Gmail Becomes Google Mail in the UK 337
akadruid writes "As of today, UK Gmail users are seeing 'Google Mail' at the top of their Gmail accounts, and Google is warning they may lose their '@gmail.com' addresses in the future. All new signups from the UK will be assigned '@googlemail.com' addresses, and existing accounts will be able to use either domain for now. Gmail's help pages explain this is related to their ongoing dispute regarding the Gmail trademark."
FAQ-ing confusing (Score:5, Funny)
Re:FAQ-ing confusing (Score:2)
So if you have registered, say, david.brent@gmail.com, you won't be forced by Google to change it to david.brent@googlemail.com for now. But since there is a possibility of Google losing the lawsuit, they can't guarantee it will last.
Re:FAQ-ing confusing (Score:5, Informative)
Translation: They cannot guarantee that your address won't change if you have an existing account and are allowed to continue using the gmail.com domain.
Q5:
Translation: You don't need to change your address right now if you have an existing account that is allowed to use the gmail.com domain. New accounts will not be issued gmail.com email addresses, in favor of googlemail.com.
They are very close, but there's just enough difference to make them both valuable questions and answers.
Re:FAQ-ing confusing (Score:2)
I hate to reply to myself, but I realize now that I left that post a bit unfinished. The parent had said that the questions were the same. I paid more attention to interpreting the question and answer pairs as whole objects.
To reply to the original charge that the questions are the same: They are not. One deals with now, the other deals with the future. "Will that address ever change?" is a question
Re:FAQ-ing confusing (Score:2)
No more changing your email (Score:4, Insightful)
> I'd hate to have to go to all the websites I visit and change my stored address AGAIN...
> when this time I wouldn't be getting anything new for all the bother
Given the rock bottom prices of domain names [yahoo.com] nowadays, you should never have to change your email address again.
Re:No more changing your email (Score:2, Informative)
The one gotcha is that I had an SPF record to restrict what servers could send email from my domain. When I started
Re:No more changing your email (Score:2, Interesting)
That's why you get a domain and create/delete as many emails as you please. I have one primary email that is almost entirely spam free and two or three others that I use when I sign up for "shady" stuff. Not to mention the probably 50 or so I've created and deleted for one time use (:
Re:No more changing your email (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.spamgourmet.com/ [spamgourmet.com]
http://www.sneakemail.com/ [sneakemail.com]
http://www.mailinator.com/ [mailinator.com]
Re:No more changing your email (Score:3, Interesting)
It's my opinion that you have a better chance at avoiding spam by having your own domain. You can set your name in the email to be any random thing you want, so spammers have a much lower chanc
Re:No more changing your email (Score:2, Informative)
So, do you work for GoDaddy or just volunteer for them ?
Happy Posting.
I work internationally (Score:4, Interesting)
I didn't know Google even kept a geographical address for my gmail account. Doesn't appear when I search for it!
Re:I work internationally (Score:3, Insightful)
I am worried that they may be forced to change ALL addresses to googlemail thjough..
Re:I work internationally (Score:2)
And no, just those in the UK jurisdiction.
Re:I work internationally (Score:4, Interesting)
I imagine the change now in the UK has a lot more to do with their right to market their service in the UK as "Gmail", rather than any anticipated future technical problems with using "gmail" in their URL.
On the other hand, it's been quite some time since they started redirecting any web traffic from gmail.com to mail.google.com, so it is possible they're expecting to lose the domain altogether. But if so, it seems foolish to keep giving non-UK users new gmail.com addresses.
Re:I work internationally (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I work internationally (Score:2)
(And I do metamoderate whenever I'm offered the chance, and have Excellent karma as well. I assume I read too many articles, which is a really dumb criterion for getting mod points)
Double-edged sword (Score:5, Interesting)
When I signed up for Hotmail, I entered my country as 'Pakistan', since I didn't think it was Microsoft's business what country I'm from/in. Also, I don't live in the country I'm from, so it's pretty much meaningless anyway.
But lo and behold, when Hotmail upped their storage to 250MB, my account stayed at 2.5MB (later upped to 25MB). Why? Because I'm not in the USA. Do you think changing my profile to USA upped the limit? Hint - the answer is not yes.
Yes, I know Hotmail != Gmail, but the point is that initial profile choices can have unintended consequences...
Article to the original lawsuit (Score:3, Informative)
It seems they already did this for Germany too, didn't know that.
Re:Article to the original lawsuit (Score:2, Interesting)
Similar to Open Office and OpenOffice.org.
Quick! (Score:3, Funny)
Seriously: I wonder what criteria they'll use to decide if someone is "in" the UK or not?
Re:Quick! (Score:2)
Definition of "in?" (Score:2, Funny)
It's nice to see this (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:It's nice to see this (Score:2)
I hate to defend Microsoft (bad for karma), but in this case, they are correct. Assuming "Vista Wi
Re:It's nice to see this (Score:2)
Hmmm... (Score:5, Funny)
Did they trademark 'BlackMail' too?
Jolyon
Re:Hmmm... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Hmmm... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Hmmm... (Score:3, Funny)
Did they trademark 'BlackMail' too?
Hey! We call that "AfricanAmericanMail" now, you insensitive clod!
Gmail Notifier got too much? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Gmail Notifier got too much? (Score:2)
So much for (Score:5, Funny)
Kind of a moot point when you lose the email address.
Do no evil, and ignore the courts (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Do no evil, and ignore the courts (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Do no evil, and ignore the courts (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyone who's still unconvinced that this is fully transparent,
dig mx gmail.com
dig mx googlemail.com
Re:Do no evil, and ignore the courts (Score:2)
Re:Do no evil, and ignore the courts (Score:5, Funny)
Keep quiet about it, I'm trying to get people to buy all the new special GoogleMail invites I have
Re:Do no evil, and ignore the courts (Score:2)
gmail - googlemail gateway? (Score:3, Interesting)
If so this isn't nearly as big an issue at it would seem.
Dan East
Re:gmail - googlemail gateway? (Score:2)
It's a f*cking huge issue if gmail goes away (Score:2)
It's just like moving house without the moving of course, or the house... Everyone has to be told.
For those of us with gmail accouts. Start moving to googlemail now, whether it's required in the future or not.
What are they doing with the trademark? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:What are they doing with the trademark? (Score:2)
What I want to know is what the other party is doing with their trademark. If they built an email service, and had millions of people relying on it, I'd understand, but if the trademark owner isn't doing anything with the name, I'd say give it to google. I hope the court takes into consideration the confusion this will bring to all these people with email addresses, and takes a look at the few, if any people who are currently confused because of the original trademark holder.
The other company uses the name
Other company has had an email service since 2002 (Score:5, Informative)
Abbreviation (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Abbreviation (Score:2, Insightful)
They're only operating in the UK so they bought http://www.gmail.co.uk/ [gmail.co.uk] instead (before google bought gmail.com). One of the biggest problems with the current DNS system is that if you register http://www.nasa.gov/ [nasa.gov] it doesn't stop someone else from buying http://www.nasa.net/ [nasa.net], http://www.nasa.com/ [nasa.com], http://www.nasa.org/ [nasa.org], or whatever. Time to get rid of top level domains altogether.
Is Google String in the pipeline??? (Score:4, Funny)
-
Re:Is Google String in the pipeline??? (Score:2, Funny)
links and background info (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/
suggesting that a bunch of people attempted to register gmail as a trademark at the same time back in march/april 2004, including google who were a bit slow off the bat. this applies in the US and i assume it's been resolved, anybody?
as for the uk this guardian article
http://technology.guardian.co.uk/online/news/0,12
suggests that the company registered it waaaay back in 2002, therefore not qualifying for bandwaggoning and actually probably having a legit claim.
Re:links and background info (Score:2)
From one of the links in parent's post:
An independent valuation report commissioned last year by IIIR put a value of between £25m and £34m on the Gmail trademark.
Ironically, this is probably a price augmentation in reverse. It's only really valuab
No problem at all (for now) (Score:4, Informative)
And so, this change is the second one (after they changed the name in Germany). It seems this company (IIIR) thought of a "great" plan to make money uh?
Anyway, from the article and Gmail site, current users do not have anything to fear, and of course you can always change your country location when you sign up and get an actual gmail account.
On a side note, I guess 90% of pepople on slashdot already knew that, as they certainly have gmail...
branded addresses (Score:2, Interesting)
Of course, companies with confidentiality/privacy concerns might be loath to adopt this; but for others, it could be great.
Re:branded addresses (Score:2, Informative)
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answe r=20616&topic=1571 [google.com]
Thankfully... (Score:3, Informative)
Unlike Microsoft, who now offer you a hotmail.co.uk adress if you say you're in Ireland.
Crap! (Score:2)
Re:Crap! (Score:2)
Switching domain is never good. (Score:3, Insightful)
It may not seem like much, but we lost a lot of business when the address @ibm.net switched to @attglobal.net
Same would happen with a change from @gmail.com to anything longer.
Re:Switching domain is never good. (Score:2)
People keep address books for freakishly long times, judging by how many wrong-number calls I get at home for the same business that used to have the number many years ago.
So, who... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:So, who... (Score:3, Informative)
From the contact page
Independent International Investment Research PLC
Head & Regestered Office
30 City Bussiness centre
St Olav's court
Lower Road
London
SE16 2XB
Email:salesinfo@iirgroup.com
tel: +44(0)20 7232 3090
fax: +44(0)20 7232 3099
Privacy issues? (Score:5, Insightful)
Hmm. If Google have to give up gmail.com, then whoever gets the domain instead would be able to receive a shit load of people's private e-mails?
zRe:Privacy issues? (Score:4, Funny)
That's okay. All the really important e-mail has a disclaimer at the bottom noting that it is for the intended recipients only. That makes it illegal for another person to read it. If another person reads it, they have to notify the sender and delete the message.
Re:Privacy issues? (Score:2)
Re:Privacy issues? (Score:2)
And that's why you should always encrypt your emails.
That would certainly help, but how about newsletters you get from, say, Amazon? That would indicate to strangers that you have an account there, and they'd probably be able to use the standard "I forgot my password" service retrieve the password. Fun!
Lesson? Don't sign up for newsletters!
zRe:Privacy issues? (Score:2)
Re:Privacy issues? (Score:2)
I'm not, I don't trust Google to handle my mailbox. ;-)
zRe:Privacy issues? (Score:3, Informative)
Google still own the "gmail.com" domain, whether another company owns the trademark in the UK or not, mail addressed to @gmail.com will still end up at a google server.
@googlemail.com address may be a collector's item (Score:3, Interesting)
If this legal dispute goes Google's way, then they'll probably discontinue the practise of handing out @googlemail.com addresses, but will likely keep existing ones active. As a result, having one of those rare email addresses might actually have some caché amongst the technorati. I'm sure that someone will try to sell an @googlemail.com address for big bucks on eBay.
Re:@googlemail.com address may be a collector's it (Score:3, Informative)
The trademark registrations (Score:5, Interesting)
Now, just because they registered first doesn't mean that another company wasn't already using it as a de facto trade mark, but it does occur to me that the value of the mark should be determined by what it was before Google started using it, not what it's worth now. That the other claimant has a total market value of £3.24m ($5.6m) should be an indication that the GMail mark isn't worth "$48m to $64m" as they claim.
I actually prefer @googlemail.com (Score:5, Insightful)
Will I keep my username? (Score:4, Interesting)
I have a really common name and getting a user name that was remotely like my real name was only possible by getting hold of an invite right at the start. I'll be really pissed off if someone else can swipe it. I've tried opening another account with myname@googlemail.com and it is not available - hopefully this indicates that they have reserved it for me.
Re:Will I keep my username? (Score:2)
Re:Will I keep my username? (Score:2)
Re:Will I keep my username? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Will I keep my username? (Score:2)
Re:Will I keep my username? (Score:2)
Why wouldn't you keep the same name?
why @googlemail.com? (Score:2)
Why not @google.com? And before you say "well that's for google employees" consider that msn, yahoo, etc already do that.
Sick of IP... (Score:2)
Sure...it's all supposed to help protect the artists/innovators, the little guys....but in most cases I do not see this happening. And right now there seems to be a complete lack of common sense among the legal systems.
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
More trouble ahead for Google! (Score:2)
GMail users already have GoogleMail! (Score:3, Informative)
So, for those of you who are concerned about losing your coveted gmail address when "switching" to GoogleMail, don't fret. You already have it on GoogleMail!
-Jim
http://gmailtips.com/ [gmailtips.com]
IIIR used the gmail name since 2002 (Score:4, Informative)
Google should have checked this stuff out before rolling aout the name around the world.
Re:IIIR used the gmail name since 2002 (Score:5, Insightful)
> world.
They're not rolling it out - Gmail is still in beta.
Re:IIIR used the gmail name since 2002 (Score:3, Informative)
According to the BBC [bbc.co.uk] IIIR did not already own the TM before Google announced their version of Gmail:
After Google announced its Gmail plans in spring 2004, IIIR rushed to register the Gmail trademark with Ohim, the European Union's trademark office, and the US Patent and Trademark Office.
Re:IIIR used the gmail name since 2002 (Score:3, Informative)
There is the difference between TM and (r), you know?
I have several projects where I haven't bothered to register any trademark for. If a giant like Google or Yahoo would announce a project with the same name, I would be quick to register my existing trademark, too. After all, they exist and are established and I don't want to loose them. Every business would do so, everything else would be neglection.
Re:IIIR used the gmail name since 2002 (Score:3, Insightful)
There is the difference between TM and (r), you know?
You're right, of course. I really wanted to respond to the statement that Google were at fault for not checking for already-existing trademarks. I could be wrong - please correct me if so - but it must be trickier to check for unregistered trademarks.
I'm not saying Google should get their own way, but it may not be entirely their fault that this situation arose.
Re:IIIR used the gmail name since 2002 (Score:2)
Actually, I don't say that Google is to blaim -- maybe they should have used one of these agencies that specialize in creating world-wide usable product names. I don't know what they could do; I just wanted to mention that I don't think IIIR is to blame
Re:IIIR used the gmail name since 2002 (Score:3, Informative)
You "own" a trademark as soon as you use it in commerce. You register it to gain certain other rights, including a presumption of validity in a lawsuit. But, the basic test is first to use, not first to register.
Re:IIIR used the gmail name since 2002 (Score:3, Insightful)
Welcome to the Internet, sometimes things here are grey.
Re:I hate these freeloaders (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I hate these freeloaders (Score:2)
Any large corporation would / should search before they use a name.
Agreed. It doesn't look good, and it pisses off users. If my email address changes I'll probably move to Yahoo.
Re:I hate these freeloaders (Score:3, Informative)
Re:email through webmail companies (Score:2)
Meanwhile you can do what I have done and foreward all your messages from all of your accounts to gmail.
I did this with my universities accounts (they gave me 2 emails, one from the University and one from the department, and messages arrive to both of them). As for webmail services that do not allow (free) forwarding [spell?] you should just ignore them.
On a side note, I have never used an offline email client, I s
Re:email through webmail companies (Score:2)
Re:Yep (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Yep (Score:2)
Sorry if you were hoping for something more insightful.
Re:Yep (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Yep (Score:5, Insightful)
How on Earth did this get modded insightful? Not only is this just regurgitating the same thing people say every time we talk about Google products on Slashdot, but it doesn't even make sense on this one! Gmail is still in Beta because of trademark disputes? Huh?