data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a9f6/0a9f602d1e8aea45dd080f4c7d58fd6a6856b86b" alt="AMD AMD"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4aed5/4aed504ce8aee2dc05aad5c795061ff521803c58" alt="Hardware Hardware"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48200/482001dc55ccabd5cbb4027c081892317aea7223" alt="IT IT"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6f85/a6f851c8783074640b3793f84df3eb59585db49c" alt="Technology Technology"
AMD Ships Heavy Duty Cooling With Latest Processor 63
jmke writes "With the increasing heat output of recent processors both Intel and AMD are shipping larger and heavier heatsink/fan combo's to cool them down. AMD has now incorporated heat pipe technology, which is usually only found in more expensive third party CPU cooling solutions. This test compares the new heatsink to a popular 3rd party product and it turns out that the new AMD unit is very impressive: high performance and silent operation from a free CPU cooler? AMD has done it! Now if only Intel would follow."
Wow! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Wow! (Score:2)
Re:Wow! (Score:2)
Re:Wow! (Score:2)
Re:Wow! (Score:2)
Re:Wow! (Score:2)
Re:Wow! (Score:2)
Oblig. slashdot whine (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Oblig. slashdot whine (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Oblig. slashdot whine (Score:2)
I will grant you that computers make great space heaters--they not only heat the room, but they can do all [stanford.edu] sorts [unrealtournament.com] of interesting [half-life2.com] things [doom3.com] in the mean time.
Re:Oblig. slashdot whine (Score:1)
And possibly win money in the process. [mersenne.org]
Although, i'm kinda tired of spending an extra $20 on electricity each month... anyone want to buy a quad PIII Xeon for cheap?
Re:Oblig. slashdot whine (Score:1)
Re:Oblig. slashdot whine (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Oblig. slashdot whine (Score:2)
Heatsinks and fans aren't going to reduce the amount of heat being produced by your PC...
Nice, but... (Score:5, Interesting)
...when do we hit the hit wall. I know that we can got for liquid cooling etc etc but we must surely be approaching the point where processors can't get much fast simply because the cooling solutions are becoming impractical.
Fair enough there will be some people that will be happy to have cryo units strapped to the side of their boxen but I think most computers are already a little on the large side considering what's in them.
I suppose one thing that hasn't been done on a large scale yet is ducted inputs and outputs. I imagine having the ability to draw in cooler air from outside the case would make for a fair advantage but this would require a redesign of the basic case which manufacturers are loathed to do.
I would be interested to know if anyone has studied this problem and come to any conculsions about whether will will hit the limit of Moore's law first or just be unable to cool a processor first.
Re:Nice, but... (Score:2)
It's worth mentioning that Intel made an attempt at it with the BTX form factor. They were driven by the increasingly hard-to-manage heat output of their processors (Presscott). Since they are changing direction and abandoning the GHz-at-any-cost approach, they will be using c
Re:Nice, but... (Score:2)
Re:Nice, but... (Score:3, Interesting)
Intel has a spec for TAC (Thermally Advantaged Chassis) that a lot of vendors are conforming to. It's basically a design guide that offers recomendations to ensure good air flow.
Re:Nice, but... (Score:5, Informative)
AMD has not increased the heat output for quite a while. Their CPUs still produce the same heat. IIRC it is 65, 85 or 110 depending on the submodel for Athlon and Opteron. If their CTO is to be believed they do not intend to change any of these values anytime soon. They will ship 110 for people who do not care, 85 for ones who kind'a care and 65 for blades and small form factor. They intend to increase the performance while keeping to one of these "sweet spots" for all three types.
Simply the market has demanded quieter and quieter PCs lately. As a result Intel went the BTX route which provides lower noise and better cooling due to a new case design. AMD dropped the noise on their coolers by changing the cooler design at least twice over the last 2 years. Possibly more times. This is from looking at upgrade leftovers I have left which are not that many so they do not make a statistically significant sample.
Re:Nice, but... (Score:3, Insightful)
AMD has been trying to retail compatability with all S939 boards, including the early NF3 and K8T800 Pro boards. I don't know AMD's original requirements for the current the motherboard should be able to supply to the CPU, but I do know the dual core parts can draw about 10A more than the original highest power parts on S939. That may be one factor that's d
I disagre-have increased in speed but not cooling (Score:1)
While processors have been increasing in heat recently, over time, cooling has become better. Early computers were the size of whole, air conditioned rooms!
I know that we're talking 20-30 years ago, but the idea is the same; for the most part, technology has become smaller and previous solutions are still suitable. One example is the cell phone. And computers have been getting more powerful and smaller as well; laptops as thin as yo
Re:Nice, but... (Score:1)
What do you mean? Cooling your PC with cooking oil [tomshardware.com] is completely practical ;P
Re:Nice, but... (Score:1)
It all depends. (Score:1)
AMD and Intel both have reached the point where speed doesn't matter so much. You can have as many Gigahertz as you want, the software is still going to constrain the performance. Add in networking bottlenecks and people who have no problem with using dial-up a
Free? (Score:2)
So I take it this person has never looked at the price difference between retail package and oem(bare) processors. You're definitely paying for the packaging and the heatsink/fan, though maybe not as much as a nice 3rd party unit.
Re:Free? (Score:1)
Re:Free? (Score:3, Insightful)
That's not much of a risk since cpus pretty much never die from any cause that would be covered under warranty.
Re:Free? (Score:1)
Re:Free? (Score:2)
It is. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:It is. (Score:1)
Re:Still waiting... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Still waiting... (Score:5, Informative)
Let me guess... You haven't bought a new CPU in over two years...
Both the Athlon 64s and Pentium 4 processors do exactly that, and have since those particular product lines were introduced.
Go down to Boxmart.. (Score:2)
Defrost anyone? (Score:1)
Volume! (Score:2)
Many thing are similarly affected by unseen factors. What appears irrational is usually just ignorance of factors.
Wonder why AMD would do this (Score:4, Informative)
I'm sure Newegg will soon be full of reviews about how high you can overclock an Athlon using this retail heatsink. It almost seems like AMD is encouraging them... and I wouldn't be surprised if the Athlon's widespread fame as an excellent overclocker contributes to the increased market share that AMD is enjoying. But I also wouldn't be surprised if overclocking eats into the sales AMD's higher-margin models.
Maybe the solution is to bundle these fancy heatsinks only with their upmarket processors ($350 and up) so as to allow even them to run at a substantial overclock.
Re:Wonder why AMD would do this (Score:2)
Re:Wonder why AMD would do this (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't really think it eats into it that much. The people that can afford the $1,000 FX chips either have money to burn and could care less about overclocking, or they are the type of person that seriously cares about getting that last 2 frames per second in their favorite FPS game... which means they will happily overclock it so they can get 3 instead of 2. The kind of person that thinks in terms of "best
Re:Wonder why AMD would do this (Score:1)
Re:Wonder why AMD would do this (Score:1)
Re:Wonder why AMD would do this (Score:1)
A brief, but good explanation is here: http://www.heatsink-guide.com/content.php?content= connector.shtml [heatsink-guide.com]
If you need something more specific, then a fan controller is
I'm still pissed at shelling out extra ... (Score:1)
Imagine my annoyance/glee when I discovered that, not only do I not need the XP-120/120mm fan, but I am *unable* to get the CPU to go above 100F, even when running at a 145-155%% overclock (I have PC4
Old news (Score:2)
Re:Old news (Score:1)
Re:Old news (Score:2)
Re:Old news (Score:2)
The system I put the CPU into was a Shuttle SN25P. It uses it's own cooling solution which, ironically, uses the mounts for a Socket 478 P4. It works beautifully in a push-pull configuration, but it feels really odd specifying an Intel socket when looking for potential water-cooling parts.
The problem I find with the stock AMD heatsink with the heat-pipes is that most motherboa
Silent? Submitter is on crack. (Score:1)
Re:Silent? Submitter is on crack. (Score:2)
The article says the thing is 50db when the CPU is under load, when measured 18" in front of a closed case. It also says
Dispite the misleading Slashdot article summary, this is not a solution for people looking for a "silent" PC.
Re:Silent? Submitter is on crack. (Score:1)
If it's such a big deal. (Score:1)
Re:If it's such a big deal. (Score:2)
Aftermarket heatpipes are silent because they don't use fans, period.
Re:If it's such a big deal. (Score:1)
Re:Silent? Submitter is on crack. (Score:1)