Yahoo! Photos to Shut Down 71
prostoalex writes "Yahoo has finally made a decision regarding Yahoo! Photos vs. Flickr battle, and will be shutting down Yahoo! Photos by the fall of this year. Even though Yahoo! Photos currently maintains a higher share of Internet visits, Flickr growth convinced the company to maintain a single photo site from now on. Says USA Today: 'Stewart Butterfield, who co-founded Flickr in 2004 with wife Caterina Fake, says the move is a "validation" of the central idea of Flickr: that photos in the digital age are very different from a physical print. "We saw it as a means of communication and connecting with people," says Butterfield, Flickr's general manager. "People can take a picture and get immediate feedback from all over the world, and you can't do that with a printed photo."'"
Was wondering (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Lets hope Flickr doesn't have "karma" thing, my precious(!) yahoo photos are generally funny looking stuff I got from mail attachments.
Wonder how much money Flickr makes. (Score:3, Insightful)
They have other revenue streams [slashdot.org] too of course, but I can't get help get the feeling that Flickr gets Yahoo! more good PR than money.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Wonder how much money Flickr makes. (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Sam
*WARNING* The above is satire/comedy, not heresy. LAUGH!
Re: (Score:1)
Still, many won't like it...
Multi Search Interface [friskr.com]
Re: (Score:2)
So Google's got 'em with Picasa Web, which is a beautiful application. Not that Yahoo photos was ever much, so it's not that big a loss, still.
Re: (Score:1)
flickr still has a bunch of restrictions for free accounts.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
-- Electron
But... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
They did; I was one of the victims. The kept offering a "merge with your yahoo account" option, then they made it mandatory :(.
Re:But... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Photobucket 40% market share (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Photobucket 40% market share (Score:5, Interesting)
It does, however, redeem Yahoo! in the eyes of a lot of people, and for that, I suppose they should be grateful.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You haven't spent long browsing on flickr, obviously
Re:Photobucket 40% market share (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Also, Photobucket is really just that - a big bucket into which you dump stuff. Flickr, on the other hand, is all about sharing, exploring and interacting (I know that sounds cheesy, but it's true). I can see why Photobucket has a higher market share if all you want to do is dump your photos on a free h
Re: (Score:2)
I see links images on Flickr on lots of websites. I cannot remember seeing any to Photobucket.
My guess is that Photobucket has more hits, but Flickr has greater reach [moneyterms.co.uk].
Re: (Score:1)
Quit being disingenuous. We all know what Photobucket is used for. Flickr's cute bunnies, landscapes, and OMG! silliness can never compete against pics of 40 DD's and the latest upskirt of a celebrity.
Re: (Score:1)
Well, that's not what Yahoo is saying... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: That's not what Yahoo is saying... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Let's hope they'll get to keep Flickr then... (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN04222
Re:Let's hope they'll get to keep Flickr then... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Let's hope they'll get to keep Flickr then... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Well you did ask...
best is to shift to picasaweb! (Score:4, Informative)
I used Flickr before but was annoyed much with their 20MB/month limit as 1280x1024 images were talking 600KB+....means, not more than 35 images a month...a big restriction...
Photobucket? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
As far as every communi
eGroups (Score:2, Insightful)
Target Photos (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Continuity of free services (Score:3, Interesting)
It would just be nice to know that if I happen to forget about the service for a year or two and then happen to need it, it's there--ready to serve those pictures that you uploaded years ago.
Paid services are worse because any accidental lapse in payments and your photos all drop into the bit bucket. I know that sounds like a silly worry, but when you are talking about long-term continuity (across generations, possibly), at some point there is going to be a payment screwup of some sort.
Doing it yourself is probably the worst case. Eventually a server crashes or screws up and you don't reload it, also--what a waste to leave a server running 24/7 for years just in case you need to review a picture!
This is most significant with pictures. Many people consider the pictures of their family among their most treasured possessions. You could just spam all the services with all your pictures, but that has a bunch of problems. They all use different upload methods and most take a huge amount of manual labor--Also many have limits so you can't really just blindly upload all your pictures anyway.
Of course, I'm complaining about a "Free" service that I'd use rarely, so I realize I have not right to demand, but to see a site that thousands of people have trusted to hold memories--people that my not even check back before the site closes--makes me a little sad.
Yahoo! on their way out? (Score:1)
east coast models [eastcoastmodels.co.uk]