Google's Secret Lab 203
Voelspriet writes "The mystery behind
eval.google.com should be solved soon. It's a secret lab of Google. Real
people, from all over the world, are paid to finetune the index of Google,
reveals Searchbistro, a new weblog of
the Dutch reporter
Henk van Ess. A Flash-movie shows some screens of Google's 'Rater Hub', Full
details about Eval.Google will be published later this week.
Oops! (Score:2)
Re:Oops! (Score:2)
Re:Oops! (Score:2, Funny)
Lab. (Score:1)
Re:Lab. (Score:1)
Google have secrets you can't even begin to imagine, like this toast [tinyurl.com]!
Eval?... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Eval?... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Eval?... (Score:2)
I think the mystery of google's secret sauce of search engine algorithms has finally crumbled. Now I wouldn't be surprised pigeonrank [google.com] was true or not.
And perhaps they need to employ somebody other than young teenagers with left hand typing skills - see the image search results for RSS [google.co.in].. (mm.. seductively feathered pigeons comment ? ).
Whew! (Score:5, Interesting)
<sarcasm>
Finally...past noon on the East Coast and still no Google Slashdot story....I was beginning to get worried.
</sarcasm>
From TFA:
OK...so the best search engine is people. Well, as long as you have the scratch to pay these international agents (which Google certainly has), it seems like a great idea. If this arrangement can cut some of the spam, hallelujah, although I'm wondering just who chooses which sites are the 'right sites' to ocupy the top of the list...
Anyone know where I can put in an app?
Re:Whew! (Score:4, Interesting)
This is just a plain-old good idea, I'm not surprised that Google is doing it, or that Yahoo! did it first.
Disclaimer: I used to work for Yahoo!
Also, the majority of the female Surfers at Y! were gorgeous when I worked there. But that's neither here nor there.
Re:Whew! (Score:2)
Hiring hot chicks is ALSO just a plain-old good idea.
Re:Whew! (Score:2)
Re:Whew! (Score:3, Funny)
so the best search engine is people.
</Charlton Heston voice>
Google is the Soylent Green of search engines!
Re:Whew! (Score:1)
Re:Whew! (Score:1)
Hatcher: I promise, Tiger. I promise. I'll tell the exchange.
Det. Thorn: You tell everybody. Listen to me, Hatcher. You've gotta tell them! Google is people! We've gotta stop them somehow!
Soylent Google (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Whew! (Score:2)
Obligatory Matrix Tie-in (Score:2)
SEO employee: Our client listings got kicked from the first page of Google. I don't k
Bias? (Score:2)
Re:Bias? (Score:2)
On top of that, why isn't this the way you want to do it? Essentially, what this is doing is highering a bunch of low rate librarians, or researchers, figuring out a computational way to amplify their results so that i can scale to a huge number of people (rather than just a few) and then running with it.
Re:Whew! (Score:2)
I assume you mean "agent" to read "sweatshop worker"
Asia and South America? Where the wages are "extreme" to say the least.
Re:Whew! (Score:2)
The wages may be extreme, but the cost of living is also "extreme" in the same way.
Re:Whew! (Score:1)
They'd put these little quiz/application things in the student newspaper here (UIUC) all the time last year. It usually consisted of a bunch of pattern finding / abstract thought questions. I think this must be what they were actually applications for.
Re:Whew! (Score:2)
Re:Whew! (Score:2)
How is paying them to do so better?
Re:Biased lab. (Score:1)
Re:Biased lab. (Score:3, Interesting)
Of course, this isn't so much a bug as a documented feature - Google automatically searches for morphologically similar keywords. But what typica
Evil (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Evil (Score:1)
Re:Evil (Score:1)
secret lab (Score:1)
Wouldn't this look better? (Score:2)
make sure you don't let google search it or it might be come known.
Re:Wouldn't this look better? (Score:1)
Don't you love it (Score:2)
Do no eval (Score:5, Funny)
</bad puns>
Re:Do no eval (Score:1)
Proof of the Evil Bit (Score:3, Funny)
eval -> 01100101011101100110000101101100
evil -> 01100101011101100110100101101100
Google has obviously turned off the Evil Bit.
Real people? (Score:2)
Re:Real people? (Score:1)
Re:Real people? (Score:2)
http://www.google.com/technology/pigeonrank.html [google.com]
Oh no! Secret labs! (Score:1)
Re:Oh no! Secret labs! (Score:1)
There aren't many people evaluating pages (Score:2)
surprise ? (Score:2, Insightful)
Their pagerank system, while incredibly good, is not infalliable, and requires some checks and balances.
Did they ever say directly that they didnt use humans to check up on the system?
I dont really see what the big secret is here..
Re:surprise ? (Score:1)
Gotta love the mainstream media. (Score:1, Funny)
As opposed to imaginary people that exist only in my head.
Hey, wait a minute...! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Hey, wait a minute...! (Score:2)
Give a man a fish, he owes you one fish.
Teach a man to fish, you give up your monopoly on fisheries.
Give a man a fish, he owes you one fish.
Teach many men to fish, you create healthy competition, and collect on fishing IP licensing.
Re:Hey, wait a minute...! (Score:1)
pigeon (Score:1, Troll)
--
http://unk1911.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com]
Google Slashdotted (Score:1)
Secret Lab? (Score:5, Funny)
'Cause while I'm sure there are many Phd's there... I'd like to think none of them went to evil medical school.
NB: Not responsible for the reactions of the humor impaired.
Re:Secret Lab? (Score:2)
Re:Secret Lab? (Score:2)
Erotic Writing (Score:1)
"Erotic Writing"
Looks like this google agent is enjoying his job.
Google Rocks! (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Google Rocks! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Google Rocks! (Score:2, Funny)
Dude, I don't know, but shutup about it.
If the people find some infinite wisdom in it then more points for me :)
Re:Google Rocks! (Score:2)
Can't get to the link... (Score:1, Offtopic)
What about slashdot editors setting up a mirror before posting?
Re:Can't get to the link... (Score:1)
Re:Can't get to the link... (Score:1)
Google, as always, has the answer. [google.com]
proof of their pur eval (Score:1)
proof of their eval - they are #4 most phishiest hosting company!
(anyone have an explanation for this?)
Re:proof of their pur eval (Score:1)
This doesn't surprise me at all. (Score:1)
The system is widely distributed (read: international), low cost (read: $20 an hour), with no single point of failure, every person can be replaced if they break down, because it's been factored into the design! They apply the same Zerg mentality to everything!
Mirror!!! (Score:2)
Unfortunately... (Score:2)
Re:Unfortunately... (Score:5, Informative)
Oh My God! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Oh My God! (Score:2)
Raters (Score:1, Flamebait)
[rant]
Do the folks who meta-mod the raters actually get more rater points, or is it like a certain well-known site (hint: rhymes with "cashbot") where you can meta-mod all the time and never get to mod?
Every time I ignore that certain site (rhymes with "'stache rot") for a few weeks and come back, voila, I'm rewarded with mod points. I don't like that. When I come back after being away, I want to spout off, not critique. Gimme mod points after I've been active ever
Re:Raters (Score:3, Funny)
So it works just fine.
Re:Raters (Score:2)
A few years old (Score:3, Informative)
Google, google google, google (Score:2)
Re:Google, google google, google (Score:1)
Someone already has. [googledot.org]
Terry
$20 an hour (Score:2)
Am I the only one... (Score:2)
Slashdotted. (Score:2)
manual review...not a 'secret lab' (Score:2)
MOD PARENT UP (Score:2)
Agggh!!! (Score:3, Funny)
I bet their labs have more than that! (Score:2)
Burns: It was the best of times, it was the blurst of times!
Re:I bet their labs have more than that! (Score:2)
Google now advertising with Aurora (Score:1)
Secret lab discovered? Time to call in... (Score:3, Funny)
IronChefMorimoto
Where's the beef in that? (Score:2)
Of course they're evaluating their search and ranking technology all the time. It's also evolving all the time. And of course there's a site where you can log into from all over the world (google is global you know) and of course this site is restricted to those people they hired to do the job.
Way to toot your own horn. (Score:2, Informative)
Henk van Ess
Domain Name: SEARCHBISTRO.COM
Registrant:
voelspriet.nl
regenboog 36
amersfoort 3824ED
Netherlands
Registered through: GoDaddy.com
Domain Name: SEARCHBISTRO.COM
Created on: 22-May-05
Expires on: 22-May-07
Last Updated on: 22-May-05
Administrative Contact:
van ess, henk henk@vaness.nl
voelspriet.nl
regenboog 36
amersfoort 3824ED
Netherlands
(084) 222-8995 Fax -- (084) 222-8995
Tec
Flash animation on second server (Score:2, Informative)
I've put the Flash-animation of eval.google.com on a second [zoekzone.com] server.
I know what this is..... (Score:2)
(eval is the Russian for Beowulf cluster of Old Korean people)
Google REPL? (Score:2)
Huh? (Score:2)
Huh? (Score:2)
Google sells out (Score:2)
Re:Eval ~ Evil??? (Score:1)
Re:Eval ~ Evil??? (Score:2)
Re:YAGS (Score:3, Funny)
Re:YAGS (Score:2)
Re:YAGS (Score:2)
Your website says you work for Microsoft.
Somehow, I'm unsurprised.
Re:Like /. Moderation?? (Score:1)
how do you know I don't want to see baseball links when google for '...midget and with a bat'