Cisco Lost Rights to iPhone Trademark Last Year? 162
An anonymous reader writes "An investigation into the ongoing trademark dispute between Cisco and Apple over the name "iPhone" appears to show that Cisco does not own the mark as claimed in their recent lawsuit. This is based on publicly available information from the US Patent and Trademark office, as well as public reviews of Cisco products over the past year. The trademark was apparently abandoned in late 2005/early 2006 because Cisco was not using it."
Old News (Score:5, Funny)
--Steve
simple solution (Score:5, Funny)
Re:simple solution (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Name stealing nothing new. (Score:1, Funny)
Apple - Sued by Apple records
Unix - Sued by Open Group
iPhone - Sued by Cisco
Re:Name stealing nothing new. (Score:1, Funny)
iDiot
Err: 1D10T
Re:simple solution (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Looks great but (Score:2, Funny)
Would that make it an iBeowulf Cluster, or a Beowulf iCluster? Damn, I'm so confused! Who do we sue next?
So that's it! (Score:4, Funny)
If this checks out, Youch! Everyone was wondering what was behind Apple so brazenly using the iPhone trademark. Cringely wrote a whole piece on it http://pbs.org/cringely [pbs.org] but no one guessed something as simple as this!
Memo to self: Don't play Poker with Steve Jobs.
Why aPhone? (Score:5, Funny)
-BA
Too Late Buddy (Score:5, Funny)
2. National obsession with dance at the expense of expanded consciousness - Check.
3. Horrific fashion - Check.
4. Youth culture co-opted by advertising - Check.
5. Government stomping all over personal liberty - Check.
Sorry, dude, you're too late. The Seventies are back in force.
Re:You Know What This Proves? (Score:3, Funny)