Google Losing Ground in China? 192
TG writes "Yahoo is running an article about a recent study released by a Chinese Internet research group that shows Google losing market share to their Chinese rival, Baidu.com. From the article: 'The survey, conducted by the Beijing-based China Internet Network Information Center, reported that Baidu.com Inc. boosted its market share in Beijing by 10.8 percentage points to 52 percent. Google Inc.'s share was at 33 percent, as the American Internet search engine kept its customer base steady while the overall market grew, said the survey, seen Tuesday on CNNIC's Web site.'" Factual analysis or results driven by self interest?
Oh Goody (Score:5, Funny)
190 to go...
Re:Oh Goody (Score:1)
At least there's one country where Ballmer doesn't have to fucking kill Google and Larry Page.
Ironically, one where he could probably get away with it.
Re:Oh Goody (Score:1, Troll)
Re:Oh Goody (Score:2)
If they're corrupt, then Ballmer could probably bribe them.... it's not like he's short on cash.
Bad choice of word: corrupt (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Bad choice of word: corrupt (Score:2)
Re:Bad choice of word: corrupt (Score:2)
ummmm.....
Re:Bad choice of word: corrupt (Score:2)
Duh... (Score:5, Interesting)
and maybe suso.cn too (Score:3, Informative)
Re:and maybe suso.cn too (Score:1)
It'd only be the nice thing to do, and I doubt it would have to take up much space
Re:and maybe suso.cn too (Score:4, Informative)
Suso means nothing like fast and/or search in Mandarin. The site appears to be some kind of entertainment portal / message board.
And it uses the Google, Baidu and Yahoo China search engines to conduct its searches.
A more likely explanation would be that the existing search site suso.cn was already very popular or heavily advertised in China.
And yes I am a native speaker of Mandarin and several Chinese dialects (Hokkien [Fujian], Henghwa [a Hokkien sub dialect], Cantonese and a little Teochew)
Re:and maybe suso.cn too (Score:2, Informative)
Re:and maybe suso.cn too (Score:4, Informative)
See http://babel.altavista.com/tr?&trtext=speed+rumma
I don't blame blackicye though. I didn't recognize "suso" at first either. Since Mandarin Chinese syllables have 4 inflections (5 if you want to classify short as an inflection), we'd have to mentally run through at least a few combinations before we recognize a phrase.
And yes, I'm a native speaker. Mandarin and Hangzhou dialect.
Link to the article? (Score:1)
Just doesn't have the same ring to it... (Score:3, Funny)
Looking for information on a subject? Just Bi>Baidu it!
Nope..not the same at all...
Re:Just doesn't have the same ring to it... (Score:1)
But to someone who speaks Mandarin, it might roll a little more naturally off the tongue
Re:Just doesn't have the same ring to it... (Score:1, Interesting)
Baidu is better than Google in China (Score:5, Informative)
The second is that Baidu is in Chinese, by Chinese, and for Chinese. Google may be in Chinese, but it is owned by American company and anyone who has done business in Asia knows, Not Invented Here was invented there. So Baidu has the hometurf advantage.
And finally, Google simply doesn't bring up the sorts of search results that people are generally looking for anymore. Lots of random searchvertisements, links to other lame search engines (with no results!), and contentless blogs are the results you get with Google when searching outside of English. With Baidu, it's still pretty new enough that it isn't overwhelmed with spam.
What's the deal with the story writeup with no links, though?
Re:Baidu is better than Google in China (Score:5, Interesting)
Not to mention that Baidu tends to do better on Chinese queries. A lot of times when I'm trying to find lyrics to some song or some proverb, Google will fail but Baidu will give me results.
Coupled with the MP3 search, image search, discussion board serach, and page caching, it already offers what most people would use Google for. I know I don't bother with Google for Chinese queries now.
Re:Baidu is better than Google in China (Score:1)
google.com and Google.jp returns only two results.
Google.cn splits it up
baidu splits it up and changes the last two characters.
Not for long (Score:5, Insightful)
China has new copyright laws and has acted as if they are going to enforce them [china.org.cn]. Don't expect this sort of feature to last for long on Baidu. The link is to a Chinese article, so it could be filled with propaganda, but they are acting this way to favor western companies. If the AA's make enough noise, Baidu will fall in line too.
Re:Baidu is better than Google in China (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Baidu is better than Google in China (Score:2)
Really. Might I enquire exactly what search terms you used in Japanese?
The reason I ask is that g
Re:Baidu is better than Google in China (Score:3, Interesting)
This is a big reason why many people no more use google.
At least Google owns (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:At least Google owns (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't know, was yahoo hedging their bets with the 5% stake they had in google?
No link=No slashdotting (Score:1)
Re:No link=No slashdotting (Score:1)
Re:No link=No slashdotting (Score:1)
http://mp3.baidu.com/m?f=ms&rn=&tn=baidump3&ct=13
Maybe not though:
http://news.baidu.com/ns?word=ten+feet+per+year+i
Article link... (Score:5, Informative)
From the article (Score:2)
Ah, Slashdot. Timely as always.
Does Google care? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Does Google care? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Does Google care? (Score:2)
I just returned from China (Score:5, Informative)
Just saying...
"English" spelling (Score:5, Informative)
Another thing that most people don't think about is that Chinese people are proud of their country. This comes as a strange thought to most people who went through university indoctrination in the West, but Chinese people will prefer a Chinese solution when one is available. Even if it's a poorer alternative than the foreign one (it'll get better if we use it, they think).
And as someone else pointed out, baidu.com has links to "multimedia" (i.e. pirated movies) that google would get sued over. I mean, look at their site [baidu.com], it's got "mp3 search" right on the front page. And check out this site [520music.com], it's got plenty of entire albums available for your listening pleasure, and it's a legitimate site in China.
Re:"English" spelling (Score:2)
Pretty cool, but the U2 songs I downloaded from them were only 22 kbps. (Far short of the 128kbps offered by iTunes, and no where near my preferred quality: 192kbps.)
Re:"English" spelling (Score:2)
Sounds to me like they can't have hq music freely downloadable then.
Re:"English" spelling (Score:2)
Sadly, in the US, such nationalism is frowned upon. If you do think that way, you'll be called a racist/sexist/nationalist/somethingist.
Re:"English" spelling (Score:2)
Re:"English" spelling (Score:2)
The US isn't really patriotic. It's fashionable to call yourself patriotic, but there's no real patriotism here.
From the American flags and yellow ribbon stickers that are made in China, to shopping at Wal-Mart where everything is made in China, p
Re:"English" spelling (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:"English" spelling (Score:2)
The WW2 years seemed to be the high point for Germany. They seem to be in decline now.
At the rate things are going in the US, we're in decline also.
Re:"English" spelling (Score:2, Troll)
Re:"English" spelling (Score:2, Insightful)
They are proud of each other, their accomplishments, and etc, and it is not dampened by their form of government.
Yes, I'm chinese, but I'm Canadian, so I'm not exactly propaganda-filled.
Re:"English" spelling (Score:3, Interesting)
MP3 search (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:MP3 search (Score:3, Insightful)
Problem: Google has Chinese Competition.
Solution:
from the we-have-seen-this-before dept. (Score:1)
Thank God! (Score:5, Funny)
Although I must admit I am more than slightly disturbed that there was a two day period wherein not a single story about Google was posted. Surely the parties involved have been disciplined accordingly.
The Link to the story... (Score:3, Informative)
Google Losing Ground in China [yahoo.com]
Any Chinese Speakers Here? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:No. But maybe Asus can help here... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Any Chinese Speakers Here? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Any Chinese Speakers Here? (Score:2)
Re:Any Chinese Speakers Here? (Score:4, Funny)
Mr. Sparkle.
I'm disrespectful to dirt!
Re:Any Chinese Speakers Here? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Any Chinese Speakers Here? (Score:2)
*shrugs*
Fixed article, maybe (Score:5, Interesting)
The report itself has a pie chart with the following breakdown: Baidu 51.5%, Google 32.9%, Sohu 4.6%, Sino 4.0%, Yahoo 3.7%, and 3.3% other in Beijing; 43.9% Baidu vs. 38.2% in Shanghai; and 48.0% Baidu vs. 28.7% Google in Guangzhou.
However, the next page breaks down searches by category, and Baidu is only in the lead (55% vs. 15% Google) in downloadable music. In all other categories, Google is in the lead. Indeed, 60% of users who use Google primary and Baidu secondary say that the reason is Baidu's music search.
This confirms that Google is a better (more popular at least) search engine, of course, but Baidu is either better at searching Chinese music or, as another poster said, Baidu can link to MP3s without the RIAA being able to do anything about it.
That's normal (Score:4, Informative)
Same goes for Japan (Score:2)
Really? (Score:2)
I admit I haven't tried goo, but I have tried Yahoo a number of times, and I've always found that Google gives me better results (yes, in Japanese). Though I admit it's possible I'm subconsciously working around whatever limitations Google may have--come to think of it, ISTR it doesn't consider hiragana and katakana equivalent, which would certainly be a major drawback.
Baidu.com (Score:4, Funny)
How the hell does that company have any market share at all? It's in some crazy foreign language or something.
I'm moving to China. (Score:1)
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F %2Fbaidu.com&langpair=zh-CN%7Cen&hl=en&safe=off&ie =UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=%2Flanguage_tools [google.com]
Of Course Google is losing market share... (Score:1)
Re:Of Course Google is losing market share... (Score:2)
What kind of search engine is this? (Score:2, Funny)
I can't find slashdot anywhere in the first few pages, but Google shows up a lot.
Google is often censored (Score:1, Insightful)
Baidu also contains features that Google cannot do, like their very convenient MP3 search. This may be a strong reason why they are favored by users. Even users outside of China are realizing this.
Baidu and Google and Baidu (Score:1)
Re:Baidu and Google and Baidu (Score:1)
Brought to you by the RIAA, MPAA, etc.
Re:Baidu and Google and Baidu (Score:1, Funny)
>If Baidu.com basically links you directly to illegal music and movies what's stopping us, I mean certain people's, from using it?
The fact that the Chinese government remixes all mp3's in Mandarin first, to avoid possible WTO sanctions. Would you want to download _this_ from Baidu?nirvana_smells_like_teen_spirit.mp3
Hoi, chingy...chong, pingy...pong, chi chi tzuuuUUU mah tsi wha...Baidu is easier to use when searching in Chinese (Score:5, Informative)
Firefox's default mp3.baidu.com search bar (Score:1, Interesting)
Google invested in Baidu (Score:2)
Re:Google invested in Baidu (Score:2)
Quality vs Quantity (Score:2, Insightful)
If you look at the original report, though Baidu has a greater overall market share (maybe because of the pirated mp3 search someone mentioned earlier), Google is well ahead of Baidu amongst high income and highly educated folks.
They're the kind of people that advertisers will pay big bucks to reach, especially in China, where the majority of people don't have much spending money.
So, atm, Baidu might have more users, but Google should be
Which is the lesser of the two evils? (Score:2, Insightful)
We always allude to "our" search engines because they don't suffer the same fate as Chinese web-produce - massive censorship. One just has to search Baidu for Tianamen Square Massacre [baidu.com]. There are 3 (pro-Chinese) results. This is unlike Google that provides over 750 results for the same search term.
But then, Google isn't much better. One just has to look up Google for anything that could contrive [google.com] the plans of a business, and the corpor
Re:Which is the lesser of the two evils? (Score:2, Flamebait)
And if you do decide to search in English on a Chinese-language search engine, you could at least spell "Tiananmen" correctly.
What is the DMCA crap, karma whoring? You forgot to throw in a derogatory comment about Bush as well.
Re:Which is the lesser of the two evils? (Score:5, Informative)
Spelled correctly, Baidu [baidu.com] shows 777 results. Google [google.com] gets 50100.
And after the two wikipedia error pages, you only get very short snippets. Oh, and the third result got through. I think the reason that it slipped through is that someone cleverly named the thread on a bulletin board "stir fried tomatoes with eggs" in Chinese.
Re:Which is the lesser of the two evils? (Score:2)
Mp3s: No WONDER it's gaining share! (Score:4, Interesting)
Seriously though, I "baidued" jackson and I fond real honest to goodness songs of michael jackson, mp3 encodes available via http! It's like being in 97 all over again!
Steady as she goes (Score:2, Interesting)
That said, there's a "them that has, gets" mechanism at work here. Just as we will see when Vista's out, user inertia is strong. Baidu may have its work cut out for it.
Hear something from a Chinese's prespective... (Score:5, Interesting)
Google goes offline periodically. (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm sure that the gov't is mandating educational institutions use something other than google as a home page when the browers starts up.
Remember, in a fascist oligarchy there is no true capitalist supply and demand. It makes no sense to even bother to try to figure out what is going on in that distorted economy.
Re:Google goes offline periodically. (Score:2)
Thanks for reminding us. Maybe that's why everyone's having such a hard time figuring out supply and demand these days when the only important things on the government's agenda are how to get more money for the large corporations who run the show and how to get more popular support for war. Fascist oligarchies DO make capitalism impossible. But China is Communist. The United States is moving closer and closer to the fascist oli
Re:Google goes offline periodically. (Score:5, Interesting)
Socialism is about putting cooperation over competition for the good of all, and in Marxist ideology a majority rule over a capitalist minority (and the eventual disintegration of the capitalist class which in Marxist ideology would lead to the end goal of communism, where the state whithers away as a means of power)
The problem China faces, that the Soviet Union also faced, was that they quickly descended into an oligarchy once it became clear that the revolutionary movements didn't have the mass support they needed.
It all boils down to both Lenin and Mao believing (mistakenly) that they could gain the support of the peasant populations that would have been needed for a socialist majority rule, and then their and their parties refusal to accept they were wrong.
Unfortunately this is a common theme in most revolutions - the most radical elements tend to also be the ones most willing to use violence to grab and hang onto power in part because they've had to get used to facing opposition that would do anything to get rid of them, and have had to spend a lot of time politically isolated from the mainstream but still keeping their faith in ultimate victory. It happened in the French revolution, it happened in Britain (during the civil wars in the mid 1600's), and it's happened in nearly all the Marxist inspired revolutions.
In nearly all such cases, these regimes paradoxically tend to start applying the same oppressive methods of the regimes they ousted as part of their effort to carry out their programmes of changes that often go much farther than what the general population - even those initially supporting a revolution - would support, and end up transforming into regimes with more in common with their old oppressors than with what they were struggling to become as a result of the fact that they see opposition as counter revolutionaries trying to revert to the old and themselves as liberators, ignoring the fact that these "counter revolutionaries" may very well enjoy as much or greater support than they do (see for example the Bolchevik oppression of the Mecheviks and Social Revolutionaries who managed to grow significant popular support after the Russian revolution).
The result in both the Soviet Union and China were that instead of getting a socialist majority rule nationalising the means of production for the benefit of all, the governments rapidly turned into stale oligarchic structures as the efforts at weeding out counter revolutionary forces quickly turned into an elimination of all opposition - whether or not it enjoyed support from the public - and as a result the nationalised industries quickly came under control of people that were able to put their personal interests first.
Paradoxically, considering these regimes claimed their basis in Marxism, is that Marx specifically warned about this. In "The German Ideology" he stated roughly that unless a revolution would happen in a country well developed enough to fullfill the needs of the masses without need, the "same shit" would happen all over again. And it did - only using different symbols and different language.
The Chinese government can pretend to be socialist all it wants, but given that they never removed the upper class, merely shifted the values around, and for decades have been slowly moving to a capitalist economy and introducing even larger economic differences, that is a rather silly charade.
Smart (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Smart (Score:2)
But if you can get a non-linked article past the editors, what's to stop getting a wrongly-linked one through? Goatse anyone? (IIRC that actually happened a week or two back...)
I ain't crying (Score:2)
The same happened in Russia, too (Score:3, Interesting)
No wonder... (Score:2)
Bad in Korea as well (Score:2)
Don't forget about impact of censorship (Score:2)
And we don't know nothing of performance hit that censorship overhead imposes on Google. Maybe it screwes their indexing (they have to exclude more pages than they'd like to, while the local guys already have developed technologies for automated and neat removal of censored information/sites) or searching procedures.
The Chinese-related features that some guys here mentioned aren't that
maybe that's why investors were all over it (Score:2)
The search engine (eg. google) and internet commerce (eg. ebay) are big battlegrounds in China...
Re: (Score:2)
Spyware and a name grab? (Score:2, Interesting)
I've never used the site (until Slashdot mentioned it searched MP3s) but I was reading a discarded magazine in a hostel in Beijing that was comparing the effectiveness of two major search engines' spyware campaigns -- not the morality, just the effectiveness of the business practice -- and just about every public computer I've seen is hosed with programs trying to redirect your query. As far as I know, that's not the kind of game Go
Re:Incompetent (Score:1, Interesting)
I don't see you complaining about how everyone else uses gunpowder.
Re:Incompetent (Score:2)
Re: Starving poor google CEO's?! (Score:2)