KDE 3.5 Released 385
WhiteFoxBR writes ""The KDE Project is happy to announce a new major release of the award-winning K Desktop Environment. Many features have been added or refined, making KDE the most complete, stable and integrated free desktop environment available." Here a Visual Guide to new features, including build-in ad-block for Konqueror and support for MSN and Yahoo! webcams in Kopete. "
Kool! (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Kool! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Kool! (Score:3, Interesting)
I too have bee
Re:Kool! (Score:5, Interesting)
For one thing, they said it was the most stable, integrated and complete *free* desktop, so Windows and OS X don't count. However, I use KDE by choice at work even though I was encouraged to use Windows, could have used OS X and did try Gnome. I think KDE is more integrated than Windows or Gnome and is on par with OS X. Its features are second to none (Windows and OS X don't even compete with the features I use a lot, such as working with remote servers).
I think it's important to remember that everybody uses their computer in different ways. KDE is great for me and a lot of other people and it pisses us off when a condescending jerk like you tries to blow it off as crap just because you heard it was bloated (but can't provide proof) and think it may be buggy (but can't list any more bugs in KDE than any other DE) and say it's poorly organized (even though it's all customizable).
Re:Kool! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Kool! (Score:3, Informative)
To repeat, Keramik is old. It's still there if you want it, but you're only showing your ignorance by bitching a
Re:Kool! (Score:5, Informative)
Hmm.. he is talking about ioslaves
Re:Kool! (Score:2)
What's that sound? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:What's that sound? (Score:4, Funny)
"award-winning" "the most complete, stable and integrated"
To me, it sounds like a marketroid has somehow snuck in.
Lopete link (Score:5, Informative)
It's About Frickin Time!!! (Score:2, Insightful)
Webcam - yes! (Score:5, Interesting)
I haven't got a webcam myself at the moment, so I have no idea how it works in Kopete. If you have tested it, and can recommend a webcam that is working nicely under Linux, I would like to hear about it. Are there webcams out for Linux that actually support face-tracking?
Re:Webcam - yes! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Webcam - yes! (Score:3, Insightful)
Too often, Linux suffers from great applications and features being available to those willing to spend 5 hours trawling every project hosting website then spend several hours getting the 101 dependancy issues sorted out and then go make dinner while the whole thing compiles.
The bueaty of the KDE enviroment (and gnome fo
Re:Webcam - yes! (Score:3, Funny)
Not KlownKam?
Great work (Score:4, Interesting)
Way to go KDE!!
KDE.org mirror (Score:5, Informative)
Re:KDE.org mirror (Score:5, Informative)
here's a link via mirrordot for the visual guide: http://mirrordot.org/stories/e5a9203473858cda85ab
Already slashdotted! (Score:4, Interesting)
Anyone here using KOffice in a "real world" environment? The last time I attempted using it, I found it had tonnes of bugs!
Re:Already slashdotted! (Score:2)
I primarily use OpenOffice.org 2.0, but keep KOffice around because it's very fast and seems to work well. I may be able to replace OOo with KOffice if I bothered trying to figure out how to do the same things. OOo has an excellent dialog for parsing fixed-width delimited files in Calc and their Save as CSV dialog is second to none.
KOffice is good, but with OOo 2.0 around it always se
Re:Already slashdotted! (Score:4, Interesting)
What I didn't see (Score:4, Insightful)
What I didn't see was much change in KDE's horrible default settings. The desktop is very configurable. Why does it have to look like some terrible pudgy windows clone? And what's with two toolbars on every app? Why not save some screen real estate for the body of the application? That toolbar for konqueror could easily be paired down to one row of icons with the location bar along side. I'm sick of a print icon on every application. I print things rarely enough off the web. That should be left to a menu, or just alt-p.
Still, if you're willing to configure KDE a little bit, it's awesome. The good news is that much of the configuration is easy, right-click kind of stuff.
Re:What I didn't see (Score:5, Funny)
I hate KDE! Damn them for making useful stuff.
Re:What I didn't see (Score:2)
You've got to admit he's got a point though. Even my parents have started to give up trying to print the Internet out so things must be changing for the better. Think how many trees we could save by simply removing that one little button.
Re:What I didn't see (Score:5, Informative)
KDE4 is what you need. Not only are there some serious usability-improvements, polishing, cleaning and other improvements in the pipeline (yes, seriously. Lots of KDE-devels seem to be fed up with the clutter), there seems to be some really low-level changes thought of as well.
Good things come to those who wait, and KDE4 will deliver lots of goodies. KDE3.5 is "just" an extension of KDE3.
Re:What I didn't see (Score:2, Funny)
So as not to scare off the pudgy Windows users.
KFG
Cool! (Score:5, Funny)
Now, knowing Gentoo this will be in the tree in the next 5 minutes. Woo, emerge is gonna be hot tonight, and tomorrow, and the day after, and probably some time after that too....
(Disclaimer: I use Gentoo, it doesn't actually take that long with kdeenablefinal flag on!)
Re:Cool! (Score:2)
Actually, it's been in the tree since before the release. If you unmasked them and tried to emerge them, portage would just complain that it couldn't download any of the distfiles.
Re:Cool! (Score:2)
Kubuntu already has it, just as they've released the beta and RC releases the same day as release.
Re:Cool! (Score:2)
Also, what does kdeenablefinal do?
Visual Guide Mirror (Score:4, Informative)
Kould you kindly kan the naming konvention? (Score:4, Funny)
Google Maps and Blogger (Score:5, Informative)
If you want blogger.com to not post blank blog entries, add a user agent for www.blogger.com to Konqueror as Firefox.
Now email google to fix both of them so we don't have to do these silly workarounds.
Re:Google Maps and Blogger (Score:2)
Re:Google Maps and Blogger (Score:5, Interesting)
I did email Google about that issue (I emailed Google Local because that's where I was at the time. Same problem there). I simply asked that they add Konqueror's user agent to the supported browsers after stating that the browser did work when I switched the user agent. This is their response.
--------------
local-help@google.com to me
Nov 17
Thank you for your note. It appears that you're having trouble using
Google Local because you're using a browser that is not fully supported.
In order to obtain full functionality of Google Local, please use one of
the supported browsers listed in our Help Center at
http://local.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?ans
We appreciate your taking the time to send us your feedback regarding the
use of Konqueror with Google Local. We'll keep your comments in mind as we
continue to make improvements to this service.
Regards,
The Google Team
---------------------
Utterly frustrating. Sounds like a bot may have wrote that
Notable changes (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Good point! (Score:4, Insightful)
Keep thinking it ... (Score:3, Insightful)
Kubuntu packages available (Score:2, Informative)
Filterset? (Score:4, Interesting)
(...As you've certainly noticed...) Adblock by itself is worthless. Its empty filter base makes it inactive and only weeks of careful building it would make the extension normally useful. Only combined with a good killfile like Filterset.G [pierceive.com] it really kicks ass, at once. Same applies to any other adblocker - what filters are available for Konqueror?
Re:Filterset? (Score:3, Informative)
Yes, it is.
Re:Filterset? (Score:4, Informative)
Looks like KDE is short on funds! (Score:2)
"Stable?" "Stable" is for Isotopes (Score:5, Insightful)
It also deserves better than having its major graphics package called "The Gimp," but that's a discussion for a different day...
Re:"Stable?" "Stable" is for Isotopes (Score:2)
Re:"Stable?" "Stable" is for Isotopes (Score:2)
A horse is an OS here, and the stable is a state of security for the horses... I mean, OS.
And an "UN-stable" is rather a horse stable controlled by the United Nations.
So it's more for users who truly understand the implications of having a horse/OS there.
I hope it's more clear now.
Re:"Stable?" "Stable" is for Isotopes (Score:3, Funny)
Oh, hey, thanks for pointing that out, Bunky. A couple more correspondence courses and I predict an absolutely stellar career in Marketing is yours for the taking.
gentoo (Score:4, Funny)
If 3.5 is a major release... (Score:5, Funny)
...what will 4.0 be? A stupendous release? An amazing release? A "Moses came down with KDE 4.0 on some tablets" release?
I'm not knocking them, but I thought there was an accepted custom to releases. If the number to the left of the decimal point changes it's a major release and if it doesn't it's a minor release. Kids today and their releases...I can't keep up.
Re:If 3.5 is a major release... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:If 3.5 is a major release... (Score:4, Informative)
Got it?
KDE 3.3 -> KDE 3.3.1 minor release, bug fixes, small enhancements
KDE 3.4.3 -> KDE 3.5 major release, re-engineering things, big enhancements
KDE 3.5.4 -> KDE 4.0 new version, re-written, ported apps to new Qt version
Now we just need... (Score:4, Interesting)
...one of the major distributions to get behind KDE and push it a bit. Debian is about the closest I can think of (yes, I know I'm going to get flamed for that) and that is desktop neutral. There's kubuntu but that could hardn't be called major (although I think it will do pretty well).
It's a real shame because IMVVHO I think KDE is the better Desktop system. I know under the hood Gnome is supposed to be better but quite frankly as long as it works I don't really care. I want different things from my desktop than from my API. I want my desktop to be inviting and fun to use I want the APIs I use to be like my bank manager (boring and predictable). Gnome seems to have the API right but the desktop wrong and KDE has the desktop but not the API. I might be totally wrong here because I have never used the API of either (roll on (a fast) swing) but that's the impression I get from the advocates for each side.
The other main argument against KDE is that it is too much of a Windows clone. Perhaps I'm the only one that thinks this but I think that's a good thing. I can switch quickly between windows and KDE without too much thought. Like it or not, M$ have spent millions designing an easy to use desktop system. Perhaps it's not perfect but I can't help feeling that the Gnome people are being different simply because they don't want look like windows.
Re:Now we just need... (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't know what it is, but KDE just feels "wrong" at this point. When rendering text under in icon, it often cuts it off in an odd place. Toolbars look cluttered. The default icon and widget themes (and even most of the others available) are so busy and flashy that it's often hard to discern from the picture what the function is (and in essence totally nullifying the usefullness of an ico
Re:Now we just need... (Score:4, Interesting)
KDE is far more integrated than any other set of apps I've seen, and this integration is useful in many non-obvious ways. To me, in KDE things look more refined.
Re:Now we just need... (Score:2)
Downloading them now...
Re:Now we just need... (Score:5, Informative)
That's rather the strangest thing I have heard all day, KDE is generally thought to be cleaner and better than Gnome under the hood. With the better underlying technology and architecture.
Gnome seems to have the API right but the desktop wrong and KDE has the desktop but not the API.
Seems like you have got that one backwards, the API are the one thing people usually praise with KDE. The complaints are about the "cluttered" desktop, indication that they think Gnomes is better.
but quite frankly as long as it works I don't really care.
Agreed, and there's the point where KDE wins out in the end. It got the applications and features making it possible to get the things you want done.
The other main argument against KDE is that it is too much of a Windows clone.
Anyone who have actually used KDE know it's not true, as KDE is much more. Funny thing is, set KDE up with a non-blue color scheme and those complaints dissapear.
A big step up from KDE 1.x (Score:2)
But agreed on the comments about the default styles.
Autorun? What the heck? (Score:2)
"KDE has made an exciting breakthrough in its support for removable devices. On detection of specific media types KDE presents the user with a list of optional actions. These actions are configurable in KDE's control center and can be disabled entirely. This goes a great deal of the way toward fixing an old complaint, that managing removable media is too difficult in Linux, by exposing existing features in KDE and Linux to the u
Repeat after me: That is not autorun. (Score:5, Informative)
The problem with Windows autorun is that it automatically ran untrusted code from the CD you just put in. This appears to let you automatically do something using the trusted code on your own computer. That's what OS X does, and it's fine.
There is a BIG difference between opening the CD ripping app on your computer, and opening some random app on the CD itself. If the CD ripping app on your computer is a Trojan, it's on your computer and you're already rooted. This is no more dangerous than a script you write yourself to call applications on your own computer.
If KDE allows the CD maker to point to a random file on the CD and say "Run me!" then they deserve all the scorn one can pour upon them. But if the computer just says, "Hmm, I see a bunch of audio files! I will open my trusted audio application!" then it's a timesaver and not a major risk. (Ok, there might be some exploitable overflows in the code that does this, but that can happen anywhere.)
Re:Autorun? What the heck? (Score:3, Informative)
Fitts Law and the Dual Layer Task Bar (Score:3, Interesting)
Placing task bar items along the edge of the screen provides the benefit of "infinite height". With the stacked display of items on the KDE task bar the top row of items do not benefit from this.
Why have many Linux Desktop Environments chosen to implement the dual layer task bar?
Now I understand that by providing more rows the width of the items can be greater than if they were all forced onto a single row. While the size of the target benefits from the greater width does it outweigh the benefits of the infiite height?
Question for KDE people (Score:3, Interesting)
Xorg 7 is almost here. With Xorg 7 comes EXA. With EXA comes a way to have stable, accerated eye candy. KDE 3.4 was ahead of its time for putting a compsite manager in Kwin, but it was so buggy that I had to stick to my old Xcompmgr+ Gnome/Metacity combination because I could turn off the composite for times when I need a stable desktop with the click of an icon with my old setup(I need stability for a few things). I plan to switch to whatever DE has a stable composite manager first.
Luminocity seems to be at least a year off, XFCE's composite manager is the most buggy I have dealt with, so all my hope is in KDE.
Does 3.5 have what I want? Or am I yet again left to wait a year for KDE 4 to come out? Will I be liberated from "the toy" Xcompmgr? Can I have a stable and modern Linux desktop before 2005 ends? Or do I wait another year (well.....I won't wait another year....if its like this in mid 2006 an Intel Macmini will sit on my desktop)?
Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:2)
And one Gnome desktop.
And one FVWM desktop. and so on.
Linux is just the kernel. X11 just a window manager. There are just several interfaces that run on top of these, and that is what the user or corporation selects, depending on their likes and dislikes.
People have their own preferences. Give them a choice. Anyway it isn't as if they are programming it for money, it's their own time, so let them do what they want.
Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:2, Insightful)
So basically, one has to decide: Is it better with several parallel applications, that allow for a lot of people to test many different implementations of features, to find those that work best, or is it better to put one, standardized desktop-application on top of the X-standard?
Sure, it could allow for lesser confusion du
only one widgetset? why? (Score:4, Insightful)
You don't need a "single widgetset/toolkit" to make a great "user experience".
Windows actually has several widget implementations. Access has its own widget set (don't remember the link, sorry), IE has its own widget set [msdn.com], office has its own widget set (noticed how the scrolling bar in office is like windows 98 instead of looking like in the XP theme? The same happens for messenger BTW)
They don't have a "single" widget implementation - they just have several widget implementations which LOOK THE SAME. In the same way, you don't need gtk OR qt - you want a way to make them look the same (the usability guidelines like menus etc are another matter). Implement the same theme for both desktops and make kde swwitch to a different look when you change the gnome theme and viceversa and you're done.
Let's just have one Language (Score:2)
All the whining about how choice is good and it makes life better distracts from a more important factor. All the competing viewpoints make in
Re:Let's just have one Language (Score:2)
Let's have one culture/language/religion be the standard for people on earth
Which language? English? Latin? Esperanto? Let's have one culture/language/religion be the standard for people on earth. Homogenous is great for milk, not so good for culture and people.
Re:Let's just have one Language (Score:2)
Disagree (Score:2)
My point is, two dominant desktops need not be a weakness provided the two desktops agree to "play nice" with each other.
Re:Disagree (Score:2)
IMHO, GDM should be taken and overhauled, and
Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:4, Insightful)
Yes, it is.
Are we creating Free Software for the users? or the developers of commercial software? Personally, I'd rather have freedom, and a wide array of options than a wide array of commercial (and most probably non-free) software. I don't care if commercial software developers have a hard time fitting in. Some will make the effort, and some won't. Either way, I won't use their products if they restrict my freedom to do as I like with it.
All software doesn't need to be free. But conversely, all software shouldn't be non-free either. Each user should be able to choose from a wide variety of options to best suit their own needs. And in my opinion, Free Software cares more about the user than non-free software. What good would wide "linux" adoption be if all the "linux" users were saddled by hundreds of non-free software package licenses? I care about the adoption of software freedom, not your interpretation of "linux".
It sounds as though you're a software developer who hasn't got a real handle on the Free Software/Open-source development model, and therefore you're finding it hard to become rich and famous... Or perhaps you submitted a patch and have had it rejected, or something. Anyway, your OP seems like ax grinding.
Join in the fun, or use a commercial (non-free) OS. But don't try to reduce the choice that other's enjoy.
Typical misunderstanding (Score:2, Insightful)
The point is that some desktops or window managers will be annoying to some people because of the way they choose to work (e.g. some prefer to have lots of desktops wi
Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:3, Insightful)
Mod Parent Down! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:5, Informative)
The problem is that Qt is proprietary and this upsets some people. Also, we should have some sort of Open Source widget toolkit that we can fall back to when trolltech goes by the wayside, though they will probably just release Qt as Open Source
Qt was released under the GPL a long while ago. You can license it for non-GPL applications, but then you have to pay TrollTech money. The "Qt is not free" myth is covered in the KDE Myths section: here [urbanlizard.com]
--NgRe:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:3, Informative)
Also, to top that off the KDE foundation has an additional agreement that if "trolltech goes by the wayside", they get a completely unrestricted (as in BSD-like) license to the code. And Qt4 is now also GPL'd for Windows (always a source of confusion/FUD), previously only the X11/Mac version existed as open source.
The only annoying
Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:2, Interesting)
Trolltech licensing. [trolltech.com]
Is it really? I was under the impression that it was Open Source. But then I'm not a lawyer and haven't been paying that much attention to it. They seem to mention GPL on that page though. But perhaps that's just the program that you write yourself with the Qt library, not the library itself.
Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:2)
I'm not sure if you're making fun of the parent or not, but it is GPL. It's quite impossible for your program to be GPL and Qt not, because the GPL requires that the work as a whole is licensed under the GPL. (technically, the Qt library could be under an even more liberal license like BSD or LGPL, but not a less liberal one)
Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:3, Informative)
Its free for opensource, but if you want to sell your application you can buy a commerical license. I think this is awesome and allows Trolltech to have income to hire developers.
QT licenses where an issue but not anymore, pick your license GPL or Commerical.
Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:4, Insightful)
Wow, that's a lot of FUD in one post. I'm impressed.
Not true; there are several alternatives.
Not true: QT3-X11 is available under the GNU GPL; QT4 is available under the GNU GPL even for windows. In addition to that, QT is available under proprietary licenses; this has no effect on the GPL release whatsoever.
QT already is open source.You should really do some research before you start spreading FUD. People like you give people like us a bad name.
Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:2)
And, no, not every company is going to release their software under the GPL.
Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:2)
Not Anymore (Score:2)
Nope. Visual Studio Express Editions [microsoft.com] are completely free equivalents to the commercial versions of Visual Studio. They lack some features but allow people to do commercial or non-commercial development for windows.
-everphilski-
Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:2)
You don't have to have Visual studio to develop software for windows, though.
Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop (Score:2)
Still, It'd be interesting to see a study about propietary-app development cost comparison between linux. windows, osx and whatnot, showing lib/compiler/ide/support/etc costs and the like...
There's got to be one on the net.. I'll go back to my googling.
Re:troll? (Score:3, Interesting)
Consider the w
Re:troll? (Score:2)
Amusingly enough, stories about the Linux Standard Base Project http://www.linuxbase.org/ [linuxbase.org] are not labelled troll, though people often use their posts in those stories saying the whole thing is a waste of time, because by gum if they had to wrestle with dependencies for an hour to compile a
You don't like it. DON'T INSTALL IT. Simple, non ? (Score:5, Insightful)
"Call me a troll"
Consider it done...
Re:You will comply... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:slashdotted??? (Score:2)
But I am still unhappy with the tool bars in Konqueror. Why won't the developers merge these? There is still lots of screen real-estate being "wasted." The default Firefox 1.0.7 layout is OK in my view. Buttons for incresing/decreasing font size and the "find" button should not be on the default layout. Anyone that needs these can add them later.
Re:how to upgrade? (Score:5, Informative)
Open Software->'Installation Source'. You want to add a yast repository that contains the KDE 3. rpms. Lucky for us SuSErs, almost every suse mirror has them!
You can find mirrors from google if you search 'suse mirrors', and choose the 2nd result.
The directory that you need to choose depends on the mirror, but it is usually along the lines of pub/suse/i386/supplementary/KDE/update_for_10.0.
Make sure you choose FTP, or HTTP depending on the server. Enable refresh on the server (this makes yast check to see if the repository is updated each time it's accessed).
Then click finish to close the 'installation source' window. Now in YaST, open 'software management'. What you want to do is display all your installed packages, so you want to filter based on the 'package groups', then choose 'zzz all packages', located at the bottom of the left side. This will show you every package that you have installed, and is available to install. Now click 'Package->All in this List->Update if Newer Version is Available'. Now all the installed packages that can be updated have been selected!
Click 'Accept', and try an solve any conflicts that arise, usually solve each conflict one at a time and click 'OK - Try Again' each time, sometimes solving one conflict removes others.
It'll then tell you of any extra packages that will be needed, and away you go!
Re:how to upgrade? (Score:2)
Re:Something Kool for my Komputer! (Score:2)
Re:Windows lookalike? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Windows lookalike? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:If KDE is so advanced, why gnome? (Score:4, Insightful)
Projects like KDE and Gnome have different communities, and different developers and sponsors with different goals and ideas. You can't just "pick one". That doesn't make any sense.
Re:If KDE is so advanced, why gnome? (Score:3, Insightful)
All you people desiring authoritarian conformity should stick with Windows. You'll be happier.