New Google Homepage Features 274
SecularG writes "It seems that Google has added new features to it's Personalized Home. To edit the content of your personalized homepage you click 'Add Content' in the top right, and a list of options slide out from the left. You can add your own bookmarks, select from more news feeds, and add your own RSS news feeds." Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?
Obviously... (Score:5, Funny)
Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?
It takes less bandwidth to see a dupe headline with RSS than it does when one reloads the entire slashdot mainpage. [rimshot]
Re:Obviously... (Score:2)
note: the current story is this one right here [slashdot.org].
Re:Obviously... (Score:2, Insightful)
Securityfocus, blogsites, infinite matter of the universe. I think being able to have your own home page with rss feeds is great!
Re:Obviously... (Score:2)
Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?
It takes less bandwidth to see a dupe headline with RSS than it does when one reloads the entire slashdot mainpage. [rimshot]
Because Slashdot has become a mirror for other sites, only 24-48 hours late?
Re:Obviously... (Score:2, Interesting)
There is something I think you may have missed - You can search for your own entry (or enter a url) if it isn't in Google's stock list.
Just click on "Create a Section" at the bottom of the sidebar, and you will get a search box.
I have already used it to add "This Day in History".
Michael
Re:Obviously... (Score:2)
Re:Obviously... (Score:3, Informative)
Yes. I have seen that happen at least once.
Re:Obviously... (Score:2)
GOOGLE spelled backwards is Echelon
Re:Obviously... (Score:2)
Countdown until Google.com looks like (Score:3, Insightful)
RSS eliminates the need for web portals entirely. You can just use the RSS functionality of Safari for a home page, or make a local page with the RSS feeds you want to see.
Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like (Score:5, Interesting)
On the other hand, I don't think that Google as a whole will turn into Yahoo!. The main Google page will likely always stay simple, whereas the personalized homepage is just for people who want portal stuff. The one advantage that a Google RSS/portal has is the same that Gmail has: everywhere you go, regardless of what computer you're on, it's the same interface and setup. You don't need to configure an RSS reader on each computer you use: just go to Google.com/ig. Same with Gmail.
Also, the dhtml sliding options pane on the left is nifty, but I can't help but think that it's going overboard a little bit.
Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like (Score:2)
Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like (Score:2)
Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like (Score:2)
Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like (Score:5, Informative)
use search.yahoo.com for a bare bones interface
Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like (Score:5, Insightful)
That would be like taking your car into the mechanic with a transmission problem and having him scoff at you, "Pffft. Go build yourself a new one. Moron."
The large majority of net users don't know what RSS means. They don't know HTML. Web Portals let people click on things and have a familiar feel to them. People only need to know one little address to get to a place where they can find "everything" on the web.
Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like (Score:2)
I want a web page version of Thunderbird, myself. This is heading toward it, with gmail and rss on there. If I could only delete the stuff I have read from the rss lists, I would delete Thunderbird and use this portal everywhere.
J.
your other... (Score:2, Offtopic)
Re:your other... (Score:2)
And once again, someone posting the parent story doesn't know it's from its.
Anyone keeping count? (how many in a row is this?)
I think if its were used in every parent story, they'd have a 98% chance of being correct. Rarely is it's actually used|needed.
Gmail (Score:2, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Top left (Score:5, Funny)
He's talking about the computer 's right.
Re:Top left (Score:2)
sorry but your browser is not supported (Score:5, Informative)
- Netscape 7.1+ (download: Windows Mac Linux)
- Mozilla 1.4+ (download: Windows Mac Linux)
- Mozilla Firefox 0.8+ (download: Windows Mac Linux)
- Safari 1.2.1+ (download: Mac)
Many other browsers work with Gmail's basic HTML view, including:
- Microsoft IE 4.0+
- Netscape 4.07+
- Opera 6.03+
Konqueror users are still SOL
Re:sorry but your browser is not supported (Score:2, Insightful)
Lynx users are SOL too!
Seriously though, they did manage to make sure it works with 99.5% of all the web browsers currently out there. Nobody is forcing you to be that 0.5%.
Change your UA (Score:2)
Re:sorry but your browser is not supported (Score:2, Informative)
Re:sorry but your browser is not supported (Score:2)
2. Web archiver. I use it frequently.
3. Split windows.
4. Perfect integration into my OS. None of the others do that at all, even to the slightest degree.
There are other minor things. But it's more of a situation of what I DON'T LIKE about the other browsers. I simply do not like them.
First of, M$ is not even in the picture here, nor is MAC.
That leaves Opera, which has SHIT for fonts.
And then the
Re:sorry but your browser is not supported (Score:3, Interesting)
http://img223.imageshack.us/my.php?image=omfgx130 9 ea.jpg [imageshack.us]
I use a 21" Sony Trinitron CRT at 1400x1050 at 112hz
Be aware that jpeg compression makes the fonts in this snapshot look *much* worse than they are when live.
This is *after* I tweaked Firefox to use the same fonts (Suse Sans 12).. They do NOT look the same despite that they are both configured to use the same fonts at the same resolution.
I rest my case.
Re:sorry but your browser is not supported (Score:3, Insightful)
You may choose to use Konqueror for a list of valid reasons, but in terms of fonts, I think your case is far from rested.
Re:sorry but your browser is not supported (Score:2)
Firefox does not render the fonts the same.
In this image you can see that links in firefox are so heavy they just ugly. It does NOT look the same, no matter what size the fonts are set at.
Looking at browsers all day is like looking at women.
You may look at a woman and think "Wow, she's hot!" and I may look at her and think "Damn, that ho is fugly!" It's all a matter of personal preference.
And here's Opera and Konq side by side
http://img149.imag [imageshack.us]
Re:sorry but your browser is not supported (Score:3, Insightful)
A dud? (Score:4, Interesting)
For whatever reason it won't display the weather for my location (Hamilton ON) [ec.gc.ca]. I don't particularly like the way it displays my g-mail info, and would like to change the arrangement and width of the blocks.
All in all this one actually looks like a beta - dull, uninspired, and not fully realized.
Re:A dud? (Score:2)
For someone that has *never* used an RSS feed I see a benefit: I don't need a program to see the RSS feeds as my browser goes straight to this page when it opens and I can see everything I need to see in one shot (except Slashdot which isn't up-to-date enough for me).
Being that I don't know any better, with regards to how RSS feeds can be modified, I am quite happy with it. I can keep up w/my friends' RSS shit and I don't have to rememb
Re:A dud? (Score:5, Insightful)
This is the 21st century, people! Let's start using those SI units that everybody* has agreed on.
*The States not included
Weather (Score:2)
Re:A dud? (Score:2)
Woah, for a second I thought I was on deviantart.com.
Does this thing work at all? (Score:2)
I go to the "news" section and increase the number of stories from 3 to 5 and, nope, it keeps 3.
I go add a "gmail" section and it does nothing?
Is this thing working at all? I can't seem to be able to save / configure anything.
Re:Does this thing work at all? (Score:2)
I just tried it on IE And it works, seems like it's a problem with my version of Firefox (perhaps a conflict with one of my extensions?)
Re:Does this thing work at all? (Score:2)
I just tried it on IE And it works, seems like it's a problem with my version of Firefox (perhaps a conflict with one of my extensions?) Make sure you're accepting the relevant cookies from [www.]google.com; it sounds like Firefox is rejecting them, causing Google to load default content.
Re:Does this thing work at all? (Score:2)
Re:Does this thing work at all? (Score:2)
No Java in that page. Likely your 'noscript' plugin was the culprit.
Re:Does this thing work at all? (Score:2)
My FF version is 1.0.6 and I have the following extensions: FlashGot (0.5.9.7), Adblock (0.5.2.039), NoScript (1.0.9), ForecastFox (0.8.1.1), Tabbrowser (1.2.7.1), Gmail Notifier (0.4.3), StumbleUpon (2.02), ImageZoom (0.1.7.1), Download Tweak (0.6.6), FoxyTunes (1.1.1), fireFTP (0.88.3), ShowIP (0.7.10), SessionSaver2, Flashblock (1.2.9), DictionarySear
Uh ... (Score:2)
Because... (Score:2, Insightful)
awesome (Score:2, Interesting)
too bad limewire doesnt have rss feeds for its files...
Not updated (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Not updated (Score:3, Informative)
Slashdot feed (Score:5, Funny)
It's good to be reminded that Slashdot is a Technology, not a Lifestyle.
highly editorialized? (Score:4, Interesting)
But I can see how someone might see this as liberal bias. "Where's my Washington Times, or Fox News feed??" And then some people will complain the other way -- "How come I can't get my Democracy Now feed on the home page??"
Maybe I just take the position that I like their choices and to those who complain about not having their own right-wing news feeds available, I say, go and create your own Google, losers. On the other hand, is it dangerous for one company to filter the available options so dramatically? You don't have to use their homepage, but when one provider is so dominant, you can't avoid issues like that...
ps. I believe the page now lets you input your own choice of xml feeds...
Re:highly editorialized? (Score:4, Informative)
Fox News (US & World) RSS Feed [foxnews.com]
Fox News RSS List [foxnews.com]
The Washington Times appears to offer their headlines via RSS only to subscribers.
Democracy Now [democracynow.org]
Re:highly editorialized? (Score:2, Interesting)
This one claims liberal bias, http://google.blognewschannel.com/index.php/archiv es/2005/05/04/google-accused-of-liberal-bias/ [blognewschannel.com]
The truth is that Google news simply shows results that are more left and right instead of just stuff in the middle. I like to see this approach more than a homogenized result. http://blog.searchengine [searchenginewatch.com]
Add RSS capability to the Google toolbar (Score:2, Interesting)
How do you make money with this? (Score:2, Interesting)
Google can not really commercialize this portal with the fear of getting sued [finfacts.com] by the news media.
Or does it think that by giving away these freebies, it would attract more users to their search engine which seems to be the primary source of all their profits.
Can anyone justify the price for google stock?
Re:How do you make money with this? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:How do you make money with this? (Score:2)
As for the stock price -- $300/share for a company that lives and dies by text ads? I'd wait for the correction.
You know what would be cool ... (Score:2, Interesting)
Currently they have a plugin that syncs to an FTP server. This is cool but not everyone has a web-accessible ftp server handy. Everyone can, however, personalize their google account.
--
Wiki's (Score:3, Informative)
won't work with customize google ff extension (Score:5, Informative)
Ask Yahoo! (Score:3, Interesting)
del.icio.us (Score:2)
didn't work for me. has anyone tried it?
Re:del.icio.us (Score:2)
It looks to me as if what Google is actually doing is letting us add RSS feeds from some sort of "approved list of feeds", rather than letting us add any feed we wish. If so, lame.
Lame bookmarking feature (Score:2)
They should just let me import my bookmarks from elsewhere. For example, from Simpy, using its REST API:
http://www.simpy.com/simpy/service/api/rest/ [simpy.com]
Feed URLs need .xml or .rss extension! (Score:2)
Otherwise the OK button does nudda.
Subscribing vs. tickering... (Score:2)
it's/its (Score:2)
Re:it's/its (Score:2)
Nothing compared to Yahoo and MyWay (Score:2)
Start.com (Score:2, Interesting)
Slashdot banned me (Score:2)
I just re-added Slashdot and will try them again. Last time I got temp banned for accessing their RSS feed too often. I guess that's what happens if you have Google Fusion as your start page. I hope Google has since updated their service so for each account accessing their page, Google don't *always* ask for the RSS feeds you subscribe to.
Re:Google not the innovator here. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Google not the innovator here. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Google not the innovator here. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Google not the innovator here. (Score:2)
Re:Google not the innovator here. (Score:2)
Re:Google not the innovator here. (Score:2)
"Yahoo somehow managed to time travel back in time to steal Google's great new innovative idea... those bastards!"...
It has elements of sci-fi, our beloved time travel, and it implies Yahoo is evil (even though they are not), since only evil people travel back in time to gain an advantage. That, and the fact that it still gets the point across that Yahoo did it first...
Re:Google not the innovator here. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Google not the innovator here. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:wait..! (Score:2)
Re:News? (Score:2)
Re:How freaking difficult is this? (Score:5, Funny)
Because it's illogical: most other possessives have an apostrophe. And a short survey of modern English usage (as seen, for example, on Slashdot) will tell you that the usage is changing: quite possibly the apostrophe in the possessive "it's" will be the norm in a few years time.
Still, I'm glad you're not pompous.
Re:How freaking difficult is this? (Score:2, Informative)
Like Your's, Hi's, Her's, Their's, and Our's?
I wish the language would evolve in the opposite direction and lose the apostrophe, everywhere.
Re:How freaking difficult is this? (Score:2, Redundant)
All possessive pronouns do not use apostrophes.
His
Hers
Yours
Mine
Theirs
Ours
Its
There is no magic to this rule.
No it won't (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:How freaking difficult is this? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Oh SNAP (Score:2, Troll)
If it's common enough, it's not a mistake any longer.
Re:Oh SNAP (Score:2)
Re:Selling out (again)? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Selling out (again)? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Selling out (again)? (Score:2)
As long as it's "free as in beer" and runs on Linux, otherwise, hit the road...
Re:Selling out (again)? (Score:2)
Re:old news man (Score:2)
Of course, if you wanted that, you could just go straight to Yahoo!.
Re:Google keeps doing it. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Shuttle launch (Score:2)