Google Jumps into Radio Advertising 97
Luke PiWalker writes "Just days after Microsoft announced its online advertising entry, Google has announced their entry into the radio industry. Google announced today that it has signed a deal to purchase dMarc Broadcasting Inc. for a cool $102 million. The deal will allow Google to enhance its presence in the advertising industry over to the radio industry. What's even more interesting is that Google says it plans to integrate its highly successful AdSense program with those from dMarc. The Google and dMarc deal is expected to close at the end of the first quarter, 2006."
Re:Dupe... (Score:2, Informative)
What's amazing is that this Google posting is still on the front page!!
Well (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Well [its a dupe, so what] (Score:3, Interesting)
For instance, this article [theregister.co.uk] in the register makes this interesting point:
Duh (Score:2)
DANGER WILL ROBINSON! (Score:2)
Re:DANGER WILL ROBINSON! (Score:1)
Re:I sure hope... (Score:1)
WHAT DO WE DO (Score:4, Funny)
QUICKLY! REPOST BEFORE ANYONE NOTICES!
Google will soon get bloated (Score:4, Insightful)
fleet footed company that managed to wrongfoot the large sluggish opposition
corporations such as MS that find it almost impossible to make snap decisions.
However recently google seems to be putting lots of fingers in lots of pies
and getting rather fat. I'm wondering how long before this golden child of
the dot come revolution turns into yet the type of fat bloated corporation
that its founders we so successful in outdoing....
Re:Google will soon get bloated (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Google will soon get bloated (Score:2)
I'm talking about their ability to come up with new stuff fast.
Re:Google will soon get bloated (Score:1, Redundant)
I'd say it changed a lot:
http://www.machinehasnoagenda.com/images/my_google
Also they used to brag they're not like Yahoo, turning their portal into a mish-mash of all things, but now we have Picasa, Google Racks, GMail, Video/TV Shop, Google Pack, GTalk and what not.
It's just becoming a large company and doing lots of less coordinated stuff than before - let's face it.
That doesn't mean it will become worse as a product, but it's not going to surprise me if it does.
Re:Google will soon get bloated (Score:2)
Not it at all. (Score:3, Insightful)
Google is diversifying, while staying in the ad business. It's not like they bought a shoe company or something. The cliche they'll use is probably "synergy".
Re:Google will soon get bloated (Score:1)
The very fact that Google has managed to do so much and to put its fingers into so many pies is a testament to the nimbleness of the corporation. I'd like to see the News Corporation, AOL or Microsoft (all of whom desperately want to be big internet players and have the money to do it) come up with as
Re:Does /. have RSS feeds? (Score:1)
duplicated story error overflow... warning warning, system will be halted in 5 4 3 3 3 3 3
Find the 10 similarities (Score:4, Funny)
Baby seems we never ever agree
You like the movies
And I like T.V.
I take things serious
And you take 'em light
I go to bed early
And I party all night
Our friends are sayin'
We ain't gonna last
Cuz I move slowly
And baby I'm fast
I like it quiet
And I love to shout
But when we get together
It just all work out
I take-2 steps forward
I take-2 steps back
We come together
Cuz opposites attract
And you know-it ain't fiction
Just a natural fact
We come together
Cuz opposites attract
Re:Find the 10 similarities (Score:1)
Re:Find the 10 similarities (Score:2)
Nah, Paula really meant the resolution to the Kai-Fu argument (a.k.a. popularly the Kung Fu argument).
http://internetweek.cmp.com/internetbusiness/1754
oh for the love of.... (Score:1, Insightful)
Screw it. Just search the actual, current frontpage.
Re:oh for the love of.... (Score:2)
Google Jumps into Radio Advertising
On January 18th, 2006 with 45 comments
Luke PiWalker writes "Just days after Microsoft announced its online advertising entry, Google has announced their entry into the radio industry. Google...
Google To Buy Radio Advertising Firm
On January 18th, 2006 with 144 comments
M3rk1n_Muffl3y writes "According to the BBC Google is buying US radio advertising firm dMarc Broadcasting for an upfront payment of $102m (£58m), rising...
Adsense Everywhere now? (Score:1, Redundant)
This move just seems to back up that claim.
Re:Adsense Everywhere now? (Score:4, Funny)
Bad enough to have a dupe article - we don't need dupe comments too [slashdot.org]
Re:Adsense Everywhere now? (Score:2)
Re:Adsense Everywhere now? (Score:2)
Duped comments too (Score:1)
What he said!
Don't bother ScuttleMonkey (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Don't bother ScuttleMonkey (Score:2)
"Funny, I don't remember posting that...?"
*pops another pill*
"Aaah, that's better. Look, a story about Google!"
Submitters Site... (Score:1)
Re:Submitters Site... (Score:2)
Why don't (Score:1, Interesting)
other avenues (Score:2, Insightful)
Look at the link! (Score:5, Interesting)
http://www.playfullyclever.com/ [playfullyclever.com]
And then you'll see articles like this one:
"The Problem With Slashdot
Everyone seems to be bitching about Slashdot these days. Whether it's dupes, digg farming, **Beatles-Beatles spam, or even yours truly, everyone has something to whine about. The problem is that none of these things are really the problem (oops, that's a thinker, don't hurt yourself slashbots)...."
So it seems this guy is working in the spirit of http://anti-slash.org/ [anti-slash.org] -- but even sneakier -- the guy gets a dupe posted, where it links to his "how to fix Slashdot" webpage.
What a PLAYFULLY CLEVER bastard!
Re:Look at the link! (Score:2)
Dan East
Re:Look at the link! (Score:5, Insightful)
Mod Grandparent Up. Taco posted a story on story selection. No one has actually gotten around to doing anything about it yet. This is the second virtual dupe by ScuttleMonkey in under 48 hours.
Please stay on-topic.
With dupes this blantant, the dupe is the topic. Anyone who mods "dupe" posts as offtopic, clearly doesn't understand how this site functions.
Re:Look at the link! (Score:2)
One "it's a dupe" top-level post and discussion attached to it is enough. This article got about 15 or so "it's a dupe" posts. THESE are really annoying dupes!
Re:Look at the link! (Score:1, Flamebait)
Helping with
Mod parent up! (Score:1)
Re:Look at the link! (Score:3, Insightful)
So you care more about the symptoms than the disease? People are posting these comments for a reason.
Realise: The Dupe Is The Topic.
I just want to read the good posts by the informed readers who haven't seen the story yet, and just one or tw
Re:Look at the link! (Score:2)
More reason than to perpetuate the drama and keep the infamous Beatles/Monkey/Random-Poster in the limelight for as long as possible? Email the editors please, and keep the soap-opera out of the comments.
The previous story was posted yesterday.
Meaning it was off the front-page today. Meaning those who did not read
Re:Look at the link! (Score:2)
Why email the editors? Their inboxes are already full enough. Better to call the dupe on the story page. It's more effective, and more appropriate. The *current* discussion is the du
Re:Look at the link! (Score:2)
Re:Look at the link! (Score:3, Interesting)
Editors, it's your site. You can do whatever you like with the submissions, and I can certainly understand you removing that link now that it's been brought to your attention.
However, at the time of my writing this, the only comment rated at +5 is the one I'm replying to, commenting on the link. Surely it's only polite to update the article summary to add something about having removed the link? Otherwise putko starts to look
they're arguing quite well for their detractors... (Score:2)
But removing commentary from your detractors is a pretty big turnoff, especially when they've just shown a good lesson of how they are probably right.
Integration of AdSense in radio (Score:2)
What's all the hubbubb? (Score:2, Insightful)
What's the big deal with duplicates anyhow? If someone didn't see it yesterday, they'll see it now, and if someone _did_ see it yesterday; they don't have to RTFA, ya know?
Re:What's all the hubbubb? (Score:2)
The complete failure of the editors to address this problem, despite dozens of such posts every time it happens, would seem to indicate otherwise.
Re:What's all the hubbubb? (Score:4, Insightful)
Good point. Why does the Los Angeles Times put all that effort into writing a NEW newspaper every day? They should just change the date. If somebody has already read the articles, they can just skip them. If they missed them, then they can go ahead and read it! It's like a second chance. Forever!
Re:What's all the hubbubb? (Score:1)
Re:What's all the hubbubb? (Score:2)
Good? I'd say excellent
Answers (Score:1)
AdWords - not AdSense (Score:1)
For the advertisers, it makes perfect sense: they can deliver the ads across the web, on print and radio. Expect TV support within 2007.
Re:AdWords - not AdSense (Score:2)
Not *Truely* A Dupe (Score:3, Informative)
Nonetheless, a simple "following up on yesterday's story", would do a lot to increase confidence in the editors. However, doing that would require ScuttleMonkey to actually read the front page.
Sorry if that sounds a little snide but I am seriously trying to hold back the flames of fury here. I wish 'Taco would hurry up with the next Slashback.
Google should hire some graphic designers (Score:2)
Another thing I would like to see is what the actual profit share percentage is but that's another story...
Community (Score:2, Insightful)
Once a certain number of users have done that, the two articles in question will be merged, one will be removed or something.
Something must be done, cuz I'm tired of all this complaining everytime it happens, but nothing gets done.
Doing something like this will keep Slashdot relevant, in an age where 2.0 rules the Net.
Let's do something! Yesterday!
Re:Community (Score:2)
Simplest would just be to leave it live, but take it off the front page. Any threads people were invested in could continue as they received notifications of replies they get a link to the page to read/respond.
Re:Community (Score:1)
Wow...Google's not as smart as I thought (Score:1, Funny)
And I don't know how dMarc thinks they're going to get away with that, what with all the press attention the two sales have received.
bkd
NOT a dupe (Score:1, Informative)
Adsense (Score:3, Interesting)
And "Pee colon slash" sounds pretty awful, anyways.
Re:Adsense (Score:1)
If your advert is one amongst hundreds in the adsense basket (ie, Sleepy Happy Docs Good night tablets) it makes no sense in your advert being playing at 8pm on a Saturday night whilst the heavy dance music is playing, but what if during a talkin show at 3pm somebody is talking about lack of sleep, your advert would be PERFECT there, and more likely to gain sales.
Sure, you could just target your advert for the middle of the night, bu
What's the strategy (Score:1)
For future reference (Score:2)
Jaj
It's not a dupe! (Score:1)
And so it begins... (Score:1, Insightful)
Satellite Radio for the Masses .... (Score:1)
Note to Google: (Score:2)
Hummmm, google! (Score:1)
oh hum... more radio deregulation (Score:1)