Lax Security At Russian Rocket Plant 116
theshowmecanuck writes "Reuters reports that there is little or no security at one of the main factories in Russia responsible for military and Soyuz rocket manufacture. Blogger Lana Sator was able to walk right into the empty (off hours) facility through huge gaps in the fences that no-one bothered to repair, and there was no security to stop them aside from some dogs that didn't bother them either. In fact Lana even has one picture of herself posing next to an apparently non-functional security camera, another of her sitting on what looks like to be possibly a partially assembled rocket motor (someone who knows better can fill us in), and has about 100 photos of the escapade all told on her blog about this (it's in Russian... which I don't speak... any translators out there?). Russian officials are said to be deeply concerned. I wonder if this has any bearing on why Russian rockets haven't been making it into space successfully, or whether it and the launch failures are all part of some general industrial malaise that is taking place."
Translation (Score:5, Informative)
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ru&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Flana-sator.livejournal.com%2F160176.html%23cutid1&act=url [google.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Amazing how the lights are even left on and how there seem to be no locked doors.
The really strange thing (Score:2)
The really strange thing in all these pictures is there are not Chairs and almost no tables. I think this might be an abandoned site.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As far as I know, no ones leaves functional elevators [yandex.ru] behind on abandoned sites. ;-)
Re: (Score:1)
Looks like ... (Score:2)
another of her sitting on what looks like to be possibly a partially assembled rocket motor [yandex.ru]
Re:Looks like ... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Looks like ... (Score:5, Interesting)
Elena aka KiddOfSpeed. They were bogus in that she took a guided tour and was not on a solitary motorcycle ride through the area as she had claimed on her site. In other words the photos weren't photoshopped, but everything else about it was fake. I was considering this possibility myself reading the headline; there must be guided tours into the Russian space-technology facilities as well. On the other hand it would not be hard to believe the facilities are not very secure or well guarded, and probably quite empty over the holidays.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Also, I've never heard of organised motorcycle tours
What do you call Sturgis?
A nominally organized motorcycle rally.
Re: (Score:2)
Also, I've never heard of organised motorcycle tours
What do you call Sturgis?
A target for a copyright troll [techdirt.com]?
Re:Looks like ... (Score:4, Informative)
Timed release or whatever it's called. And the motorcycle part is just it: Motorcycles were forbidden there, but in none of her pictures was the motorcycle actually shown within the Chernobyl Zone of Alienation, which was probably one of the first clues people had that the story of her taking a motorcycle through there alone was bogus. Second clue was when a Chernobyl travel-guide [neilgaiman.com] told she'd been on their tour group.
Now you might suggest its a conspiracy of them trying to cover up letting her in against rules, but Elena wrote [museumofhoaxes.com] on the site in response "I am being accused that it was more poetry in this story then reality. I partly accept this accusation, it still was more reality then poetry and it is why this site has millions of people visiting each month from the day when I put it online and I think I have right to say that people love it". If you go to the KiddOfSpeed website, you'll find a disclaimer from the person providing the hosting, "Regardless of what is true, this site has certainly made people think more about Chernobyl and this tragic disaster."
So it would seem the people with "vested interests" to accuse her of making up things include both herself and the person currently hosting the site.
Tours of the are have been available since 2002, and her website appeared in 2004. Wikipedia cites mainly Slashdot has having made the site famous. The site has ofcourse been changed numerous times since then with new pictures etc. Also Mary Mycio (who MAY have a vested interest in it) alleges many of the pictures are from books and different timeperiods.
So in short, yes Elena's KiddOfSpeed story was fantasy. The images were of Chernobyl, but staged and not what they purpoted to be. As it relates to THIS story, the "solitary woman on unauthorized exploration of forbidden area" has a chance of being a fantasy. Looking cursorily over the site it's hard to imagine those pics being from a public tour, though the lack of actual rocket engines on site makes it a remote possibility.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I can seriously see why they don't bother guarding it.. I can't see any real valuable tools or other fancy looking components laying around...
Value lies in the eye of the beholder. I wonder if there's potential "dirty bomb" materials laying around in the back rooms. A little missed plutonium, selenium, ... goes a long way in the right circles.
My first thought on seeing this story: more of the same, plus ca change ... May we please have that revolution in management I've been praying for for so long? Please?
Damn, my $deity appears to be broken. :-P
Well, that's a face I haven't seen before.. (Score:1)
... and probably won't see ever again in the future.
Sorry, sometimes it's so sad you get jaded.
When you cut costs... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
They have the best security they need to prevent anybody from stealing these rockets.
These things have great record of blowing up on the launch pad. Who wants to steal crappy rockets? Or even the designs for crappy rockets?
Same as in any big beauracracy (Score:2, Interesting)
This is exactly the same problem that's existed in any big beauracracy since the beginning of time.
e.g. read how Feynman irked the guards at Los Alamos by leaving the secure area 5 times without entering.
The beauracracy spends so much effort putting on a show at guarding the official entrances and any other place you might leave or enter? It can't even fit into the minds of the security guys.
Re: (Score:3)
When I was stationed at Redstone, we found that MSFC had some junk-piles with uber space geek appeal. No fences around them, once you was on post, you could just walk up and look around, touch things, pick them up. Once a security guard stopped and check our ID, we told him what we were doing and he said "don't get hurt and just take pictures" and left.
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, I must have missed the part where the parent poster was the hulk. For a better example, look at the big fuss recently about all the "stolen" moon rocks. It's exactly the kind of security show he's talking about. 30 years after the fact, a bunch of moon samples that were essentially given away or loaned out indefinitely by people who had de facto or outright official authority to do so, are now being treated as if they were stolen by the people who have them now. Basically, they left the barn door wid
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, no... Feynman's reason for those antics was not to show that you can't guard things, but to show they weren't being guarded very well. He did believe things could at least be safer than they were.
A trifle surprising... (Score:5, Interesting)
I am somewhat surprised, though, that they haven't had a greater incentive to repair the fence and put together something resembling a night watch for reasons of simple theft. Rocket surgery presumably involves some expensive tools, and big piles of parts and stock in various rather pricey metals and alloys. If your security is so fantastic that bored bloggers are wandering in, I'm amazed that the whole operation hasn't been melted down at the nearest scrapyard of loose morals...
I think that will be more obvious then just 1 pesr (Score:3)
I think that will be more obvious then just 1 person snooping around.
Re: (Score:2)
These rocket motors are sold freely. For example, they are used in Atlas V rockets by Lockheed Martin & Boeing.
So there's no great secret in their production. China or India might be interested in technologies used, but I somehow think they already have them.
Re: (Score:3)
having a product in hand and knowing how to build it are completely different things. I'm constantly in and out of plants that make products you can buy in stores in bulk.. but they all have a very strict no camera policy - and we have to sign NDA's because it is their process for building the products that is the important secrete.
find an average product in your home.. a light bulb.. a pen.. a drink in the fridge.. all things you can buy - all things you your self MIGHT be able to make - even though yo
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
yeap - that is more common in process plants than people would like to believe.. people know how to do it - they just don't know why they are doing a particular step/task - only that they need to.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Not really what you were thinking of, but FOGBANK was a bizarre twist on/subversion of the idea: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOGBANK [wikipedia.org]
Basically this material used in US nuclear weapons hadn't been made in 15+ years, and when they tried to make it again, the result failed in testing. Of course, people started assuming they'd "forgotten" how to make it, but it ended up being that they never knew how to make it in the first place -- impurities in one of the ingredients turned out to be important, and the ingred
Re: (Score:2)
It wouldn't surprise me if the cost establish the capital equipment to replicate the manufacturing process wouldn't greatly exceed the cost of just plain buying it from the Russians. The Russians have amortised their capital costs over thousands of units, all they have to do is maintain that infra-structure. The amount of un-repaired fences, un-swept floors and unpainted iron in the factory does make one skeptical that the Russians are treating the factory like a going concern.
Re: (Score:2)
The kind of chemicals expected to be on site should be sufficient deterrent for 99% of casual metal thieves.
LAX security?!? (Score:2, Funny)
Why is Los Angeles Airport's [lawa.org] security at a Russian rocket plant?!?
There needs to be an investigation!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Just maybe.... (Score:2, Interesting)
They think people are generally pretty decent and no one is going to come and steal their rockets.
This OMGWTFTERRORISTS mentality is thankfully not yet universal.
Re: (Score:3)
Out of interest, when was the last time a terrorist used technology stolen from a government space agency to launch an attack? Ever?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yep, this is my suspicion too.
The rocket programme is a source of national pride for Russia, and what external forces would have an interest in sabotage? the rest of the world is dependent on Russia's launch facilities now for the most part, and let's be honest, the difficulty with a rocket programme isn't so much figuring out how to run one, that groundwork has mostly already been done and is pretty well known, but the issue is of cost to run the programme - even the US has had to pull back from funding th
Washington Post Article (Score:5, Interesting)
The Washington Post (reg required) just had a good report on how Russia's scientific base has changed for the worse. Apparently, the labs are populated with a bimodal mix of young and elderly scientists -- the middle has been hollowed out over the last two decades. And while a new funding push has sent money towards science, much of it is wasted through corruption:
In Russia, the lost generation of science [washingtonpost.com]
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah! Lana is freaking James Bond! Anna Chapman, Natalie Portman, and all the others are just silly bit actresses while Lana's got the infiltration plus hardware shots to prove her mettle with The Power. And Reuters takes note. Dig on those photos!
Don't know what the fuss is about (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Hold the press! (Score:2)
Shouldn't this be appraised as the first crowdsourced space program? And look how cute and friendly the puppies are! No full body scans either!
Old Plant? (Score:5, Informative)
Khimki, Russia [google.com]
A little wikipedia research tells you that this is the old OKB-456 development and test facility for the RD-100 engine, a predecessor of the modern RD-107 engines. the plant was build right after WWII to build a copy of the german V2 rocket and probably has not been used for years. Todays Sojus rockets fly with the RD-107 or with its upgrades RD-117 and RD-118. These are produced by NPO energomash in samara at this location:
Progress Plant, Samara [google.com]
This was a 5 min research, so I could be wrong.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Khimki isn't out of the way; the best shortcuts into Moscow from the principal international airport Moscow-Sheremetyevo run through there. The area is a strange combination of old industrial sites and high-security gated communities.
The site doesn't look abandoned, old facilities often look like this. I'll bet there is a genius old-school engineer keeping the thing running with duct tape and bubble gum. He probably comes out of retirement every time a test is fired.
Re: (Score:3)
In my Western experience, I have a hard time conceiving of power being provided by somebody other than a private commercial interest that'd rush right out and pull the meter the moment bills stopped getting paid. However, would a state-run facility receiving state-owned power in a non-capitalist nation even bother with a meter? In that situation, when the facility was shut down, would workers just throw anything of interest in trucks and drive away, not bothering to disconnect power or do any other rigorous
Re: (Score:2)
So, even in Soviet-Land, an abandoned factory still having power after all these years looks odd if it is not a huge pile of ashes.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
The summary is not accurate: it is a test stand. (Score:4, Informative)
This is not a "plant" where rockets or parts would be assembled. It is just a testing facility where new rocket engine designs can be mounted and studied. It provides a system for dealing with high-temperature engine exaust, which, naturally, is a problem if one wants to monitor the engine in a laboratory conditions. It also provides some measures to deal with test failures, mainly a fire-extinguishing system and blast doors. Apart from that, it is just another low-security building and there's nothing interesting there when no tests are being conducted. It has nothing to do with the actual rocket assembly. Just one big test stand.
I used to be an adventurer like her.... (Score:2, Insightful)
It's funny how this is an article about "lack of security" and not "cool photos of rocket plant".
Americans..... just can't stand when people aren't being groped by a security guard.
Re: (Score:1)
Well, at least one picture [yandex.ru] shows a recent-looking label with "18.05.12", which looks to me like a due date for next inspection or something like that...
Of course it always could be something else entirely.
Re:Really? Yes. (Score:1)
Yes, you are probably correct, this is the next inspection date. But so what? It does not change the fact that the installation in question is a large test stand, by far the largest part of which is the system that deals with rocket engine's exaust. Again, it's whole point is to provide a "socket" where you plug an engine prototype in - it is the large tunnel closed by the red lid here: http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/3008/33213654.de/0_71e50_3a09f837_XXL.jpg - as you can guess, it is close to impossible to
That's not the motor (Score:5, Informative)
She's sitting in the socket into which the rocket motor is plugged. The motor is lowered through the doors in the ceiling and conected to the fuel and power lines in the socket. The big round red lid covers the exhaust pipe, which leads outside into that huge tower in the middle of the complex. And as for the security camera, there is no mention of it being broken. Lana says it's likely used to monitor the tests. Since there was no motor in the building at the time, there isn't much reason to watch it. Yeah, sure, there might be sabotage, but I doubt anybody would bother. General vandalism is the most likely threat and those kind of people aren't too keen on trudging a mile through the snow to get to the hole in the fence. Same goes for stealing metal and stuff; people will do it, but they probably won't bother if they have to haul it that far.
Re: (Score:1)
Not exactly a mile through the snow, the site appears to be on the edge of a fairly large town.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Correct, in my years of rocket testing in the 80-90s its called the thrust cup or thrust adapter... the motor being tested or validated is bolted to the big ring... you will notice the angled, radially arranged tubes leading to a central hub in the background which is obscured. A load cell or measuring device is bolted between the central hub and the immovable mass of a test stand. In this manner they can static test the motor's performance like a dynamometer does with automotive engines etc.
Sickness still bigger ðan any industry (Score:1)
I wonder if this has any bearing on why Russian rockets haven't been making it into space successfully, or whether it and the launch failures are all part of some general industrial malaise that is taking place.
It is quite obviously part of a sickneß, but not an industrial sickneß: it is a civilisational sickneß, and as part of ðe periphery of our exChristian civilisation Rußia is bound to feel its effects even heavier ðan the civilisational core.
Historically, new civilisations start eiðer at ðe periphery of old ones (think Barbarians occupying ðe Roman empire) or out of it, so Rußia might still have some hope, but ðese ings typically take many generations of
Re: (Score:2)
What the Romans called barbarians were all the people who didn't speak a language they new, and often them had more advanced technology. Romans understood the power of roads, and were very good at large stone construction and military construction, but in general their tech level was not very high. The barbarians didn't go out and occupy the land as the Romans left, they were already there all along.
Re: (Score:2)
Barbarians with more advanced technology ðan Romans? Now you have my attention, please provide any references.
Actually, what really set apart Romans (including Greeks and oðer subjects of ðe empire) was a civic superstructure, not any technology; but ðat superstructure sure had technological implications. Only, at ðe time, ðe military aspect was more important ðan ðe technological one.
Barbarians were not ðere all along, but ðey were already occupying parts
Re: (Score:2)
Barbarians were not ðere all along, but ðey were already occupying parts of the empire, particularly around ðe borders, as Romans not left, but dwindled away due to lack of fertility, just as with our civilisation now. Ðe parallels are stunning.
How are they not there, if they are in fact occupying?
And not particularly around the borders, it would be more accurate to say, most of the people inside the Empire's borders, and everybody outside of it.
Re: (Score:2)
Barbarians — mainly Germans — for many years were incorporated as auxiliarii to the legionarii, around ðe borders. As ðey suffered injustices — today we would say ‘discrimination’ — and sensed ðe empire crumbling down, ðey just took compensation by occupying lands more and more into ðe heart of ðe empire, until ðey reached Rome itself.
Where you went wrong is ðat you seem think of Romans as ðose who inhabited Rome and ðe s
it is a real plant (Score:1)
stop wasting everyones time saying this plant is defunct or vacant. look at the pictures, the water in the tower one day and not the other. or look at their website where they specifically list the plant as a mailing address. http://www.npoenergomash.ru/eng/about/room/
For display room of the enterprise visiting the letter with the request for visiting by group of employees of the organization (pupils of school or institute, etc.) with the indication of desirable time for visiting is necessary to send to
RE: Russia (Score:3)
"Lax Security" is pretty much everywhere.
USA: Genuine NASA motor:
http://www.ninjito.com/images/2007-01-25/qx-door-3.jpg [ninjito.com]
Russia, particle colliders:
http://www.ninjito.com/2008-08-24/qx-collider-1.jpg [ninjito.com]
France, air tunnels
http://www.ninjito.com/_2010-05-07/qx-xx-4.jpg [ninjito.com]
USA, a certain famous bridge in NYC
http://www.ninjito.com/images/2009-10-07-NYC/qx-b-1.jpg [ninjito.com]
The only reason this never comes to public attention is because generally, the people that do it don't want public attention.
Glasnost (Score:2)
Used to be that ordinary Russians marveled at American openness, but now it's the other way round! You'll get arrested for taking a photo of the Brooklyn Bridge.
Re: (Score:2)
Hardly:
http://www.ninjito.com/2009-10-07-NYC [ninjito.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Saved For Posterity (Score:1)
Backed up the web page and images.
Doom 3 (Score:1)
blame capitalism (Score:4, Insightful)
novaya gazeta recently had a story where they interviewed some actual technicians who work at actual rocket factories.
basically the problem is that the managers are too focused on money, and the quality is slipping as a result.
the quality assurance measures that used to be in place have been stopped and deemed too costly.
What's the difference between the US and others? (Score:3, Interesting)
I've walked into facilities who have absolutely no security in the US, France, Germany and the UK which would be considered important to the nation. Defense contractors who keep their backdoor open all day and a false sense of security with a locked front door and to facilities with no secretary and doors open all day long, you can waltz in, take what you want, and no one will notice, they'll think you work there or you're an outside contractor. Hell, even with a secretary, they just let you in without question. And to those who say they have "security" that there's no way that happens, I probably was already through your entire building without notifying anyone during one of your new installations in the building. You're part of the joke.
Hell, I was at the Boeing plant in Long Beach where they build the C-17, and I just waltzed right into there without any questions from anyone, all that security they have there is a joke.
The only reason no one blogs about it or posts pictures of these issues because they'll probably lose their jobs or not work with said companies ever again. Or they just simply don't care like me.
So? (Score:2)
Unreal (Score:2)
The Difference Between American and Russian Tech.. (Score:4, Insightful)
American tech and machines are all so clean. Gleaming, shiny, spotless and built in clean rooms where everyone wears body-covering overalls and face masks. In order to work on it, you need a special facility and all manner of special equipment and clothing.
Whereas the Russian factories look like a steel mill. All you need to work on Russian equipment is a tool kit, shade tree and a bottle of vodka. And up until now, it's worked pretty good? To the point where we're dependent on them now.
Perhaps that's part of the problem, rather than "sabotage" or "terrorism"? Things have become too dirty, and could use a little cleaning up.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
ie giving cosmonauts pencils instead of billion dollar space pens
Oh dear lord, not this again. Please become less fucking stupid [scientificamerican.com].
you shouldn't blame the maintenance guy.... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)