Robot Composed of "Catoms" Can Assume Any Form 168
philetus writes "An article in New Scientist describes a robotic system composed of swarms of electromagnetic modules capable of assuming almost any form that is being developed by the Claytronics Group at Carnegie Mellon. 'The grand goal is to create swarms of microscopic robots capable of morphing into virtually any form by clinging together. Seth Goldstein, who leads the research project at Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, in the US, admits this is still a distant prospect. However, his team is using simulations to develop control strategies for futuristic shape-shifting, or "claytronic", robots, which they are testing on small groups of more primitive, pocket-sized machines.'"
By Any Other Name (Score:5, Funny)
Multi Meme Heaven (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Me, being a trusted slashdot personality, am sure our new overlords will see how convenient to have someone like me at their side.
I, for one, welcome our new t1000 overlords! Be their reign long and fruitful!
Re: (Score:2)
Me, being a trusted slashdot personality, am sure our new overlords will see how convenient to have someone like me at their side.
T1000 : Are those the slashdotters ? Right, sort yourself by karma !
T1000 : Quicksort please !
T1000 : T100, take the half at the back away for recycling.
Re:By Any Other Name (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:By Any Other Name (Score:4, Funny)
Pittsburgh (Score:2)
The question is, which Pittsburgh is it located in, in the US?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
and that is "we didn't see this coming."
Sci-fi has been predicting this for seventy years, and I'm starting to really believe that it might be on the list with satellites and lasers of stuff that's actually going to happen in our lifetimes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Thinking of our power relationship with technology as a random walk, we can win as much as we want and we're still destined to lose by basic mathematics. It's called the gambler's ruin.
Re: (Score:2)
I can predict the toss of a coin perfectly if I'm allowed to make three predictions and choose among them later.
Tag (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why ? Aren't "greygoo" and "predprey" good enough ?
Obvious comment (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Obvious comment (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I wish they would do a sequel
Re: (Score:2)
Seeing that movie with my dad when I was what... 12 or 13 is somehow a very distinct memory.
Re: (Score:2)
Any relation? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Replicators!!! (Score:5, Funny)
Someone shoot them before they doom us all!!!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Replicators!!! (Score:5, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replicator_(Stargate)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As always, the hardware became commodity while the new and valuable changes occur in software.
Re: (Score:2)
And that would be why the x86 architecture has lasted for as long as it has.
But, the AMD64 architecture is here, creating a gradual changeover from x86.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh my goodness, those people obviously never watched stargate! They're making replicators! They are swarms of robots that can assume any form. The only way to stop them is for MacGuyver to stick his head in some ancient machine to gain their knowledge. Then he'll develope a super weapon that looks like a BFG3000 that will shoot waves at them causing them to disassociate with each other and fall to the ground like a pile of leggos. But that's only enough to stop a few of them, the REAL solution is to link all the stargates together at once (anyone seen baal?) and then send said 'waves of magical energy' through the one closest to T'ealc.
Someone shoot them before they doom us all!!!
If they only had a deflector dish to reroute those waves through, it just might have worked!!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I can tell you about Lost to compensate you. The 3 full seasons.
And no, I'm not being ironic, I truly and sincerely mean it.
Re: (Score:2)
And that's why... (Score:3, Funny)
I want... (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
May I, as your humble financial advisior, sugest you to ask for euros? or (even better) gold?
Re: (Score:2)
It's the T-1000! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
"Have you seen this boy?"
Terminator II here we come! (Score:2, Insightful)
In your dreams... (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, we'd need two types of nanobots, or give them a double function: One type can bend and expand like a muscle cell to provide mobility. The other type needs to function as a skeleton (exo or endo, you choose).
How will you supply the energy to nanobots? And how is that energy going to be transmitted to different parts of the body? How will it be stored? And if it's in the form of liquid, you'll need blood vessels too. Also, if the design of the form that you're going to emulate
Catoms? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Catoms? (Score:5, Funny)
I gaev u electron (Score:3, Funny)
I gaev u electron.
Wut moar u wants?
Re: (Score:2)
Geek comedik fail!
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Electromagnetic modules? (Score:2, Funny)
Invisible force!
Re:Catoms? (Score:5, Funny)
Herds of Cat Robots! Cool! (Score:3, Funny)
Just think of it (Score:2)
Yeah, I know, I'm a sick puppy.....
Re: (Score:2)
Thus proving creationism.... (Score:1)
Shiver (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
not that I read sci-fi books or anything
assuming almost any form (Score:1)
pokey pokey (Score:5, Funny)
I never foresaw that the machines that take over the world in the future would look like Gumby...
Holographic Video, Batman! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Awesome! (Score:2)
Claymation (Score:3, Funny)
Mercedes-Benz SilverFlow (Score:5, Interesting)
This sounds like the clarketech* that the Mercedes-Benz SilverFlow [egmcartech.com] concept has been waiting for. At the 2057 Robocar Design Challenge in Los Angeles last year (wherein car manufacturers touted concepts for cars 50 years from now), Mercedes showed off "SilverFlow", a shape-changing car that melts into a pool of liquid metal when not in use. The vehicle's shape would be tailored for different usage scenarios through programming, and the entire concept revolves around micro-particles that combine in varied ways. But is this really feasible though? I suppose that it's within the realms of possibility, but are there any serious deal-breakers that could derail this vision? Any thoughts?
*From Arthur C. Clarke's well-known aphorism about sufficiently advanced technology being indistinguishable from magic, "clarketech" refers to tech so advanced that we don't know as yet how it would work. Love the term.
Re:Mercedes-Benz SilverFlow (Score:5, Funny)
Smartwheels? (Score:2)
(Three entirely different pop culture references in one post. Way to go making myself ununderstandable...)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Kinda makes the foam filling car from Demol
I'm left unimpressed (Score:2)
Catoms, schmatoms (Score:2)
Wormhole Extreme (Score:2)
Yes, I realize that was a plot on one of the shows -- creating a show about the "real" stargate program, but that plotline was only created to create "plausible deniability" in case information about the real effort to create plausibl
Reminds me of a GURPS game I ran (Score:2)
ESD (Score:2)
Thanks for the nightmare, guys (Score:2)
It it can look like... (Score:2)
Re:Awe gee-whiz... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:MOD PARENT UP (Score:5, Funny)
OK, now that's funny!
No it's not! You want funny? Here's funny : There's two hookers in a lift. One goes, "It smells like cum in here". The other one replies, "Oops sorry I just farted".
Tada! Mod points please...
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
specialization beats generalization every time (Score:2)
Come to think of it, this is the lesson most people seem to have drawn about robotics, too. Maybe even for electronics, inasmuch as we're increasingly seeing people get a collection of specialized consumer electronics (MP3 player, PDA or smart phone) rather than try to program their microcomputer to do it all.
Apparently it's so dazzlin
Re: (Score:2)
Well, first of all -- has it? What's the evidence that conscious thought has powerful survival potential? Human beings have been successful for a mere 50,000 to 100,000 years, and eyeblink on the time scales of evolution. Cockroaches and crocodiles have every right to regard us as Johnny-come-latelies who might yet blow themselves to smithereens and disappear, proving consciousness to be the Betamax or 8-track tape of the biological world,
Re: (Score:2)
Mmmm, no. First of all, do not conflate conscious action with all human action. We do a great deal from instinct, and use our conscious reasoning powers to rationalize it afterward. For example, it's unlikely any significant part of our sexual behaviour derives from conscious reflection, and our sexual instincts and drives underly a great deal of our general behavio
Re: (Score:2)
There definitley could be many other uses for this technology down to the least useful: Artistic value.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
As long as they evolve into an evil robot Sam Carter!
Re: (Score:2)
Clayfighter, Clay-Clayfighter... Okay, that's about as far as I get. Still, great game.