Nokia Unveils Shape Changing Nano-phone Concept 89
An anonymous reader writes "Morph, a joint nanotechnology concept developed by Nokia Research Center and the University of Cambridge, has gone on display as part of the "Design and the Elastic Mind" exhibition at The Museum of Modern Art in New York. The concept demonstrates how future mobile devices might be stretchable and flexible, allowing the user to transform the gadget into radically different shapes. Nokia said that elements of Morph might be integrated into handheld devices within seven years, though initially only at the high end."
Ugh (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Ugh (Score:5, Insightful)
If you have a reasonable expectation that you'll receive a call, say, during your drive home, then the safest thing you can do is leave the thing on, even if it makes you look like an extra from a bad sci fi movie.
Now, if you're in a theater, your phone is off, and you're still wearing the earpiece, then yeah, you're a tool.
Re:Ugh (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Ugh (Score:5, Insightful)
No, the safest thing is to let it go to voicemail
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
I've seen people in a meeting with their handsfree device on. That's pretty damn bad. You COULD have it hanging around your neck if you're going to be interacting with people, so they don't think you're a total asshole/crazy.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
That does not make any sense unless you shower, sleep, etc. with that blue bug stuffed into your ear.
Some people ware it even in the mosque, some people put it right before turning their ignition on and take it off right after turning the ignition off, or more generally, right before they need their hands to be constantly busy with something else.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
When driving it's best not to talk on the phone at all, but failing that, far better they keep it in their ear than fumble around with a phone.
Re: (Score:2)
You'd rather they set their ringers to full power in case they can't hear their oh-so-important-call from their pocket? There are some benefits to the rest of us from those ear-pieces.
there are other benefits too (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1, Redundant)
Anything to help you make harsh judgements at first sight, mmm?
I cannot help but wonder if the average Slashdotter really wants to live in that world.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Wow, for a moment there I thought this was a geek site.
Nonononononononono...
This was a geek site. Like, ten years ago [archive.org], maybe eight, even [archive.org].
Now it's a site for wannabes, soi disant k3wl kidz and Microsoft astroturfers.
(Yes, I am getting old. So are you. So what?)
Re:Ugh (Score:5, Funny)
The Bluetooth Headset is the human equivalent.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Ugh (Score:5, Funny)
It's a serious matter and everyone must do their part!
Re: (Score:2)
How about this? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
In unrelated news... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Better pictures (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
My Dream of a Shoe Phone May be Viable! (Score:4, Funny)
<ring>
"Kai, I think your phone is ringing."
<ring>
"Oh, sorry. I'll get it."
Re: (Score:1)
Next up... (Score:5, Funny)
P.S. Don't ask about Caller ID or Voicemail. It's a prototype.
Re:Next up... (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Link [slashdot.org]
Scroll down to the part called "How Does Moderation Work?" Pretty much a few random people with good karma are randomly given a few points every once in a while. You can tell if you have them, because drop-down boxes appear next to every post.
Re: (Score:1)
Is it a functioning "concept" (Score:5, Insightful)
Cool design is...well cool.. but if this included flexible circuits, displays, etc. to make it function (even if fragile or only in the most basic way) I'd be very interested in reading more on the underlying tech.
There's a long way between design concept and all the technical risks being retired.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Pay no attention to the tentacle extending itself into your ear canal in order to take over your brain, it's just there to improve reception.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Given how much battering some phones get.. (Score:2)
Could be cool (Score:2)
I'd like to announce, (Score:5, Funny)
I expect the technology required to create "solid air" will be invented by someone, somewhere, by 2016, or perhaps later.
Damage Resistant? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Damage Resistant? (Score:4, Interesting)
Well, if they bend, stretch, and vibrate, I'd say a pretty good number of people will play with their gadgets (though not quite like silly putty). What really matters at that point is whether or not it's water proof. =P
On a more serious note though, I can really appreciate the additional durability one would expect with this, as parent mentioned. I've actually broken a few phones just from leaving the phone on my pocket and rolling over the wrong way while working on my car. Though I've learned to take my phone out of my pocket before I start work like that, it'll be nice if that's one less worry. On that note, it'd also be nice if it was water proof (and possibly heat resistant) as well in case it gets left in the pant pockets and run through the washer and dryer.
Re: (Score:2)
But surely the real question is... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Big deal. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Big deal. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
in-car power (Score:1)
woah! (Score:1)
If only we could warp drive and the whole Utopian society thing working too.
Airport security headache (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Read Wired much?
http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/02/10-uses-for-the.html [wired.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
In seven years? (Score:5, Informative)
What we see on the photos is at best a mockup made out of plexiglas and at most likely a render.
Lets see, a completly transparent screen. Because as well know nanotech makes things transparent. Apparently in a mere seven years we will have a material that looks a nice uniform light transparant green but can be used as pixels, wires, battery, antenna, electronics, it can be be reshaped at will without deforming at random.
In seven years?
Come on, this isn't a concept, it is just wishfull thinking with absolutly no bases in reality.
If you can shape a screen, how do you stop it from deforming when you don't want it to? Do you enjoy reading leaflets outside where the wind flaps them about?
I am just getting to old for this non-sense. I don't mind concept products where designers and engineers wonder "what if". But please at least use tech that MIGHT BE. After all if we are randomly speculating I can come up with far more intresting stuff. How about a mobile phone that sits on your eye like a contact lense and is controlled by thought? In seven years? I can even show you how one might look, someone got a place to host a picture of a contact lense?
Re: (Score:1)
Come on, this isn't a concept, it is just wishfull thinking with absolutly no bases in reality.
My thought exactly, especially after having seen the concept video.
Ok, so this incredible nano-tech does the following:
Cmon, cant it do any of the standard features ... like raise the dead, take the dog for a walk, do my job for me etc..
Great! (Score:2)
But what about the charger size? (Score:2)
perspective (Score:1)
Granted, this seems a fair bit more cutting edge,
It'll blow your mind! (Score:1)
Yes, that probably is better.
slap bracelet cell phone (Score:2)
heck, that sounds like an awfully good patent to troll! (where's my laywer?)
Youtube Video (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX-gTobCJHs [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
ripping some style.
Why Reinvent the Wheel? (Score:2)
Seems like the general shape phones are in and have been for most of the last century has worked pretty well. Why reinvent the wheel?
Meanwhile, nanotech doesn't exist (Score:1)
Always when someone uses the "nanotech" buzzword, I'm reminded of a study (from Helsinki Univ of Tech) that nanotech isn't a field of technology [tuta.hut.fi]. It's just a marketing trick. When you actually dig up the patents, social networks and case studies from corporations, the conclusion emerges that "nanotech" is consists of four different fields of technology that don't "talk to each other". They are measurement instrumentation, materials, pharma/chemicals and semiconductors. For example, a pharmaceutical chemist