Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Communications Data Storage Handhelds Hardware

Nokia Announces Hard-Drive Phone 410

blorg writes "The new N91 features a 4gb microdrive and a 2 megapixel digital camera, and plays music in MP3, AAC and WMV formats. With this phone, Nokia reckons it has an iPod killer and aims to become the largest seller of portable MP3 players this year, having already outstripped camera manufacturers in the photography market. However, as the BBC points out, people are not necessarily buying these phones for their camera or music features."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Nokia Announces Hard-Drive Phone

Comments Filter:
  • Killer Phones (Score:4, Interesting)

    by ackthpt ( 218170 ) * on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @06:51PM (#12366373) Homepage Journal
    "The new N91 features a 4gb microdrive and a 2 megapixel digital camera, and plays music in MP3, AAC and WMV formats. With this phone, Nokia reckons it has an iPod killer

    The only downside is the long extension cord.

    However, as the BBC points out, people are not necessarily buying these phones for their camera or music features."

    Really! This pub chef story [bbc.co.uk] was carried by the BBC World Service, this morning (California time) regarding a chef bitten by a spider and had the presence of mind to snap a picture or two of it, which helped identify which spider it was and how to treat the venom. I think this link [itv.com] carries and actual photo from the phone.

    • Re:Killer Phones (Score:5, Insightful)

      by PeteQC ( 680043 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @06:56PM (#12366445)
      and had the presence of mind to snap a picture or two of it

      That's the most useful feature: the "conveniance" of always having a camera with you. You never know when it can be useful. Took a picture of that big diagram drawn on a blackboard before someone erase it, take a picture or two of that guy who looks like trying to sneak in your neighbor house...
      • by CODiNE ( 27417 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:03PM (#12366543) Homepage
        Is their editor drunk or is this standard British English?

        The Wandering Spider is one of the world's most deadliest spiders

        Is this called a "double positive"? :-)
        • A quote regarding the late philosopher Sidney Morgenbesser:

          n example: in the 1950's, the British philosopher J. L. Austin came to Columbia to present a paper about the close analysis of language. He pointed out that although two negatives make a positive, nowhere is it the case that two positives make a negative. "Yeah, yeah," Dr. Morgenbesser said.
        • Wandering Spider being a proper noun i don't see the problem.
        • Re:Killer Phones (Score:4, Informative)

          by lamasquerade ( 172547 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:57PM (#12367032)
          I believe it is a double superlative.

          Also fun are double comparitives (more better), and forgetting the correct comparitive or superlative form (gooder, goodest), and of course absolutely bizzare errors: betterer, more gooder, bestest...

          In Australia at least, these aren't confined to 4 year olds leaning to speak or uneducated boobs whose main cultural activity involves watching other uneducated boobs in Big Brother, I've actually seen a news reader use a double superlative (it could be argued that said news reader was just an uneducated boob, but is that really an excuse?:)
        • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @09:16PM (#12367656)
          Obviously the spider is more deadly than "most deadlier" but less deadly than "mostest deadliest."
      • When everyone carries a camera, watch the available photographic evidence for car accidents, muggings and other crimes go through the roof.

        Give it ten years time, and the government will have a system set up for anyone to instantly send a picture of a crime to a pholice database.
    • by fembots ( 753724 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:00PM (#12366502) Homepage
      ...snap a picture or two of it, which helped identify which spider...

      That's why I always carry a 2lb fire extinguisher with built-in MP3 player with me just in case.
    • Yeah, I know, the thing is heavy enough to crash a skull if launched at a high starting velocity. And as if that wasn't enough it can finish you off with ~15000 minutes of Britney Spears 'music'. Killer indeed!

  • How many? (Score:3, Funny)

    by PeteQC ( 680043 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @06:51PM (#12366381)
    How many ringtones can I download on this thing?
    • Re:How many? (Score:3, Insightful)

      by ZephyrXero ( 750822 )
      If it can actually play those same mp3s as ringtones...quite a few.

      Still, this doesn't do much for me though since I didn't see Ogg Vorbis in that list. Seriously... I really dont' feel like re-encoding all my music b/c they were too lazy to add a completely free of charge feature to their phone... I know it's become sort of an obligatory joke to mention the lack of Ogg support in media players, but it really is a serious problem for some of us ;)
  • by yagu ( 721525 ) <yayagu.gmail@com> on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @06:52PM (#12366387) Journal

    Arrrrrrrrrrghhhhhhhhh! So, I guess I see my chances of EVER just buying a phone slipping even further away. Sigh.

    Press, press, press, press, press, press, press..... Send..... Shoot! Was just trying to call home, and created a playlist, no wait!, took an upskirt (illegal in WA) and sent it to Mom, no wait!, ordered pizza from Amazon!

    • by QuantumG ( 50515 ) <qg@biodome.org> on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @06:56PM (#12366448) Homepage Journal
      Blah. If you want to get locked into a contract you'd "buy" a phone like this. If you just want to make and receive calls you'd go and buy one of the billions of Nokia 3210s or Motorolla flip phones available on the second hand market and get a pre-paid sim. All these fancy camera, mp3, email phones are just for people who want the wizz bang new thing. Those people will always be behind the 8 ball.
      • Not in the states (Score:5, Informative)

        by John Seminal ( 698722 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:07PM (#12366592) Journal
        Blah. If you want to get locked into a contract you'd "buy" a phone like this. If you just want to make and receive calls you'd go and buy one of the billions of Nokia 3210s or Motorolla flip phones available on the second hand market and get a pre-paid sim. All these fancy camera, mp3, email phones are just for people who want the wizz bang new thing. Those people will always be behind the 8 ball.

        You can't buy a pre-paid SIM in the USA. The closest thing we have is pre-paid phone cards. You buy a $50 phone card, and then using your manufacturers pre-chosen phone, you call it in and add the money to your account.

        Last time I checked, those Virgin Moble and TracPhone cards were very expensive, over a dime a minute. If you talk 10 minutes a day, every day, that is 300 minutes a month, or $30 bucks in pre-paid. Many monthly plans start at $30 a month and give closer to 1000 minutes.

        I would love to see the pre-paid market get in touch with reality. No more crap like "you must buy a card every X days or lose your credits and phone number" or "we only have 2 phones to chose from".

        If I could get a motorola flip phone and use prepay without losing my credites just because I don't use them all in 30 days, and not be threatened with losing my phone number if I don't buy more credits, I would consider pre-pay. Also, if the yearly contracts can get you 2 cents per minute, why do some pre-pay charge 25 cents per minute. It is dumb.

        • Yeah, but surely you can sign up for a plan and not take the option on a "free" phone right? You couldn't possibily be so backwards as to force people to buy a phone when they already have one.
        • thats so patently false it makes my eyes hurt. For a time, from when I was in 8th grade, to when I was a junior in HS, I had a prepaid cell phone, and yes I live in the states. It was with AT&T and worked perfectly fine. Basically, every time I made a call it would say at the end "you have x minutes remaining" and I could always have AT&T add more. It was good because it actually cost me less than a service, ie I didnt use my phone that much so the time I did use was cheaper than monthly service, an
          • I'm familar with the ATT Plan you are on.

            My parents were on it-- they would by 300 minutes at the beginning of the year for $50, and by the end of the year they usually had 50 minutes left. The cell phone cost $50 or so. $100 a year for a cell phone plan is a very good deal.

            It's not available to new customers as far as I can tell. The minutes for Cingular's new prepaid cell phone plan expire in 30 - 90 days. So you pay $30 for 300 minutes, and need to use it in 30 days. It costs the same as a regular cell
  • On Hold (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Does this mean that we get to choose the music we get to listen to when we're on hold?
  • by Luscious868 ( 679143 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @06:52PM (#12366396)
    I've got a 40 GB iPod that I take with me when I'm planning on taking a long trip, but I don't carry it with me everywhere I go because I'd have to put it in my pocket and I don't want it to get damanged. If this thing is priced right, I'd buy it and use it as a second mp3 player. It would always be with me because I always carry my cell phone. For long trips, I'd grab the iPod, otherwise I could just plug into the phone.
  • With Nokia's history of exploding batteries, they could be closer to the truth than they realise!
  • by fakedupe ( 872465 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @06:53PM (#12366403)
    Will this be anything like or as successful as their Gameboy killer?
    • Different case (Score:4, Insightful)

      by ultrabot ( 200914 ) on Thursday April 28, 2005 @01:43AM (#12368913)
      Will this be anything like or as successful as their Gameboy killer?

      The difference is that ipod is very easy to kill. It's an mp3 player, there is nothing special about it.

      A gaming platform is a different thing altogether, because it represents a different level of "commitment", and is influenced by such things as availability of games.
      • The difference is that ipod is very easy to kill. It's an mp3 player, there is nothing special about it.

        I don't think you understand what ipod really is... It definitely is not just a music player: People are proud of their ipods, they like to show them to their friends -- People are happy not just because they can listen to music with their ipod, they're also happy just to own one. It would be foolish to think that people buy music players based on technical quality only.

        Nokia is an impressive compan

  • by chris09876 ( 643289 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @06:53PM (#12366405)
    At the moment, these devices that do everything don't really to anything really well. A stand-alone camera has better quality than the phone. ...but we are starting to see that change. As technology continues to develop, and manufacturers are able to pack more and more into a device, the quality of the combined unit might start to be acceptable for more and more people.

    I am quite looking forward to the time when I only have to carry one device around, and it will do everything! (including allowing me to SSH into my home computer) :)
    • by John Seminal ( 698722 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:02PM (#12366533) Journal
      At the moment, these devices that do everything don't really to anything really well. A stand-alone camera has better quality than the phone. ...but we are starting to see that change. As technology continues to develop, and manufacturers are able to pack more and more into a device, the quality of the combined unit might start to be acceptable for more and more people.

      I am quite looking forward to the time when I only have to carry one device around, and it will do everything! (including allowing me to SSH into my home computer) :)

      I agree. But I think they are moving in the right direction. Thank god the did away with those HUGE palm looking phones. Those were so big. Smaller is nicer when it comes to something you want to keep in the pocket.

      The 2MP is a huge jump forward for cell phones. For the longest time, finding a reasonably priced 1MP phone was difficult. Even the less than 1MP phones were well over $150. I hope this new 2MP phone pushes prices down a bit.

      But the huge winner is the 4 gig hard drive. It is a breakthrough for a cell phone.

      I think with cell phones you will always be a couple years behind everything else because the tecnhology needs to shrink. But the days of 10 and 20 gig hard drives on phones are comming.

      Since cell phones are so small, I can see new applications like voice recognition tied into the OS. You want to write a report? Talk into your cell phone.

      I see so many uses here. This will be fantastic. The only worry I have is with cell phone camera's getting such high resolution, it will invade the privacy of people. Nobody will be free to walk in public anymore and protect their image. For example, say you live down south where black people and white people don't date because of social pressure. You see two kids flirting and take a picture. Post it on the web, and now two people's lives will become miserable.

      Or you are in a store and some woman is trying to look at the bottom shelve. Unfortunatly she is wearing a skirt, and the kid clicks a picture. Up on the web it goes.

      • by Anonymous Coward
        Camera phones in Japan and South Korea are actually legally required to play a sound everytime you take a picture, to prevent those upskirt shots. Does anything like that exist in the US? Though there are supposedly some shady shops that will get rid of the noise...
      • by cgenman ( 325138 ) on Thursday April 28, 2005 @12:54AM (#12368682) Homepage
        The number of MP in a camera does not denote the quality. By and large, the lens does that. The quantity of light the lense can gather, and the quality with which it can focus that light on a CCD generally determines whether or not your photos are good enough to print. Increasing resolution on a camera which relies on a cheap 4mm lens with a 2.5mm focal length is like an airport increasing the size of their gates and walkways despite everyone still being stuck for five hours at the badly understaffed security checkpoint.

        The "quality" of most camera phone cameras has increased to that of a cheap webcam 7 years ago. In no way does a 1MP camera phone come close to the quality of a 1MP Elph.

        The Mars rovers took some of the greatest, smoothest pictures yet seen with just a 1MP CCD.

        Of course, quality will jump tremendously when we switch over from the RGRB CCDs to tri-color CCD's. Slightly offtopic, does anyone know the progress of this? When will we be able to get true 3-color CCD cameras? About two years ago I had heard this would be in about a year...

    • SSH on cell phone (Score:5, Informative)

      by spiritraveller ( 641174 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:04PM (#12366555)
      I am quite looking forward to the time when I only have to carry one device around, and it will do everything! (including allowing me to SSH into my home computer) :)

      Well, that capability has been out for at least a couple of years. I've been using ssh on my Nokia 3650 for a while now. The version I use is Putty for Symbian [sourceforge.net], but there is another SSH client [xk72.com] written for the Java VM that comes on most cell phones.

    • I agree that none of these 'convergent' devices do anything well. I have a Treo, and am unhappy with it - it's too bulky as a phone, the camera sucks, and has a poor user interface as an mp3 player.

      In the future, a combined device might be acceptable; but it's likely that dedicated devices will still be better, as the technology for both the convergent and dedicated devices improve. Of course its a tradeoff and matter of preference, but I've decided no more 'convergent' devices for me...

    • The problem with this device is that it doesn't have a keyboard, and you really need a scroll wheel to select songs from a hard drive-based MP3 player.

      I recommend the t-mobile sidekick II as a device that can do everything but play music.

      I saw a girl today who carried both a mobile phone and an iPod, one on each hip. It looked almost like she had two weapons on her hip, and they were both aimed at whatever hapless person was talking to her at the time.

      D
  • work out for Nokia like the N-Gage?

    I just want a phone with Bluetooth. That's it.

    Peace

    • Nokia throw ideas at the wall, not all of them are going to stick.

      I think in the civilised (GSM) world where your mobile goes everywhere, and we don't even bother with landlines, there is a huge market for this.
    • Re:So this will... (Score:3, Insightful)

      by gl4ss ( 559668 )
      what good is bluetooth if there's nothing you'd want to get out from the phone or to the phone? these now announced phones are 3g so there's bluetooth usability right there as well.

      all the now announced n-series have bluetooth.

      or hell, just get the n-gage off from somewhere cheapo cheap... it's got bluetooth too.

      and would you really pay ,say, 300$ for just a bluetooth phone(whatever that might be, t610 or whatever but even that's not "just bluetooth") when you could get one that plays movies for 301$?
  • The 4 gig hard drive is so sweet. That is going to make the phone so awesome. The 2MP camera, nobody will use that as a real camera, but it should give good enough pictures for the unexpected shot. :)

    I also like that the phone has wireless support. This could replace my laptop. Hmmmm.

    If this phone can be programmed with the J2ME, this will become a hit. I wonder how much RAM it has.

  • Price tag... (Score:5, Informative)

    by nvrrobx ( 71970 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @06:55PM (#12366422) Homepage
    Sounds great until you see the price tag - it's nearly $800!

    http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/ptech/04/27/nokia.mp3 .phones.reut/index.html [cnn.com]

    If the Motorola Razr is any indication, you can't get insurance through Cingular. My boss told me that Lockline refused to insure his Razr when he bought it.

    Screw that!
    • Re:Price tag... (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Stevyn ( 691306 )
      The retail price of most phones is a few hundred dollars. But the monthly payment offsets the cost, so you end up paying this over a year or two, depending on the contract. So this might come out to a few hundred dollars on top of the plan. Which is on target with an iPod.
  • by sfcat ( 872532 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @06:55PM (#12366424)
    The reason people like the iPod is because of the interface. You could legally (and illegal) get music before the iPod. Companies made mp3 players. But the reason people got the iPod is because it had a good interface which people liked. Then the hype came in and it became large. If you are going to make an iPod killer your interface has to be natural and easy to use. Now what cell phone has that good an interface? Sure, some cell phones have okay interfaces, but it has have as easy to use an interface as a walkman or iPod to be an iPod killer. Otherwise, it is just so much typical marketing fertilizer.
    • From the pictures, it looks like the interface is practically an ipod clone.
    • "Now what cell phone has that good an interface?"

      Who cares? A lot of people don't have an iPod becausae they don't think they'll carry it around. My cell phone goes everywhere, but my PDA, MP3 player, Game Boy, Digital Camera, and email client don't. The people attracted to these things aren't likely to be the "Ooo, I can listen to music" types. They're more likely to be the "ooo, now I'll have a music I'll actually take with me to places" people.
  • Convergence. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Molly Lipton ( 865392 ) <molly.lipton@gmail.com> on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @06:55PM (#12366437)
    We may not be getting the flying cars promised to us in the sixties and seventies by Hannah-Barbara and company, but the day of handheld devices that can do nearly anything is quickly approaching. As the BBC points out, this device, though not quite there yet, is a big step in that direction.

    It is important, however, to reflect upon the advancements of the late twentieth century and how they've impacted our way of life. In particular, have TV, the internet, computers, and all the rest of today's modern miracles made us more virtuous? Have they made us less virtuous? What are the dangers inherent in having everything at our fingertips?

    There's a great deal of social criticism these days about the so-called "Generation Now," the sense of entitlement and so forth. These matters are especially important for us, as afficianados of technology, to consider, particularly in an open forum such as this.
    • Re:Convergence. (Score:2, Interesting)

      by TGK ( 262438 )
      It's a common misconception that technology -=should=- make us more virtuous. I'd disagree. Technology is virtue neutral.

      Technology, afterall, can be only as virtuous as its creators. It can only impact the virtuosity (am I making that word up?) of an individual so far as that individual allows it to.

      I, for example, enjoy video games, computers, video entertainment etc just as much as the high schoolers my wife used to teach. Somehow, they came across to me as having an enormous sense of entitlement..
  • Gadget Convergence (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Eberlin ( 570874 )
    So we have a phone that can take pictures and play music. Possibly do video as well. Might as well add all the PDA capabilities of e-mail, address book, grocery shopping list, etc.

    I'm all for the convenience of an all-in-one device but have we gone far enough into the technologies that everything works well/reliably? I remember the old 3-in-1 printer devices that weren't all that reliable.

    If done well (and compact), gadget convergence would be a great thing. Might as well add a TV remote to it while t
    • If Nokia can't even get a PDA right, how could they possibly pull off the remainder?!

      The problem is about user interface. If it takes six button presses to take a picture, the device doesn't work. If it is supposed to fit in your pocket, it can't have sixty buttons.

      The things that have killed all convergence devices as viable options are:

      Battery Time. Different devices have different expectations on battery life. Integration could work between devices at the "lowest commond denominator" approach only

    • "I'm all for the convenience of an all-in-one device but have we gone far enough into the technologies that everything works well/reliably? "

      Yes. My Nokia 3650 has been doing the phone/PDA/Camera thing quite well since 03.
  • with all that... (Score:2, Insightful)

    by LiquidMind ( 150126 )
    ...with all these gadgets and non-cell phone functions, what's the battery life on these things? i remember my old 'big' cellphone (it didn't even flip open, oh the humanity) that would last for days on one charge....my new one (yea it looks cool and all) lasts for maybe 72 hours before i gotta plug it back in. imagine having a HD sucking juice from it too...
  • by grasshoppa ( 657393 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @06:59PM (#12366489) Homepage
    people are not necessarily buying these phones for their camera or music features.

    Maybe they're buying them to...talk on?

    Give me a good, solid, long lasting phone with an easy to use interface. Leave the rest of that crap on some other device.
  • Butt ugly (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymouse Cownerd ( 754174 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @06:59PM (#12366492) Homepage
    Yes, but can Nokia make a phone that is not butt-ugly? They always make phones with all these extreme designs that hurts usability and then claim innovation in design. Have you guys seen some of their phone designs?!??

    http://www.nokiausa.com/phones/7610
    http://www.nokiausa.com/phones/3660
    http://www.nokiausa.com/phones/3205

    Wake me up when Nokia can make a phone look like this:

    http://www.sonyericsson.com/spg.jsp?cc=hk&lc=zh& ver=4000&template=pp1_loader&php=php1_10235&zone=p p&lm=pp1&pid=10235

    Yes, I know Nokia is the top manufacturer of phone and their phones tend to work better as phones than other manufacturers, but seriously, they need to hire some designers and usability experts!

    • I agree. Nokia's design team is on crack. Ergonomics and usability have been thrown out the door for the sake of gaudy fashion.

      The whole remove-the-battery-to-change-a-catridge thing with the N-gage proves that their designers are completely stupid too. If you choose carefully they still have a few basic models with decent keypads and no fru-fru features like cameras, multiple screens, etc.

      From a technical standpoint, Nokia and Kyocera (formerly Qualcomm) are the only manufacturers I'd trust to make a dec
    • just give me this phone [motorola.com] and I'll be happy.
  • by coolgeek ( 140561 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @06:59PM (#12366500) Homepage
    Uh, yeah I didn't get that call you see because unfortunately, I drained my celly battery listening to Kraftwerk.
  • 100 hours of video! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mpesce ( 146930 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:01PM (#12366525) Homepage
    There's been some studies in the US (sorry, no link) which show that folks will actually watch feature-length films on their phones. Until recently this was thought to be entirely ridiculous. Now, with a 4GB drive and some nice MPEG4 encoding, I could conceivably get 100 hours (!) of video content onto my mobile. (MPEG4, well compressed, uses about 40MB per hour of audiovisual content.) That's really something - more amazing than having 600-or-so songs on my mobile... And that's going to lead to some interesting content being developed for this platform... TiVo on your mobile, anyone?
    • by Unknown Lamer ( 78415 ) <clintonNO@SPAMunknownlamer.org> on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:44PM (#12366910) Homepage Journal

      I have a Nokia 7610 with a 512M RS-MMC card in it. I had to try really hard to fill that up :-). Anyway, I hacked a script together that rips dvds and re-encodes them as QCIF h.263 + AMR audio (3gpp videos) for my phone. You have to download some stuff from the 3g site and pass a few extra options to ffmpeg's ./configure (the README documents it and it's not hard).

      When I had a Real Job (tm) and I took my lunch breaks I'd prop the phone up and watch episodes of Futurama while eating lunch. It was nice.

      For letterbox movies, I rip them to my HD first and crop them to 4:3 (on a 1.5" screen I'm more concerned with everything being big enough to see and couldn't care less about preserving the entire picture) first. On long car trips it keeps me busy (well, the few times I'm not driving).

      The only downside is that it eats the battery. If I turn down the backlight to half strength it gets a little better, but I can still only get about a two hours movie in before the battery is too low to make calls with. I can almost fit a BL-6C from the N-Gage into my phone...that'd get me an extra half an hour. If I'm in the car the cigarette light adaptor works. Battery tech needs to advance more, damnit..

  • WMV? (Score:3, Informative)

    by Jsutton1027w ( 757650 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:01PM (#12366529) Homepage
    Since when was WMV a music format? I believe they mean WMA. That is, unless the phone plays videos as well (which wouldn't be suprising).
    • Re:WMV? (Score:4, Informative)

      by YetAnotherName ( 168064 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:58PM (#12367040) Homepage
      I'm sure it does play video. My current Nokia phone, a model 6600 [nokiausa.com], plays back AVI files that I run through Apple Quicktime Pro [apple.com] on my Mac. Before I take a road trip with my daughter, I load up my phone with some anime videos discovered through Animesuki [animesuki.com].

      The nice thing is that this is an industry standard file format, 3GPP, supported by multiple vendors, operating systems, and software packages.

      WMV, on the other hand, is not.
  • Product Camouflage (Score:4, Insightful)

    by haydon4 ( 123439 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:04PM (#12366554)
    Nokia expects to become the largest seller of portable MP3 players this year.

    Then why not make a really good MP3 player? I'm not going to drop another chunk of change just because Nokia crams another "feature" into a cell phone.

    If I want a digital camera, I'll buy a good digital camera. If I want a PDA, I'll buy a good PDA. If I want an MP3 player, I'll buy a good MP3 player.

    My Swiss Army knife has lots of all-in-one features, but I'm not likely to use it to open my soup or screw in a new door knob. I have real tools for that.
    • If you're on the road / down-town / whatever and you see something and would like to take a picture of it, you could..
      A. Go home, get camera, return, take picture
      B. Whip out the camera phone, take picture, carry on

      If your boss calls you up telling you that he would like to see you on saturday at 7pm for a meeting, you could...
      A. Remember it, program it into your PDA when you get home
      B. Write it down on a piece of paper, program it into your PDA when you get home
      C. Whip out your phone and toss it into the c
    • by lavaface ( 685630 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @08:48PM (#12367396) Homepage
      My Swiss Army knife has lots of all-in-one features, but I'm not likely to use it to open my soup or screw in a new door knob. I have real tools for that.

      I'm tired of people recycling this garbage every time the issue of cell phones comes up. Think about what you're saying. You have a Swiss Army knife. You've probably been somewhere you needed a knife, or pliers or whatever. You whip out your multi-tool and get the job done. Sure, you could have done the job better if you had been carrying a power drill but that makes little sense, right? The whole point of having a multi-function tool is convenience. It may not be the best tool for the job, but you get stuff done.

      I can think of several times where it would have been handy to have a camera phone. Usually it's some strange scene, like a funny sign. It would be cool to have an MP3 player on the phone if I run into an unexpected wait and feel like listening to some tunes.

      To sum up, if you want to carry all of those devices around all the time, then do it and quit complaining when they add new features for cell phones. There are plenty of folks like myself that would like to have a sort-of digital Swiss Army knife that can do things like check a calendar or listen to some music in a pinch (but not quite at that price--ouch!)

  • by bi_boy ( 630968 )
    Cos we all know how well the Ngage did in the portable games market.

    Hint: not too well.
  • Bulky phone with poor battery life, not enough storage to be a serious music player, screen too small for a PDA, not fast enough to run games.
  • Major Problem? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by almostmanda ( 774265 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:08PM (#12366595)
    Cell phone makers don't seem to understand a major problem with throwing every possible gadget in the world into one's cell phone: battery life. What happens when there's an emergency, and I need to call someone, but my phone is dead because I've been listening to MP3s, playing games, and taking pictures all day? What if I accidentally forget to stop the music when I stop listening, and it plays all day in my backpack? I'd rather separate my "fun" gadgets from my "necessity/emergency" gadgets, just in case.
  • having already outstripped camera manufacturers in the photography market

    With respect, this is hardly true. Just because they shipped more devices than camera manufacturers doesn't mean they outstipped them in the photography market.

    You can't really classify a camera phone as being in the "photography market". They are in the "camera phone" market, and there is a large difference. Anyone looking for decent optics, a zoom, good resolution and a raft other other features that camera phone's lack, will

  • Convergence is certainly what the marketplace is calling for - why carry a PDA, a Phone, a camera, an iPod when you can just carry an N91.

    The problem is that for all of these, there are concessions:

    • The PDA does not integrate well with lookOut (despite all your groans, thats what the business community use by and large).
    • The music player is klunky and not yet big enough, and doesn't integrate with iTunes
    • The phone has miniscule buttons

    On the plus side - the camera is probably good enough and has enough s

  • gb (Score:2, Funny)

    by X1011 ( 819111 )
    The new N91 features a 4gb microdrive and a 2 megapixel digital camera, and plays music in MP3, AAC and WMV formats.

    gb? Is that gram bits or gravity bits?
  • ogg vorbis (Score:2, Insightful)

    by transami ( 202700 )
    Ogg Ogg Ogg Ogg Ogg ... How many times do you have to say it for frig'n sake?!!!
    • Re:ogg vorbis (Score:3, Informative)

      OggPlay [sourceforge.net].

      It works great. I'm not sure if it supports stereo operation (the standard Symbian sound device was mono-only until recently). If it doesn't, the source is there and everything is well documented so it shouldn't be too hard to change that.

  • one less box (Score:4, Insightful)

    by child_of_mercy ( 168861 ) <.moc.tcatoir-eht. .ta. .yobnhoj.> on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:13PM (#12366648) Homepage
    the Beeb's analysis is flawed methinks.

    4Gb is a sweet spot on storage, but more importantly *everyone* is already carrying a phone.

    if the phone means i don't have to worry about keeping and charging an ipod mini then it's a winner for me and mine.
  • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • It is a view with which digital music player maker Creative agrees.

    "I'm not sure that this represents competition for us," said a spokesman.

    "It is endemic of the trend to integrate devices that you lose quality. Separate, dedicated devices are always going to be better," he said.


    Does anyone else see the shear irony of these words coming from a purveyor of MP3 players? Sounds like a maker of pocket knives pooh-poohing those Swiss guys with their inferior, do-everything knives.

    Look, good enough is good e
  • Similar design?? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by startleman ( 567255 )
    I have a Sony Ericsson T610 [sonyericsson.com] wich looks startingly similar to this new phone (Nokia N91 [com.com]), but with the addition of the iPod -esque controls on the slider. The T610 is easily the best designed phone I've ever had, and I can't help thinking that Nokia took a few design tips from S-E (and aPple). So, I'm psyched about it!
  • by rsborg ( 111459 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:36PM (#12366833) Homepage
    1. Interface
    2. Style
    3. Marketing
    Like it or not, Apple has the golden touch of style that Nokia never had, and it seems that Nokia has really gone off the deep end with some of their recent phones (lets not even talk about the DOA N-gage).

    Specifics? This thing has a joystick, 4 buttons around it (like my clunky T610), a play/pause, forward, back, stop, and (im guessing) a popout-button to shift the playpad down to get the number pad. I'm not going to go into all the possible confusion, but it looks busy.

    As if that weren't all.. the color seems to aim for the stylish/classy 20-30s market, but the features (cameraphone, music) seem to really gear towards a younger market (think teens - 20s).

    I wish them well, but from just looking at it, it seems a bit misguided.

  • Nseries launced (Score:5, Informative)

    by tsvk ( 624784 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:40PM (#12366866)


    Nokia announced a whole new line of phones, the Nokia Nseries [nokia.com] (press release [nokia.com]).

    In this series, three models were introduced:

  • by femto ( 459605 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:41PM (#12366882) Homepage
    Has anyone bought a mobile phone and decided *NOT* to use the telephone function? Why should one pay for an ongoing telephone service, when all one wants is a camera, hard disk and music player?

    Has anyone tried this? What was the reaction of the seller, who was no doubt expecting further income from a telephone plan?

    Perhaps that is an indicator of when a mobile phone's 'other' services come up to scratch, when people buy them with a view to ignoring the telephone function?

    • The cell phone companies heavily subsidize the new phones, to convince you to sign up for a term contract. If you sign such a contract, they'd ding you for cancelling early. If you didn't sign the contract, then the phone cost a lot more.

      Either way, it'd be cheaper to buy a specialized device, and the spec. device would provide much better quality product.
    • Has anyone bought a mobile phone and decided *NOT* to use the telephone function? Why should one pay for an ongoing telephone service, when all one wants is a camera, hard disk and music player?

      Well, if you buy it "subsidized" from Verizon or whoever, you have to sign a contract for phone service. If you break the contract it costs more than you saved on the phone.

      If you don't buy it subsidized, it's a pretty high price for a camera or music player.
  • by garagekubrick ( 121058 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @07:54PM (#12367000) Homepage
    Why do I not care for any games or apps or cameras or music being stored on my phone?

    Because currently, and I'm sure this applies to a hell of a lot of travellers - I can't turn on my phone mid flight to listen to some music. Do phone manufacturers understand this in the slightest? What's the point of putting all my portable music into a device that I cannot use say in my car on a plane, probably the two most common places other than walking or exercising where such devices are used.

    I own a Motorola RAZR V3 and have found it's nowhere near worth $500. The menu system and phone book are a joke, the battery life is negligible if bluetooth or any serious use of the screen comes into play. The interface is absolutely hideous. Internet via cell phone even to check on movie times is nightmarishly slow and pointless and probably costs more than calling a service. The camera often gets smudged by virtue of its placement and the photos arre hideous.

    Anything else I need to do - I turn on my powerbook, latch onto a wifi connection. Done.

    So what I'm left with is an expensive phone that has only served as a status symbol and little more.

    For all the talk of iPod competitors, yes it is priced more - but furthermore no single device has music software and an interface anywhere near as good, and that's to say nothing of the preamp and headphones quality. My Razr can play MP3s, horribly, distortedly.

    Phones are ubiquitous and not a single sci fi writer saw that coming - but here in the US we are lagging far behind some other worldwide markets in what can be done with such devices.

    • Why do I not care for any games or apps or cameras or music being stored on my phone?

      I don't for the same reason I don't want any of that stuff on my PDA. Because telephones have enough battery problems as it is, and it's aggravating and embarassing and even dangerous to have your phone not work because you were listening to NiN and John Denver.

      My ideal phone is a 4" long fat old-fashioned Nokia with a monochrome display and hours of talk time. Too bad you can't GET one any more because everyone's making
  • by spir0 ( 319821 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @08:22PM (#12367218) Homepage Journal
    I wouldn't buy one of these for several reasons.

    1: I drop my cellphone all the time. When I get mad, I throw it against a wall. So far Nokia phones have been the sturdiest, but with a hard drive in it, it wouldn't last me a week.

    2: because it's got a hard drive in it, battery life would suck. I'm on call 24/7.

    3: I've already got a phone.

    4: I've already got a digital camera that does a pissy 5 megapixels.

    5: I've got a mini-disc player which plays MP3, ATRAC, and I think WMA (but wfc anyway)

    6: I've already got a portable device which plays movies/music -- my laptop. It's got 40GB of drive space.

  • Ipod? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by andreyw ( 798182 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @11:27PM (#12368278) Homepage
    iPod killer? Far fetched. The best I could claim would be iPod mini 4GB killer - and even then, that only depends on design, UI and tight integration with iTunes (haha, like Apple will let this one run through).
  • Hello, Battery Life? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mkiwi ( 585287 ) on Wednesday April 27, 2005 @11:58PM (#12368448)
    Assuming someone puts a bunch of songs on their phone and plays them, the power consumption for the hard drive and the speakers would be too much for a cell phone battery. From what i've seen, phone batteries are very small, usually rated at 3.6V.

    This one may be a 5.0V, but nonetheless it will sacrafice size and weight (not to mention battery life) if it were used as a music player.

    Only so many Watts of power can be crammed into an electronic device these days, and I seriously doubt that one could get even 6 hours of continual, uninterrupted music without a power adapter plugged in. The hard drive and the RAM just consume too much power.

  • by ayjay29 ( 144994 ) on Thursday April 28, 2005 @02:13AM (#12369036)
    How long is the HD going to last in a phone???

    I've have four Nokia phones as I got a new one with each job i took over the past 7 years. Each on has been dropped on the floor a number of times, and generally subjected to a fair bit of abuse. All four of them work, and I have never had a problem with any them.

    I doubt a small hard drive could take this kind of punishment. One hard knock, and somethings going to break. I'd much prefer 1G of flash memory in a phone that I know will last me a few years.

  • 3000 Songs??? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by iainl ( 136759 ) on Thursday April 28, 2005 @05:40AM (#12369706)
    The BBC article claims that this 4Gb device can hold "up to 3000 songs in CD quality".

    Bollocks it does. My 4Gb iPod Mini claims to hold 1000 songs (I actually hit around 800, due to having some long stuff on there), and I don't know anyone that claims 128kbps lossy compression is actually "CD Quality". God only knows how they fudge the numbers to get that value.

"The following is not for the weak of heart or Fundamentalists." -- Dave Barry

Working...