Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Communications Businesses

Handling the General e-Mail in an Organization? 31

cheezycrust asks: "I'm part of a small organisation (four staff members, seven board members), and we get a lot of mail on our info@... email-address. Some of the questions are complex, and require input from several staff and/or board members. I'm looking for a way to track and handle these messages. It seems to be a combination of a bug tracking and a groupware system. It should be very simple to use, be platform-friendly (Windows, Mac, Pocket PC), and work on- and off-line (if I want to handle 50 messages on a train ride, this should be possible). I have a preference for free software, but the administration of the software itself should not take too much time. What solutions have you used in your organisation?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Handling the General e-Mail in an Organization?

Comments Filter:
  • Exchange Server (Score:3, Interesting)

    by RussHart ( 70708 ) on Saturday May 21, 2005 @01:06PM (#12599544) Homepage
    Know it'll be shot down here, but...

    Might only be platform independent on the client side, but is the best thing for this, giving access to mailboxes to those who need it.
    • I was going to say Outlook/Activesync can already handle that but the answer seems too easy. Maybe I'm misreading the question? I know he said free but his company probably has Office, so they would have Outlook already.
    • Why not an IMAP mail server? It should do just as much as Exchange server in this context, and there are some good free/low cost implementations.

    • by Anonymous Coward
      Exchange is anything but cross-platform. You can't therefore use it in the context of the original post.
    • by hughk ( 248126 ) on Sunday May 22, 2005 @03:07AM (#12603581) Journal
      Sorry, despite marketing info to the contrary, Exchange Server isn't enterprise ready. The file storage uses a combination of propietary technologies, which make it difficult to recover parts (it always seems easier to recover the whole message store). It certainly doesn't provide an open client interface. Those people interfacing have had a lot of hard work getting at the protocols.

      There are maintenance tools, but they aren't documented. Without source code or documentation, you can be very much in the dark.

      • Come on now, you've got to be kidding me.... Enterprise ready.... I wasn't aware that just because something is not based on open standards, it's not enterprise ready. Despite popular opinion, many IT organizations have better things to do than messing with the code of every application they want to use. I'm not saying that opensource has no place in the enterprise, but proprietary applications also have their place, and many times, it is less expensive to pay for something like exchange, knowing that if y
        • I was joking, but only slightly. Personally, I think that when Exchange and Outlook run well, they are excellent. I have been there and suffered when IT support try to restore stuff and screw up, often badly. I'm not talking Exchange Gurus there but the regular support monkeys appointed by major outsourcing vendors. The best thing about it is that Exchange Server always gives an investment bank a convenient excuse to lose email!

          Microsoft's insistence on sticking to its own standards which move on frequent

    • I have experience with Exchange and Sendmail, and some familiarity with a number of other systems including postfix and PMDF.

      I do not find any basis for your claim in my experience; AFAIK, for "giving access to mailboxes to those who need it" Exchange is pretty much equivalent to everything else out there.

      Can you explain to me how you came to the conclusion that Exhange is "the best thing for this", as you put it?
  • FogBugz (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Screaming Lunatic ( 526975 ) on Saturday May 21, 2005 @01:19PM (#12599596) Homepage
    At my last place of employment we had support emails sent directly to FogBugz. After that they were organized by priority and severity, dupe checked, and assigned to a developer to resolve. You should probably be able do that with any bug tracking software.
  • FogBuz (Score:1, Redundant)

    I believe FogBugz [fogcreek.com] is exactly what you need.
  • try basecamp (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 21, 2005 @01:31PM (#12599680)
    I absolustly adore Basecamp [basecamphq.com], which is a hosted project management system.

    It's mantra is "communication", so it's centered around posts and messages. But you can also set milestones and check off to-do's.

    It's really super-simple and flexible for different purposes. It's like the "Mac" of project management. Two fields to create a new project. One field to create a client. Three or four fields to add a new person on your team. Compare that with some other groupware or PM systems that have screenfuls of crap you have to fill out and complicated workflows that you just give up on after a week.

    It doesn't exactly handle your PocketPC (though they just added a mobile interface to their other project, backpackit.com, so they might add it to basecamp.. they are very open to user suggestions).

    And then offline thing doesn't seem like a big deal... just use text files and then upload/send them when get online?? However the basecamp folks ARE planning on letting you use email to create and respond messages someday, so that's another plus. You could just compose your messages on the train and then send them in.

    But do check out basecamp.
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Keep it simple. I know some tracking systems, OSS and commercial, and all lack of offline mode. So maybe simple email is the way to go.

    Our traking system we use atm sends emails i can read on the road. If it's on the queue where i'm the only one who's working on that i prepare the answer and send it later with the system (to be honest i don't know if the system can handle mails i send to it directly, but i know some can do that).

    Get someone who will sort the mails for you. Depends on the amount of mail
  • RT (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 21, 2005 @02:04PM (#12599861)
    • I need to second the AC parent post.

      I have been using Request Tracker for a while now and I love it, and so does my support staff and customers. It is very robust and flexible. I use Apache with mod_perl, SSL and a MySQL database, and sendmail for the mail interface. You might hit a few bumps during setup, but you should be able to work through them. There are a lot of good docs out there which walk you through the entire setup. If you haven't looked at it you should. Everything is free except the hardware
    • Amen, Brother! (Score:5, Informative)

      by cjsnell ( 5825 ) on Saturday May 21, 2005 @03:33PM (#12600392) Journal

      RT has been a godsend for our company. Before I installed it, sales-at-ourcompany.com was getting deluged with e-mail from customers and spammers. Customers' questions were getting ignored and they were getting pissed. Our customer service reps were frustrated and the lack of coordination resulted in multiple replies to customers' questions.

      Enter RT. It took me about 45 minutes to get it up and running and to master the basics. An hour later, I had all my reps trained on it and answering questions. Later that afternoon, I wrote a simple web interface [totaltrak.com] for customers to contact us with. I created seperate queues for Customer Service, Billing, and Technical Support and the web interface routed questions to these queues appropriately.

      But it gets better...I quickly discovered that RT is useful for much more than customer service. Our software development team uses it to keep track of bugs. The eBay team uses it to track auction questions and payment problems. Even the guys on our brick-and-mortar sales floor use it to keep track of special orders.

      It's also super-customizable. It's written using Mason [masonhq.com], which happens to be what I used to build all of our websites. When a customer creates a support ticket, the rep viewing his ticket sees a pane containing the customer's entire order history, including the status and FedEx tracking numbers for each order.

      Best of luck,

      Chris
  • sounds like you need a workflow system.

    If you don't mind proprietary systems you might consider Lotus Workplace (based on websphere and DB2).

    It has advanced workflow systems and of course everything essential to groupware.

    Ontop of that the Workplace product line has clients for Linux, Mac and Win32.

    It also has replication features so you can have your data with you when traveling, and syncing the next time you go online.

    With their express offerings IBM has made the product relatively affordable too for
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Maybe Bugzilla (http://www.bugzilla.org/ [bugzilla.org] can do the trick for you. It's free and it has Email integration. Also I think SuSE had a System like that based on a News Server which also means platform independent offline support.
  • by natmsincome.com ( 528791 ) <adinobro@gmail.com> on Sunday May 22, 2005 @06:51PM (#12607668) Homepage
    2 of the three I recommend have already been mentioned. RT and Fogbugz.

    The last one is Cerberus Help Desk [cerberusweb.com] which is what we picked in the end. It's not free but it is low cost. Basically it's designed for help desk work instead of the more generic request tracking.

    What does that mean? Well you can:
    *Say how long it took to handel an email
    *Assign billable time
    *Create Service level Agreements
    *Look at about 15 different built in reports
    *use the knowledge base build in.
    *Teach it's fuzzy logic engine that looks up knowledge base articales based on the content of the email.
    *Setup Mutliple groups which can't see each others tickets based.
    *Add custom feilds

    So far I've been very impressed with it.
  • Seriously, nobody sorts questions faster than our secretary who is the funnel of all info@blah.com.

    If needed she forwards to Help Desk or Engineer or Production or Marketing. You cannot automate info questions but tracking them is a different story we have a custom web app she uses to assign info request to depts of course this requires constantly training her who does what but it sure beats all of us recieving the same mail and then checking to see whose working it. All requests must get resolved in some

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...