KDE 4.0 Is Out 165
Many users wrote to alert us that KDE 4.0 has been released. Here's Computerworld Australia's take on the release KDE 4.0 is based on the Qt4 toolkit, which brings significant enhancements in the way memory is used. "So it ends up making KDE less resource intensive than KDE 3, which is quite an improvement," according to Australian KDE developer Hamish Rodda, who calls the new architecture "future-proof." Computerworld notes that developers are already at work porting the new environment to Windows and the Mac.
woo-hoo (Score:2)
Oh well. It will probably show up with 4.1, which is fine, the bugfixes for missed critters will be done by then.
Re:woo-hoo (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm looking forward to multiple desktop support in windows that is better than the MSVDM, and free as in beer.
Luxury. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Eh, I've never considered GNU free as in speach - Althought the fifth amendment isn't technically part of "free speach", it is however a very important implicit part of it. But that's a whole 'nother can of worms based on which group you look at when considering the free speach aspect.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm gonna take a shot in the dark, and I may be wildly off base about what you meant in the first place, but here goes. Under the GPL, if you do not distribute the code, you have no responsibilities to anyone at all, you can do whatever you want with it. Isn't that analogous to a "right to remain silent?" However, once you distribute said code, you are in effect giving up your right to remain si
Re: (Score:2)
Guy to Gal, in the freedom of speech context -w- 5th:
"Hey, wanna go and get some coffee?"
Without the 5th:
"Hey, wanna go and get some coffee? I'm using this as an attempt in a standard recipe for me to eventually get into your pants, sooner preferably to later, but the schedule can vary."
In this case the source is the motive. Althoug
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
All I'm doing is expressing concern about it now, before it's released. Should I wait until it's complete before I bitch a
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
While I do use Amarok on my Linux boxes, I'd REALLY prefer running foobar2000, and even investigated how well it ran with Wine.
Re: (Score:2)
I prefer Banshee on Linux, and foobar2000 on Windows. Banshee doesn't have quite the myriad of functions that Amarok does, but I find it a good deal more pleasant to use, and never used the advanced functionality anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've been served (Score:5, Funny)
That sounds like a challenge to me.
Oh, it's on.
Love,
The Future.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Bring It. (Score:1, Funny)
KDE.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Why only 4 words on the main page? (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm a keen and loyal Gnome user and a former Gnome developer.
I think the 4.0 release of KDE deserves an un-abbreviated summary on the front page.
Congratulations on this milestone guys, keep up your work.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I hope then it'll be worth a full summary on the front page.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Why only 4 words on the main page? (Score:4, Insightful)
from my own toying it really does seem to be quite feature incomplete
BTW just to emphasize, I've never been a KDE fan, I'm not really a huge fan of gnome either these days
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm back to using Gnome sometimes (first time since the glorious 1.4 times =) and I have to say it works quite well. It's just that with all the "We know what's good for you" and "You are too dumb for options" talk around 2.0 they managed to drive me off quite thoroughly. Had they just told us that there was a lack of features because 2.0 was a rewrite and they didn't have time
Re: (Score:2)
This was mentioned in the summary. What do you want them to do, mention it twice in the summary?
Re:Why only 4 words on the main page? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Personally I'm a GMONE user, so this isn't going to affect me at all. But it is still good to know that there are alternatives, especially for people who prefer there X/GNU/Linux desktop to be slightly more Windoze like.
*Insert joke about MS Windows versioning (point zero releases and all that) here.
To avoid Slashmeat accusation (Score:2, Informative)
Configurable? (Score:5, Informative)
The menu is a bit awkward to navigate, and again there are hardly any options to change the default behavior or look. I know they promised more features for 4.1 or 4.2/3, but I was still a little shocked as to how completely barebone it felt compared to KDE3, which I will continue to use for the time being.
Anyways, I'd still like to thank the KDE team for their effort, and I'm looking forward to using KDE4 once it has been optimised.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Configurable? (Score:5, Informative)
As I've mentioned elsewhere, KDE4 is still making rapid progress, and in the mean time KDE3 is still a great desktop. When KDE4 is ready for mass consumption (hopefully 4.1 will be better in this regard, scheduled for 6 months or so), the Linux distributors will pick it up and start delivering it as a supported option. Until then, this first release still shows a great deal of progress, and I think the developers can definitely justify a bit of self-satisfaction!
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Let's quote the Plasma FAQ [kde.org] (disclaimer: I'm no KDE dev, but I wrote it):
Q. I can't my favorite [ insert feature here ]!
Don't forget that Plasma is still in its infancy (it's brand new, after all) and that KDE 3 was an extremely polished codebase: it took seven years to get to that, while Plasma had about 18 months to get to its current status. With time, the Plasma developers plan on reintroducing features that have been missing and fix regressions. As KDE progresses through the KDE4 cycle, Plasma wil
Re:Configurable? (Score:5, Interesting)
Yes, I am only joking. But there's no way I'm shifting to KDE4 until it has at least the level of beautiful tweakery that by beloved KDE3 has. When I tried out one of the RC's (more deserving of the "alpha" moniker if you ask me), I too was similarly astounded at the lack of options for even changing basic things like the colour of the panel (I tend to keep my desktop in neutral, low-contrast colours and the big'n'shiny'n'curvy look of the default KDE4 is about as appealing to me as regurgitating a whole lobster).
I'll also reiterate my stance on widgets - No. Fucking. Way. Why should I minimise every app I have just to be able to see an OpenGL clock or something useless? If it deserves to be treated as an app, then treat it as an app rather than desktop eye candy and give it a taskbar slot or a system tray icon. My desktop is visible for all of every three seconds every time I log in, otherwise it's covered with whatever app(s) I'm using at the time - I don't see the point in using your desktop as anything other than a workspace, your filesystem is where the eye candy (applications and files) lives.
I find Kickoff awkward; Lancelot IMHO is a much nicer K-menu replacement. I'd still like there to be an option for there to be a simple ye olde style menu as well.
I must be a bit of a luddite or something...
Re: (Score:2)
Lots of people do. Aaron Seigo had code for it but refused to commit it [blogspot.com] because he thought people were being mean. Quote:
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There's a shortcut you can hold to see the desktop widgets so that you can quickly see them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not against the implementation of widgets at all (indeed, with plasma they're pretty much a side effect), I'm aware that alot of people think they find them useful
Re: (Score:2)
At the moment I'd like to call Plasma the most overrated piece of shit that ever made it into something masquerading as a release. At the moment it offers me nothing but took away everything I loved about KDE 3.5, to the
Re:Configurable? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Configurable? (Score:4, Informative)
Other things that I found insta-annoying:
Things I insta-like:
Bottom line... yeah, nice work but it's simply not ready for proper usage. It feels and handles like a beta. I can't configure it so I can work efficiently in it and it's broken in places (I don't think I'm supposed to be able to shift my entire background out of the screen). Right, back to KDE3 for me now.
Re: (Score:2)
After you've submitted bug reports, I hope.
Re: (Score:2)
More than Memory (Score:5, Informative)
o. Complete library overhaul
o. Complete graphical overhaul
o. Simplification (see Dolphin)
o. New desktop, taskbar, dashboard
The changes to a desktop environment don't get any bigger than that. I'm very surprised that the article summary only seems to mention memory usage.
Re: (Score:2)
I have been a gnome user for the longest time as I have waited for e17 to mature. But kde4 is the first version that seems to be the version to interest me the most in a long time.
KDE 4.0 is still alpha! (Score:1)
"KDE 4.0.0 is our "will eat your children" release of KDE4, not the next release of KDE 3.5."
Speaking of which... I've been using e17 for a while. It is not feature-complete but it is use-able. And it does not crash on me like XFCE does (I'll probably get modded down for saying this...)
Anyway, I am not here to bash anyone, just wanted to put things in perspective. Enjoy your WM, whatever it is
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Distribution support (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I just spent 20 minutes playing around with it via this method, and have seamlessly switched between kde3 and kde4 and back again.
Congratulations! (Score:1)
As a happy Kubuntu 7.10 user (Score:1)
This is what, Beta 1? (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Color me doubtful (Score:2)
I remember a blog (linked by
Re: (Score:2)
totally 1337*2 (Score:2)
thus proving that KDE 4.0 is, without a doubt, t0t411y 1337.... *2.
Design looks tacky - unlike other releases. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yay, KDE4 (Score:4, Insightful)
Whiners aside, yay, KDE 4.0 is here. Congratulations everyone!
Waiting for Godot^H^H^H^Hentoo (Score:3, Interesting)
As soon as this shows up in Gentoo Portage (the main branch, not an SVN overlay) I intend to backup my configuration and switch to KDE4. Yes, I know I'll run into things that don't work the way I expect and a few missing features. I figure if I want to see KDE 4.1 sooner, I can at least put in some effort to test and report problems. Now that the feature-freeze is over, developers ought to be able to deal with the "but the icons are icky" complaints that everyone seems to make, too.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:This Could Be The Worst Thing For KDE (Score:5, Insightful)
No, the sad truth is, this should have been KDE4 Beta 1. It's not finished, it's been rushed out. I like KDE and I appreciate that KDE4 is going to be very cool eventually, but this is not the time. And rushing products out before they are finished, saying that the real stuff will turn up in the
Again, let's be clear about this - KDE4 is gonna kick some ass eventually, but releasing it in its current state has been a big mistake.
Re:This Could Be The Worst Thing For KDE (Score:4, Insightful)
When Vista (just an example, I'm not bashing MS) was released, then Microsoft was having it put on store shelves, pre-installed on new computers and were generally selling it and distributing it for everybody to use. When you receive a piece of software in this way, you generally expect it to be in a complete and serviceable state, which is fair enough.
Something like KDE is different. Yes, the KDE community is very pleased with this milestone event and they are all having a party etc., but at the same time they are clearly advertising that the KDE 4.0 desktop is probably not ready for general use on most people's desktops. When your say that KDE 4.0 is released, it doesn't really mean the same sort of thing as the release of Vista, because all that's really happened is someone's created some source archives and put them on a website to download. I don't think any mainstream distribution is going to put KDE 4.0 into its repositories for general use, and as such the only people who are running KDE4 at this point are either developers or people who have gone to the effort of seeking out unsupported, community-provided packages out of their own curiosity. Most of the reactions I've seen from enthusiasts of this type have indeed confirmed that they do not believe KDE 4.0 to be ready for day-to-day use, but they're not disillusioned or upset or dissatisfied because they know that they deliberately sought out an unfinished product -- they just wanted to have a preview, really.
There is another point concerning this whole "maybe it should still be a beta" situation, which involves the distinction between KDE4 as a platform and KDE4 as a desktop environment. According to what I've read, a large part of the decision to release KDE 4.0 in the state it's in was to do with the fact that in order to end up with a complete desktop environment, there needs to be a community of developers working with the new platform. The concern was that people wouldn't want to start developing for a "beta" platform, only to have the rug pulled out from under their feet when the APIs were changed. This 4.0 release marks a stable target platform which people can start building on with confidence. It's important to realise that this isn't some sort of trick -- the libraries and frameworks underpinning KDE4 are apparently pretty complete and stable and it's mainly the applications which need the work.
Re:This Could Be The Worst Thing For KDE (Score:5, Interesting)
But consider Joe Average, the non-technical guy who decides to ditch Windows in favour of Linux, since he's read a few good things about it and all that. Exactly the kind of user everyone feels Linux should be targetting if it is ever to achieve critical mass. Assume for the sake of the argument, that he installs Kubuntu. His current KDE version - and he is probably aware of it, or will find out very soon - is 3.5.8. Now he visits kubuntu.com. The site tells it in no uncertain terms that "KDE4 is the start of something amazing" and to "be free with KDE4".
If that's not enough to make him install KDE4 without second thought, he can visit kde.org and learn, again, to be free and that the " KDE Project Ships Fourth Major Version of cutting edge Free Software Desktop". He also learns that The KDE 4 Libraries have seen major improvements in almost all areas. and that the KDE 4 Desktop has gained some major new capabilities. and so on. Nowhere immediately obvious does it say that it is not, in fact, ready, feature complete or stable.
So, what happens to Joe Average? He installs KDE4, tries out a few things, finds it broken in several places, not working as expected in others and not configurable where he may want it to be configurable. Compared to WinXP, it will feel to him as a significant step backwards (probably more because of the brokenness than the lack of features compared to KDE3). In the end, he'll just go back to Windows because, clearly Linux isn't there yet.
Bottom line, this should have been a Beta and it should have clearly been advertised as such, not via comments on some mailing list but clearly visible within the main announcement.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Alright, I'll give you that one. I suppose I have been paying rather close attention to the whole thing, and it's easy to forget what the general level of awareness is.
However, I don't buy this rather ridiculous picture of "Joe Average" you're painting. So this guy, completely new to Linux, downloads Kubuntu, manages
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But consider Joe Average, the non-technical guy who decides to ditch Windows in favour of Linux, since he's read a few good things about it and all that. Assume for the sake of the argument, that he installs Kubuntu. His current KDE version - and he is probably aware of it, or will find out very soon - is 3.5.8. Now he visits kubuntu.com. The site tells it in no uncertain terms that "KDE4 is the start of something amazing" and to "be free with KDE4".
I'm curious about your definition of "Joe Average, the non-technical guy". Is this the Joe Average that has never visited Microsoft's main website, just clicks "Yes" to software updates provided by Windows Update, and at most changes the wallpaper and screen saver? Or is this the Joe Average that installs every virus that claims to remove viruses and surfs Warez sites? I can see where the second Joe Average might be a problem, on any platform.
So, what happens to Joe Average? He installs KDE4, tries out a few things, finds it broken in several places, not working as expected in others and not configurable where he may want it to be configurable. Compared to WinXP, it will feel to him as a significant step backwards (probably more because of the brokenness than the lack of features compared to KDE3). In the end, he'll just go back to Windows because, clearly Linux isn't there yet.
That's a bit of a stretch. Joe started with a stable copy of
Re: (Score:2)
Second, even taking your unlikely scenario, so "Joe Average" does go to kubuntu.org and follows the instructions to download KDE4, he's still going to have KDE 3.5.8 to
Kubuntu. (Score:2)
And I imagine that in another few months, it's going to be better than KDE3. By that I mean functionality; KDE3 just hasn't been particularly stable for me. (The ACID3 test crashed Konqueror, and Konqueror quite frequently crashes while I'm typing comments on Slashdot...)
terminology (Score:2)
Although personally, I don't see why they didn't just follow the progression of Greek letters and call it something like "KDE4 Gamma 1.0" (with small fixes p
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There's a splash screen (one of the "tip of the day" screens) for KDE startup that claims the K doesn't stand for anything at all. That said, I don't think it said anything about it never having stood for anything, just that it no longer stands for anything.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because unless your name is "Internet Explorer", people won't know, just from the name, what kind of program it is. I think most of us have generally accepted names like Firefox, but unless someone already knows what it is, how would you know Firefox is a web browser? Should we just be naming the first project "Web Browser", and subsequent projects like Konqueror, iC
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And don't get me started on the whole "IntelliActiveDirectCrapX.NET" stuff...
A bit iBiased? (Score:3, Funny)
iThink you may be just a bit iPredisposed to think of iLinux apps as having weird iNames.
Honestly, why is iCrap better than Krap?
What program isn't an application?
Or at least, it's generally possible to know it's an Application from context; by knowing what it does. It's generally not possible to know, without the naming scheme, which desktop environment (or graphics library
Doesn't compare (Score:2)
Linux applications have taken the whole single letter prefix thing a bit too far. Let's see a package listing of all the KDE apps on your system, then compare =)
It was a way to differentiate GNU software from the native software it replaced, but then continued on
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
If an application comes with KDE (KWrite for example), I can see adding the K. It signifies that the application is actually part of the KDE project. Developers outside the KDE project sometimes use the K to signify that the application depends on kdelibs. I think this is what started the problem. Gnome's use of G is a little more confusing to me. The G in Gnome stands for GNU. However, it's sometimes used by developers to signify that the application was designed for Gnome. Does that application use G to s
Re: (Score:2)
If an application comes with KDE (KWrite for example), I can see adding the K.
I think it's tacky. ;)
If most GUI apps are not started by typing in the actual program filename, then why would you need to rename the shortcuts the GUI launches? Just set the icon name to the longer name.
That's what I mean by shortcut, the icon name, not stuff like symlinks or launch scripts.
With Gnome and KDE both giving sensible names to most applications, the actual command names are getting more and more irrelevant. My point is that the prefixes don't serve a purpose anymore, other than some brand association, and in the case of the 'G', you're right, it's confusing. As far as the 'K' branding, I think it's already been overdone.
I'm glad it's being fixed in the GUI, but that br
Re: (Score:2)
Nowdays, that helps when installing a package. If it has a K prefix, I run KDE, so I know it's going to have most of the libraries it needs already installed, already in RAM, in fact. If it has an X prefix, I know it's going to have an ass-ugly interface, and probably won't be incredibly intuitive. If it has a g prefix, or if it contains the word "gnome", I know it's going to require a ton of libraries I probably don't have a
Re: (Score:2)
Tell that to SteveJobs. Maybe next year Apple will put out the Phone, the Pod, Tunes, Photo, and so on.
My point is that whether it has a point or not, you only ever hear people bitching about the K nowdays. No one says a word about the iStuff anymore.
As for "who cares" that it needs KDE? Well, KDE pulls in a ton of libraries. So does GNOME, by the way. Qt and GTK+ themselves aren't as bad, but if so
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Wow, thanks for the warning. I was almost considering using gnome.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Which is strange enough how I feel about gnome. Now mind you. I am more comfortable with Fluxbox, Enlightenment and Afterstep than gnome. All of which are NOT at all like Windows. So it is not that KDE is striving to be like Micorsoft Windows which makes it comfortable.
Gnome has that "itch" that you can not scratch syndrome going for it. If something is almost what you want but not quite...well to bad you are stuck with it. In KDE there is enough room for customiz
Re: (Score:2)
I use xtdesk for icon support. What is cool about, as seen in the picture, is that instead of getting a context menu for the icons, I get a menu of more apps to launch. Since I do desktop support. I have an icon for each location, left click and I remote into the server for that location. Right click and I can pick any d
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
There's always a need for people with a good eye for UI. I'm a KDE developer and I know that I personally do not have a good eye for such things. There is a usuability team, but they are completely swamped with work.
I'm always happy for people to make suggestions on improving the interface.