Inside Google's London Complex 130
An anonymous reader writes "ZDNet has some interesting pictures of Google's new London office which is incidentally looking to boost its 200-man headcount. Also, a Doodle 4 Google contest was held in conjunction with the office opening for schoolchildren."
Hmm (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Hmm (Score:2, Informative)
Yeah, someone really misfiled that one... (although Tripod have removed the site in question. It's a photo of a penis, for those who don't feel like clicking the link.) Possibly it got selected by a human at Google, the image was switched or defaced, and then was automatically updated by a crawler bot.
Re:Hmm (Score:3, Insightful)
Prizes (Score:5, Funny)
Obvious jokes:
1) Much better than those non-interactive whiteboards which ignored your marker completely.
2) Does the whiteboard display advertising relevant to whatever you draw on it.
3) "her prize was an upper case "G" of frosted glass" - when you put it in those terms, yes that prize does sound like a joke.
Re:Prizes (Score:3, Funny)
That's nothing that the right Firefox plugin can't handle! ;)
200-man headcount? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:2, Insightful)
I completely agree with your comment. As a (male) professional mathematician, I see outrageous overt sexism in the academic commmunity, but whenever anyone suggests the use of gender-neutral terms they are often lambasted (largely by the older generation) as politally correct weenies.
The point that many science geeks completely fail to realize is that 'labels' are important. Our use of language deeply affects our relationship with the world and the manner in which we perceive our environment and fellow
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:3, Insightful)
if you were truly enlightened, would it even affect you if someone called someone else a jew? why do, in issues of (presumed) discrimination/racism, people invariably assume the worst in other people? maybe because we *all* are prejudiced?
methinks a better way to increase the peace is to stop assuming and projecting our own prejudice onto others. wor
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:2)
That phrase is still commonplace here, especially in the jewish community.
It depresses me.
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:2, Insightful)
If you say 200 person, some politically-correct-nazi will jump out at you, and chasticize you for not saying 200 perdaughter.
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:1)
Did you know that when referring to a group of people of both genders mixed together, the french use the MASCULINE plural form of adjectives? Why not go after them? Oh yes, because it's part of the history of the language, as is the english example.
No women I know think that this is somehow a male plot to
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:2)
Perhaps your friends are more secure. But unlike you, my colleagues are not in Michaelmas term of their first year, but rather are senior mathematicians at an older English univers
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:2)
You'll have language geeks tell you that English has neuter forms, they're just the same as the masculine forms. In "if someone wants a fight, he'll get it", "he'll" is not masculine, but in "if Bob wants a fight, he'll get it" it is. It just so happens masculine and neuter forms collapsed together at some point. You need context and a brain to figure out the gender.
This either makes English highly efficient or highly o
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:1)
LADIES!!! (Score:2)
It's pretty hard. Ask my high school PE teacher. He would walk into this all male gym class and promptly yell out, "Alright LADIES, get your asses up and on to the track, DOUBLE TIME!!"
"Men", "ladies", those two, amongst many others are interchangeable in the English language so it seems.
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:1)
Plus politically correct people suck.
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:1)
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:1)
(Or you could be semi-normal, hate the word "people", and write "200 persons", but that ruins my condescending comment.)
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:5, Interesting)
Yes, because it would be far from normal english.
From the dictionary.com's usage notes about man:
While women are less accepting of the general use, at least according to that information, a majority still is.
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:2, Insightful)
Once again quit nitpicking, you get angry over simple laziness. How about getting over something that truly matters, like the salary gap in genders, or workplace sexual harassment and accept man as a non gender specific term for those to lazy to write out person. Focus on the issues, not the l
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:3, Interesting)
and no, i wouldn't
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:2)
it's also very easy to not attribute meaning to something that isn't meant to insult or discriminate.
"I find it interesting that so many people get upset that i pointed it out."
you are projecting. how do you know they are upset?
one reason people might react is because they don't like being told how to speak. "live and let live" - might make things a lot easier for everybody.
many people who get worked up about these issues forget that in 99% of the c
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:1)
it's also very easy to not attribute meaning to something that isn't meant to insult or discriminate.
Of course most people don't mean to insult or discriminate. The language is entrenched in our culture.
"I find it interesting that so many people get upset that i pointed it out."
you are projecting. how do you know they are upset?
Well the AC up furthur called me an 'anally retentive prick'. The usage of prick mainly indicates this.
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:2)
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:1)
I also think your argument is pretty lame. People say things with intent all the time. and it can be correctly interpreted by another person.
The point I was getting at is that our society has sexism (and allot of other negetive things like racism) entrenched in it, and people don't even realize they are being sexist. It's usually the people who aren't oppressed by sexism who are most vocal against people like
Re:200-man headcount? (Score:1, Funny)
What are you, fucking 10 or something?
Disappointing... (Score:4, Funny)
Googleplex (Score:2, Funny)
Since when... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Since when... (Score:1)
For that reason EVERY slashdot page includes the much-discussed google-analytics scripts (see here [slashdot.org]) are included on every page on this site.
Just check a page source code...
When techs add to London congestion? (Score:2)
It's an online business, for crying out loud. Why submit your people to the torture of daily commuting into a sardine can, and the costs that go with it?
This doesn't apply just to Google of course, but Google is an excellent example of the problem.
And no, it's not because th
Re:When techs add to London congestion? (Score:2)
Re:When techs add to London congestion? (Score:1)
Re:Since when... (Score:1)
Not one comment (in 116 at time of writing) has actually discussed that (except to quibble about whether or not they're hiring women).
Slashdot's readership brings it on itself.
Hey google where's data center photo? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Hey google where's data center photo? (Score:1)
PICS - MIRROR (Score:5, Informative)
Re:PICS - MIRROR (Score:3, Interesting)
What the... Oh right, this is England.
Anyway, where's the male kids?
http://www.eightyford.com/google/06-googleplex.jpg [eightyford.com]
Cute, the trademark sign in a heart!
I'm sure they'll grow up to become good business(wo)men.
Re:PICS - MIRROR (Score:2)
Cute, the trademark sign in a heart!
I'm sure they'll grow up to become good business(wo)men.
I think the "g" looks like Raphael the ninja turtle.
Re:PICS - MIRROR (Score:2)
Weird.
Re:PICS - MIRROR (Score:2)
Re:PICS - MIRROR (Score:2)
Datacenter pictures (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Datacenter pictures (Score:3, Interesting)
http://www.uwtv.org/programs/displayevent.asp?rid
a Google bangalore saga (Score:4, Funny)
At least one sign... (Score:4, Funny)
justen
No, another sign (Score:2)
Slashdots apparent obsession with Google makes People Magazines "bennifer" story look like an idle fancy. Let's move on.
Great doodles (Score:3, Interesting)
Maybe there's a Greasemonkey script here...
Non-karma whoring link (Score:2, Informative)
http://zdnet.com.au.nyud.net:8090/insight/softwar
Re:Non-karma whoring link (Score:3, Informative)
this link works tho
http://zdnet.com.au/insight/software/print.htm?TY
and yes, karma whore me plz
kthxbye
And from New York... (Score:4, Informative)
The floor's not much to look at now, but I'm looking forward to seeing it fully decked out when they throw a party someday (keeping my fingers crossed!) I'll invite y'all.
All the children drew "tm" (Score:4, Funny)
Re:All the children drew "tm" (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:All the children drew "tm" (Score:1)
Plus they probably had the original Google-logo with the TM to base their doodles on.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:All the children drew "tm" (Score:3, Informative)
Sure looks to me like these were just xerographed logos, that they colored with crayons and markers. Meaning the TM wasn't added after, it was there all along, just ignored by some children. So perhaps counter-jokes about kids starting young ignoring trademarks and copyrights are more appropria
Aghh (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Aghh (Score:2)
Two thousand years from now, archeologists will wonder what happened to the world in the twentieth century. With all the cheap looking crap produced in that century they will no doubt assume it was a time of great poverty in the history of Western Europe.
Considering that all those beautiful buildings of the past were built by a society that was much less affluent it is really shameful that we f
Google's office in Ukraine (Score:1)
Re:Google's office in Ukraine (Score:2)
Re:Google's office in Ukraine (Score:1)
Maddox anyone? (Score:2, Funny)
Interresting (Score:2)
Well, most of them should have internet at home, BUT I'm not sure they can draw logo of other big firm as easilly as they did with the google one.
Concerning the google desks, I suppose these desks are for the commercials entity, as the technic ones don't really need desk all over the world. At least, I don't see the interest to rent a building if the same can be done from ho
Google moonplex (Score:1)
Huh (Score:2)
Why did the office open for schoolchildren?
Pictures (Score:1)
I suppose if you appreciate artwork of 10 year olds it's an interesting scoop.
Re: (Score:2)
google-analytics on Slashdot (Score:5, Informative)
Check the page source and see for yourself.
Why London (Score:2)
With all their money and the choices available in the UK, couldn't they find somewhere pleasant instead ?
Try Bristol, Bath, Cambridge, Edinburgh, Oxford and make an office people will actually want to work in
Re:Why London (Score:2)
Re:Why London (Score:1)
Re:Why London (Score:1)
Re:Why London (Score:2)
Re:Why London (Score:1)
Re:Why London (Score:1)
All that state money comes from the rest of the country and subsidises the London economy (both directly and indirectly), which drives more people towards it and raises the house prices that cause so many problems. It causes a mass of jobs to be created there and impairs opportunities acr
Re:Why London (Score:1)
Re:Why London (Score:2)
Yeah sure. (Score:2)
If you want to live in a place with a few sleepy cows and funny sheep you are welcome, those places do not compare with the cultural and social posibilities of London.
The killer is that Paris is just 2.5 hours away.
No brainer frankly.
Google NYC (Score:2, Informative)
Elitist (Score:1)
Note: for those of you lucky enough not to be familiar with London, that's some of the most expensive real estate in the world. And in the UK, public school == fee paying school. Ie. Only the rich and privileged get to go there.
Re:Elitist (Score:2)
Not that would have been anything wrong with excluding the state sector. If I'd just opened some nice new offices the last thing I'd want is a bunch of trainee mobile phone thieves and dodgy cigarette salesmen running around them.
Isn't that... (Score:1)
Sausage machine (Score:3)
Re:Stanislav Lem (Score:1)
God help us all... (Score:1, Funny)
"Don't cross the streams."
"Why?"
"It would be bad."
Re:God help us all... (Score:2)
The last time I heard this line was in the loos at The Hobbit pub in Southampton. Keith nearly pissed on me doing the actions.
Funny though.
J.
Re:Fucking crashdot slowd (Score:1)
(sorry had to be a nerd)
Re:OUTGOING (Score:2)