Preview of KDE 3.5 402
tr_x_data writes "There is a quite interesting KDE 3.5 preview with screenshots on JLP's Blog. I thought there wouldn't be so much improvement to KDE 3.4 since everyone is working on porting KDE4 to QT4, but obviously there are quite a few changes. Look forward to "Storage Media Notification", "Adblock" for Konqueror, new Tooltips, better Workspace-Pager, and so on. Read for yourself."
It looks good... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:It looks good... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:It looks good... (Score:2)
I used to think that the zooming icons were annoying, until I set my taskbar to be tiny. Then it was usable. And if you need that taskbar to be anything smaller than tiny, then you must have incredible eyesight. :)
Re:It looks good... (Score:2)
If it hasn't been removed somewhere along the development line, you *can* adjust the size of the kicker bar. Just go into the control panel and look for the Panel settings. You should be able to find a size that's more suitable to your tastes.
Re:It looks good... (Score:2)
Re:It looks good... (Score:2)
Re:It looks good... (Score:3, Interesting)
Is it just me, or does that media recognition window look eerily like the one in Windows XP? The longer I use KDE, the more it feels like Windows. I don't want it to feel like Windows. It seems to me that the Linux community doesn't have a creative bone in its collective body when it comes to GUI design. Can't we do better than just emulating Windows or Mac OS X?
Re:It looks good... (Score:3, Insightful)
Interesting. It seems to me that the "Linux community" that produces applications are programmers, who will probably treat GUI design as secondary. It also seems to me that the "creative community" is not really interested in *sharing* their work the way programmers do. Maybe if a few graphic artists and GUI folks were less self centered they would contribute to some of these projects. In
Re:It looks good... (Score:3, Insightful)
The second point I will make, the most repeated one, is that Apple and MS do things for
Re:It looks good... (Score:3, Interesting)
If you haven't INITIALLY done it that way, another way is to go through KControl (KDE Control Center) and then under "LookNFeel" click on "Panels"
There, you have two nice options to try in the "Arrangement" tab, subsection "Length":
click the box for "Expand as required to fit contents" and THEN set the slider to say, 50% or whatever you want. You'll still have blank space to the left or right if you've centered the bar,
Don't Interrupt (Score:5, Interesting)
A better way to do it would be to stick a little message notification bubble above the system tray. This would also prevent movies from auto-running.
A big problem with XP is that DVD movies often have crap software that auto-installs on the computers of people who don't know any better. If OSS wants to become a widely used desktop, then it needs to be better than the status quo, rather than a copy. This means that it has to protect users rather than facilitate spyware and junk.
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:5, Interesting)
Nice (Score:2)
A better way to do it would be to stick a little message notification bubble above the system tray. This would also prevent movies from auto-running.
That's a good idea. I don't know that autoinstall is a problem because you have to choose an action before anything happens, according to the synopsis. However, I've always hated autorun because it's intrusive - if I put a disc in, I probably know what I want to do with it, and it's guesses are usually wrong.
A nice little bubble as you suggest would help a lo
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:2)
That might be difficult to get wrong, considering that Windows software usually does not work on Linux
One would have to spend considerable effort to integrate something like Wine into KDE, just to facilitate spyware and junk. Not likely.
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:2, Informative)
The easiest way to handle this? Disable AutoPlay.
I find it best to disable CD or DVD autoplay in XP using either local group policy or, for an enterprise, an Active Directory group policy.
The local group policy editor method:
* Click Start
* Click Run
* Enter GPEDIT.MSC
Group Policy mmc will popup. On left panel:
* Double-click Computer C
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:4, Insightful)
It needs to come up with something more useful before the other OSs come up with it. If people see that Windows pops up with a window notifying them that their SD card is now ready to be read they will expect that everywhere else.
People don't consider it an "interruption" they expect that window to appear and if it doesn't it's not acceptable.
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:2, Interesting)
Currently if there's an autorun, windows runs it. Fine for installers, generally.
If it's some sort of removeable media with no autorun, it'll scan the disk then ask you what you want to do. Unfortunately, sometimes you can't tell it to do the same action every time (it hides the checkbox) or even if you tell it to do that, it'll ignore your setting and prompt you again anyway.
What'd be nice is an option for either no notification, or a simple "Your device is ready" popup
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:2)
That's what we would prefer with our understanding of the computer world. It doesn't work like that for other people's viewpoint.
They see a window show up telling them what to do and the second that another OS doesn't do exactly that they don't feel comfortable.
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:2)
God, I hope not. Copying is easy -- vision is hard.
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:2)
Currently if I plug in a USB HD, windows spends several minutes with a popup window telling me it's searching for an autorun file. While this is easy to turn off for a CD drive, I have yet to figure out how to tell windows to stop for a removable drive that actually gets removed.
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:2)
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:2)
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:2)
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:2)
Assuming you meant "intuitive", I do not think it means what you think it means.
It means "obvious" and "natural", something discovered through intuition [die.net] rather than reasoning. It does not mean "practical".
A little notification can easily be missed, and is thus not intuitive, even if it might be more practical.
The popup asking you what to do can't be missed and is fairly obvious, making it intuitive, but maybe a little annoying.
There is sometimes a trade-off between practical and intuitive. It is
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:2)
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:2)
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:3, Interesting)
unless you consider SUSE, Novell Linux Desktop (which provides both desktops equally), Mandriva, Linspire, Xandros, Knoppix, etc, etc, etc as inconsequential "one man band" distros (well, Knoppix may still be a one person effort, not sure), then your argument is demonstrably false.
about a year and a half ago ESR claimed during a radio interview that KDE would be irrelevant by now. he basically used this exact same argument and yet
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:2)
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:2)
I don't run Debian, though I have tried most of those other Distros (and one could argue that Knoppix, MEPIS, and Ubuntu are Debian, since that's the baseline for those distros).
Re:Don't Interrupt (Score:2)
Err, here's a free clue ... Ubuntu and Mandriva are not the most used "big distros aimed at commercial organisations", ergo. distrowatch.com is not measuring what you are implying they are measuring.
Another way of looking at it is this, using the above "results" the "number 1" distro. is dpkg based ... this i
Wow! (Score:5, Funny)
Lack of freezing is always good. (Score:2)
Although I'm quite enthused for the new feature in home: I like the idea of having a mac-like user folder so easily accesible for things like dropbox functionality.
Way to go (Score:2)
looks (Score:2)
Can't comment on the feel. Last time I tried to get KDE running on top of OS X it did nothing (unless crashing is one of its hidden features).
Re:looks (Score:2)
I *really* want KDE on OS X. Why doesn't the version in Fink for 10.4 compile correctly?
BAH HUMBUG!
Warning about the comments in the linked-to blog (Score:2, Informative)
It might be a good idea for the blog author to turn off commenting for this post.
Reading the comments on that site.... (Score:5, Funny)
Meh (Score:2, Funny)
Konq gets adblock, yay! (Score:2)
Re:Konq gets adblock, yay! (Score:2)
I miss KDE 1.0 (Score:3, Interesting)
It was light, fast, stable, and pretty enough. Using wmaker right now because XFCE4 has a few drawbacks. While I might look at KDE 3.5 just to see, i still might cobble together all the 1.0 code and try to run it on my fbsd 5.4/athlon system. It oughta fly balls!
It oughta fly balls? (Score:2)
Re:I miss KDE 1.0 (Score:2)
Re:I miss KDE 1.0 (Score:3, Insightful)
Desktop icons aligning properly yet? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Desktop icons aligning properly yet? (Score:4, Informative)
But I also have "Line up Vertically" and "Line up Horizontally" commands which...well I think do exactly as you wish
This is in KDE 3.4 by the way...
I think KDE needs a new default icon set (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:I think KDE needs a new default icon set (Score:3, Interesting)
That horribly bright WinXP-clone icon theme needs to go if KDE wants to gain any credibility.
I recommend Slick as the new default. It already comes with KDE, so there's no need to package anything new. It's also the single best icon set out there--it's very sleek, and it's also quite unique. I've yet to see any other icon set that resembles Slick in any way. Did I mention that it lives up to its name?
It would also be nice if KDE were to adopt Slick's subdued colour scheme as their main colour scheme-
KDE4-win32 (Score:2)
Imagine Windows (or ReactOS), running KDE as the desktop, with applications like Firefox on top. This is Windows?
Can they fix 3.4.1 please? (Score:2)
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106274 [kde.org]
Tell you the truth, I've actually moved to Thunderbird + Enigmail now - it rocks.
Re:Can they fix 3.4.1 please? (Score:2)
Konqueror? (Score:2)
I know you could argue that Google should make them work but Konqueror has such a small market share that I know Google will not.
Will the new version of KDE render faster? Use the 3d in my video card for eye candy?
Re:Konqueror? (Score:3, Interesting)
Google maps has been working pretty well for me for the last month or so. For some reason I don't get the intial "default" map of the US that I get in Firefox when I connect, but otherwise typing in addresses, GPS coordinates, etc into the search bar and/or getting directions seems to be working for me reasonably well in Konqueror.
If you add "fc=1" to your query it'll bypass that obnoxious "you aren't using a 'supported' browser!" warning, too (e.g. "http://maps.google.com/?fc=1").
YMMV - I'm a compulsive
Re:This is the dumbest post I have ever posted (Score:5, Funny)
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=152845&cid=12
ac.
Re:This is the dumbest post I have ever posted (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:This is the dumbest post I have ever posted (Score:3, Insightful)
Not that I'm complaining. 3.4 is an awesome release, and makes KDE feel a lot more solid.
Re:Bubblegum? (Score:5, Interesting)
Personally, I've always found the resemblance to Windows to be entirely superficial, and KDE's excellent integration across a wide-range of apps and its nifty kio_slaves (along with a whole bunch of other reasons) made me fall in love with it. I'll let a GNOME fan argue the other side :)
Re:Bubblegum? (Score:3, Interesting)
More than that, the unchangable UI things need some improvement. KDE has really bad right-click menus in almost all cases. The options availible there need to be pruned down, moved into sub-menus, or "hidden" as accelerators attached to clic
Re:Bubblegum? (Score:3, Interesting)
I disagree, so that blows the whole "everyone" argument out of the water. I find Gnome to be uglier and less useful. I think Gnome's goals of simplicity are good, but those of us who are used to the power and supposed "complexity" of KDE find
Re:Bubblegum? (Score:3, Insightful)
More than that, the unchangable UI things need some improvement. KDE has really bad right-click menus in almost all cases. The options availible there need to be pruned down, moved into sub-menus, or "hidden" as accelerators attached to clicks.
I'm a big fan of the "hermetic interface", where simple commands are availible from the menus, buttons, and so forth, but really powerful commands are "hidden". They don't clutter the UI, the newbie doesn't care about them, and the old-hands will find out how to use t
Re:Bubblegum? (Score:3, Interesting)
How does it make technical sense for a file-browser and a web-browser to "use the same code"? I've never heard a good reason for this and believe that KDE just copied Windows in this respect. Microsoft made Windows behave this way so that they could more easily make the claim that IE was an integral part of Windows and could not be removed.
Re:Incremental Changes (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Incremental Changes (Score:5, Informative)
Google Search of KDE Change Logs [google.com]
Changes KDE 3.5 (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Incremental Changes (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Bloat (Score:2)
You don't 'need' to install them all.
kdebase and kdelibs contain the core environment, and while not being stripped to the bone, are hardly bloated.
The specific example you have problems with ktuberling (Potato Head) is actually contained in the additional package "kdegames".
k3b is in the additional package "extragear"
Re:Bloat (Score:2)
Re:Bloat (Score:2)
On the other hand its quite handy to have a raft of similar/associated applications installed together, since users will often then "browse" and be impressed or surprised when they stumble across something interesting.
But again... the original post
Re:Bloat (Score:2)
Such as? Care to point any tangible examples? If you are referring to the number of apps, then the solution is simple: don't install them.
Re:Bloat (Score:2)
I find KDE has a lot of bloat (KDE 4 should have less to my understanding). K3B is still the most useful burning app but really, who needs an icky looking Mr. Potatoe Head game as an included part of a desktop environment.
I don't burn CDs very often, so I think I'll call KDE bloated so long as it has K3B. On the other hand, my little brother uses the "icky" game all the time.
Maybe we shouldn't rush to call something bloated just because it has a feature we don't use often. Plenty of other people us
Re:Bloat (Score:2)
Still, there definitely is *something* taking up more ram, but whether that is the system maturing, bloat, or somewhere inbetween is not entirely clear.
KDE 3.4 is really slow on a Pentium MMX class machine with 192 mb of ram.
Soemtimes, you have to make sacrifices. However, XP can run on that machine nicely. I haven't found a Window manager to make such a machine run properly (and conviently), so I bought new discount new motherboards with integrated vi
Re:Bloat (Score:2)
It doesn't. K3B isn't part of KDE at all. It's just perhaps the best CD/DVD burning application available on Linux, and it just happens to be built using KDE libraries.
Re:Bloat (Score:5, Insightful)
People who say that Gnome or KDE are bloated need to be slapped, because they invariably have no idea what "bloat" means.
Both DEs are designed around a functional, reusable framework. In essence, every single thing you see is like a shared library. This allows the end-user applications to have a huge amount of functionality with little work, and is almost the antithesis of bloat.
If KMyMoney had code to allow me to load and save my accounts over an SFTP (or IMAP or webdav) connection, I'd agree with you. However, it simply uses the kio-slave features of KDE to support that automatically (as does almost every other KDE application). It's not bloat to include an excellent programmer's editor in every application when that editor is written as an embeddable object. It's not bloat when Konqueror can view PDFs because KPDF is written as an embeddable object.
I really don't think you have any idea what you're talking about. Writing the same code individually for each application would be a tremendous waste of resources. Designing the system from the ground up to lean heavily on reusable objects and a featureful core system is nothing but good.
Re:Bloat (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Bloat (Score:2)
I agree. Good luck getting the Gnome devs to switch over to KDE.
Re:Bloat (Score:3, Insightful)
Bonus points: name an OS - any OS - that only includes one application framework. Windows has MFC and .Net. Mac has Classic, Carbon, and Cocoa. Solaris had CDE and OpenWindows. Amiga had Gadtools, MUI, Reaction, etc.
Somehow, though, it all boils to "KDE and Gnome are bloated", even though every single widely-used system ever invented went through (or is currently in) the same situation.
Besides, I disagree on principle that this in
Re:Bloat (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh, thank you. I hate all the whining about "bloat". If you want to use a minimalist WM and everything, you have dozens of options. Use them and stop whining. I'll keep using KDE with Amarok, KDevelop, etc. It's fast, and it has a hojillion useful features and a great UI. That's not bloat.
Re:Bloat (Score:3, Interesting)
When my sister in law's kids com over and want to play with the computer I load up Mr. Potatoe. After all, one of them is OCD and my copy of Civ or Sim City is a bit too much for him, and the other one gets hyper if allowed action games. Mr. P. keeps them happy during computer time (20 min each)
Re:Bloat (Score:2)
My 4-year-old, for one. He loves all of the educational games that come with KDE. He now has his own box that I got him for his birthday this past weekend. He came to me this morning and said "I wanna play with my Linux, dad. Dad, I like Linux"
Re:Bloat (Score:3, Interesting)
http://developer.kde.org/development-versions/kde
Judging by how many items there are on that list, and that this is a port, not a re-write, I think that KDE4 will be full of features. Though there are some which could go, really minor useless ones.
Re:Bloat (Score:3, Interesting)
> removed from KDE4?
i haven't either. perhaps you could educate all of us
if you're afraid KDE4 will be "KDE, without the features" then perhaps you're thinking of that "SimpleKDE" fork thing or perhaps you just got wrong information.
we are certainly aiming for a more usable KDE, but not a featureless one. popular perception aside, the two are not mutually exclusive.
Re:Why fuss with KDE when can buy an Apple? (Score:4, Insightful)
1. You are locked into a single vendor
2. Want to upgrade your desktop? That'll cost you. Thanks very much
3. What if someone produces a better desktop GUI? I switch GUI's every few months as improvements are made. Sometimes I just want something small and sweet like Fluxbox, othertimes KDE for some eye candy
4. Not all development work requires a GUI. Even if it does, the logic should be seperate, not built into the GUI itself (Visual Basic anyone?). This allow the choice of GUI to become a seperate issue. You can use web, cli, GUI.... whatever
5. Your window manager won't start? Thats a tradgedy under MS Windows as well as a Mac (OK, not as bad on the Mac). Under Linux I can just choose another window manager until I sort my problem out.
6. Bah... thats enough for now.
I encouraged my Fiance to get an iBook as her latest machine, mainly so there wasn't a MS machine in the house. We still don't have *any* MS machines
You might like the Mac, thats fine by me. Choice is good thing as it helps drive improvement. Competition improves the breed. Myself... I like the flexibility to have my machines the way I want them, not the way some company wants them.
Re:Why fuss with KDE when can buy an Apple? (Score:2, Insightful)
2. Upgrading will cost you? I can go buy a hard drive, ra
Re:Why fuss with KDE when can buy an Apple? (Score:2)
Re:Why fuss with KDE when can buy an Apple? (Score:3, Insightful)
I do. If you like MacOS X, want to pay for it, make Jobs even richer and use it, great. I OTOH really like the ability to "tune them to world's end", plus the overall flexibility of Linux.
I would agree that the Linux GUIs (kde, gnome, whatever...) are not perfect - probably not as good as the MacOS X GUI, but they are constantly changing and improving. If you don't like it, don't use it, but don't disparage those of us that still value freedom and choice.
Re:Kool (Score:2)
Karma kwhore.
Re:It looks nice (Score:2)
Please check http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=Secret%20C onfig%20Settings#id362646 [kde.org]
There's a setting under 'Change OK Cancel button order'
There are a lot of KDE improvements in the pipeline (well, there *always* are), and never enough manpower, primarily because KDE-fans (like me) don't always know enough about coding to help, at least in any useful fashion.
Re:It looks nice (Score:5, Interesting)
When was the last time someone asked you a "no or yes" question? Dialogs should support natural idiom, including those of English, and not the whims of some developers, regardless of how many single-sourced HCI studies they can cite.
Re:It looks nice (Score:2)
Re:It looks nice (Score:3, Interesting)
if you'd like to help police this, you're more than welcome to join the project =)
> Politics I guess is the main reason for not
> doing this
no. it's because we've done it this way forever, as has the DOMINANT desktop: microsoft windows. there's little to be gained in practical usage from switching the buttons around, except to annoy users who a
Re:It looks nice (Score:3, Informative)
Unlike GNOME, the KDE developers understand that the tiny usability improvement of having the buttons in a different order is vastly outweighed by the massive usability mistake of surprising users by switching around the order of the buttons to the exact opposite of what it was before.
Sure, it might be nice to have Close on one side instead of Save, but it sure is annoying when you've been clicking in the same place for years to save, and end up closing instead.
Re:It looks nice (Score:3, Insightful)
1) Everyone knows what they mean. Unless you're deliberately messing with the user by using bad grammar, OK/Cancel and Yes/No are so absurdly simple it's amazing this issue got the mileage it did. In fact, the only rational explanation for verb pairs that I've seen is "but what if there's bad grammar!" Wouldn't it be easier all around to fix the bad grammar.
2) OK/Cancel and Yes/No allows for *common* dialogs. The developer doesn't need to come up with a dozen different acc
Re:What does the K stand for? (Score:2, Informative)
However, it started out as the Kool Desktop Environment. Read the 1996 project announcement [google.com] on usenet, and the interesting replies.
Re:Well, it's about time for Debian... (Score:2)
Re:Yippie!!! (Score:3, Insightful)
What "bloat" are you referring to? Could you give some real examples? As to speed.... I find KDE to be fast enough.
Here's a news-flash for you: you are not required to go through all the settings. But if you want to change something, they are there. But you could use KDE just fine without ever touching the settings at all.
Re:Yippie!!! (Score:5, Insightful)
For example, I want a file manager that can do sftp, ftp, smb, nfs, etc. I'll agree that those elements make the code bigger and possibly slower, but I make use of them. I know a lot of other people do as well.
I also find that dcop plays a very important role in messaging between apps and KDE. Sure, it's another app that sucks up some RAM, but maybe some people like me use it.
Considering that most elements in KDE are embeddable objects (eg. Kate, Kedit and Kdevelop all use the same editor), I'd say bloat is cut down a lot. Nobody is implementing three different text editors when one will do the job.
I, and every other reasonable person, expects KDE 3.x to be larger and have more features than KDE 2.x. Such is the nature of software. That's not because coders are lazy or don't care if their program is bloated, but because hardware is catching up to their dreams. Programmers are able to implement things today that they couldn't do a few years ago.
If you don't want those features, then run Blackbox.
Personally, I don't think you know what 'bloat' is -- you seem to think that because 3.x is slower than 2.x it must be bloated. I think you've just heard that term so often that you repeat it to sound knowledgable.
Re:Yippie!!! (Score:3, Insightful)
2.0 was hobbled and very slow in many ways compared to 3.4. put them side by side for work tasks and the improvements are pretty obvious.
but for your measure here, i'd suggest loading KDE 2.0 on your IBM laptop, or 3.4 on your Ultra 1 =)
Re:when is KDE 3.5 due for release? (Score:2)
Re:Exactly what is KDE, anyway? (Score:3, Informative)
> applications, or both?
KDE ships with a window manager, kwin. it's also a collection of applications that span the gammut from web browser to file manager to groupware to image viewing/editting to media playing to software development to
it's ALSO an application development framework, and ALSO a desktop infrastructure (providing things like IPC, access to standard services, network transparent IO, etc)
> And when will they remove all those games tha