IBM and Sun Launch Intranet Metaverses 123
wjamesau writes "Sun and IBM have launched intranet metaverses designed for business and built to work behind their corporate firewalls, so their worldwide employees can use them to collaborate together. Most interesting to game developers, IBM (which also runs a private, no public access Second Life island as a development lab) created their intranet world from the 3D Torque engine from Garage Games. Will the metaverse actually be thousands of gated community metaverses?"
It is. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:It is (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm not surprised that there's a new chat-room product built like Second Life. I just wonder if it meets the business requirements as well as or better than the chat program we already use.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:It is. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Don't join.
I heard they are suffering from global warming.
Responses show Slashdot no longer technical (Score:1, Insightful)
95% of the responses to this story show how riddled with dumb, non-tech plebs Slashdot has become. Pretty sad.
Fortunately companies like Sun and IBM still have techs and planners who can see beyond the end of their noses on issues like this. Yet all you can do is criticize with empty insults or cheap shots for +Funny mods. I guess there's no shortage
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Yet I don't see you trying to school us ignoramuses.
Fact is, it's not really that great of an idea. It's noting like real life where you have limitless expressions, can write on white boards in front of them, assemble models, etc. Now if they pack that into the 'metaverse' engine, then maybe it could be useful.
However, IM, Webpages, e-Mail, a
Re: (Score:1)
The thing that's remarkable here is that the stupid stuff doesn't just have a flawed line of reasoning behind it, it has NO reasoning behind it. I mean, anyone, give me any reason, any reason at all for this as opposed to chat and videoconferencing. Physical organization is lame compared to virtual. Why simulate physical organization in a virtual environment?
So, this will go nowhere, on a budget large by sane standards and tiny by big c
Interesting. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Try Croquet (Score:4, Informative)
Open source and well funded, based on Squeak Smalltalk.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Go read The End Of History And The Last Programming Language.
Stop living in denial.
Re: (Score:2)
As for living "in denial", it worked pretty well for Paul Graham.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I have wanted to give it a go for a while. The only download seems to be the SDK. Does that mean you have to write code to get it working at all?
I tried to get the SDK via a torrent once but I got an error from bittorrent and didn't take it further. It seems rude these days to download 70M at a time from one server.
WTF? (Score:1, Interesting)
WTF is a metaverse?
Re:WTF? (Score:5, Informative)
I will use Google and Wikipedia before asking stupid questions.
I will use Google and Wikipedia before asking stupid questions.
I will use Google and Wikipedia before asking stupid questions.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Disregarding that, I have to say though that he was my favorite teacher ever. Physics and computer science. Only high school class around my area that t
(Trolling, please ignore) (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
How good is computer vision these days? (Score:2)
How about doing multiple humans at the same time?
Can it be done in real time?
Ok, great. How about making a system that can take a video feed from a web cam (with pivot and tilt) and map the body and facial movements of the humans it is look at onto models in a 3d environment?
Then I can collaborate with my co-workers on the other side of the world at the weekly meeting with more to go on than just their voice over the spea
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It's a big room. There's 20+ people in it. You're on the other side of the world. There is *no way* you are getting *any* information about the body language of the occupants of this room by controlling the web cam remotely. By the time you figure out who is talking you have less than a second to get the camera pointing at them. You can forget about facial expressions.
What you need is some smarts in the camera to look at what you would look at, if you were there. Now, this would probably be so f
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Or you could use any of the existing videoconferencing hardware/software and actually see their real faces. Sure, that's not quite as cool, but I bet it's several times more productive and it already exists.
Re: (Score:2)
Or you could use any of the existing videoconferencing hardware/software and actually see their real faces.
Sometimes that's not what you want ;o)
Sure, that's not quite as cool,
Agreed, not sure how it helps you argument though.
but I bet it's several times more productive
You don't offer any evidence. Do you have experience in this area ? I would say that a virtual world is more productive in some ways - for instance, in the videoconferencing scenario, there really isn't a way to continue interacting after the conference is done. Everyone disconects from the conference, and that's it. In the virtual world, it is possible to have a conversation with your virtualised colleagues as you le
Re: (Score:1)
Answer. (Score:4, Funny)
No, that's just silly. A metaverse will be a single line of the first metapoem.
The first metapoem (Score:2, Funny)
There you go. The first metapoem, in iambic verse. Written by Short Circuit.
wow... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
But the idea of being able to visit rooms hosted on people's computers, and finding other rooms by walking through doors ("hyperlinks") might actually be interesting.. you walk through a door and are then in a room hosted on another server. Common protocol, running on whatever operating system. The probl
Re: (Score:2)
Re:wow... (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm sure people said "We don't need email, just call them on the phone!".
call somebody on the phone
I'm sure people said "We don't need phones, just write them a letter!".
Write them a letter
I'm sure people said (gestured:)?) "We don't need to write letters, just stay in our hunter-gatherer band!"
While I don't want to imply that Second Life is the next communication revolution, I do want you to notice the trend. Just because something exists that can accomplish roughly the same thing, doesn't mean it won't kick the other one's ass.
It's called progress, buddy, and it's telescoping, whether you like it or not.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not that other ways exist - it is that Second Life is shit.
This was a public service announcement, honest.
Re: (Score:2)
(Also useful for other stuff than 3D!)
And we've put a lot of work into trynig to design a flexible structured system, and also actually making the networking perform efficiently for this application (no conneccting to random SQL databases or using HTTP over TCP sockets and stuff like that!)
Check it out. We're currently revising a some of the core library, but we will soon need people to help make the end user application have
Re: (Score:2)
Say have you selected a scripting language, and if not would you consider Tcl/Tk?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't. From my (admittedly limited) experience as a commercial game designer, I believe that Second Life's primary two benefits are the open scripting (obvious) and the size of the player base (less so.) The game that got famous inside Second Life, called Tringo, is an excellent example. What Second Life brought to Tringo's author wasn't a scripting enviroment s/he cou
Sun and IBM? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Sun and IBM? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Sun and IBM? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or, ya know, maybe they have nothing to do with that stuff and we're just being a little unfair here.
Re:Sun and IBM? (Score:4, Informative)
What an immense waste of time (Score:5, Insightful)
I work from home every couple of weeks, and really the biggest thing I would like is a live video link to the colleges I most often talk to, having to break from working to go into a virtual world to talk to colleges is just such crud.
They show their 'virtual boardroom', which has video streams from other locations. Why bother with the virtual boardroom at all? What's wrong with just having video feeds?
Urgh... this is almost doing something for doing something's sake, without actually considering how useful it really is.
Re: (Score:1)
What's wrong with adding a virtual boardroom?
Re: (Score:2)
All you should do is fire up a webpage or app that has the video streams on it, end of story
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
For instance, without physical presences, many colleagues and managers have a natural tendency to believe you are not working or that they are
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Why spend all that time navigating around the WWW (which has to be built) and doing things in the these websites when really you should be actually working?
The problem is that a lot of people see the metaverse as a "Game". A better way to think of it is as the next extension of the web. You don't have a game client, you have a 3D browser.
Webpage
Am there, doing that... (Score:2)
Um, you mean, like, this [slashdot.org]?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
All the little astroturfers in their virtual ties in case a boss wanders through (in a double sized ego boosting power avatar) to check if they are earning that paycheck.
All the oldschool linux hippies running around in full pixilated nudity, expressing their freedom.
All the REALLY hardcore slack and gentoo peeps runnign around in optimized featureless single colored textures. (
Re: (Score:2)
I believe that is called a strawman argument.
3D medium as a collaboration tool works quite well. For example lets try and relate it to
I walk into an area discussing this topic I see various people talking various comments, those making more sense would have more people gravitating to them to talk while those screaming what you mentioned are more likely to be turfed out the back with the rest of the loonies.
Avatar representation als
Re: (Score:2)
In the early 90s I was doing some VRML work and I was shown the future of media research by one of our collaborators. They had created a virtual library. You started in the lobby and had to take an escalator to the second floor. I've seen more bad UI than good in my career but that was special.
The Metaverse will be a lonely place. (Score:3, Insightful)
I sure hope not. If the Stephensonian concept of a Metaverse were ever to take off in full cyberpunk force--VR goggles, gloves, and fiber lines in all glory--I sure don't want it to be a community of gated communities.
The entire idea of a Metaverse embolized existentialist absurdity: the idea of an "unending avenue of lights," 24 hours a day, is supposed to suspend reality. We're supposed to make this irrational and, frankly, just have fun with it.
For the thousands who don't work for IBM, Sun, or have some other connections, a gated Metaverse will be a bad place and waste of time. Not everyone (especially those who have few friends in real life) will have these connections. A Metaverse could be the perfect place to interact and meet others who want nothing else to do but relax and enjoy a little digital vice. This triumphs over EQ or WoW because you DON'T have a goal: it's not competitive and you can just relax.
In short: a filfilling Metaverse could be a great place for the (bored/lonely/connectionless/antisocial). Making it a world of gated communities will only make it some fancy social party.
Re: (Score:1)
William Gibson??? (Score:1)
Stephensonian??? Not hardly.... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I disagree. This is your subjective reading of the Metaverse. Objectively, the metaverse did not symbolize anything, rather, it was a technological commodity that people found to be very useful and fun. It is a tool. I don't know what you find absurd about this, and you
Re: (Score:2)
What you are missing is that the Stephensonian concept of the Metaverse is a community of gated communities.
It's a good thing I came out as a geek a long time ago, because this comment would leave no doubt.
The equipment that draws the street and other non-internal environs belongs to L. Bob
We're Meta, They're Endo (Score:3, Insightful)
"This is Endo. Endo has forgotten more about..." (Score:1)
Ok, I rate this comment because it mentions Endo and Endo is cool.
However, You've given the Greek meaning of "meta". The Geek meaning is an extension (a "metameta" if you will...) of this, meaning "based on", "connected to" or "extension of".
None of which matters because "metaverse" was coined by a novelist. Fiction writers use what's called "poetic license" so the invented word or phrase cannot be judged against the same rules to which "science" (bwah
Re:"This is Endo. Endo has forgotten more about... (Score:2)
The universe beyond the real one is "heaven" or the imagination (or nothing), depending on your faith. These virtual universes are contained within the real one, and so are "endo", as in "endodontic", "inside the teeth".
I am a writer, of Slashdot comments at least, and so I have used my own prose license to correct the wo
I hope not, but... (Score:1)
not the best idea... (Score:2)
Also most of the time when I'm writing code, having another channel of interruptions is just suicide. Already with email, IM, phone, and in person interruptions its difficult to get 2-3 hours of solid coding in in a day. Add this to the mix, who knows, if at any time someone can just jump on and request a meeting on the thing...
Just Maybe (Score:2)
You spelled metaverse wrong... (Score:1)
As Intel wipes the sweat off its collective brow.. (Score:3, Interesting)
Torque sounds neat but extremely expensive. Just how much did IBM spend on liscensing it and how much to upgrade hardware to support it? And is it that good? They could also have invested in becoming the top sponsor of croquet too, though it seems to require significant resources. (in terms of max. people in a room, and also how well it works on different pcs - I've had it crash mainly due to a gl bug I think or fail to run on a number of machines).
No, no, and no. (Score:3, Informative)
Also, Second Life is not what you should be using to measure how much horsepower this takes. Pretty much anything
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well (Score:3, Interesting)
But wait, no, if they can make all our development and design tools run INSIDE their 3D world, on virtual computers, and make their workers use the virtual computers to work, then we know they lost it.
Seeing from what we have here though, I wouldn't be surprised if they're already working on it.
"Collaborate together" (Score:2, Insightful)
VRML hype all over again (Score:1)
And isn't it interesting that crap like Second Life and it's ilk still look like 90's VRML?
Similarity to Gibson and Stephenson's metaverse (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
On behalf of the two science fiction non-fans that read Slashdot, I thank you. Note that I'm not such a person, and I haven't knowingly met one, but I'm sure they're here. Maybe.
History of network development (Score:4, Insightful)
Since the usefulness of networks is directly related to the number of users connected to them, it makes sense that eventually these isolated corporate worlds will set up interconnections, bridges, tunnels, whatever to let people wander back and forth. And eventually there will be public interfaces, and inter-world-networks.
I see Sun + IBM's work on this and Second Life and World of Warcraft and all the other current worlds as something akin to old information services like CompuServe or GEnie or Delphi. Eventually they'll come to their senses and allow greater interconnectivity, and once the protocols get standardized, they'll end up selling different add-ons or levels of service or GUIs for your metaverse experience. WoW may be selling awesome fantasy-style avatars and Blizzard goodies for PvE/PvP games, and IBM may be selling four- or five-nines reliability and excellent customer service.
Of course, I'll be 65 years old by then and will *still* get my butt kicked by random 13-year-olds in deathmatches.
Isnt This just.... (Score:1)
Could Make For Some Interesting Meetings (Score:1)
And you just know that some people would show up with opposite-sex avatars too.
Yes and no. (Score:2)
To a certain extent, of course it will. Just like "the world wide web" itself has lots of "gated communities" of various types. Really, "the metaverse" is a lot like "the web" with a different UI metaphor.
Sounds like an interesting idea (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> That is why so many people in the world speak English as a second language.
Bollocks.
The reason so many people speak the English language as a second language is that there are so many people who speak the English language as a *first* language. The reason so many people speak the English language as a *first* language is that the English people have sprea
Re:metaverse??? (Score:5, Informative)