Microsoft Says Goodbye To CES 79
theodp writes "Microsoft has traditionally delivered the pre-show keynote and put up a mammoth booth at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas each January. No more. GeekWire reports that Microsoft will bow out of CES after this year's show (Steve Ballmer says buh-bye on Jan. 9). 'As we look at all of the new ways we tell our consumer stories,' explained Microsoft's Frank Shaw, 'it feels like the right time to make this transition.'"
Re: (Score:1)
Heh (Score:1)
What... astroturfing?
NO, it's TV (Score:2)
They continue to flood TV with their message. It makes sense - why waste money advertising on, for example, the net (after all, if you're on the net, you have almost zero attention span for ads even if you don't have them blocked, and you already have a computer, so it's not like they can really control the message in 30 or 60 seconds).
TV is still the best place to advertise something that has to be seen and heard.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You mean to say there are still people that watch commercials on TV? Or are you referring to those annoying ads in Hulu? ;-)
Between Online Sreaming (Netflix,Hulu) and DVRs (MythTV with auto-flag+skip commercials) TV commercials are quickly losing their relevance as the best place to be "seen and heard." News outlets, social media, retail stores - that's where the real PR action is nowadays.
Re: (Score:2)
But YOU know it won't work, I know it won't work, and any developer stupid enough to fall for such an obvious ploy is too dumb to write any code worth having anyway. They've thrown billions at the consumer market trying to be the iShiny and its been a MASSIVE fail, just as even after buying all of Yahoo's search they'll never get better than a distance second against Google.
Unfortunately, just because code isn't worth having does not prevent it from being successful, even wildly successful. And good code, even great code is no guarantee of success.
As to MS's efforts at iShiny, brown is not the color to choose and I am deeply troubled that my Macbook has not flagged "iShiny" as a misspelling.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Nah. It is all those stores they are opening (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Heh (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
hahaahaahahaha what?
Reintroducing windows 3.1 is a game changer?
Re: (Score:2)
Ssshhh! The fake astroturfer was being snarky!
That's it! (Score:2)
You're definitely getting an internet for Christmas.
Re: (Score:2)
What... astroturfing?
Wasn't really telling consumers at CES anyway, but CE industry press. I attended one of these keynotes about in a nutshell Bill Gates was threatening to invade the markets of about half the companies present. He seemt to carry on like it was all a wonderful, bright and shiny future, not realizing he was talking about taking the bread out of attendees mouths with his Microsoft products. Lotsa hogwash anyway, most of his prophecies were never to be realized.
Re: (Score:3)
You sure the Zune 2 won't be coming out any day now...?
Inovate to ass fuck? (Score:5, Informative)
Since I live in the Puget Sound area, I've signed uyp for and participate in MS "Usability Studies" on a regular basis (it's an excuse to shop at the Redmond Value Village, you would be amazed at the kind of stuff Microsofties donate to second hand stores).
I've seen some of the stuff they are working on in their "labs", and a lot of it is indeed quite innovative. Yet very little ever makes it to a product. Wonder why? There are some smart people working on interesting things in Redmond, but apparently at some level on the Microsoft machine, it all gets patented and forgotten (until they need to ass fuck someone with the patent?)â¦
Re: (Score:1)
It's a shame. Not many places can afford good research teams.
Re: (Score:2)
Meanwhile, the brain-dead leadership lets it happen.
What leadership?
Very few companies have leaders anymore. With few [youtube.com] exceptions.
Re:Inovate to ass fuck? (Score:4, Interesting)
I've seen some of the stuff they are working on in their "labs", and a lot of it is indeed quite innovative. Yet very little ever makes it to a product. Wonder why? There are some smart people working on interesting things in Redmond, but apparently at some level on the Microsoft machine, it all gets patented and forgotten (until they need to ass fuck someone with the patent?)
Thing is, this observation isn't new- it's been commented on for *years* that Microsoft have labs stuffed full of very clever and innovative people, yet still seem to end up churning out mediocre, uninspiring crap. One explanation is that internal politics are responsible- this article comment from someone who claims to have worked at Microsoft [dailytech.com] (click link for full version) is informative:-
There have been many instances at Microsoft where genuine innovations have sat on the shelf or been half-heartedly brought to market [.. In 2002 MS had..] a prototype smartphone that had (essentially) all the useability features of an iPhone, including a trick interface, accelerometer and multi-touch. It was cobbled together and not very pretty, but as a proof of concept, it worked. Yet it never saw the light of day. Why?
Brass’s tablet project was well advanced in the labs too, but somehow never got the traction it deserved internally. [..]
Microsoft has a Darwinian internal structure. Each business unit has to fight for scarce resources, - they compete with each other and only the strong survive. Succeeding in that environment involves more than just having a good (or even great) product or project. Unless you’re Office or Windows, you have to build symbiotic relationships with other business units (preferably the big guys) just to ensure your survival. You have to make their success (at least partially) dependent on yours
[..Secondly..] in its youth, Microsoft could afford to hire only the best and the brightest. Smart people are flexible and innovative in their approach and this reflects in the company’s culture. As the enormous growth of the late 90s took hold, we couldn’t keep up with the demand for more employees and as a consequence, the quality bar dropped. We started employing people who were merely good, not outstanding. These new people were less flexible, less able to handle organisational ambiguity and less passionate about what they were doing. They started to build bureaucracy as a safety-net and as a structure in which they were comfortable operating. Goodbye to dynamic decision-making and rapid market responses.
Anyway, bottom line; the "smart" people starting work there know (or must be really, *really* blinkered not to know) of this reputation, so why are they working there? Silly money?
I'll grant that they came up with Kinect recently, which was pretty innovative (albeit as a response to the Wii controller) and smacked of research turned into a workable product. But that was pretty recent (so couldn't have inspired any but the newest recruits) and probably benefitted from being an XBox product that was out of the way of the entrenched interests and politics of the main Windows-focussed divisions, and in an area where MS had more to gain than lose from innovation.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
$2.75 earnings per share and a 3.1% dividend yield on 23 billion in net income, I think they're doing fine. They are a money machine, they aren't hipsters. Why invest all the time and money in huge new projects and technology when you have stuff making tons of money and more importantly profit. MSFT isn't even in the same class as Apple or whatever people are comparing them to nowadays (Apple, I'm guessing). Geeze, look at IBM, same story. No one balls out IBM for having tons of patents and no real pro
Re: (Score:2)
I think they're doing fine. They are a money machine, they aren't hipsters. Why invest all the time and money in huge new projects and technology when you have stuff making tons of money and more importantly profit.
Er, but the point is that they *are* "investing all that time and money" in lab research on innovative products and technologies anyway... it's just that it rarely seems to make it out!
Re: (Score:2)
Yet very little ever makes it to a product. Wonder why?
Because often the 'cool stuff' will be too expensive when it goes to market. Why did the Lisa flop? Because, while in many ways it was cooler than the mac, it was too expensive.
It's no good inventing some cool 3D gaming console - If it needs to retail for $1,499 it's going to fail. Cool stuff needs to meet a magic price point - Even though some people are willing to pay the 'apple tax' they're only willing to go so far...
Re: (Score:2)
You say "a** f**k" like it's a bad thing.
Re: (Score:2)
You say "a** f**k" like it's a bad thing.
I *did not* say "a** f**k", I said "ass fucking". There is a difference.
Consumer Expos on the way out? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Counterpoint: the Big Show is a useful tool for focusing attention of the engineering staff, including the gatekeepers (like the build team) who otherwise enjoy telling people why their special request can't be done. It gives engineers and small teams developing new stuff something concrete to shoot for. And once projects and products are committed for the show, serious issues MUST be resolved by that date, so slipping the schedule by one week every week is no longer an option.
I agree with the MS guy that
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
including the gatekeepers (like the build team) who otherwise enjoy telling people why their special request can't be done.
You mean it lets management force poor ideas down the development team's collective throat?
Re: (Score:1)
I think the internet has largely made consumer oriented conventions obsolete. Once upon a time, you wanted to make big announcements at CES (or a similar convention) because it would get you more publicity. The main avenue of publicity for consumer electronics was magazines, and the convention review type issues were always the best selling. So if you put out an announcement in May and it showed up in the April issue, not many people read it. If you made your announcement at CES and it showed up in the
Re: (Score:2)
It seems to me like Microsoft isn't exactly losing anything by bowing out.
It's not so much CES that's on the way out as Microsoft that's on the way out as far as a consumers are concerned. Microsoft didn't decide to "bow out", in fact CES decided to not invite them to do the keynote for 2013. After all it's been a long time since they were amongst the most influential consumer technology companies.
http://parislemon.com/post/14590185649/fuck-me-no-fuck-you [parislemon.com]
http://gigaom.com/2011/12/21/mystery-who-killed-the-microsoft-ces-keynote/ [gigaom.com]
Re: (Score:2)
CES, Macworld and others are increasingly places for smaller 3rd party vendors to peddle their usually cheap (and sometimes knockoff) wares.
In other words, It is going to be filled with the people Microsoft is going to be suing for patent infringement if they don't pony up. I wouldn't show my face either.
New MS show? (Score:1)
MS will probably want an all MS show. LIke a 'Microsoft-con' or something....
5 will get you 10.
Re: (Score:2)
No, Micro-Con.
Maybe... (Score:2)
Not just Microsoft (Score:5, Interesting)
Trade shows are largely a relic of the pre-Internet world. Nowadays we can get pretty much any information we need about a brand new product simply by visiting the vendor's website. We've seen technology-driven companies moving away from announcing and/or releasing products at mega-trade shows especially over the past 4-5 years, whether they're computer companies (Apple, Microsoft), camera companies (Nikon, Canon), or "we do it all and do it badly" companies (Sony).
Re: (Score:2)
That certainly neatly explains the continued growth of PAX doesn't it?
Not so much for camera makers - Photokina is still a very big deal. The Paris Air Show
Re: (Score:2)
Not so much for camera makers - Photokina is still a very big deal. The Paris Air Show is still a big deal in the aviation world as well. Etc... etc...
I'll give you the Paris Air Show, but those are airplanes for goodness sake!
It seems to me that Photokina announcements tend to be about consumer kit rather than pro kit anymore - but we'll see what happens. With an every-other-year show, I don't know that trends would be as apparent as with annual shows.
Re: (Score:3)
I'll give you the Paris Air Show, but those are airplanes for goodness sake!
For many, the primary value of the Paris Air Show is to see if the Soviets/Russians will crash their latest Tupolev/Sukhoi/MiG. Can't be good for sales. To be fair, they haven't done it for a while at Paris.
Re: (Score:2)
Everybody who is saying that nobody needs trade shows to make announcements in the internet age is right. Quite frankly that trade shows for other industries are less effected so far is probably more an indicator of lag than anything else. Be
Re: (Score:2)
But what 'everyone' is missing is that there is more to trade shows (much more) than just announcements.
In other words, you've assumed yourself to be correct, and any evidence otherwise is just more evidence you're correct.
Re: (Score:2)
I used to work for Boeing as a contractor on 777 final assembly. My wife still works for Boeing, and we're both the third generation from our families to do so. I probably know more about aircraft and the industry surrounding them than you do.
And what you say of visiting manufacturers is true of any industry. By that logic it would be universal. It doesn't matter whe
Re: (Score:2)
PAX is explicitly not a trade show - nothing new is announced there and the trade presence is typically companies re-using their demos and booths from the previous E3 as well as a bunch of indies who are too small for a real trade show. PAX is a community gathering, the panels and other community events are way more interesting than the expo floor.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
or "we do it all and do it badly" companies (Sony).
Plus we introduce an incompatible, inferior, more expensive, new format in the process.
Re: (Score:2)
Our company attends conferences but not trade shows anymore. We used to have a big rush to get our marketing material and booth ready every year for the Design Automation Conference (DAC) but even the big vendors have long pulled out of that one and we abandoned it before that. It's just too much effort (and expense) for very little benefit. The only people going to the trade shows in the last few years were existing customers who would come by for a chat. New customers just go to the web.
Microsoft CES Exit Echoes Apple MacWorld Exit (Score:5, Interesting)
Microsoft (Dec. 21, 2011) [technet.com]: As we look at all of the new ways we tell our consumer stories â" from product momentum disclosures, to exciting events like our Big Windows Phone, to a range of consumer connection points like Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft.com and our retail stores â" it feels like the right time to make this transition.
Apple (Dec. 16, 2008) [gizmodo.com]: Apple is reaching more people in more ways than ever before, so like many companies, trade shows have become a very minor part of how Apple reaches its customers. The increasing popularity of Apple's Retail Stores, which more than 3.5 million people visit every week, and the Apple.com website enable Apple to directly reach more than a hundred million customers around the world in innovative new ways.
Re: (Score:2)
It might be tempting to draw a parellel, however it's a false one.
Apple decided to stop being a part of the MacWorld convention. Both Keynote and Stand.
Microsoft on the other hand were not invited to do another Keynote for 2013, and withdrew their plans to have a stand in response. to that.
Apple jumped, Microsoft were pushed.
http://parislemon.com/post/14590185649/fuck-me-no-fuck-you [parislemon.com]
http://gigaom.com/2011/12/21/mystery-who-killed-the-microsoft-ces-keynote/ [gigaom.com]
Spin (Score:2)
'As we look at all of the new ways we tell our consumer stories,' explained Microsoft's Frank Shaw, 'it feels like the right time to make this transition.'"
New ways they tell consumer stories?! Golly that is some grade-A PR bullshit right there.
Well there go... (Score:3)
...my all expenses paid trips to pr0n-con^H^H^H^H^H^H^H, CES.
On topic, I'm surprised that it took Microsoft this long to drop out of CES. It has been shrinking and becoming more and more irrelevant with each passing year. I always figured it was just an excuse to be in town at the same time as the AVN awards.
Re: (Score:2)
Even the porn stars see the writing on the wall with regards to CES.
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure what the deal is with moving both the AEE show and the
Now that's confidence in their Consumer products (Score:2)
It makes perfect sense because it isn't called the <bold>Consumer</bold> Electronics Show for nothing.
LoB
Nobody cares about software at CES (Score:3)
I attended CES last year. Nobody there was interested in the stuff that wasn't the 'end product.' As such, people were in the MSFT booth, but they were much more interested in the hardware from other vendors than they were with the MSFT software running on it. People could have seen that stuff in the booths of the appropriate hardware vendor. The one place this didn't hold true was in the XBox/Kinect area. There were a ton of people interested in spending time in that space - but that's an 'end product'. Interestingly, it's an end product that is probably best showcased at E3.
The same can be said about Intel's booth. The biggest draw there was the chance to play Portal 2 before release.
Chances are that, unless I can hold the product you're selling in my hand and get an immediate benefit from it on its own, it probably isn't best showcased with a mega-dollar booth at CES (a small booth in the component exhibitors area maybe).
I guess I'm just saying that conventions like CES probably aren't the best bang for the buck for MSFT.
CES has been no fun and a chore to cover since... (Score:2)
...the porn vendors left and set up their own show. Who wants to go to CES and endure all that crap when your show badge doesn't even buy you any decent eye candy?
Translation: (Score:2)
We don't have anything to show that people couldn't easily pick apart, and we don't want customers to get close to Windows 8 until we can keep it from randomly exploding, and Balmer's stage presence... let's face it, he's become a laughingstock. So we're choosing to present our products in much more controlled circumstances like TV ads. And in those ads we'll mostly be ragging on how complicated our competitor's products are, because we can't compete on functionality, as every one of them will do more tha
Great To See An Old Idea Moving On (Score:1)