Pressure Mounts On ICANN To Approve .xxx Domain
372
An anonymous reader writes "An application for the.xxx domain was first submitted six years ago. ICANN approved the application in 2005, and entered into an agreement with ICM Registry regarding technical and commercial terms. However, ICANN reversed its decision in March 2007. An independent review panel was called to look into why ICANN had changed its mind, and concluded that the body had been under pressure from the US government. Now the registry that submitted that application, ICM Registry, is pushing for .xxx to be approved. The company has argued that the .xxx internet domain should be approved for porn site use, allowing parents and businesses to easily configure browsers or filters to automatically block sites that carry the domain."
Heh (Score:2, Funny)
Mounts.
RFC 3514 redux (Score:3, Funny)
Yes, because this will work just as well as RFC 3514 - The Security Flag in the IPv4 Header [ietf.org].
Re:Yay ignorance. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Yay ignorance. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Yay ignorance. (Score:2, Funny)
...as long as they come.
Indeed.
Headline (Score:4, Funny)
Was it really necessary to use the words pressure and mount in this headline? The subject matter is provocative enough on its own!
Re:Retarded bible belt morons (Score:1, Funny)
WHEN THE FUCK ARE WE GOING TO STOP TREATING SEX AS SPECIAL?
The moment a middle-aged lady is being anally fisted while receiving six simultaneous facial cumshots from African-Americans in a Calvin Klein commercial. Oh, you weren't talking about porn? Sorry.
Re:Yay ignorance. (Score:4, Funny)
The porn industry should be used to strange bedfellows.
Re:Yay ignorance. (Score:5, Funny)
...loosing something precious every time they have sex!
Ironically, that sentence still makes sense with the typo.
Re:Yay ignorance. (Score:3, Funny)
While it can be viewed as a form of prostitution, marrying rich men is legal as well, yet nobody complains about that.
I will speak up for all the non-rich men out here... We are complaining about it.