Science Meets Style In This Cathode Tube Watch 190
scope-n-SHOUT writes "The Nixie Watch displays the time on nixie tubes, a cold-cathode tube filled with neon, a little mercury and argon at a small fraction of atmospheric pressure. Nixies were used in many early electronic desktop calculators, including the first: the vacuum tube-based Sumlock-Comptometer Anita Mk VII in 1961. This two-digit wristwatch is designed for everyday use, being water-resistant and rugged, not to mention looking really retro-future cool. The watch requires no button pushing to operate - it shows the hours, minutes and seconds in sequence at the flick of the wrist. For the hardcore code tweaker, a programming adapter allows the GPL'd PIC firmware running the watch to be hacked up at will. The Nixie Watch is being sold in very limited edition, with each piece individually numbered and engraved."
Why a watch? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why a watch? (Score:5, Informative)
Something like one of these [amug.org] or these [electricstuff.co.uk]?
more nixie clocks from my watchmaker (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Why a watch? (Score:2)
Thanks for that link. There are so many examples there that now I'm officially bored with the idea.
Does anyone bother to make anything other than clocks out of these things?
Re:Why a watch? (Score:1)
http://www.hack.net/nixie/ [hack.net]
Keep it quiet, or the link will get front page'd
Re:Why a watch? (Score:1)
Can you bend cold cathode tubes (that people use to light up the insides of their computers) over a candle..?
No, its different. (Score:4, Informative)
Its basically a glow discharge tube like you can find them as gadgets sometimes (like a hearth, or a number or so glowing). The glow is around the kathode, which can be formed however you want.
So this tubes have 10 different kathodes in one tube, sorted by visibility (to but the "big" shapes back as to not hinder the view to other ones). All in all, you can see that they are in different planes (about 5-8mm or so, which makes neat effects for a frequency counter (as the digit seems to jump rapidly, seemingly randomly back and forth in 3d-space)).
Re:Why a watch? (Score:3, Interesting)
Some older equipment used displays that were like miniature slide projectors. Each digit had a small rear projection screen. Behind that screen was an assembly of miniature light bulbs and optical slides. When one of the light bulbs was turned on, its light passed through an optical slide that had an ima
Re:Why a watch? (Score:5, Informative)
In a Nixie tube, the cathode wires are shaped into numbers {or letters, or symbols} and each one is brought out to a separate terminal pin. The anode is a fine wire mesh grille in front of the cathodes. This is connected, through a ballast resistor {to limit the current} to a positive supply of several tens of volts DC {dependent upon the size of the tube}. When one of the cathodes is connected to ground, the gas ionises and a visible glow is given off around the cathode. The smaller the resistor, the bigger the current, and the further the glowing region extends {and the shorter the overall lifetime of the tube, since some material is transferred }; the general aim is to get a strong enough glow around the active wire so the whole digit is visible. Note that if a switched-mode power supply is being used to generate the high voltage, it will most probably already have a high enough output impedance so as not to need a ballast resistor.
The cathodes can be driven by ordinary, open-collector NPN transistors but they must be selected carefully: the collector-base junction must have a sufficiently high breakdown voltage to withstand the display drive voltage. Otherwise the C-B junction will behave like a Zener diode, essentially dropping a constant voltage irrespective of how much current is flowing through it; and once a digit has been lit, it won't extinguish until the anode supply is interrupted. It won't actually fail catastrophically due to the ballast resistance limiting the current; but it probably is not what you want anyway. If the anode supply is switched-mode, and the output capacitor is small enough that this afterglow can discharge it completely, you might just be able to get away with using under-rated transistors to switch the cathodes; but this is not ideal since the anode supply will always be dying {not just in the afterglow while the transistor is staying on} and the display will flicker.
Re:Why a watch? (Score:2)
Sure, you can't we
Re:Why a watch? (Score:2)
Re:Why a watch? (Score:2)
It's _really_ a pain to have to stop the pendulum, adjust the screw on the bottom of the bob, restart and (maybe) reset it, then wait for about 2 days to see if it's any more accurate. (This may seem like meaningless pedantry when you consider there's about a minute either way slop in the minute h
Re:Why a watch? (Score:2)
I have one (Score:2, Interesting)
- It uses nixie tubes. I think they are the nicest of all digital display technologies. I like the fully formed numbers and I like the 3-dimensional movement as the digits change.
- It was designed and manufactured by one person. I think that is quite an accomplishment and makes for a much more personal and unique timepiece.
- The designer released the firmware under the GPL. This is the only watch in the world that I know of that ca
Re:Why a watch? (Score:2)
So its basically the complement of Slashdot (Score:4, Funny)
$395 too! (Score:5, Interesting)
Simplicity and function (Score:2)
It just works. It's been sc
Re:So its basically the complement of Slashdot (Score:2)
Re:So its basically the complement of Slashdot (Score:2)
What time is it? (Score:5, Funny)
Dammit... too far.
*flick* *flick* *flick*
11... No, I'm sorry, that's the minutes.
*flick* *flick* *flick*
Something 11.
*flick*
And 15 seconds.
Old school hip (Score:2)
Not (Score:5, Insightful)
Maybe 4 smaller nixie tubes, but this first hours then minutes then seconds display on two digits looks more like a bad high school science project than a must have geek item.
Re:Not (Score:2)
Thank you, Johnny Olsen. (Score:2)
Re:Thank you, Johnny Olsen. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Thank you, Johnny Olsen. (Score:2)
Oh.
Nevermind.
Re:Thank you, Johnny Olsen. (Score:2)
A real conversation with my wife (Score:5, Funny)
My Lovely Wife (MLW): Oh - uh, what is that?
Me: Cathode ray tube watch.
MLW: Oh. How much is it?
Me: About $400.
MLW: $400 for that?
Me: Yeah. And you know what?
MLW: What?
Me: That is the exactly opposite of what kind of a watch I want you to buy me for Giftmas someday.
MLW: Got it.
Re:A real conversation with my wife (Score:2, Funny)
Re:A real conversation with my wife (Score:2, Funny)
Re:A real conversation with my wife (Score:2)
Re:A real conversation with my wife (Score:2)
While I'm at it, I love how they claim it's a limited edition and every watch has its own engraved serial. My Seiko has its own serial number engraved in the metal and, last time I checked, they didn't claim to be producing it in infinite quantities.
Re:A real conversation with my wife (Score:2)
Oh, and roman numerals on the face.
Possibly a pocket watch. With a really cool chain.
Re:Huh...I was banking on a wrist sundial. (Score:2)
Not the only one (Score:5, Informative)
Too bad these weren't around in 1984... (Score:3, Interesting)
Cost vs. Reward (Score:3, Funny)
Tiger Print Suit: $2530
Authentic Aviator Goggles: $125
Realizing that you have the fashion sense of Helen Keller: Priceless
The Wind o' the Hawk (Score:2)
Wow, it's the outfit Bob Calvert dreamed of but could never afford!
This Bob Calvert reference was brought to you by a stubborn desire to refer to the things that nobody else bothers to refer to. I would type more but I'd hate to give away too many clues to the sonic conspiracy.
Re:Cost vs. Reward (Score:2)
Re:Cost vs. Reward (Score:2)
Bet one of them old retro cathode tube monitors would be easier to clean.
Slashdotted already? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Slashdotted already? (Score:2)
Science Meets Style??? (Score:3, Funny)
OR... (Score:1)
So when did /. become such an ad pusher? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:So when did /. become such an ad pusher? (Score:2, Insightful)
OMG!!!! SLASHDOT is linking to an item FOR SALE!!!!
LIES CORRUPTION END OF THE WORLD!!!!
... or maybe it's just a link to a small company with a cool product. Stop acting so self-righteous and get over yourself.
Are you really suggesting that slashdot shouldn't link to any product or service that is offered for sale?
Re:So when did /. become such an ad pusher? (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't understand how this got modded +5 "Insightful." I mean, were all the XBOX 360 articles somehow enlightening to geeks, but this one is all of a sudden an "advertisement" because some dude will (gasp!) make money off of the product?
I just checked the front page (3:35 am EST) and found that 4 of the 10 articles are about either
Skip it, thanks... (Score:2)
Re:Skip it, thanks... (Score:1, Interesting)
This actually is a pretty cool watch... (Score:5, Insightful)
Aesthetically, yeah, it's hard to argue that it's not a piece of junk. The first thing you notice -- because your eye expects to see two more Nixie tubes -- is the huge battery next to the two that are present. That should have been a stack of heavy-duty lithium coin cells mounted out of sight. If they'd gone that route, then the housing could have accommodated three tubes... which 85% of the time is all you need, right?
It doesn't deserve the bashing it's getting on a "News for Nerds" site, at any rate. Everybody reading Slashdot has scarier stuff than this in their (psychic?) basements.
Re:This actually is a pretty cool watch... (Score:2)
If this were giving time in hex, three tubes is all you'd need 100% of the time (assuming a twelve-hour clock).
Re:This actually is a pretty cool watch... (Score:2)
Re:This actually is a pretty cool watch... (Score:2)
It's implemented by having 10 separate "filaments", one per digit, stacked over each other. Because different digits are at different distances to your eye, a whole line of nixie tubes looks a bit odd since some numbers are farther away than others.
On the other hand, that's also why the digits look so nice. No nasty 8-segment displays here.
Re:This actually is a pretty cool watch... (Score:2)
...power is a problem... (Score:3, Informative)
WOW.... that watch is UGLY. (Score:1)
Ahem, "Cold Cathode Neon Readout Tube Watch?" (Score:2, Funny)
[N]ame brand word association is one of the more subtle threats to this nation's free trade. It gives the larger, well-known companies an unfair advantage. I'm doing my part to keep the playing field level by weaning people off referring to generic products with brand names [imdb.com].
And yes, even though all the manufacturers are out of business, the principle here is still really important [wikipedia.org].
Back in the day... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Back in the day... (Score:2)
I don't think there was a maintenance tech in his right mind that would have suggested taking one of those frequency counters to the field.
Whether there were that many maintenance techs that were in their right mind to begin with is an entirely different question, whic
Re:Back in the day... (Score:5, Funny)
10... 9... 8... 7... 6... ooh, shiny... 4... and look at the depth change...
Only kidding
Re:Back in the day... (Score:2)
What I would like to see (Score:1)
is a watch like this one, but instead of using nixie tubes, it would use those green-blue displays also used in some old calculators. Does it exist ?
I think I'd prefer a watch like this (Score:1)
Meh, if it was trully geek (Score:4, Funny)
DIY (Score:2)
According to the .PDF copy of the user manual on the site, the software that runs it is GPL'ed and fully user-compilable/modifiable.
Go for it!
Re:DIY (Score:2)
Better site, and cool photo: (Score:2)
[flickr.com]http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonlucas/1580799/ [flickr.com]
Re:Better site, and cool photo: (Score:4, Informative)
time to get a new arm model (Score:2)
Science Meets Style (Score:4, Informative)
Seriously people.. this does not look cool, neat, retro, funky or any thing other than an ugly lump on the end of an appendage.
Re: Science Meets Style (Score:2)
At least I'm not alone in thinking so; I don't care how geeky you are, this [cathodecorner.com] does not approximate "style", unless your style is "ugly". At the very least, for $400, I expect brushed metal, if not something better. That plastic look just has to go.
Geeky, yes, but it's not stylish at all, not even to a bunch of geeks on Slashdot. Sorry, but it's true.
Options? (Score:2)
Not for me (Score:2)
Much cooler version (Score:3, Informative)
Science meets style? (Score:4, Interesting)
Seriously, years ago I actually encountered a Geiger counter (don't ask) which used transistors to drive Nixie tubes. In those days there were no high voltage transistors, so it worked around the idea that the Nixies turned off at a certain voltage, therefore the VEBO of the transistors did not need to exceed the difference between the high voltage rail and the Nixie cutoff voltage.
Did you notice the words "Geiger counter" there? Yes. Of course, if the radiation reached a level sufficient to ionise the gas in the tubes, they stayed conducting. So turning a small gamma source on the tubes themselves blew all the output transistors.
It's not that simple... (Score:5, Informative)
Agreed (Score:2)
I hang my head in shame when I read some of the posts here. Isn't the journey of hacking together some technology from design to completion what /. is (was) about?
Did anyone comment on the
Maker of the day (Score:2)
The only problem... (Score:3, Funny)
... after 3 weeks of wearing this watch your hand goes black and drops off.
Watch design still stuck in the 1970s (Score:2)
I was disappointed when I read:
I can't understand why in the year 2005 every digital watch does not include a tiny radio receiver to pick up the WWV or GPS radio time signals. Then every watch will be accurate to within a second or two, all the time (as long as the wearer goes outside every so often if it's a GPS watch), and there's no need to set it - u
Nice Hack, but wouldnt ... (Score:2)
back to the future? (Score:2)
Is that a clock on your wrist? (Score:3, Funny)
On the down side (Score:2)
Why do I get the feeling the developer is in cohoots with Union Carbide?
and you thought woz's watch was the must have item (Score:2)
Hell, that ain't nothing... (Score:2)
http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/atomic-bill/ [leapsecond.com]
One hell of a lot more accurate than that nixie tube toy!
Vacuum tube cathode tube display calculator? (Score:2)
All good fun until you go through airport security (Score:2)
Something I will always regret... (Score:2)
I don't remember the make or model of this calculator - it may have been a Texas Instruments, not sure. I do remembe
lacking fashion sense (Score:2)
I, for one, am working on a 35-mm film base camera watch. Don't be left behind in the dust man, - get with the retro-future cool movement you square.
Good prop (Score:2)
Good prop for a Lensman movie. I think E.E. Doc. Smith would be pleased.
Re:sTUPID aMERican Dream (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Retro-future cool (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Retro-future cool (Score:2, Informative)
Re:geek application (Score:2)
Re:UG-LY (Score:2, Funny)
Everyone complaining about it being ugly is clearly not a nerd, since a nerd doesn't care whether a watch is ugly.
Re:Geeky? No. Pricey? Yes (Score:2)
How about a watch that displays the time digitally in colors matching the resister color code?
12:17 == brown red brown blue
Re:It's so cheap too! (Score:2, Funny)
Yeah, $395 is a steal, but the "plus shipping" is where they get you. Have you seen the size of that thing? Wow... it'll cost you a mint to ship that.
MadCow.
Re:some more... (Score:2)
A shame he's only built one