KDE 4.8 Released 165
jrepin writes "The KDE community has released version 4.8 of their Free and open source software bundle. The new version provides many new features, improved stability, and increased performance. Highlights for Plasma Workspaces include window manager optimizations, the redesign of power management, and integration with Activities. The first Qt Quick-based Plasma widgets have entered the default installation of Plasma Desktop, with more to follow in future releases. KDE applications released today include Dolphin file manager with its new display engine, ..., and KDE Telepathy reaching its first beta milestone. New features for Marble virtual globe keep arriving, among these are: Elevation Profile, satellite tracking, and Krunner integration. The KDE Platform provides the foundation for KDE software. KDE software is more stable than ever before. In addition to stability improvements and bugfixes, Platform 4.8 provides better tools for building fluid and touch-friendly user interfaces, integrates with other systems' password saving mechanisms and lays the base for more powerful interaction with other people using the new KDE Telepathy framework."
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Last I heard, KDE didn't replace the XP UI, just gave it a bunch of KDE apps.
And if you don't like the Fisher Price UI of XP, do what I do, switch to the classic UI. It once again looks professional (if boring), rather than like a kids toy.
Re: (Score:3)
I always called it the Toys-R-Us UI, but it comes down to the same thing. I am not alone! :)
(I think I like Fisher Price UI better, actually).
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
I tried a few distributions before settling on Kubuntu 11.10. It just works and everything is easy. The menu has the same search feature that OSX and Win7 have. Type what you want to do, and crap just pops up on the list. Click it and go. All my devices just work. Pop in a flash drive? Automatically mounted and I can drag and drop files and take them with me. Click a picture? Viewer opens up. Not GIMP, which belongs in the "shit that sounds like it might earn me the 'sex offender' badge" bin. Just a regular
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, what works for me probably won't work for a system builder. Economy of scale is working against you with Linux. I think it would be great to have an LTS version good for 5-7 years. Maybe have fewer releases, but supported longer.
Re: (Score:2)
A stable ABI would turn Linux into an unstable mess, because it'd encourage hardware makers to only release their own crappy closed-source drivers instead of opening the specs and allowing high-quality drivers to be written and maintained by the community. Crappy drivers are exactly what cause the most problems for Windows and gave it such a horrible reputation for instability and crashes. MS mostly fixed the problem by instituting the WHQL program, signed drivers, etc. The Linux community, by its very n
Re: (Score:2)
I don't understand where the idea comes from, that a stable ABI is needed on linux. It's already trivial from me to download new drivers (it's called a kernel update and it happens about once a month) and I get them all from a central repository -on Windows I have to burn my time hunting for them.
The last thing I need is to for things to change so I have to navigate various vendor websites looking for drivers.
Re: (Score:2)
If you want long term support on a stable version, and you're looking at the community distributions, then you're doing it wrong. You will never get a 7 year lifetime out of a community distro. That just ain't gonna happen.
If you are in need of long term supported and stable Linux distros then you turn to the commercial versions. You need to look into something like the full version of RedHat or SLED/SLES (SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop/SUSE Linux Enterprise Server). With SLED/SLES (the one I know/use),
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
OK, then my next question is... why do you "need" to upgrade? If a Linux install is working fine... then leave it alone. There is no rule that states a particular Linux distro MUST be upgraded when the next latest and greatest comes out. I know lots of people that are using years old installs of Ubuntu and openSUSE... and they are fine.
Alternatives.. Arch and its rolling release?
Also... I've been using various Linux distros for a long long time.. since mid-90s, and upgrades were at one time a total disas
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There is a significant different between no patching and keep up with the patches. Again, with openSUSE, there is a Community driven initiative called Evergreen which maintains the older releases through security patches so that older releases can still be kept in place without upgrades yet be patched with security fixes.
You point at the very valid security issues that do definitely crop up in Linux as they do in all current OSes... yet you also say that you may as well install Windows since it'll be a zom
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Please, what driver is missing from Linux now that would suddenly be available if we (stupidly) gave you the stable ABI you won't stop demanding?
I can appreciate your perspective in some areas but this focus you have on a stable ABI is really off. You said it yourself, "If a company is gonna be open to FOSS the ABI isn't gonna change their minds one way or another" , and you are correct. Having a stable ABI isn't going to make previously non-existent drivers appear, it'll just allow the current ones to go
Re: (Score:2)
You won't get the KDE desktop UI on Windows XP. KDE for Windows is just the software collection, and since Qt uses Windows widgets on Windows, you'll get KDE applications that look like Windows applications, just not very well tested.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, the standard Qt styles and Oxygen are included as well as a native Windows one.
Re: (Score:2)
gees, its only been a fucking decade and you still bitching and whining about a 3 version ago UI from windows? turn it to classic, its 3 mouse clicks dink.
Re: (Score:2)
Try installing Krusader.
I still using Dolphin for things like picture browsing, but Krusader is great for file management.
New in konsole (Score:5, Informative)
I'm guessing konsole will get a lot more use with this crowd, that, say, Marble. I'm not sure this feature list is worth the effort of upgrading, but here it is:
http://konsole.kde.org/changelog.php [kde.org]
Noteworthy:
Before any window is opened, make sure pty device has right size before starting the terminal process.
Allow an image to be set as the background in the terminal window.
Close session reliably when the session process doesn't die with SIGHUP.
Don't show the default profile in menu New Tab list when no others are listed.
Add "Select All" action for selecting the whole history of this session.
Add popup menu for drag-n-drop operations using KonqOperations::doDrop.
Bidirectional text support is on by default.
Left-To-Right direction will always be used in the terminal area even when the language is Right-To-Left.
Add support for Unicode decomposed characters and in general better unicode displaying.
Re: (Score:2)
Allow an image to be set as the background in the terminal window.
Seriously, who _wants_ this shit ? Black is not good enough for you now ?
Re:New in konsole (Score:5, Informative)
Hey, I actually like that idea. I can have ssh sessions open for up to five different machines... I'd definitely find it useful to attach different backgrounds to each one so I immediately know which machine I'm currently using. It would prevent me from entering commands in the wrong session, which I've done multiple times before with somewhat disastrous results...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Except those times I shut-down those servers.
Re: (Score:2)
Having the hostname in the prompt doesn't give you a hint as to which machine your currently using?
Re: (Score:2)
For example, consider when are running vi to copy contents between config files...
Re: (Score:2)
Believe it or not, after using multiple sessions on different hosts for an extended period of time the promps meld together and you don't see them anymore. It doesn't help that they all look more or less the same. The background is far more noticeable.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There are escape codes for changing the title of the terminal window (or tab, in konsole). Which kind of helps when the left hand side of the window is obscured.
Even so.. you can't MISS the background. If you forget to glance left, you just rm -rf'd the wrong server. Even worse, if you're logged in to KFFHHJJKF0001 when you meant to type into KFFYHJJKF0001, then apart from killing whoever made your DNS naming scheme, you could really use those images. Then again, I just make them randomly change the fon
Re: (Score:2)
I used different text colors for different servers, maybe that can help you
Re: (Score:3)
actually, having the terminal open with a random subtly different background colour kind helps when you're a sysadmin with about 30 windows open and you can't remember which one you're typing in to. If you use several terminals at once, try it for a few hours. Mental association and all that. Ah yes, I was upgrading the kernel in the PINK window.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or just type screen.
Re: (Score:2)
btw. you can set your default shell to screen. It will throw you into the configured shell when you start it, and is tty-aware when it gets run out of a terminal..
kinda helps in the.. "I just started a 3 hour job on this remote host.. I'll just... " ctrl-d, ctrl-d, ctrl-d... "OH CRAP, forgot to start screen :(" situation.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm guessing konsole will get a lot more use with this crowd
I use konsole as an engine, but Yakuake [kde.org] runs my life.
Re: (Score:2)
I just wished they'd fixed copy (and paste) from konsole - most of the time when I copy some output from the konsole to paste elsewhere (e.g. my editor of choice or my chat program), I have gobs of spaces after each line. That's the most frustrating bug ever...
Re: (Score:2)
OK.. here's my main gripe with KDE since version 1.0. konsole STILL has no option to select semi-condensed fonts. I'm not an anti-antialias nazi. I use AA fonts everywhere else, but that 6x13 semicondensed xterm font is still the best thing for writing in a terminal. With every release I would've thought that this still-open 10 year old bug would've been fixed by now.
Re: (Score:2)
but can you turn semicondensed on and off? Try reading again.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. the fixed/misc one you get when you type "xterm -font fixed". At least I was until I started using konsole. gnome-terminal gives you the option of selecting semi-condensed. fontconfig *should* select it automatically out of the box, but the problem lies deep in Qt where it doesn't even recognise the semicondensed bit or carry it through to the font layer. There is actually a couple of work arounds:
1) hack the code (which I did once)
2) delete all non-semicondensed misc:fixed fonts so it's forced to
Pause after click fixed? (Score:2)
Re:Pause after click fixed? (Score:5, Informative)
kmail ? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
IIRC they are "just" mbox files. Set up thunderbird, let it create a simple mbox file for like 1 throw-away message, exit thunderbird, copy over your mbox files.
Re: (Score:2)
Google around. There are some scripts out there that do the job (and some that don't, so back up your email first). I successfully migrated from Kmail to Thunderbird with them.
Re: (Score:2)
Telepathy (Score:2)
and KDE Telepathy reaching its first beta milestone.
Is it an adequate replacement for Pidgin & Kopete yet? And do I have the ability to have it minimize to the systray? Kopete was by far my favorite client but once the improvements and bugfixes stopped I had to jump ship to the (IMHO) inferior Pidgin. The lack of facebook chat did it for me. And since it's taken like 4 years to get to beta with this, I question whether re-inventing the wheel was a good idea.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
it works in telepathy, so I'm assuming that kopete now supports it.
Re: (Score:2)
I know it can now, but back then (late 2008, early 2009 as I recall) it didn't. At that point Facebook was using it's own homebrew chat backend. it took until 2010 for them to actually implement XMPP.
As Dragonslicer eluded to, there are a *LOT* of bugs still in the program as it stands now, and with it taking however long to get a *BETA* version out, I wonder why bother?
And the Regressions? (Score:5, Interesting)
In any case, thanks for the best desktop environment I've ever used. KIOSlaves (if they are still called that) are awesome, and we should all be thankful for KHTML, which laid the foundation for Webkit-based browsers everywhere.
Is it any better? (Score:2)
I used KDE v4.4.3 in stable Debian and didn't like it. I loved v3.x and v2.x, but v4 was bleh for me. I know about Trinity fork, but I am waiting for it to be mature, popular/official, and have a lot of support.
Re: (Score:2)
It'll happen at the same time the magical pink unicorn farm gets discovered on Mars...
Re: (Score:2)
Basically, never. :)
Re: (Score:2)
Yup... But you have to be fair: there are two years between 4.4 and 4.8. And the progress has been very fast. It is to me a bit of a mystery why Debian stable does not upgrade the GUIs faster. The base components, the server bits, sure. But there is no valid reason to no update KDE and GNOME to their latest releases.
On the contrary: bugs in interfaces are in many cases not logic bugs, but unexpected behaviour, or inconsistency. And keeping the old version won't help.
Re: (Score:3)
It's not the bugs. It's the usability, design, etc. in v4.3. Did KDE v4.8 get much better in those areas?
Re: (Score:2)
I use it every day, because I think it works great and looks good. Objectively, it is faster, snappier and more stable. It also got features at each release.
Subjectively, I think the looks were always good, but that they improved with time. But that is, of course, subjective. There are not many styles I can say I have kept for a long time before I felt the need to change -- oxygen is the exception: it is clean, clear and, to me, beautiful.
But Your question is too vague to be answered meaningfully. What bugg
Re: (Score:2)
I did not like the design, usability, etc. I preferred v3.5.10's. For now, I am using old Gnome v2.3.
Re: (Score:2)
Which is completely meaningless. you cannot "not like the design". It can be too distracting, the icons not recognisable enough, the contrast can be too high or too low. You can dislike gradients, find the colours depressing or garish. but you cannot "not like the design".
"Usability" does not exist. There is only a collection of actions required to perform given tasks, which you could not easily find, or which you found too time consuming, or which gave you RSI.
I will guess that you are one of those guys wh
Fix some damn bugs already. (Score:2)
All these new features are great (when they work), but they need to keep new feature additions to new versions. Minor version updates are supposed to be to fix bugs and improve performance, not add new features complete with new bugs. There are a ton of old bugs, quite a few of which are major issues, that they need to work on before adding in more to the mix.
The KDE developers are as bad as the Ubuntu dev team. They add in a new feature, then move on to the next new feature completely ignoring the crie
Re: (Score:2)
The ability to pass geometry information to KDE apps via the command line has been broken for 3.5 years (well, a bug was filed that long ago). So the developers aren't too interested in fixing basic functionality!
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165355 [kde.org]
Re: (Score:2)
It sounds like you want a much less feature rich and more debugged product. There really aren't feature rich high quality Linux desktop environments. Linux desktops are mainly just trying to keep up with mainstream products in terms of features.
Dump akonadi (Score:5, Interesting)
Its a fucking disaster. I used to blame kmail2 but came to realise its a decent frontend, its the back end that drags it down.
4.8 RC2 Gmail imap account, working fine for weeks. Nothing changed, then I get that perpetual rotating wait icon, followed by the
"Unable to fetch job" error when trying to access sub folders. Reboots don't make any difference.
I know the deal - the only reliable way to fix it is to delete the virtuoso/nepomuk databases and all kmail configs and recreate the account from scratch, but you know what? I just can't be bothered any more. Tired out and fed up. I've been a good boy, I given up hoping for a search that works, I don't attempt to integrate with google calendar or contacts any more, I don't expect address expansion to work reliably. Theres bug entries ate bugs.kde.org related to this months old with no dev attention, not even to confirm or reject then.
Its just easier to use my webmail or Thunderbird. At least it always works, even if its not as integrated with the kde desktop.
So one less reason to use KDE at all.
Razor-qt (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm going to have to check it out, I like qt, both for its looks and its API. KDE has a huge infra structure with it I'd be reluctant to give up but they've bet the farm on nepomuk/akonadi, which are complete clusterfucks, as said in Jurassic Park - "Dennis, our lives are in your hands and you've got butterfingers?"
Re:Dump akonadi (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
No, it's because you posted it a matter of like 6 minutes after the first poster did. Unless the competition includes a time travel application, I think it's safe to say you wouldn't have ended up with first post on those either.
Re: (Score:2)
Gnome 2 had time travel but they removed it because the UI was too clunky.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:LALALALALA (Score:5, Informative)
No, it doesn't. It actually rocks. I really have become bored of all that desktop environment hate going on /. cough....) . KDE has always been a powerhouse of a desktop
in semi knowledgeable circles (cough...
environment and a feature complete one at that. It definitely can become option heavy but this is exactly
what a user that needs a productive environment wants.
The only thing that I don't like about KDE is that whenever I touch an "out of the box" implementation of it
I feel like using an overpolished windows NT machine. But that is only the KDE aesthetics not being my
kind of soup. Software wise it still is a top notch environment.
Re: (Score:2)
I have always felt that the pre 4 versions were just windows NT that for some reason just sucked up a bunch of horsepower for unneeded fluff, the kde 4 series is much departed from that, but now I cant stand using it ... dont worry I cant stand gnome 3 either.
maybe I am stuck in the 90's as some people claim (which is odd cause KDE's setup remind's me so much of the windows 3x program manager) but I just rather not mess around with the whole new flashy toy like DE's , just give me something that has a menu,
Re: (Score:2)
and stays the fuck out of my way
that's why I like the xmonad window manager. Sure you have to master haskell and unix in order to make it work for you but on top of a gnome environment or a good self roll it's just plain awesome! (pun not intended)
Re:LALALALALA (Score:4, Interesting)
For me, I initially hated 4.x. However, I did grow to like some things about it.
I actually had to use 3.x last week on one of my old machines I'd forgotten to update, and everything just felt so damn backwards.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Agreed. I've tried Gnome but have stuck with KDE for the last 10 years because it comes with everything I need. No need to hunting for DVD burning software, a music player or anything else that Gnome doesn't bother shipping with.
Re: (Score:2)
I'll gladly make it my preferred DE once it's safe to use on a primary machine, but until then, I'll stick with the feature-lacking Gnome 3.x.
Sadly... (Score:3)
I want something with the power and configurability of KDE but the non-crazy, makes me feel claustrophobic window layout of GNOME.... Sadly after many years as a Linux users I find that that environment is called Windows 7 + VMWare.
Re:LALALALALA (Score:4, Insightful)
I understand people having their own preferences but if your view of KDE 4.x was jaded by the first few releases, please look again and give it some serious playtime. I don't miss KDE 3.x any more and Gnome feels very basic in comparison. It's great!
Re: (Score:3)
I'm someone who likes it and I can tell you what changed. Stuff works properly now. That's a pretty good summary. For example, 4.4 still had Dolphin launching four instances of your media player if you launched four video files, instead of simply queueing them for play in a single window. That sorf of jerky behaviour is now gone and bugs are quite rare.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's still slow here. It takes Dolphin about a second to repaint it's window after a resize. That hasn't changed since 4.0
Re: (Score:2)
openbox+fbpanel+pcmanfm+nm-applet+gedit+QtCreator+gnome-term+ario+smplayer+chromium+libreoffice+my own apps
When you are done with my refrigerator, would you mind giving it back please? :-P
Anyway, I think that; if you are able to roll your own it's definitely preferable. But my initial post was just to contradict the AC who trolled at the prime spot. In general I prefer gnome as a base for my systems, mostly I think because I have become good at bending it my way. Still I have to acknowledge that KDE does offer a complete desktop env that in the right hands can surpass a gnome based workstation os.
Still, just my
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why? Why do you hate the cashew? I'm not asking as someone who thinks it's awesome or anything.... it's just that I simply don't even notice it. It's stuck up in the top right corner, and I never see it. If it stays there or is removed is of no consequence to me... and I've yet to see anyone be able to articulate why they hate it so much. So many people list it as the sole reason they hate KDE4.... which makes no sense to me.
But... the beauty of Linux is this: http://kde-look.org/content/show.php/Steal [kde-look.org]
Re:LALALALALA (Score:4, Insightful)
Just because someone doesn't like KDE 4.x doesn't mean they haven't tried it.
Mind you, I've tried, IIRC, 4.1, 4.2 or 4.3 and 4.4 or 4.5 and haven't liked it in any of those, over 3.5
Different people have different tastes.
Re:LALALALALA (Score:5, Insightful)
Opinions are subjective?
That being said, I think it stands head and shoulder above the competition. It is the most feature-rich desktop on the planet. And if you don't like how something looks or operates, you can customize it to look and operate exactly how you want.
And honestly, given the choices of a Windows 8 (Metro) desktop, Gnome Shell, Unity, Lion, and KDE 4.8 as modern desktops, only Lion and KDE are particularly appealing to me. And sadly Lion seems to be slowly morphing OS X into iOS. I'm beginning to think that perhaps only the KDE devs understand it is about having the right interface for the right hardware.
With KDE the same stack can easily switch between a Netbook interface, a traditional desktop shell, a more modern desktop shell, and a tablet interface. They don't force one interface for every situation.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I'll take Win XP (classic) or KDE 3 over Win 7, which I'll take over any of those.
Someone was posting the other day (or even today?), it seems almost pathological that people seem to need the "latest" and "most modern". Do the extra features actually add much? I don't feel much gain from them.
Re: (Score:2)
What advantage does XP have over KDE 3?
What advantage does KDE 3 have over 4?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
To one fellow I know there is one little thing missing from KDE4 that he became very used to in KDE3 that's keeping him from "moving on", as it were, kpager.
A little app that puts a thumbnailed view of each desktop or workspace so that, at a glance, he can see which desktop has what on it. This isn't like the pager in KDE4 that only puts a frame and an application icon to represent the apps that are running and their size and position. kpager actually creates a thumbnail version of each desktop, backgroun
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
sorry, you distracted me from getting actual work done there. Have you tried turning off the "graphical bloat"? and by that I mean the 3D effects, which is more down to your gfx card. KDE4 is -less- bloated than KDE3 even with the effects turned on. Try running top...
Re: (Score:3)
Someone was posting the other day (or even today?), it seems almost pathological that people seem to need the "latest" and "most modern". Do the extra features actually add much? I don't feel much gain from them.
Well, there's two significant reasons why I'd pick Win7 over WinXP.
1) SSD alignment, both for performance and lifetime, you can hack it into working on WinXP too but it's not good at it.
2) 64-bit so I can have 16GB of RAM. Now if you say PAE or XP 64-bit, I say try it.
When it comes to UI, I really can't say I care... everything since win2k is good enough for me, yes I've tried Linux and Macs but there's nothing about the ability to organize applications that gets me excited. I can do it with virtual desktop
Re: (Score:2)
Upgraded my machine from a dual core to a faster quad core processor, quadrupled the memory, and went from CentOS 4 to Mint 12 w/ KDE 4.x. KDE 3.5 felt faster.
Re: (Score:2)
Just because someone doesn't like KDE 4.x doesn't mean they haven't tried it.
Mind you, I've tried, IIRC, 4.1, 4.2 or 4.3 and 4.4 or 4.5 and haven't liked it in any of those, over 3.5
Different people have different tastes.
If it is a matter of taste, then I agree that KDE 4, nor any other desktop, will satisfy everyone. If things are broken or unintuitive for you, though, I would really like to know so that the issue could be addressed. You can reply here or email me, my Gmail username is the same as my /. username. Thanks.
LOL (Score:2)
"Mind you, I've tried, IIRC, 4.1, 4.2 or 4.3 and 4.4 or 4.5 and haven't liked it in any of those, over 3.5"
Mind you, I've tried, IIRC, Gnome 1.x and haven't liked it in any of those, over 1.0x
so, what or where does this matter? KDE is better, but not the main target funding for RedHat or Ubuntu. That is it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
System Settings > Window Behavior > Window specific overrides.
That's exactly what you're looking for, and oh, it's been there for several releases.
Re: (Score:2)
% konsole 200x200+40+50
This doesn't work. How does one do this (so a simple script can pop up several windows in fixed locations with fixed sizes)