MS Says Vista Selling At Twice XP's Pace 322
Several readers made us aware that Microsoft said today that it sold more than 20 million Windows Vista licenses in the first month after the OS's general debut on January 30. This compares to 17 million licenses of XP sold in the first two months after its release. (Just a coincidence the announcement came out a day after this community's speculation, surely.) Most of the coverage of this story, picked up from Reuters, looks like it follows an MS press release. The Associated Press dug deeper, noting that since XP's release the overall PC market has grown by almost a factor of 2, so it would be a surprise if Vista didn't do twice as well: "...51 million PCs were sold to consumers worldwide in 2002; this year... 96 million consumers will buy a computer." Also, Microsoft's 20 million figure includes the backlog of upgrade coupons bundled with XP computers sold since last October.
Misleading (Score:5, Insightful)
In summary: computer sales up; consumers forced to adopt Vista. Microsoft chuckles gleefully.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Misleading (Score:5, Insightful)
Microsoft declined to break out the number of Vista copies sold at retail, though it has said in the past that 80 percent of Windows revenue comes from sales to PC makers.
Eventually we'll all (those of us running Windows) upgrade, but my sense of things right now is that most XP users are waiting until software availability forces the upgrade.
Re:Misleading (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Misleading (Score:5, Insightful)
What's more is that the figures suggest that 20 million copies of Vista are currenty being used, rather than having been shipped to OEMs and sitting on shelves. I would suspect that the actual number of Vista licenses in the wild are substantially lower, to the point of embarassment for Microsoft.
Personally, I've bought my last Microsoft license. At the same time I realize that Business runs on Microsoft, Business accounts for the lion's share of Microsoft licenses, and I've yet to see Business in general, or any single business in particular, leaping towards Vista. Most, including the one I work for, are waiting until it is absolutely necessary (certainly not before SP1) before even contemplating a widespread rollout.
The numbers are nonsense and reflective only of PCs in the pipeline (or whatever other figures can be found in Redmond-area proctological exams), not in deployment. In 12 months, Vista will be unavoidable but for now it is a non factor. As far as Business goes, it's still more important to make sure your widget works with MS Windows 2000 than with Vista.
Re:Misleading (Score:5, Interesting)
I wouldn't even give them that. Personally, I don't plan on upgrading any of the computers I administer until at least 18 months out. I've got a test machine running Vista Ultimate, and while I'm actually a fan of the features Vista introduces, it will be an absolute nightmare to roll this out to my users, especially since (currently) Vista and Server 2003 don't always see eye-to-eye. Microsoft is just trying to convince people that Vista is doing well, and I understand that, but any business that tries to upgrade any time soon is asking for a world of hurt.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Misleading (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Anyway, AMD migrating to Vista certainly is not a guideline for the majority of businesses that are not, you know, producers of CPUs and GPUs that are needed by Vista. For one, they AMD is certainly not impartial. Second, I am sure they get a tiny bit of support from MS whenever the co
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Misleading (Score:5, Interesting)
Well... a week ago, an acquaintance said she was finally upgrading her computer (from one running Windows 98, with 64 Mbytes of RAM!), and wanted some advice, because she'd heard bad things about Vista. She'd heard of Linux, but had bought the line that one had to be a "nerd" to use it, so she was hoping to buy a computer with Windows XP; I didn't try to convince her otherwise. I did tell her that now that Vista has been released for the general public, basically any computer running Windows she buys now will have Vista on it. Based on that, she said a Macintosh was looking better and better, so I expect that's what she'll end up with.
Of course, that's a lousy sample size, but I'm heartened somewhat that an average computer user is leery of moving to Vista.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The biggest consumers of Vista (Score:3, Interesting)
Nah, consumers have already rationalised their purchase of Vista. Even XP-loyal geeks have downgraded their opinion to "I guess it has some features I'd like on XP" and are seriously considering upgrading.
If by "consumer" you mean big box store shelf, you are correct. I'm not sure anyone with an IQ better than a shelf is really thinking like M$ wishes they were thinking, especially when they can't rationally name any real features. As people also noted [slashdot.org] M$ is stuffing the channels to make it look like an
Re:Misleading (Score:5, Interesting)
I've been using Vista for a few weeks now, came with my new laptop. There's been a single thing where I've thought "Hey, that's new, and really useful". And that's the search in the start menu. Everything else is just meh, or just a new face on an old item.
The taskbar preview is a perfect example. I move my mouse down to the taskbar to click on a folder, and a little thumbnail appears. A *useless* thumbnail. It doesn't do anything, or provide any more info than the folder icon and it's name did. It's just miscellaneous fluff. Same thing for the flip 3d thing. I don't even use it, just alt-tab the same as I've always done. Oooh, the start menu, that's different, it's now a circle instead of an elongated oval. Woohoo. Except it no longer scrolls in a useful manner. Until I turn off the new appearance, which makes the one useful thing disappear (the search). The sidebar? It's the same old stuff just on the side, instead of down at the bottom in the tray. A couple of new games.
And in exchange for these few new things, I get UAC that harasses me 20 times a day every time I do anything like open a folder or install a program. There's really nothing here, it's the emperors new clothes. The same old XP in a new face to hide it.
Literally, I have *zero* desire to install it on my other computer that came with XP.
Re:Misleading (Score:4, Interesting)
I disagree, did you see that it's not just a thumbnail but the actual live window ? (try it with a video...) It can be usefull for those tasks you want to keep an eye on. For example say you're burning a cd and copying some files. With the preview you just need to hover your mouse on the taskbar icon to see how the progress is going, instead of maximizing the window, checking, and reminimize... A little detail yes but vista is full of those little neat things. But i agree about flip3d, they could have make something really more useful if they took the time to.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
My start menu is still a rectangle, you insensitive clod!
Re:Misleading (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
They're increasing their install base for Vista. Eventually that will translate into forced upgrades for everyone else. They have plenty to be happy about -- it's just not as immediate as they might wish for.
MS has to show good sales figures to shareholders (Score:5, Insightful)
The big sell is to MS shareholders. Somehow MS must convince the shareholders that the $5bn spent on Vista is going to be a worthwhile investment.
Re:MS has to show good sales figures to shareholde (Score:2)
1) Microsoft pushes Vista onto all new machines sold, creating an install base
2) Developers start creating applications targeted at the install base. Some of these applications are Vista-only. Some of these applications are also created by Microsoft themselves, such as new versions of Office, etc.
3) Motivated by a desire to run the Vista-only applications, users upgrade from XP to Vista.
It seems that simply replacing XP wit
I'm looking for an XP computer (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
My bet is that many developers will avoid making anything Vista-only for a long time to come, since that would just reduce the potential market for their software.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:MS has to show good sales figures to shareholde (Score:3, Insightful)
In other words, they would not be in the market for OSX or Linux.
Vista has not really increased MS revenues. MS must convince the shareholders that the $5bn spent on Vista is going to be a worthwhile investment
Microsoft, debt-free, and with quarterly revenues of $14 billion dollars can afford to take the long view - and the short-term hit from the free upgrade coupons still around for Vista.
Exactly! (Score:3, Informative)
[RANT SIZE="VERY LONG"]
Well, at least one of the people I know was actually waiting for Vista to come out (against my advice... but his old computer was Windows ME, so he may be a Microsoft masochist). Of course, he promptly had me out there attempting to fix it because, although it was brand new, it didn't work very well. A few things were just a matter of moving things around: the start menu search is nice
sounds about right (Score:2)
Well, then surprise! There's no surprise!
Spelling.. (Score:5, Funny)
There. Fixed that for you.
Huh? Of course they are! (Score:3, Interesting)
Of course they are! People are fed up with cleaning spyware off their machines, to the point of buying a new one when the old one crashes. It's only in the very recent past (actually, mostly within XP's lifetime) that spyware's become such a menace, after all.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This has become the new Slashdot mantra.
But I have to tell that in this upscale suburb the last Windows PC I saw at the curb for pick-up was a crapped-out Packard Bell 486.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd like to see how they arrive at that number. (Score:2, Informative)
Like how they count their MS CRM software.
Basically anyone who has an Action Pack is counted as an MS CRM user.
Forcing vendors to stock up on Vista? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Well Long Upgrade Cycle. (Score:3, Informative)
When XP was released People had Windows 2000 and to a lesser extent ME that is good enough. So no need to upgrade. But with the long time for upgrades people with XP when they got a system in 2001 are now due for an upgrade.
Re:Well Long Upgrade Cycle. (Score:4, Insightful)
XP was a pretty big improvement over what was available prior to it. Most home users were running 98 or Me. The jump from 98/Me to XP was much greater than XP to Vista in my mind.
Re:Well Long Upgrade Cycle. (Score:4, Interesting)
And I'm really glad someone showed me Ubuntu. 2 Windows 98 machines and 1 Windows 2000 machine are now running Ubuntu. It's a major upgrade. No more hunting for drivers to make a thumb drive work. Power Point presentations display properly. There is lots of neat desktop toys. DVD support is better. CD ripping and burning is better. Photo editing and video editing is easy without buying any new software. The SIP phone which will also work with MS Netmeeting is a nice touch. The chat program which can use several services without an ad window is great.
Since I've found the new upgrade, I've been sharing it and showing it off. The new 3d desktop toys are lots of fun. Some people assumed I was running Vista, and wanted to see the new OS, so I let them.. Lots of fun.
In short, It's the applications stupid. A general lack of malware goes a long way.
I would buy vista if... (Score:2, Redundant)
Re:I would buy vista if... (Score:5, Informative)
A more interesting question... (Score:2)
In other news... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
well (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:well (Score:4, Informative)
Um they have, but in the last couple months, not over 6 years ago sales figures..
Mac sales... From the financual page..
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=AAPL&annual [yahoo.com]
Income Sept 30 2006 19,315,000 All numbers in thousands.
Income Sept 24 2005 13,931,000
Income Sept 25 2004 8,279,000
In two years from 2004 to 2006 the income went from 8 Billion to 19 Billion. It's not all iPod and iTunes sales.
Picking just one Lunux distro which is popular..
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=2276320 [ubuntuforums.org]
Since there isn't any real sales figures, I thought I would go to see if the online chatter is increasing. The Ubuntu forum is growing rapidly. "We register over 14,000 new accounts each month"
If you want a pretty graph of Linux installed base from 2000-2006, take a look here.
http://linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/6065/1
A casual glance seems to indicate more than a doubling of the 2000 installed base figure.
Here is what a market analist has to say;
http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS201
"IDC offers the following recommendations for services providers:
Open source will become business as usual in two to three years, so act today and create direct open source services offerings and embed open source in your solutions where you can"
and
"The study also reveals that open source is moving up on the investment agenda of companies worldwide, as services providers (mostly services arms of technology companies) have formalized support, training, and certification services to encourage adoption of open source (principally Linux) on their products. As open source software goes mainstream, IDC finds that services vendors must further develop open source capabilities in order to meet their clients' needs and attract new customers."
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
As much as the Linux community wants to believe it, has the amount of Linux installs really doubled as well? I wouldn't think so.
I think it is possible 18 months ago i knew one person who ran linux, Now amongst computer geek friends it is close to 100% mostly ubuntu. Ordinary users not so much.
when you talk about the amount of linux installs doubling your not doubling a huge number so doubling is entirely possible. what may be more significant is the people who are converting are not average windows users, they are tending to be the people ordinary windows users turn to... I don't know about you but I positively enjoy solving issues
20 million - 2 (Score:5, Informative)
What Microsofts Marketing Machine states and what users do are two different things.
Enjoy,
Re: (Score:2)
Hopefully they've sold enough to pay for Bill Gates retirement party.
Re: (Score:2)
give me a break.
in a market that is 95% Windows the guy who does his Christmas shopping at Dell doesn't toss the coupon worth a $150 software upgrade for his new Vista-rated system.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks.
Re:20 million - 2 (Score:4, Insightful)
Not really. The announcement Microsoft sent out regards to sales, not the amount of users compared to XP to a given date.
While I'm sure a lot of people remove Vista, a lot of people did when they first got hold of XP too.
20 million - 2 + 2 (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
One remimaged to XP (SP2) because office user said Vista (Pro) was slower than crap.
Interesting. I installed Vista Business on box with a 1.5Ghz P4 and 768M RAM. The MB is about six years old. It runs just fine. If your user says Vista is slow on a $1200 new Dell, something must be wrong with the hardware, or maybe the user just decided he or she didn't like it for some reason.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Shoulda relegated the one to the lab for dual-boot.
Re: (Score:2)
Poor Microsoft. Lots of people bought new PCs that came with Vista and aren't using it. Poor, poor Microsoft. All that money without having even provided anyone with anything of value. And you know what really sucks for them? A whole lot of those people who bought their computer with Vista and installed XP instead? They'll probably end up buying another copy of Vista in a couple years because they don't realize or remember that they have the right to a license of Vista.
Poor, poor Microsoft.
Been shopping for a PC recently... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Tag: Bullshit (Score:5, Interesting)
So Microsoft isn't quoting figures for sales spanning two months, but rather for more than five months, including at least three months of "pre-sales" in the form of coupons which likely may never be redeemed. If the coupon is never redeemed, then it can't be counted as a Vista sale, since Vista was never installed.
More FUD from the masters. Which frankly doesn't surprise me. Without apps irrevocably tied to Vista, there's no impetus to "upgrade," and people will stay with XP. Microsoft is clearly desperate to make Vista appear to have a larger installed base than it does so that ISVs will commit to it.
Schwab
Re: (Score:2)
I actually considered momentarily before using the term. Microsoft is trying to make Vista appear more popular than it is. In other words, they are trying to spread uncertainty and doubt about Vista's installed base. And they are also trying to spread fear in the ISVs that they may be "betting the wrong way" by holding back on Vista support.
So, yes, I think this announcement qualifies as FUD.
Schwab
$79 more for XP with a new system, VISTA = FREE (Score:4, Interesting)
I don't know anyone in my circle that has purchased VISTA. Personally, I am holding off for about (3) years until all the DRM and hardware issues are all worked out. I can't see any compelling reason to move to VISTA and if I do buy a new system with it pre-loaded for FREE, I will move that system to dual boot Linux/XP.
Want to know how they are doing this?? (Score:5, Interesting)
Seeing as they did not say they were NOT doing this, I can assure you that they are. Dont believe me? Well, lets see when their quarterly report comes out... I will bet almost anything that it will be uneventful...
Re: (Score:2)
A VP of Marketing I used to work with used to routinely falsify the number of users of our software in order to appear more attractive to potential customers and potential investors.
A si
How many were cancelled, returned, unfulfilled? (Score:2)
Why Upgrade when you can take the Souped-Up XP? (Score:5, Insightful)
If this is their idea of 'Vista-Capable', why would I want to go to an operating system where these awesome specs are merely ADEQUATE?
C'mon now (Score:2)
I realize that "this community" like any other has a need for self-worth, but was this petty, self-important comment necessary at all?
If 96 million PCs are going to be sold in 2007, I'm pretty sure 95 million of them (or thereabouts) will have Vista installed. It's called inertia (if nothing else), and it's very difficult to stop. Ina few years, maybe. Not today though.
And? (Score:2)
I haven't tweaked it, and I refuse to, voluntarily - so that's mostly out of the box:
While big corporates like Shell.... (Score:2)
I think MS counts corporate adoption through their so-called "Enterprise Service Agreements" as fresh sales... unless Corporates decide to junk all their existing hardware and invest in huge bloated pigs, Vista will not tak off. The barriers for Linux in the enterprise are crumbling day by day....
I say Linux adoption is happening at much more than
Bundling Vista with ALL new PCs is ridiculous (Score:5, Interesting)
A couple of weeks ago I got my mum a fairly low-end notebook (1.73GHz, 512MB RAM, 40GB HD). Since she's not exactly much of a power user and only wanted to browse the web, extract pics from her camera and occasionally check her email, her needs were easy to satisfy with a cheaper computer. Only problem was, this notebook (like EVERY SINGLE ONE in the store) was pre-installed with Vista. I figured, hey, if they're running Vista on a brand-new PC then surely the manufacturer had chosen a decent configuration to ensure decent performance. Damn I was so naive.
It was slow to boot, slow to shutdown/hibernate, slow to run programs on, full of useless pre-installed crap (e.g. Norton with 30-day subscription). After Vista did some weird shit that caused this new PC to hang with massive non-stop disk accessing, I decided to blow Vista entirely away and stick an old copy of XP with Service Pack 2 on instead. Now, the system is faster to start, faster to shutdown/hibernate, faster to launch software, it has only the software it needs with no crap lying around after an uninstall, much more responsive, plus I freed about 8 GB of a hidden recovery partition. All in all, it was a win for us with absolutely no disadvantages and a shitload of positives. In the future I might even be tempted to install Ubuntu instead, but I won't push my luck just yet.
This shouldn't be particularly surprising I suppose, but I mention it because I was totally shocked how quickly and ruthlessly the manufacturers were in totally abandoning a perfectly-working OS like XP, and sticking Vista as their default setup on hardware that shouldn't have been running it to begin with. It really astounded me just how useful the system was... *without* Vista.
Re: (Score:3)
I wouldn't be that quick in blaming the manufacturers. One reason is that they need to be competitive, and shipping a 6 year old
Re: (Score:2)
If there there for a laptop, they'll ask for a laptop. I'd like to think people care more about the laptop itself than what OS is running on it. I could be wrong; it'd be nice to have the choice however.
Makes sense I suppose. Doncha just love the way MS does business?
This may be a shock, but... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You really ought to get a Mac. Get yourself a mini or a MacBook or something. Give it a good solid try and be open-minded about the differences between it and most other GUIs.
I did this back in early 2002 at work because I needed to port a GUI photo-enhancing package from Windows to Mac. I was still working on the Windows version when my company bought the Mac so I made a point to play with it a couple of hours each day. When the time came to do the port I had a pretty good idea of what was going on wi
In Related News... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My VISTA capable desktop runs Linux/Gnome/Beryl (Score:2)
sales hype of course. (Score:2)
But its no supprise that the MS marking is trying to generate a bandwagon trend.
Seriously, with more and more large government organization picking up linux and other things advancing with linux, there is a market loss for MS. Apple moved with the flow to go with intel based CPUs and a change in its OS at the core towards a unix base.
MS days are numbered and they know it. But they don't really know how to deal with it as their business methodology that made MS succe
What can Vista do that my Linux box can't? (Score:5, Informative)
Can it open ODF, Lotus, WordPerfect, etc. formats natively within its own OS or office applications?
Does it support writing to PDF natively?
Can it natively play all of my media audio and video formats, including FLAC, Ogg Vorbis, Theora and others?
Does it support onboard IM clients using standards-compliant protocols (Jabber? irc? Others?)
Can I use freely available tools to build software on it, and do those tools come with the OS itself?
Can I read multiple filesystems at the same time on multiple different external and internal media? Linux, Solaris, Mac OS X and other filesystems?
Can I mount NFS shares to other non-Vista resources with existing, included applications/tools?
Remind me again what Vista does that my Linux box can't? Oh wait... purty jellybean graphics and melted-crayon menus and icons. Right.
No thanks, Linux does more, on less resources, at less cost, and is more extensible, secure and updates are MUCH easier to manage.. oh, and I KNOW what's running under the covers, and if I don't, I can go look and see for myself.
Re:What can Vista do that my Linux box can't? (Score:4, Informative)
Well lets see - I had to:
1. Compile my LAN card driver
2. VI my X11Config settings to get my monitor to work properly
3. Manually RPM remove some packages in a circular version loop
4. Yum update my Printer stuff
5. Manually set up my network cards using vi
All this because:
1. I have a combo printer/fax/scanner
2. On board lan
3. Dual DVD monitors of differing resolutions
So - no, none of the machines I've used linux on in the last 5 years have ever been install and use.
80% of the universe wants install and use... Linux doesn't provide that.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes... of course I am, I said I was using Linux didn't I.
"are you sure you never had to install drivers for that onboard NIC in Windows? "
Yes... insert CD, press 'YES'
The simple fact is, that the average person doesn't want Linux, because Linux is not for average people.
If (like Big Brother TV Reality), Linux was made for the average person, then Linux would be Wi
I am one of those (Score:4, Insightful)
The disk was immediately resized, and Kubuntu 6.10 Edgy Eft [baheyeldin.com] was installed on it. Windows XP was never even booted, but kept there "just in case it is needed".
For the free upgrade, I did all the paperwork for it, paid the shipping fee, and have not received it yet. I don't intend to boot it either, but I ordered it "just in case".
So, I am counted as an XP user and a Vista user, while I am neither.
uh duh george? (Score:2, Insightful)
vista wellness vs reality (Score:4, Insightful)
approx 100% of are cannibalized from XP sales (Score:4, Insightful)
By comparison, we were able to buy laptops running 2000 Pro rather than XP for years after XP came out, and XP was still selling better, percentage-wise, than 2000. That's because XP had a reason for existing... it was the retail release of NT5 and replaced the appalling Windows 9x-based Windows Me. People were going out in large numbers and buying XP for computers they already had... not simply getting it as "whatever came with my new computer".
So, no, Microsoft isn't "making a financial killing". They're selling almost the same number of copies of Windows as they would have if Vista had never shipped.
People are replacing infected computers (Score:2)
How many of those new computer sales are being done because the existing computers are so choked with spyware, nagware, and malware and botched A/V that they seem broken?
A computer thats only a few years old is already way more powerfull than most people need...until it gets hijacked. Then the apparent power goes to the floor.
Of course the pretty computer with 2gigs of ram and a core2 duo looks great in the store. It looks great compared to the perfectly operational hardware at home thats been rendered us
Look at the browser stats, wow! (Score:5, Informative)
Vista at < 0.5% Dec 2006 XP at 4%, Nov 2001
Vista at 0.6% Jan 2007 XP at 6.5%, Dec 2001
Vista at 1.2% Feb 2007 XP at 9%, Jan 2002
Can't wait till the Q1 SEC reports come out, ouch!
sources:
Google zeitgeist, w3schools, wikipedia
No wonder (Score:4, Informative)
There's a few places I can still get OEM (and a few places that seem to have old copies lying around here and there), but if you're Random McRandalot and listen to what sales people are pitching, you can't get XP any more - so why not try Vista?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I thought it was.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Sheesh, what does it take to understand that Microsoft is doing the equivalent of searching your home when they enter your computer and search. No, they don't have the right to enter my computer or home to search for any reason. If they feel I have stolen from them let them hit the courts and sue/arrest me. They'll find I am above board. But the sentiment stays. Hit the courts and do it legally. Even the police can't keep entering your home over and over to search. If they do it is harassment. The problem is that people don't know that or don't initially understand it as a search and seizure procedure.
Let me repeat. They have no right to enter my home/computer/business to do anything unless I give them permission even if it is to protect their IP. If they think I am stealing they can hit the courts up and to through due process to convict. I say this even though I am 100% legit on all copies of Windows. You would not let Walmart enter your home or business to search for goods that might be stolen and hence you would not let, should not let, Microsoft do the same.
Re:I thought it was.... (Score:4, Insightful)
It's a binding agreement. Do it.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)