'Mr. Samba' Talks About Samba's Future 111
Jan Stafford writes "SearchEnterpriseLinux is running an article that gives the inside scoop from Samba guru John H. Terpstra on upcoming new features in Samba-3 and Samba-4, recent events in FUD-fighting and the benefits that businesses can realize by adopting open source early."
Re:LISP of the Backslash (Score:3, Funny)
It's worked with that syntax for.... oh about 10 years, but then again this *is* slashdot so I can't expect you to know what you're talking about...
Jeremy.
Re:LISP of the Backslash (Score:3, Funny)
I'm chuckling away.
Jeremy came at you as good as Winston Churchill dished it out.
So the story goes...
Nancy Astor was a native Virginian who became Britain's first woman member of the House of Commons. In the 1930's she headed a clique in the House of Commons that found something to admire in Hitler's Germany. Churchill described an Astorite as an appeaser "who feeds the crocodile hoping that it will eat him last." One time shortly thereafter, Churchill found himself at Cliv
Re:LISP of the Backslash (Score:2)
Re:LISP of the Backslash (Score:2)
It's actually a syntax that was first created for RFS I believe, but has been adopted by many other remote filesystems for UNIX, as well as http and other protocols.
Jeremy.
Re:LISP of the Backslash (Score:4, Funny)
That's because I typed it wrong
Sorry,
Jeremy.
Re:LISP of the Backslash (Score:2)
Re:LISP of the Backslash (Score:1)
Try smbclient '\\I\hate\backslashes'
Mr Samba? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Mr Samba? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Mr Samba? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Mr Samba? (Score:2)
Re:Mr Samba? (Score:2)
Re:Mr Samba? (Score:1)
From a server on which I can rely
I must use windows here
but the server's a tux
(To the tune of Mr Sandman, as well as I can remember)
Wow (Score:5, Insightful)
This wasn't an interview, this was a press release!
Oh well, such is the way of the world, I guess...
--LWM
And off-topic. (Score:1)
Re:And off-topic. (Score:2)
From TFA:
It just quietly goes about its business while the rest of the world delights in arguing about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
Re:Wow (Score:1)
> It is a first step to securing a better future for our children, who will comprise the next generation of IT managers.
Re:Wow (Score:2)
Re:Wow (Score:2)
Re:Wow (Score:4, Funny)
"You know, speakers all over the world, including me, appreciate a chilled coca cola after an appearance. Coca Cola, an international brand and hallmark of the consumer products industry, features a beverage that could be seen as a standard to which all other beverages are measured.
Also, all markets, from home users to giant corporations, appreciate taking a nice relaxing dump after a good long day. Dumps have features that all of us can use..."
Re:Wow (Score:2)
The best make it look easy. (Score:5, Insightful)
That's how it looks when someone knows how to answer questions. If you go back and look at those questions again you will see some real barbs. Allow me to point out some of the more dangerous ones:
For businesses, what is adopting Linux the first step toward?
This question came 2/3rds down the article when Linux was mentioned for the first time outside of the site name. The reporter is asking him to justify his product's and free software's existence. That a big question you can lose in daily details. His answer, "Linux is a first step toward organizational independence from single-vendor IT sources," is just what people want to hear.
Could you name a couple of other Samba-3 features that have a niche and are only used in those niches?
This is a follow up to another question that together are tricky. The first question asked him, "What are the primary capabilities of Samba-3 ..." John avoided the trap by not answering the first question litterally with one or two things and then rejecting the notion Samba is a "niche" product useful only to a few dozen small shops.
Those kinds of questions are classic. His answers are simply up to task. If you don't appreciate it, just let someone like Jan [techtarget.com] grill you one day. From a distance, behind good cover like John, the words look like honey. When they are in your face and you are trying to get other things done, they can look very hard. She's has been around longer than Linux and knows how to get a story. Bad answers to any of these questions would look bad but good answers are equally good.
Re:The best make it look easy. (Score:2)
Unfortunately, it's still a press release, no matter how you present it...
Re:The best make it look easy. (Score:3, Interesting)
This one is the question I felt was most press-releasy - it's not a barbed question at all. Another way to ask it is:
Give us some propaganda on why Linux is so great, ok?
I actually liked this question - it seemed like one of the few real ones. It was a followup to his mentioning the specific things going into Samba 4 for the Sarbanes Oxley discl
Re:Wow (Score:2)
> What are the primary capabilities of Samba-3 that
> every admin should learn to exploit to the
> fullest?
>Terpstra: Samba-3.0.0 supported unicode
>characters, secure channel communication and
>digital sign-n-seal support. It included a new
>password back-end capability, as well as new
>group handling.
Erm, right. I'll go update my password back
Samba (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Samba (Score:2)
Re:Samba (Score:1)
Re:Samba (Score:2)
Re:Samba (Score:2)
Re:Samba (Score:2)
Not much about Samba 4... (Score:5, Informative)
Samba the Great! (Score:3, Insightful)
Think of the children! (Score:1)
I am a big fan of Samba, but even I think that's a pretty lofty statement.
Re:Think of the children! (Score:2)
I agree it sounds corny. I don't really see much wrong with it if it could be worded a little differently. Maybe something like this would be better?
Linux and open source software is a choice for greater business ethics. It is a first step toward redefinition of the IT services market. It is a first step to securing a better future for the next generation of IT managers.
It doesn't sound as comp
Wow... (Score:2)
-matthew
reality: it's hard (Score:3, Interesting)
Some of my co-workers who have macs have mentioned similar problems. (They phrase it as "printing from macs doesn't work," but I assume MacOS X also uses Samba for this, and they're experiencing the same problem I was.)
It's just extremely hard to chase a moving target.
Re:reality: it's hard (Score:3, Insightful)
I recently completed a training course in administering a Windows 2003 server and was shocked at the lack of granular control for printers. Things you can do easily in Unix such as print quotas just aren't possible in Windows.
So in short Windows is easy to setup but if you want granular control you're much better off with Samba.
Only if you're a dumbass (Score:2, Redundant)
Maybe Samba isn't your problem. As they say, a bad tradesman blames his tools.
Re:Only if you're a dumbass (Score:2, Insightful)
I would wager most people would rather be dumbasses with a working printer than a smartass with a broken one.
Re:Only if you're a dumbass (Score:2)
Re:Only if you're a dumbass (Score:2)
Bullshit.
I've been using Samba in exactly this way for almost 9 years - it works flawlessly, and was trivial to set up.
Re:reality: it's hard (Score:1, Informative)
Ob Carl Douglas (Score:2, Funny)
Those hacks were fast as lightning!
Obligatory Carl Douglas (long one) (Score:5, Funny)
Those hacks were fast as lightning
In fact it was a little bit frightning
But they crack 'en expert typing.
They were funky Hacking dudes from funky IRC
They were hacking them up and they were hacking them down
It's an ancient Cracker art and everybody knew their part
From a p0f into nmap, and cracking with l0pht.
Everybody was Kung-FUD fighting
Those hacks were fast as lightning
In fact it was a little bit frightning
But they hack with typing a blazin'.
There was funky K'vin Mitnick and little Jon Johansen.
He said here comes the big mafia, lets get it on
We ping their host and made a stand, started DoS'ing with deft of a hand
The sudden BSOD made me lurch, now we're into a brand new stepping stones.
Everybody was kung-FUD fighting
Those hacks were fast as lightning
In fact it was a little bit frightning
But they flip it with incredible l33t typin'.
(repeat)..make sure you have expert typing
Kung-FUD fighting, had to be fast as lightning
Mod Parent Up (Score:2)
+Funny, well-crafted parody, made me laugh.
-kgj
John Terpstra to Speak at SCALE 4x (Score:1, Informative)
Samba without Windows ? (Score:1)
Re:No more war. (Score:2, Offtopic)
1. Copy everything in Windows 98.
2-15. Keep redoing everything to keep up with changes Microsoft makes in order to try and bury Samba.
16. Copy everything in Windows 2000.
17. Repeat steps 2-15.
Re:No more war. (Score:1, Insightful)
Microsoft is deeply grateful for this, trust me.
Re:No more war. (Score:5, Insightful)
When you discuss linux on your desktop with them they won't give you the stupid look you get from MS reboot monkeys.
Jeroen
Re:No more war. (Score:2)
Re:No more war. (Score:5, Insightful)
<joke>Yes, and Apache serving HTML pages to IE effectively ensures that people can safely ignore the Linux desktop</joke>
The same argument comes up time and time again, most usually in respect to WINE, though usually as better disguised flamebait. Seriously though, if Windows won't play nice with Linux, and Linux won't play nice with Windows, then it comes down to what you need the most. It'd be a bigger pain to do without Windows than to do without Linux, ranging from drivers to applications to games and a host of applications I've come to know and like. And the last thing you want to do if you want people to switch, is to first build a chasm and then tell them to jump.
Kjella
Re:No more war. (Score:2)
Re:No more war. (Score:1)
Re:No more war. (Score:1)
The desktops are already running windows, SAMBA allows linux servers to be used where they could not be if samba did not exist.
If the windows desktop cliens couln't access filespace on linux-servers, it would be the linux servers that went away, not the windows desktops.
Pull your head out of the sand.
Jorgie
Re:No more war. (Score:1, Funny)
Re:No more war. (Score:2, Interesting)
The reason? In about 10 years, OpenOffice (or another clone) will kick MS-Office's arse, taking away Microsoft's main revenue. And maybe (MAYBE) by that time, ReactOS will have replaced windows in the same way FreeDOS can replace MS-DOS today. I'm also confident that by that time Linux will have slowly evolved into a really-userfriendl
Re:No more war. (Score:2)
You haven't seen the new generation lock-in Microsoft has for the 15 year timeframe. In 15 years, people will be running Windows or OS X because all mainstream content is only sold in DRM'd formats Linux can't touch. And don't forget the possibility for a bundle - imagine giving Xbox 2015 basic Windows + Office capabilities. They would
Re:No more war. (Score:1, Flamebait)
By that do you mean ReactOS will be able to replace a completely obsolete OS that has been superseeded by a much stronger and more market dominant OS made by the same company. If so... whoopie for open sores... we've wons ourselves a bigun'.
How come, on the edge of bankruptcy, switching Windows to Open Source saves the company? I thought the product was crap?
I honestly think in 15 years your Gentoo box will have just finis
Re:No more war. (Score:5, Insightful)
Your prediction is wishful thinking at best, because I don't see any realistic logic being applied in your post. Like in game theory, to find the most winning path you have to assume your opponent (Microsoft in this case) will be making the best moves it can in its favor. Microsoft is not going to sit around for 10+ years while others out-compete it. This, of course, will be good for consumers because as open-source solutions become better alternatives, Microsoft will have to provide even better solutions, which open-source solutions will have to improve on, so on and so on.
ReactOS will have replaced windows in the same way FreeDOS can replace MS-DOS today
Ugh, that's a terrible selling point for your theory. Basically you're saying that FreeDOS can compete today with a product that was, for all purposes, shelved and not much developed on since 1995 (when Win95 came out as a standalone OS).
Re:No more war. (Score:1)
Re:No more war. (Score:4, Insightful)
BTW, MS can't sue over Samba because they aren't copying anything except network commands thier product already accepts. Microsofts CIFS and SMB software is traced back to a public domain version of SMB. About the only way MS could sue would be if they changed the whole fundementals of thier file sharing services, required a special network card that only worked in windows and special cab ling to lock out any competition. Then they could claim DMCA violation when someoen tryed to crack it.
Actualy, it is in thier best interest to allow the competition to interact with thier software. As long as microsoft can stay one sustantial step ahead of them they arte doing good. Linux deployment won't surpass the number of windows servers for this field because of the money spent. Those using linux for file serving wouldn't be buying much from microsoft in that area in the first place outside thier desktop software wich seems to be the money maker. As long as people see an alternative to them, the masses won't wise up to thier tactics and revolt. It is a win-win situation for microsoft. even if it cuaes them to loose that part of the market.
Re:Samba is a bit clunky (Score:1)
Re:Samba is a bit clunky (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Samba is a bit clunky (Score:2)
Re:Samba is a bit clunky (Score:2)
http://www.mandrivalinux.com/ [mandrivalinux.com]
Run rpmdrake, search for 'wizard'.
Don't worry, be happy.
is this for real (Score:2)
(during install)
All hardware, such as graphics and sound, are configured and tested at this point. It's essential that the correct resolution for your monitor is chosen here as it isn't possible to change it to use a higher one without returning to the installation process.
Is this for real ? I can't believe that you have to set monitor res
Re:is this for real (Score:2)
Re:is this for real (Score:2)
This warning is there mostley because of the Newb friendlyness. They don't want to send windows convert to a terminal windows running emacs or Vim wiothout seeing the desktop first.
People act like this would never happen in windows. Actualy not as much in XP
Re:LDAP (Score:5, Informative)
Of course, you don't actually have to use multiple user bases now. The winbind component can do out-of-the-box Active Directory integration and even map users to linux users. So there's nothing to complain about there.
There are a few big problems with it, though:
1) You can't have a backup for if your WINS system is down; Samba will not deal with both the original and the backup (because it won't sync the winbind produced groups/usernames with the existing groups/usernames).
2) UIDs and GIDs are mapped by Samba on the fly...so if they're different the second time you try it, too bad. You'll just have to chown any files that have the wrong permissions.
I don't really think that Samba's the way to go with this anyway. A better "out of the box" type solution would be to a version of pam_ldap that has built-in support for registering the unix box with an active directory, which is really the only piece that is still a kludge (to do pam_ldap+nss_ldap+mit_krb5+sasl, you have to manually get the keytab right now).
Re:LDAP (Score:1, Interesting)
Users are to be taken as serious threat and I don't think that Samba protects itself g
Re:LDAP (Score:2)
My guess is if that happened, you might be fixing more then a printserver.
Re:LDAP (Score:3, Informative)
Jeremy.
Re:LDAP (Score:3, Informative)
In a small AD implementation with a couple Linux boxes running samba, I find idmap_rid to be ideal. I run across folks with this level of need all the time.
Re:Won't someone think of the children? (Score:4, Insightful)
No, you were supposed to take the answer out of context, make an irrelevant smart-ass remark, and get modded funny. And you have succeeded.
The question was about where adopting Samba would eventually lead businesses, not about why they should adopt it. And it certainly wasn't about you.
Re:Won't someone think of the children? (Score:1)
Are you seriously defending invoking "the children" in the context of using OSS? Leave aside the general silliness of putting it in terms of ethics (there is nothing intrinsically ethical about OSS, foolishness from RMS notwithstanding), invoking a better future for children is just dumb.
Re:Won't someone think of the children? (Score:5, Insightful)
invoking a better future for children is just dumb.
It certainly isn't. There is a battle going on over who controls our software. Big software companies are trying to make us depend on their software and standards, OSS tries to do the opposite. Will our children be consumers who will be told what they want in the next corporate PR campaign or will they be citizens in control.
It's not about ethics or freedom, it is about money and power. It's about Microsoft being able to squeeze huge profits out of us not by making exceptional products but by controlling software standards that could have been open. It's also about monopolies breeding new monopolies, if we don't manage to stop it here it will go from bad to worse. So yes, Samba is a small part of an important fight and your ridiculing them isn't helpful.
Re:Won't someone think of the children? (Score:2)
"Think of the next generation - don't ruin the environment" - Makes sense.
"Think of the kids - don't install all MS crap" - Makes sense.
I'd be pissy if I had to support MS and there weren't any open source tools - a scenario Microsoft has often said it's working towards. (You
Re:Won't someone think of the children? (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, yes. It's not really very unusual for people to work on projects because they want to contribute to the future, which means "the children" if you look at it that way. Why do you think it's odd?
TWW
Re:Won't someone think of the children? (Score:2)
Don't knock him until you actually read some of his articles.
kashani
Re:Won't someone think of the children? (Score:2)
Re:Google Ads show shows for Samba (Score:2)
However if someone is looking for the running shoe and gets a whole load of irrelevent computing links a sponsored link would be the only relavent thing on the page and therefore likely to get clicked on.