Magnetic Computing Takes a Step Forward 112
MaceyHW writes "PhysOrg.com reports a big step forward in the development of magnetic microchips. Since their initial creation of a magnetic logic gate in 2002, an international team of researchers from Durham University, Imperial College, London and the University of Sheffield 'team has created a number of further "logic gates" and created interconnecting structures using magnetic "nanowires," which can now reproduce the logic functions of a conventional computer.'"
Magnetic Computing? (Score:1, Interesting)
Is this really a move forward?
Re:Magnetic Computing? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Magnetic Computing? (Score:2, Insightful)
Spintronics (Score:2)
Yeah, I agree, the physorg article is hideous. But if what it says is true, then spintronics research has taken a gigantic step.
But who needs magnets... (Score:4, Funny)
Hmm,... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Hmm,... (Score:1)
'Clock' speeds (Score:4, Funny)
I'll have to find that old bubble core magnetic memory I stuck up in the attic some years ago - it might come in useful!
Re:'Clock' speeds (Score:1)
Re:'Clock' speeds (Score:2)
The (electro)magnetic core memory was used in my (old) college digital computer lab, along with the toggle switch input and lamp (by register) output.
Intel's (serial access) bubble memory was bloody slow and way too expensive for anything other than spacecraft. I may even have Intel's data books on that stuf
In other news (Score:3, Funny)
Seriously? Magnets?
Re:In other news (Score:1)
Re:In other news (Score:3, Insightful)
Seriously? Magnets?
What do you mean, "seriously"? Why is the idea of using positive and negative magnetic potentials to represent information any stranger than the idea of using positive and negative electrical potentials?
Why better? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Why better? (Score:3, Insightful)
If this scales to a useful level, you'd need much less power to run such a processor as it wouldn't all be being burnt off as heat - so your mobile phone could last much longer on a single charge, etc etc.
Sounds like reason enough to at least give the technology a chance to me...
Re:Why better? (Score:1)
Re:Why better? (Score:2, Insightful)
Quick, we need someone to develop some sort of amazing technology that can BLOCK EVIL MAGNETIC RAYS!!
Magnetic sheilding is hardly that difficult now is it.
Re:Why better? (Score:2)
Substantially harder than electric field shielding and much more expensive. It can be done though.
Re:Why better? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Why better? (Score:5, Informative)
mod parent up! (Score:1)
Re:Why better? (Score:1)
It's interesting in its own right, even if it doesn't lead to anything pragmatic.
More info is available on the earlier research (Score:5, Informative)
Yes, it was rather vague. A quick search with google turned up a more detailed report [reed-electronics.com] on their earlier work:( I used "bug me not" to login to read it
Just to give the flavour of this report, it states...
Re:Why better? (Score:5, Informative)
How about 100 GB of storage capacity for the cost of a memory card [zdnet.com]? Magnetic microchips used in cell phones could make them fully functional video cameras. In addition, the chips are non-volatile [wikipedia.org], so startup lag will become a not-so-fond memory. They use much less power than electronic chips. They can be made much smaller, possibly as small as a few atoms. The examples they have already fabricated "use no silicon and require no multilayer processing and so can be manufactured at very low cost on flexible substrates, while offering non-volatility, radiation hardness and several hundreds of MHz of bandwidth" [imperial.ac.uk]. They're talking about plastic chips. Pretty impressive.
The technology, which is still being developed, can be classified as "nanotech" and is called "magnetic domain-wall logic" [eetimes.com] and is based on spintronics [iop.org]. Lots of folks are working on this because many believe that spintronics will allow for great advances in areas from quantum computing to DNA based [physicsweb.org] molecular electronic devices. This particular development is important because it represents the first [unisci.com] actual construction of logic gates, which are the basis of computing. So far the group has produced a "NOT gate" and a "11-stage serial shift register / digital frequency divider" in a 200nm design rule. They have also demonstrated the transfer of magnetic information without the use of magnetic fields. This paves the way for hybrid chips with both electronic and spintronic components. Such "3D chips" could contain many times the amount of information possible with current electronic chips. They will run cooler, with short "nanowire" pathways, and have the potential to surpass the performance of silicon chips. Moore's Law marches on.
billy - wonder if the "$100 laptop" guys have their phone number?
Re:Why better? (Score:1)
Until the oil runs out. D'oh!
Re:Why better? (Score:2)
There is no mention as to what the hurtles have been in the technology, and how sensitive it will be to external magnetic fields or any negatives about the technology (and *every* technology has drawbacks).
Anyone albe to play a knowledgeable devil's advocate for MRAM?
Re:Why better? (Score:1)
I can always dream... (Score:3, Funny)
Disposable features? (Score:3, Insightful)
Why is this a feature? We've already shown ourselves how wonderful "displosable" technology really is. Why do we think we need more useless broken garbage? How reclaimable is it? Can we just throw a bunch of these into a pot, separate the various metals and cook up new ones when the technology improves? Disposable != Economical. You have to have an economy before you can throw it in the garbage.
Re:Disposable features? (Score:1)
Re:Disposable features? (Score:2)
yeah, thats a big cube, but the world is a big place.
The added advantage is you wouldn't have to deal the the waste products and energy waste of recycling.
Yeah, and here (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Yeah, and here (Score:2)
Re:Yeah, and here (Score:1)
Goodbye Transistors.... (Score:4, Funny)
Seriously core memory was magnetic and was first thing I thought of when I read the headline.
International Team? (Score:1)
Re:International Team? (Score:1)
Re:International Team? (Score:1)
Yellow warning sticker! (Score:3, Funny)
I'm guessing... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I'm guessing... (Score:1)
Re:I'm guessing... (Score:2)
It's a joke. Wave a magnet near a floppy disk and you just broke it.
Re:I'm guessing... (Score:1)
Two Questions: (Score:3, Interesting)
2. It seems like magneticism is somewhat harder to contain than electricity, even though they're the same thing. What I mean is that we heard about leakage in processors as we get smaller and smaller dies. How is interference from other units controlled/mitigated in these chips?
I am definitely NOT a physicists so these question might sound lame but this is the first time I've heard of these chips and the article don't say much. Maybe I'm getting way ahead right now. New computational technology is always very cool, which I hope these chips are in the literal sense as well.
Re:Two Questions: (Score:2)
Leakage should not be a problem. We're talking extremely small magnetic domains here -- nothing of the size that would extend outside the case packaging.
RAM erasure (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:RAM erasure (Score:1)
Re:RAM erasure (Score:2)
Interesting thought experiemnt, not impossible, but completely unobservable to the degree that it doesn't even qualify as a virtual phenomena. Lunatics with razors would stab it to death shouting "Occam! Occam!", failing to see the simple charm of the idea on its own.
Hard drives have magnets in them. (Score:2)
I for one... (Score:1)
Re:I for one... (Score:1)
Re:I for one... (Score:1)
And they will rule over all domains.
Hrrrm.... What about interference?? (Score:1)
%ltbest yoda hum hrrrrmmmmm....
Well now... (Score:5, Informative)
Basically, don't expect miracles. The signals can travel incredibly fast through these devices (can't remember exact figures) but there are problems. The signals are driven by an external magnetic field. Single magnetic pulse can drive high speed data transmission, but not normally operation of the circuit. Continuous operation would likely be in the 10s of kHZ to 1s of MHz range.
The main uses are in low power, low demand devices. Or in systems which need to be resistant to EM radiation (certain military interest there).
Similarities to core memory? Basically that's MRAM. And chips of MRAM up to about several hundred kb can now be mass produced.
But as for "they have made a computer" - we're not talking Pentiums. We're talking about having demonstrated the functions which compose such chips - NOT, AND, OR and signal combination and splitting. Nothing more.
Re:Well now... (Score:1)
That's good. Who needs more than 640k?
Damage? (Score:1, Insightful)
Just a thought
Re:Damage? (Score:2)
Re:Damage? (Score:2)
There is a really good referance book that deals with this advanced stuff: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/084 9 320879/qid=1128098404/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl 14/104-6945549-8695159?v=glance&s=books&n=507846. It covers everything you'd ever want to know and more (it weighs about 6lbs. and has close to 4000 pages)
Re:Damage? (Score:2)
Re:Terrible Article (Score:1)
Re:Introduction to mangetic computing (Score:2)
Offtopic comment (WARNING) (Score:1, Troll)
Witness the potential birth of a new
Development (Score:1)
Re:Development (Score:2, Informative)
Honey, please turn off the computer! (Score:1, Funny)
Yay! Disposable! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Yay! Disposable! (Score:2)
Ever closer?
Where have *you* been for the last 20 years?
Great! (Score:1)
Re:Great! (Score:1)
Magnetism Nanotech Blah (Score:2)
What about power? I seem to recall that one of the problems with magnetic microprocessors is that when you shut off the power, you lose your data...
Not mentioned in TFA.
On the plus side, no heat generation = no fans = much less noise.
But, we know this research is cutting edge and inherently valuable, because:
"This use of magnetism, rather than that of electricity has potential of being exploited further
Re:Magnetism Nanotech Blah (Score:2)
What about power? I seem to recall that one of the problems with magnetic microprocessors is that when you shut off the power, you lose your data...
Not mentioned in TFA.
What the heck? What happens then when you power down a conventional microprocessor? The whole point of magnetic is that you DON'T lose data (look up Core Memory).
Re:Magnetism Nanotech Blah (Score:2)
Not mentioned in TFA. '
What the heck? What happens then when you power down a conventional microprocessor? The whole point of magnetic is that you DON'T lose data (look up Core Memory)."
Damn... I knew I should have had my coffee before even thinking about posting...
Not too practical (Score:3, Informative)
The method referenced is called "magnetic domain-wall logic". It works by propagating domain walls in small ferromagnetic wires. They have demonstrated various logic elements. Unfortunately, the domain-wall propagation is powered by immersing the circuit into a rotating or alternating magnetic field. This requires bulky external coils, rotating the IC itself inside a permanent magnet, or rotating a permanent magnet around the IC.
In the demonstrations, field frequency is measured in the tens of Hertz. I could not find a reference to the propagation velocity, but one wire width per cycle would be a reasonable guess. In short, horribly slow.
Re:Not too practical (Score:2, Informative)
These Comments are Horrible... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:These Comments are Horrible... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:These Comments are Horrible... (Score:2)
Well if I recall correctly, the all permanetly magnetic materials do posess a property called hysteresis which acts like a resistance to change in the magnetic strength and direction of a ferromagnetic material. If you switch the magnetic moment of such a domain in a ferromagnetic material enough times, heat will be generated. It is possible that is is less than for electronic gates, b
Like in the 60s? (Score:1, Interesting)
If it's magnetic logic on an IC, that's something new, yes. The basic idea, is not.
Invaluabe "news" at its best (Score:2, Insightful)
Now to be in the real spirit of Slashdot, mod me insightfull.
Re:Invaluabe "news" at its best (Score:1)
You not only cited Monkey Island, but in doing so referred obliquely to the legendary Rubber Chicken With A Pulley In The Middle. You're going to get modded into orbit.
Are these... (Score:1)
computers?
I don't think I understood the article fully. Can anyone simplify
differently?
Duck! (Score:1)
Sci Am article on Morphware (Score:1)
The article talks about a type of harware based on magnetism that allows the hardware to be reprogrammed.
Another interesting point about this new type of hardware is that it does not need a clock.
A related paper (Score:1)
http://www.physics.mcgill.ca/~peter/publications/
All the original papers from the group mentioned in the article are too pricey.
Unfortunately I can't make neither heads nor tails out of this, somebody care to explain?
Have fun!
Some originality, please. (Score:2)