is that the mechanics have a union which forces licensing on its members to boost the price of labor.
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:3, Insightful)
The difference is in what is being diagnosed and repaired. Mechanical problems are easier to find and diagnose than electrical or software problems. If you have a puddle of antifreeze in the garage - it's a good sign that there is a problem in the cooling system. If you have a system fan in a computer that makes a god-awful sound when you sta
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:3, Insightful)
Auto mechanics, on the other hand, actually have to do work on a real, physical machine. They can't undo their mistakes just by sticking in a recovery disc. Plus, cars cost a hell of a lot more
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:3, Funny)
Wait! Wait! I know this!
(AHEM!) 'The difference between auto mechanics and computer repairmen is that the auto mechanic knows when they are lying.'
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:3, Insightful)
The real problem here is that unlike your washers and dryers and televisions there is a constant swarm of people
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:3, Insightful)
Hardly. I'm a college student, so the people around me are young enough that they have been surrounded by computers from the day they were born. And yet, many of them are clueless. Just a few weeks ago we had an email virus running amok on campus. I remember when I got the first virus email, my roommate and I laughed as we predicted how many more of those mes
A computer SHOULD be just a tool. (Score:3, Insightful)
And the fact that you have to do maintenance on a computer just means that the industry is still very, very immature. It SHOULD be just a tool. You shouldn't have to learn the intracacies of it just to use it. Case in point: cars. When was the last time you changed a distributor caps, or re-did the points on your engine or had service on your carbureator? Oh yeah. You haven't. Most people your age never have because cars are much
Its not just a tool. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:3, Interesting)
The difference between a computer repair and a car repair, is that the computer repair center can claim your computer broke from a software issue that isn't their doing, whereas a car mechanic
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:5, Insightful)
What is your legitimate auto dealer going to say when you bring your car in for service? He's going to laugh in your face!
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:3, Informative)
It's not uncommon for a station, particularly an older station, to have water in their
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:3, Insightful)
It is equivalent (sort of) to learning a new
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:5, Interesting)
I think people are too afraid of their computers. Let me explain... I was just last night helping my wife (over the phone) fix her parents computer. It had erotic popups all over the place and the computer had ground to a halt (only took about 5 minutes for the computer to stop responding after a reboot). This was a particularly nasty situation.
I had given her a CD with SpyBot and Adaware and Firefox on it to take with her (she was going to visit for easter)... the problem was whenever she would try to run either SpyBot or Adaware the computer would restart (maybe some adware was detecting it? I seriously don't know).
So what's the solution? I had her get all the documents they wanted to keep off the computer and onto a CD (luckily the computer would work long enough to get this done)... and then I walked her through resetting the (Dell) computer back to factory defaults.
In working with her over the phone (she is in NO way computer savvy... just a good user) I noticed that she was always reluctant to do ANYTHING without me telling her EXACTLY what to do. Occasionally (not familiar with their computer) I didn't know EXACTLY how to get passed a certain screen and I would just tell her take a look at what she was seeing and make a choice. Finally after doing this several times I told her "You CANT break it! We're wiping the computer clean! Just choose something and if it doesn't work we can start over!"
She is not alone. I find often that people are reluctant to explore their computers. If you've got all your documents backed up what is the worst that could happen? There is NO way to (physically) hurt the computer with software. As long as you have reinstallation CDs JUST GO FOR IT!
Ok - long story... I apologize...
Friedmud
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:5, Interesting)
My mom calls me with computer problems from time to time. I currently live about a thousand miles from her, so it's not that easy for me to diagnose and fix her problems, so I don't particularly enjoy it. Occasionally she'll call me while I'm busy at work, and so I can't even try to help her. A few times when that's happened, she's called me back later to tell me that she spent some time experimenting, and she figured out whatever it was that was giving her problems. So I know she can figure out some of it. She's no geek, but she's smart and when she actually tries, she makes progress on her problems. And even if she can't figure it out completely, when I do get around to helping her, she knows more about the problem, and we make progress faster.
I just wish she'd accept that, and not call me as quickly in the future.
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:2, Informative)
Check again. I've been using it w/o issue since I started running Windows again in 2002. It's at the latest free version and my Windows XP machine has a better uptime than my Linux box.
2. Use only one anti-spyware software. remember, we don't want conflicts do we? it'd be worst these days because most anti-spywares offer "real-time" st
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:3, Insightful)
Stability != Uptime
Fact of the matter is that if you install your updates on Windows you almost always have to reboot, which is not the case on Linux. If you keep your Windows and Linux box up to date your uptime in Linux will be higher than your uptime in Windows plain and simple.
As far as overall stability Linux is more stable than Windows because Windows getting scre
Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. (Score:3, Insightful)
Um... (Score:2, Funny)
And yes... (Score:2)
Re:Um... (Score:3, Funny)
The reason computer techs are unqualified amateurs (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate (Score:5, Funny)
You're right, I charge $40/hr
Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate (Score:3, Funny)
Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate (Score:3, Insightful)
get what you pay for (Score:5, Insightful)
Perhaps if they were paid more than your typical McDonalds employee they'd be a bit better than said fast-food dispensers.
Re:get what you pay for (Score:5, Informative)
I had a discussion with a friend about people in the IT world (I'm not one of them). One works for a large corporation's IT department. He was unaware of SSH, VNC, but was concerned that the wireless router they use in their house doesn't use MAC filtering or WEP. He also has a piece of software phoning home to Toshiba constantly, uses an unencrypted IM client, and gives you a blank stare when you talk about SSH tunnels to a squid proxy.
In this case the unpaid amateur knows 100x what the well paid IT professional does.
As long as the market continues to allow that sort of crap to go on the computing world will continue to suffer as a whole.
Re:get what you pay for (Score:3, Informative)
If you're so concerned about WEP and MAC filtering why wouldn't you be using encrypted IM clients, encrypted tunnels for POP auth, and stopping programs you are using from phoning home?
He's using industry buzz in general conversation but fails to understand how to even minimally protect himself. That's how I know.
"IT" covers a wide array of skillsets... (Score:3, Insightful)
A lack of knowledge doesn't always imply incompetence. Sometimes it's simply a lack of knowledge.
Re:get what you pay for (Score:4, Insightful)
I do think there's an interesting conundrum for companies in here. In the IT industry, and numerous other engineering industries "repair tech" or any kind of frontline support is basically an entry-level job. Try calling the phone guys to repair your line - inevitably, up shows some guy doing his best to sport some peach fuzz. Not infrequently the guy doesn't know what he's doing and hence makes a huge mess. Worse yet, when he does start to know what he's doing, and up and away he goes, to be replaced by another entry level drone.
The problem is that this is an important part of the customer's interactions with the company, particularly with long-term contracts. So unless they can figure out how to invert that hierarchy, they're be dealing with pissed off customers forever.
Unqualified ameteurs (Score:5, Insightful)
Sure it seems scary at a glance (I hire a professional builder to fix my home, I hire some kid down the street to fix my computer) but after a while it does not seem so outrageous. If you're silly enough to download enough viruses or spyware to make Windows not load or your Internet connection stop working, you'd be silly enough to hire an 'unqualified amateur' to fix it.
The reason (Score:5, Insightful)
PRICE.
No one wants to pay $50 - $100 an hour for a qualified person to come to their house and tell them that their computer would run fine if they would stop visiting so many porn sites.
I have worked on at least 100 home PCs in my lifetime and have not found a single one that was free of pornography. Don't get me wrong, if someone wants to look at porn, that is their business, not mine. But don't get all pissed off when fat-young-heiffers.com loads your machine with digital nastiness that you didn't ask for.
Re:The reason (Score:4, Funny)
One home user I went to had something like 26 viruses and over 100 malware/spyware-related objects on the machine. After spending three hours fixing everything, I looked at they guy's history, and there were hundreds of porn and gambling sites. This guy's wife is extremely religious, and supposedly he is too, so I kept my mouth shut so as not to embarrass him, but I wanted to say, "If you'd stay off the ****ing porn and gambling sites, you'd have no problems.
That was five months ago. Last week he called me back with the same problems. Same viruses; same malware; same history list.
Good grief!
Could be a winner for Firefox? (Score:3, Funny)
Hmm... perhaps you're onto something there! If we could advertise Firefox as "the best browser for viewing porn sites without screwing your PC", I wonder if even more people would want to install it?
But then, I guess that might put you out of business, so probably isn't worth the hassle for you to install for people!
Re:Could be a winner for Firefox? (Score:3, Insightful)
"Firefox: Lets you fuck yourself without fucking with your computer."
Re:Could be a winner for Firefox? (Score:3, Interesting)
That's the exact approach I used on my girlfriend's parents (my willing guinea pigs), and on my mum too.
It worked pretty well, although I did tell them what I'd done, and that it was to help stop bad stuff happening to their computers.
Hide the IE icon, replace it everywhere with a shortcut to Firefox (using the IE icon), set Firefox as the default web browser, and as a final touch, deny Internet Explorer the right to connect to the 'net using Zone Alarm, so it can't be used by "accident".
As long as yo
Qualified professionals (Score:4, Interesting)
It's not that dad's an old coot, he actually keeps his skills up to date. It's that Windows is so unbelievably insecure he just can't keep up with it. He uses antivirus software, he tries to keep it up to date, he has multiple spyware scanners/removers which he updates regularly, and he just can't keep the systems clean. Every year or two it gets too unbearable and he just has to wipe the machine and reinstall from scratch, or replace it.
If my father can't do it, then no normal mortal computer owner should be expected to do it.
I think I've got Dad just about convinced to buy a Macintosh. When he hears that I have absolutely no problems with malware and I don't even have to have special software to prevent it, he gets very interested.
Re:Qualified professionals (Score:3, Informative)
Ya put those on a machine, have them updated regularly, and it's really hard to get a messed up Windows install.
The only thing that really gets me is that while Spybot S&D has an awesome TeaTimer resident proggie, it still requires users to answer whether or not they want to add/remove esoteric sounding registry keys. The average user (not me) has no idea what those keys will or will not do. It's the only gap in the ab
Re:Qualified professionals (Score:4, Interesting)
Staying clean is a matter of reading up on what's going on on the crapware front, not OK-ing crapware installs and #1 not using Internet Explorer. I also run and update and anti-virus, Spybot S&D and AdAware to make sure I don't miss anything. The only hits I get are for cookies.
If you know you DON'T NEED any more browser plug ins....guess what else you don't need?
I agree that mere civilians don't have chance. I talked by phone late into the night last night helping one of the smartest guys I know, a doctor 200 miles away who has had to spend way too much time trying to get PCs in his office working. Now his has something making it crawl we couldn't figure out over the phone. I got him working running Firefox on a another PC he brought in from home when IE on that one still refuses to work.
I'm telling him to get an iMac on the LAN just so he and I have something that WILL connect and runs VNC so that I can get in and help the next time.
We agreed that the guy's time is worth over $200 an hour. Last night Windows on Intel stole another $1200 from him. He figures it has cost him $5000 to $7000 each year.
At least... (Score:4, Funny)
I certainly hope (Score:4, Insightful)
Who wants to pat for a professional? (Score:5, Insightful)
I think that's a major part of the problem. It's hard to make money as a retail computer repair technician, and it's not a fun career. I would guess that the good ones aspire to move away from retail as soon as they are able.
Cost/value (Score:5, Insightful)
$50/hour for 3-4 hours ($150-$200) is often 20-40% of the original computer cost. When Dell is offering $549 packages deals with a flat screen, most people's knee-jerk reaction is that $50/hour is 'too high'. And it is too high, for most people and what they do. If it's related to their work, they can expense it. If it's just an email/gaming machine, they can buy a new one that's faster anyway.
Re:Cost/value (Score:3, Informative)
My business is growing pretty rapidly. People will pay for support if they have the option of getting quality assistance.
Re:Cost/value (Score:3, Insightful)
A furnance is pretty important during the cold season. And, depending on what type, you have to do it right or else it becomes a health hazzard. A computer, to most people, isn't that important.
Re:Who wants to pat for a professional? (Score:3, Insightful)
The reason it's hard is that if you know what you're doing and are worth $50/hr, you're going to get undercut by the kid down the street who charges $15/hr and doesn't know WHAT the hell he's doing.
As long as consumers lack the abilities to distinguish between competent and incompetent computer technicians, this problem will always exist.
computer repairmen? (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh come on ... (Score:2, Funny)
My family and friends don't bug me that much about computer problems, but when they do, they know that:
And I outside of the occasional meal, I am free.
Pee Wee Herman? (Score:4, Funny)
Fortunately, the hardware problem [mugshots.org] ended up being a temporary issue.
Amateurs? Maybe, but certainly qualified (Score:4, Insightful)
In the world of computer repair though, you often get what you pay for. If you're outsourcing your computer repair to the kid down the street, you might get lucky if they're smart and read slashdot, or you could get someone who thinks you upgrade RAM by adding a hard drive.
People treat their Refrigerators better then PCs (Score:4, Insightful)
Post-career opportunity (Score:2)
I've occasionally taken a look at some non-technical friend's computer, and I can usually do enough good that they're very grateful afterward (even if it's just reinstalling some DLL so their spellchecker starts working again). Picking up $100/week or so for this kind of weeks sounds like a reasonable hobby for an unemployed techie.
Computer Repair(men) (Score:5, Insightful)
What it comes down to is a very specialized people with a knack for dealing with themundane problems encountered on the desktop today. Server maintenance, network design and upkeep is simple in comparison to the myriad of problems encountered by a low-level desktop tech today, in retail or in a SMB environment.
The author does bring up some interesting points, however, regarding the difference between car/washing machine repairmen and computer techs..... there is very little one can do to ensure they are being serviced properly in todays marketplace that, at this time, can have no place for certification and the like.... "A+ Certified and Toilet Trained: Equally proud of both." to quote.
Re:Computer Repair(men) (Score:3, Interesting)
There have been a couple occassions where I've been in a slump and just need to pick up some work and would have been more than happy to do basic hardware work. I've been building PCs since I was in Jr. High over twenty years ago, but oh hell no,
And they also read.... (Score:2)
Amateurs? (Score:5, Insightful)
We built our systems, tuned them, made them perform better than they should, kept them virus free, and done it for less than going with a retail box just so we can be called amateurs. Sorry, but only pros can do things like that.
What's really sad though, is that all you need to do to use a computer and have almost no problems is well... RTFM. =/
About his ad (Score:2)
Notice that his ad makes good use of white space, lacks grammatical errors and is generally well composed?
He should take up journalism or something!
Of course they're unqualified. (Score:5, Insightful)
Computers are like other service industries, except that they require a lot more knowledge and care to prevent the problems from happening in the first place. People don't realize that difference, and expect solving computer problems to be like plumbing, with easy estimates of time and cause.
People's don't like paying for the repairs (Score:2, Insightful)
I also had a gig providing free tech support f
It's not a fun job. (Score:4, Insightful)
I did computer service work for 4 years while going to school. It was for a consulting firm. I'd be farmed out to different businesses all over the GTA.
I wasn't great at it. But I knew loads more than anybody and these businesses. After the first service call, all computer related problems were automatically our fault. You constantly had to deal with irate people. No wonder I only made a fraction of what the company I worked for was charging for my time.
The thing is. I learned this stuff on my own. Taking apart my first computer, perpetually upgrading it, writing my own software, etc. I had an interest. Most people don't. They just want it to work. They want this website to show their video clip, or that file to play this sound clip or whatever. They have no interest in knowing what you should and shouldn't do and how it all works.
The people who KNOW how it all works usually don't want to do it. I sure don't. After working in computer repair service for four years, I hardly want to help out my best friends let along do it for "someone somebody knows with a problem". And there is the catch. People who know, who are good at it, and who can do a good job, don't want to. It's the Janitorial job of the IT world.
"Unqualified Amateurs?" (Score:3, Informative)
True That... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:True That... (Score:3, Interesting)
Apple Tech: Sorry, but since you never activated your AppleCare account, I can't even touch your laptop. Sorry.
Lady: But..? I need my files--My composition is due next week!
Apple Tech: Sorry.
Me: May I?
Apple Tech: Um...
Lady: Sure!
Me: *poke*look* Ok--it looks like the firewire port on your laptop is broken (physicall
Nobody wants to help the stupid (Score:3, Insightful)
Who wants to get roped into answering the phone at all hours from someone who cant figure out how to avoid a virus or worm? I wont answer that call from anyone. Get WebTV and shut the fuck up.
You cant pay me enough to swing by in the middle of my day to remove porn-popups, if you are gonna keep using IE, and not reign in your 13yr boy with a perpetual woody.
I dont care if you have a pair of 44Ds in your blouse, I aint fixing your machine unless you are prepared to sit on my lap while I load my "Spybot".
PCs by their definition require amateur support (Score:3, Insightful)
When I sit down in front of a Linux server I can whip out super professional tools like strace and ltrace and lsof and dig through /proc, whip out gdb, etc. and follow everything step by step through the source code. Everything's usually simple enough that I can fit the entire system in my head and see where the broken piece is (except for PAM). The system invites me to do this. I can diagnose problems scientifically, professionally, and quickly.
When I sit in front of a Windows box, with some exceptions, all I can do is push the same set of buttons that the user has been pushing, and see if I can find a combination that works.
PCs force me to become an amateur. Reason: bad tools available.
Re:PCs by their definition require amateur support (Score:3, Insightful)
They say "a bad workman blames his tools".
I say "a good workman doesn't use poor tools in the first place".
Re:PCs by their definition require amateur support (Score:3, Insightful)
Seriously, though, this is why I charge more for Windows support than for Linux. It's degrading to spend a couple of hours clicking buttons almost at random and when you've discovered the problem, get told "That was easy!" or "I could have done that!"
He's right on the last note (Score:4, Insightful)
The problem isn't completely with technical incompetence, the problem can just as easily and will more probably be with care and respect for the customer.
It's a service issue, not a knowledge issue most times when you run into a computer tech who seems to be bumbling something up. Did they check to see what the problem actually was? Do they care enough if they're only making $7-10 an hour from their employer to save your enterprise business plan or presentation? Probably not.
Actually the whole thing is a lot like having a car. You can go through a bunch of different mechaniacs who are either dishonest or lazy, but once and a while you find that one shop where they're commited to service. I don't know about you, but I end up holding on to that shop's business card like it's solid gold. And that's an industry where there are standards to meet. I pay more for better, and I'm always happy with the result.
So WE as computer techies are to blame for this attitude in non computer techies in two ways; way #1, we undervalue ourselves and in turn make the work we do less valuable. #2 we don't do the work properly because we don't respect it ourselves.
Actually come to think of it, as a freelancer, I'm not competing with these low-balling stained-shirt wearing Linksys cablemodem router admins anymore, I'm going to set my rates accordingly. //more of a rant than I wanted that to be.
Qualifications are overrated (Score:4, Insightful)
The biggest mistake that a lot of people make is thinking that computers are a business. They aren't. They are a technology and therefore you need technologically savvy people to work with them. I have no formal training at all, but most people I know always come to me for help because they know I can figure out and solve any software or hardware issue on a PC. I think it helps that I have a non-formal background in electronics first. I, generally, know how the circuitry works at the hardware level. So it's very easy for me to rule out hardware problems before I explore the software itself. Many times, I find that the culprit is too many apps that are stomping over each other.
When I was a Windows guy, it didn't take me long to discover that most of the instability in my system was caused by all the extras I loaded on for convenience. This was an alien experience to me as it wasn't that way in the Atari ST world I migrated from. I didn't like it, but I wound up finding that the best way to run Windows was to keep it lean and pretty plain vanilla. If I wanted extra apps, I always went for Microsoft products because they usually worked the best with Windows. Norton stuff was very cool, but resulted in a lot of instability (this was Windows 3.1). Then I got sick of having only one place to go shopping and moved to Linux. All problems solved...
Anybody can fix computers... (Score:3, Informative)
Considering the number of retards and windows installs in the world, this is fairly easy to do.
Computer "repair" is a lot like plumbing... the difference is that you don't see everyone who's plunged a toilet calling themselves a plumber and billing out 50$ an hour. Real plumbers know their shit and get paid accordingly- likewise, a real pc tech who actually knows their shit is earning their paycheck without breaking much of a sweat.
The problem is finding competent people. It's reasonably easy to tell if your plumber doesn't know shit, but if you're not some degree of geek, you'll get totally snowed by "computer repair"- though if you're some degree of geek, you don't need one.
Economics hampers repair process (Score:5, Interesting)
The first reason is that computers often cost more to fix than what was paid for them in the first place.
It can take a few hours sometimes to fix some of the more persistent viruses and malware out there. As a consequence, only businesses seem to be able to afford my services.
The second reason is that home users have unreasonable expectations. Many seem to think that once I've touched their computer, I own it, and anything that goes wrong after that is my fault, not theirs.
I've only made a couple of home user calls. My first call was on a PC that had 26 viruses and over 100 malware and spyware-related issues.
In another case I had to tell a lady that she could buy a new PC for about $200 less than what it would cost me to rid her aging computer of demons.
Surprisingly, I have noticed that I charge $20/hr less than Geek Squad out of the local Best Buy. However, the home computer market is a touchy one.
A good analogy (Score:3, Insightful)
But seriously...I use this analogy for my customers: You change the oil in your car every 3000 miles, you read the owners manual, you took a driver's test. A PC is a machine just like a car and it needs attention. You need to read up on it and look after it just like any other appliance or machine.
When you're on the highway, you're sharing the road with other drivers...much like when you're on the internet you're sharing it with other people. You have insurance incase someone hits your car...but you don't have virus protection or spyware protection incase someone from the net hits your PC.
Same story, different day.
Re:A good analogy (Score:3, Insightful)
[shrug] I use a Mac - it cost a little bit more at the dealer, but it will have higher resale value when I get rid of it. My highway gets me to where I want to go quickly and easily, and I've got a shield around m
People problem (Score:3, Interesting)
At work I deal with some front line helpdesk stuff, and honestly sometimes you wonder what on earth these people do at home (I keep getting an error message! What does it say? I don't know... I don't understand computers) - like if a light bulb goes, do they sit in the dark until an electrician comes out to replace it?
Mainstream media catches up to 16 year old boys (Score:5, Interesting)
I Wouldn't Be Too Concerned (Score:3, Informative)
about his "overqualified amateur" rant, since it was off the cuff.
And his point was that appliance repair people get training in fixing a specific item, whereas computers have such varied configurations that it is nearly impossible to be an expert in fixing EVERYTHING.
Or at least, I hope he understands that.
I happen to be one of those "unqualified amateurs" doing home and small business tech support for low rates. I have twenty years in the IT field, so I know the basic facts about IT: nothing works and nobody cares. I have only been messing with current PC systems for the last three years, but I learn fast and usually have some idea where to look to solve a problem. But there's no doubt that the bewildering variety of screwups in both hardware and software make it very hard to do a quick, efficient fix.
As an example from my own machine, a couple weeks ago I moved some partitions on the 160GB hard drive to make more room for my Windows 2000 and Windows XP root partitions (thankfully my Linux is on the other drive). Once I started accessing the partition that ended up on the other side of the 137GB barrier, both Windows crashed totally.
I reinstalled and reconfigured, making sure I had SP4 on 2000 and SP2 on XP (which I had before the crash). After accessing that partition again, I discovered that neither OS could see files put in that partition by the other OS.
To make a long story short, after nearly a week of wrestling with this, and being amazed at some of the bizarre behavior (all of which clearly indicated that at least one of the OS's simply was not seeing that partition in the "right" place on the drive), I discovered an MS Knowledgebase article that helpfully stated that Windows 2000 with Service Pack 3 cannot read the partition table correctly for "some" hard drives! (God forbid that MS tell us WHICH drives, WHEN, and WHY! Now I know! Big drives!) And I had installed 2000 with SP3 and THEN applied SP4 - too late, homes!
Now, I spent a HELL of a lot of time on Google looking for ANYONE who had similar symptoms or a similar problem. Nothing - on the Web or in Google groups. I should have checked MS first, but even there it was not easy to find this particular KB article.
Apparently, only under the specific conditions I had - a particular drive, installing 2000 SP3 first, then applying SP4, and possibly dual-booting with XP - did this problem arise.
Multiply this by the tons of proprietary motherboards, manufacturer-tweaked BIOSes, "custom" hardware, scores of thousands of software apps, and add in a pinch of spyware - and how the hell can ANY tech ever hope to figure out what is wrong in less than two to four hours?
Which, at the rate techs charge, is a hell of a lot of money for some home user who has, on a national average, maybe $100 disposable income for the month. It's no less of a problem for a business user if a critical server is out of action for that time.
Another tech told me about trying to get a wireless LAN working for a small business down in Palo Alto. The frequency saturation in the 2.4GHz band was so bad there that the users kept getting kicked off or re-associating with the wrong access points. He tried everything - other brands of wireless, bigger, more directional antennas - nothing worked. Finally he had them buy a Cisco access point that was seven times more expensive than the ones they had been trying, which put out 100mw instead of 20. That worked - so far.
For the last week, my AV has been turning off its email scanner for no apparent reason. No indication why, no good explanations on the company's forum. Since turning off the outbound SMTP scanner, it seems to have stopped doing it - so far.
PCs are a nightmare today, no question about it.
Of COURSE they're unqualified! (Score:3, Informative)
The big chain stores charge customers $50 an hour (for in-house repair) to upwards of $100 an hour (for on-site work) and then turn around and give these hard-working individuals a whopping $10 to $12 per hour to survive on. The word "geeksploitation" comes to mind in a big way. It's this reason that most computer repairmen who tolerate this onerous situation (you can make $10 an hour doing data entry if you can just *type* fast) and hire on at these places are literally the bottom bidders in the system. That is just barely enough money to keep a geek in new hardware so they can learn the intimate details of troubleshooting it (which is cheaper than regular training classes, and includes employee discounts on the hardware). The majority of these poor, damned souls either stagnate, or tolerate the situation only long enough to get jobs at better places as either system administrators or network engineers, who are typically only marginally less underpaid.
Your best bet to finding really skilled geeks is still word-of-mouth to find an independent contractor or small group of geeks acting in concert.
Stop the geeksploitation!
Who to call (Score:3, Insightful)
When a domestic appliance goes wrong, you can ring a repair man. When your car breaks down you can call the garage. But when your computer system goes wrong, who do you call?
In my experience, most people call their ISP, even for problems that are not internet related. How do I know? I work for an ISP. And they expect their ISP to fix it. They see their ISP subscription as a service contract. When, after some questioning, the ISP helpdesk operator ascertains that the problem is not internet related, or not covered by the support policy, then begins the hard part of convincing the customer. It's often easier to tell the customer to reboot.
Re:Nope, not buyin' it... (Score:2)
Re:Nope, not buyin' it... (Score:3, Funny)
"Then I applied the Service Pack.... AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH, the Secret Word!
[insert lots of sirens and noisy things here]
Re:amateurs (Score:3, Interesting)
However, his theory is wrong because such profesionals exist. The problem is that users are not willing to pay them.
Re:Computers can only add ones and zeros (Score:3, Informative)