The Death of the Greenphone 121
phobos13013 writes "Trolltech announced this week that they will discontinue development on their Greenphone platform. The Greenphone was advertised to be the first phone with a user-modifiable environment. Trolltech CTO Benoit Schilling stated that they are not really a hardware company and so will focus their efforts on FIC's Neo 1973, now available. However, Schilling hinted at a future Wi-Fi-enabled endeavor (possibly a VOIP phone)."
This article is not a Troll (Score:3)
Re:This article is not a Troll (Score:5, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_(toolkit) [wikipedia.org]
Which is what KDE uses.
Increased Qtopia support on open devices (Score:1)
Best regards
Knut Yrvin
Community Manager Trolltech ASA
Bummer (Score:2)
Maybe OpenMoko can fill the void left behind...
Re:Bummer (Score:5, Interesting)
I own an NEO1973. I'm glad to support the project, and desperately hope that it will succeed. Here's something I read today from the OpenMoko mail list: "The Neo is, was, and will be, a product for geeks and therefore never was intended to be a mass market product. Geeks do not look at fancy glamour but for useful attributes." I have no idea who this guys is talking about. I'm about the biggest geek I've ever met (yeah, I know some of you are bigger
The NEO1973 battery is tiny, screen too small, touch capabilities poor, integration level low, plastic instead of anodized aluminum, and worst of all... there's not the same kind of inspired software leadership. The community wants to build the world's best phone, but a guy like Linus is required to lead the effort. I think the OpenMoko guys have incredible vision, but not the complete vision, and the leader needed make it succeed is currently missing. Get the right guy involved, and they could change the world... crappy hardware and all.
Unfortunately, you're right (Score:2)
iPhone is still "it" for those of us who want a powerful *NIX-based cellphone -- even if we have to fight Steve Jobs tooth and nail for it.
Re:Unfortunately, you're right (Score:5, Insightful)
The Greenphone didn't fail, because it was never meant to be anything but a development platform to fill the void while there was nothing else good out there. Now that there are other open phones, its job is done. Aside from the sensationalized headline, this really isn't news at all.
iPhone the first UNIX phone? (Score:4, Interesting)
I think you don't need to say *NIX anymore. OS X Leopard 10.5 is certified UNIX, and as the iPhone is based on OSX, isn't the iPhone the first UNIX phone?
I thought Apple is going to open up the platform for developers.
Re: (Score:2)
That's one thing. And I commend Apple for opening it up for 3rd party applications.
The remaining problem (worth fighting Steve Jobs himself) is that people want to use it on networks other than AT&T. I live in Brazil and, if I were to use an iPhone, I would first have to crack it. I don't like the idea. It's a GSM phone after all - people should be able to use it with whatever SIM card they want.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, Steve said that, but he previously said he wouldn't. Why should we believe him now?
I say just wait and see, then believe it when it happens.
"Open up the platform" (Score:2)
Re:Unfortunately, you're right (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm not saying OpenMoko is the world's ultimate phone project. Of course it isn't. But it's a good, big start, and it deserves support. If you don't support it, don't complain if, in ten years time, all you can get are closed, proprietary phones [apple.com]you can't even load your own software on.
You know, I'm getting old. I belong to a generation which, when someone gave us cool hardware, we grabbed and built cool software on top of it. Now, if it isn't all pretty and polished right out of the box, it gets condemned as rubbish. Guess what? Linus Torvalds was just a college kid when he wrote the first kernel. His professors didn't even rate him as very good. Certainly no-one thought he had leadership potential. And as for a cohesive plan, his cohesive plan was to build a scheduler which could schedule two tasks.
Stuff happens. It will surprise you. OpenMoko may, indeed, not be a great success. But if it's a bit of a success, other people will be able to come along and build on it - it is open source [opensource.org]. In fact, that's already happening - that's what this story is about. The GreenPhone is not 'dead', it has mutated. Instead of building their own hardware platform, the Trolls [troll.no] are developing the 'green suite' on the OpenMoko platform. [zdnet.co.uk] So you can still have your greenphone - the only thing is, it will be black and silver, or white and orange [openmoko.com].
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
But, as a poster above points out, OpenMoko is the important part here, not the NEO1973. We can forget about poor hardware if the software platfor
Re: (Score:1)
You know, I'm getting old. I belong to a generation which, when someone gave us cool hardware, we grabbed and built cool software on top of it. Now, if it isn't all pretty and polished right out of the box, it gets condemned as rubbish.
My problem with the Neo1973 (I have one) is not the fact that it's not polished out of the box. It's the fact that it doesn't work with any GSM service in my area. Even though I was mislead to believe that it would work with the GSM services in my area. So now I'm wondering, is it worth my time to develop shiny software for this phone when I can't use it because the hardware is non-functional (and I can't make it functional). Further, there is no word, whisper or mention of if it will EVER work with GSM85
Re: (Score:1)
I wish you were right about this (Score:2)
The industrial design is bad, there is no leadership and it will probably never get better. I hate it, but it's true.
Re: (Score:1)
OpenMoko and the 1973 will fail just as the Greenphone did. There is no leadership behind the project, no vision, just a bunch of well-intentioned geeks who want to make something cool. With no cohesive plan, though, the Neo1973 will never succeed.
iPhone is still "it" for those of us who want a powerful *NIX-based cellphone -- even if we have to fight Steve Jobs tooth and nail for it.
FIC (a multi-billion-dollar Asian company) is behind OpenMoko and the Neo1973. I know some of the OpenMoko employees via IRC (and even from before they joined OM) and I know they do have indeed a "Vision", and a mighty cool one at that.
Mark my words: The Neo1973 is not the last gadget we will see from the OpenMoko folks, they have mid- to long-term strategies. Also they are set to build a truly open phone with OSS drivers for every component (excluding the GSM modem of course). The next revision of th
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And yes, there is hardware in front of me that h
Re: (Score:1)
Obviously these aren't your real thoughts.
Re: (Score:2)
they have open drivers for the WiMax hardware and Sprint does the right things in securing
their G4 network they're building right now, we'll have EVERYTHING you're talking to in the
smartphone through the G4 capable version of the N810.
As for the comment about us "not looking at fancy glamour but for useful attributes," heh
I think he's missed the cluetrain there. I want BOTH, thank you very much. Nokia seems
to have
Shouldn't be a surprise (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Shouldn't be a surprise (Score:5, Funny)
idk my bff jill?
Re: (Score:1)
Yes, I may have 'dicked' your best friend Jill. Probably it didnt last forever, unless she was loose.
Re: (Score:2)
wtf omg me 2!!!!
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Shouldn't be a surprise (Score:4, Funny)
Peace out.
Ooh, I didnt like that popping sound. r u ok?
Its a development platform not a consumer device (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Odd (Score:3, Insightful)
And yet they're quitting development?
DOES NOT COMPUTE!
They'll be back, I think, with something else. There's plenty of reasons for a corporate entity to want to provide customized phones to its employees, or to give them out as a promotion, or stuff like that.
It's too cool a gadget idea to throw away.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Regardless, yea, it may not be for the masses, there IS more than a significant market for this, and yes, i think the Neo is the next step for this. It just takes at
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Geek-friendly (Score:4, Insightful)
When that happens, the general non-geek population benefits due to the availability of quality software that will run on the phone.
So, step 1: make the phone easy to use
Step 2: make the phone customizable
Step 3: make the phone developer-friendly
Step 4: let me use the same API for different phones; I'm sick of recoding half of my program to make it compatible with a different phone!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Step 5: Profit!
Is it just me? (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, it's not only you. Unfortunately, there's plenty of controlling jackholes that don't trust their wives. Please do your wife/children a favor and tell them that you're a dirtbag that doesn't deserve her and she should leave.
Ugh, thinking of spying on the one person in the world that you're supposed to trust more than anybody else. How the hell do you sleep at night? Oh, that's right, you probably don't. You're probably rummaging through your wife's stuff looking for.. something.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It's not any different from any other phone, so yeah, there's nothing to stop the phone from being able to do that. What's great about a phone running Free Software, is that the owner of the phone gets to choose whether or not it has that "feature," rather than the manufacturer or a government. [news.com]
If you want it, you can have it. If you don't want it, you won't have it. You, rather than som
$700 for a phone? Screw that. (Score:2, Insightful)
The $300 neo 1973 replacement is still a bit steep for me, but at least it's in the ballpark.
Re:$700 for a phone? Screw that. (Score:5, Interesting)
It was never meant for consumers, and the fact that it works as a phone is purely secondary to its main function of providing a test bed for developing mobile phone applications for Trolltech's platform. Comparing it to consumer, mass market phones doesn't make any sense.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:$700 for a phone? Screw that. (Score:4, Insightful)
I think you still don't understand. Developer platform doesn't mean "phone marketed towards the developer/geek market" it means "device that developers use to test their software on". It's really only that, and the lack of EDGE is not really an issue (unless the network speed is crucial to your testing).
Of course, they'll blame its failure on Linux
Trolltech is hugely supportive of Linux (sponsoring developers to work on X, KDE, and freedesktop.org projects like harfbuzz), and the Greenphone wasn't a failure so finding a scapegoat isn't necessary.
Re: (Score:2)
Trolltech is exploitive of Linux. They're providing QT to the KDE community so as to promote the sales of their development platform. While many people don't see this as a problem, I personally do.
The "KDE Myths" page, should be more upfront and less marketing speak, the truth is that many people simply don't care about restrictions to closed software development. The original Qt licenses were absurd, today's is at least as legal as the GPL. Unlike Redhat, Sun, Netscape, or other FOSS-positive compani
Re: (Score:2)
You're confusing mutualism with parasitism. Of course Trolltech benefits from having KDE use their toolkit. They get free testing and bug reports from hundred of OSS devs. KDE benefits as well, because they get an excellent C++ toolkit without having to waste time developing it themselves. Given the complexity
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Errm, I might.
I mean, of course I want UMTS, but at the moment there are no open platforms that support it - the Neo1973 is GPRS and GSM only and I'm seriously considering getting one. To be blunt, I'm sick of crappy closed devices that aren't developer friendly (and in the case of my Symbian UIQ phone and VxWorks phone, totally unstable even when you're using the
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
from a comment
http://lwn.net/Articles/248819/ [lwn.net]
"Too bad that quite a few components in the Greenphone SDK are proprietary. That makes it almost useless as a developer's toy."
if i remember correctly, they opensourced it when openmoko started or something - but the community desire to hack on it was seriously reduced by keeping sdk closed. imho
Re: (Score:2)
Why does no one understand that the Greenphone was purely a developer platform?
I do understand that, I just don't think it really matters. If the developer version cost $700, how much was the consumer version of whatever this thing would become going to cost? Does the developer version have a whole lot more hardware that the consumer version doesn't? Or did they just price the developer version really high to try to re-coup costs? I didn't see any target prices for the consumer level version, so I'm only
Re: (Score:2)
There were never any plans for a consumer version. As a developer, you're not buying the Greenphone to develop for some future iGreenPhone, you're buying it to develop for either your own device (before the hardware is ready) or for other open phones based on Qtopia.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Neo 1973 (Score:2)
I like the idea, but I need to play with a phone before I buy it.
I wonder how hard it would be to adapt a NEO 1973 to VOIP. It's got USB, but I don't think it could handle a USB NIC.
Re: (Score:2)
More info:
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Neo1973 [openmoko.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If no showstoppers are found in the current prototype run, then production should ramp up and they should be available by December. Of course that could slip again if major problems are found (which is a good thing -- I don't want broken hardware, I'd rather wait an extra mon
Re: (Score:2)
I check the site every now and then, as I'd like to purchase a GTA-02. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a way of even pre-ordering one. I reckon if they put up a pre-order website which took a small deposits for each pre-order, then they'd get a pretty good picture of the purchasing demographics of the
Re: (Score:2)
The main things that have been added:
Faster CPU
WIFI
Different GPS chip
They also had to take out one of the speakers to fit the WIFI chip (the GTA-01 had stereo speakers).
My biggest issues with the Neo 1973 are that it has very few external butt
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/OpenMoko_under_QEMU [openmoko.org]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
The OpenMoko development scene has its pros and cons, but for the most part its a very active community and ha
Editor (Score:1)
Neo1973 (Score:2)
but it is not looking good. My contract is up soon so I might not mind trying Neo but they sure don't look ready for business.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
but it is not looking good. My contract is up soon so I might not mind trying Neo but they sure don't look ready for business.
Current estimates [openmoko.org] suggests the Neo1973 GTA02v4 (the production version) will be shipping at the end of December. But I think all bets are off as to whether the software will be of "production quality" by then (whatever "production quality" means these days
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Follow the meta bug for getting the Neo release ready here [openmoko.org]
Re: (Score:2)
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Talk:Neo1973 [openmoko.org]
In the Year 2000 (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
#asterix. luser001: it's not working can someone fix it ?
#asterix. luser002: it's not working can someone fix it ?
#asterix. luser003: it's not working can someone fix it ?
#asterix. luser004: it's not working can someone fix it ?
#asterix. luser005: it's not working can someone fix it ?
#asterix. luser006: it's not working can someone fix it ?
#asterix. luser007: it's not working can someone fix it ?
#asterix. luser008: it's not working can someon
Who knows? (Score:1)
do it right or don't do it at all (Score:3, Interesting)
On the other hand, if they are going to port Qt/Embedded and try to take over the phone, like they have done on other phones, they should forget it; those attempts at monopolizing the platform are unwelcome.
Overall, I'm kind of doubtful that TrollTech has much to contribute anyway. Devices based on Qt/Embedded have had lackluster commercial success, and the platform has serious usability problems in my opinion. Maybe the company should stick to writing toolkits and leave the end user experience to people who have more experience with that.
Re: (Score:2)
and by the way, it's spelled 'Trolltech'.
So, you are saying the Motorola's Linux phones are lackluster commercially. Actually, their Linux phones are some of the most popular they sell.
Re: (Score:2)
That's a self-serving attempt at justifying monopolization of the market. It's also bullshit. First of all, these devices have plenty of room. In addition, Troll Tech has no problem shipping Java toolkits, they just don't want competing native Linux toolkits. Finally, not all toolkits are as bloated and slow as Qt; some toolkits are smaller than Qt's notepad application.
So, you are saying the Motorola
Not only did I worry about ICANN and others (Score:2)
My submission/post, at 12:36 on Thursday:
"
TrollTech's GreenPhone discontinued...
[ Edit | Delete | 0 Comments | #185749 ]
Thursday October 25, @12:36PM
User Journal
Nothing emotional or rhetorical in this story submission. But, I did not see th
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20050524172943589 [groklaw.net]
Re: (Score:1)
Oh good, cynicsreport got credit where credit is due: ''Score:3, Insightful''
Re: (Score:2)
The engineer responsible sometimes has to evaluate the problem to see if it really is a bug. and yes, bugs have to be prioritized.
Not sure who you were talking to sales or marketing people, but if you were actually talked to the software engineers, I would be surprised that you got that response.