KDE Announces 4.9 Releases 159
jrepin writes "KDE announces 4.9 releases of Workspaces, Applications, and Development Platform. Version 4.9 provides many new features, along with improved stability and performance. Some of the highlights include, but are not limited to: more thorough integration of Activities throughout the Workspaces, ability to display metadata (ratings, tags, image and file sizes...) next to file names in Dolphin file manager, Mercurial versioning system support in Dolphin, detachable tabs in Konsole terminal emulator, support for MPRIS2 protocol in various places, ability to store and print PDF annotations from Okular document viewer, Okular can also play videos embedded in PDFs, Lokalize translation tool supports Qt's TS translation files, Kontact PIM suite gains ability to import data from Thunderbird and Evolution, Pairs is a new memory training game added to KDE Education package, and Marble desktop globe includes Open Source Routing Machine and support for bicycle and pedestrian routing. This release is dedicated to the memory of recently deceased KDE contributor Claire Lotion."
Nice (Score:5, Insightful)
Just make sure the tablet UI mode stays optional. We don't need another Gnome3/Unity.
Re: (Score:1)
I've been shouting that at the Microsoft Win 8 development blogs, but I don't think they were paying attention.
I suppose I could've been more tactful, insisting that the VP who came up with the design is romantically attracted to bivalves might've been a bit excessive.
Re:Nice (Score:5, Informative)
Just make sure the tablet UI mode stays optional. We don't need another Gnome3/Unity.
KDE/Plasma doesn't have a "tablet mode". For the main interface (sometimes I've seen it mentioned as "primary user interface"), with the 4.x series a new approach was attempted. Instead of having somewhat monolithic blocks rigidly coupled (kicker, kdesktop, etc.), a general framework for creating this kind of interfaces was created: what today we know as Plasma. Plasma has shared libraries and frameworks, but the desktop experience is a program named plasma-desktop. A similar UI is plasma-netbook, and of course there are versions for tablet and even phone incarnations. Many things are shared, which is the cool thing about KDE.
This approach was probably very ambitious at the beginning, and hence the initial bad impressions, but in my experience it was worth it, since now I can have a kick-ass desktop that is configurable way beyond I could imagine in the KDE 3.x days.
Re: (Score:2)
Unlike Gnome and Unity, the KDE desktop shell is flexible. You can make KDE look like Windows XP/7, OS X, Unity or even Gnome Shell, if someone implemented it. My KDE desktop looks like Unity.
Re: (Score:2)
Ditto, except I have the Task bar/launcher on the right, scaled to the size I want - love those SVG icons and Icon-Only Taskbar. And a autohide bottom panel with a activities tab bar.
Congrats! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Congrats! (Score:5, Insightful)
"While I'm not a huge fan of KDE4, it is improving."
I am a huge fan of KDE4, and, it is still improving.
Go KDE!
Re: (Score:2)
I was never a KDE fan, until Gnome3/Unity was forced down my throat. I stuck with Ubuntu 10.04 LTS as long as I could. KDE maked ubuntu (12.04 LTS) usable for me again.
Seems like too few (Score:1)
Re:Seems like too few (Score:5, Funny)
Because they are saving 5.0 for when they throw away all the code and start from scratch again.
*ducks*
Re: (Score:2)
It would be funny if it weren't most probably true.
Re: (Score:2)
What the heck are we talking about? Qt has been GPL since 2000. Who the heck cares what Nokia does or does not do with it? It's free to maintain and develop.
Re: (Score:3)
Why? Qt is GPL, widely ported, and the best toolkit there is.
Re: (Score:1)
Oh, yes, of course, I stand corrected. I'm getting paranoid after that Java thing. Good guys at Trolltech made it GPL precisely to avoid such horror scenarios. DUH!
I find Qt better than gtk (and probably also fltk), too, but gtk-based DEs surely look more polished (though IMHO no DE equals KDE regarding usability).
Funny fact: today at lunch I went into a big furniture chain seller with terminals (for price consultation) running something with KDE (though probably version 3) and Mozilla on top -- made me smi
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Seems like too few (Score:5, Interesting)
KDE 5.0 is being worked on, but it is not called KDE 5.0, it is called KDE frameworks. One of the main points of KDE frameworks is get rid of the distinctions betwen Qt and KDE applications, so many KDE features are being ported into Qt now that it is under open governance, and the rest will be made to work well at Qt components that anyone can add to their application.
Re: (Score:2)
This will be a welcome change.
There is still a maddening separation of some visual elements that have to be adjusted in QT rather than KDE, and some applications that seemingly never made it to the KDE bandwagon.
Re: (Score:1)
As long as they are only optional modules, sure. But tying cross-platform apps to KDE-specific features seems stupid.
Re: (Score:2)
As long as they are only optional modules, sure. But tying cross-platform apps to KDE-specific features seems stupid.
I have no problem with better integration of cross platform apps. When you work all day in KDE, and have some apps pop up with a look and feel that is so jarringly different and non-standard (kde standard) you feel like you stepped into a time warm to the past each time you launch them.
I wonder what percentage of Linux users even work cross platform? I suspect a large percentage of them only know an app is cross platform because it says so, not because they have an Apple computer sitting next to KDE.
Re: (Score:2)
Writing an interface for our AS/400 system in Qt wasn't especially pain-free, but it was a w
Re: (Score:1)
but the Java applications tend to be more flexible and have better selection of libraries that can be used on every platform.
Exactly what types of cross platform libraries in C or C++ are you lacking? I ask sincerely since I've heard this asserted all the time, but it is rarely true.
Re: (Score:2)
I've not run into a problem where I needed to do something and a library simply not exist for a given platform. It's just havin
Re: (Score:2)
It's not a lack. It's libraries that can be used on every platform. As in, I can select one library and it have the same interface on every platform. Usually when going between Windows and anybody else, the API changes on you with a given library.
So your complaint then is that you can't find a cross-platform library for something? Can you elaborate what that your requirement is?
Re: (Score:2)
The corporate desktop is still dominated by Windows XP Professional. So it's often a case of Windows by day, Linux at home.
None of these are Qt-based but at work I've regularly used the following in preference to win32 only alternatives due to the fact I can run them on my home machine:
Eclipse/Netbeans, Firefox, Gimp (simple image editing), Geany (no vi/emacs wars please). Thunderbird and Libreoffice not so much because most businesses
Re: (Score:2)
The corporate desktop is still dominated by Windows XP Professional. So it's often a case of Windows by day, Linux at home.
Maybe in the places you have worked but for me and I have worked for some very large companies MS Windows 7 is standard. I have even seen the dreaded "Blue Screen of Death" on MS Widows 7 OS's on quite a few occasions. I have been using Fedora for well over four years in a professional capacity and at home and have never really had any issues working with colleagues who are using MS Windows and MS Office. Actually most of the time I use KDE although when KDE 4.0 came out I had to jump ship to Gnome for abo
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why should a Qt app running on Windows or OS X need to to have a forced dependency on some KDE feature?
KDE just wants to upstream (some of) its portfolio of convenience classes and improved class methods, that's all.
http://community.kde.org/KDE_Core/QtMerge
And even that was just a proposal. I don't see many KDE developers be very keen to sign Nokia's required CLA.
Re: (Score:2)
KDE 5.0 is being worked on, but it is not called KDE 5.0, it is called KDE frameworks. One of the main points of KDE frameworks is get rid of the distinctions betwen Qt and KDE applications, so many KDE features are being ported into Qt now that it is under open governance, and the rest will be made to work well at Qt components that anyone can add to their application.
How can this completely wrong comment get "Score:5, Interesting"?
"KDE 5" is not being worked of and "KDE frameworks" is not its new name and no distinction between KDE and Qt applications will be gotten rid of.
Here's the correction:
Every 6 months a community whose name is "KDE" release 3 software bundles: KDE Plasma Workspaces, KDE Applications, and KDE Development Platform which consists of the libraries that make up the foundation of the former two.
Plasma Workspaces will stay at 4.x for the foreseeable fu
Re: (Score:1)
It is the 9th supplemental release of the 4.0 code base. Normally major number bumps, such as going to 5.0, indicate a break with backwards compatibility.
The next release in the 4.x series -- assuming there is one -- will be 4.10.
Re:Seems like too few (Score:5, Informative)
The number isn't decimal. It is major-version.minor-version. We can have 4.10 and 4.11.
A change in the major-version number usually means that changes in the API have taken place and things marked deprecated are removed completely.
Re: (Score:2)
Shouldn't they then have numbered it 4.01, 4.02,...4.09, 4.10, 4.11? And go to 5.01 whenever kde frameworks is ready?
Why? It's not the Unix convention of version numbering. GNOME went up to 2.32 or so and even KDE 3's last release was 3.5.10.
Another Win (Score:1)
Thanks KDE, your releases just keep getting better. The Metadata info will be great to have.
The haters, they just keep hating. When was the last time you used these apps?
Re:Another Win (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Any service with a commenting section is full of people projecting their anger and insecurities on others. Given the nature of slashdot, it's particularly bad here.
And anyone using the word "haters" is right up there among the most insecure.
What ever happened to a difference of opinion?
I personally dislike Gnome, but I certainly don't "hate" it.
I much prefer KDE, but I understand people who want things much simpler.
Re: (Score:1)
But even if you did hate it, so what? The fucking DE fanbois need to get over themselves.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks KDE, your releases just keep getting better. The Metadata info will be great to have.
True, but many of these features have been there for several releases.
Metadata has been available in the Information sidebar for well over a year.
Detachable Konsole tabs have been there since KDE 3.5 days (what, almost 5 years now?).
PDF annotations in ocular have been there for many prior releases, only the option to print them is new.
And Kontact PIM is still a mess.
So most of these are minor improvements to an already excellent desktop that far surpasses anything else in this market segment.
Re: (Score:2)
i was surprised about 'detachable konsole tabs' being new, as that's something i've been using s lot since kde 3 indeed.
could somebody clarify what was actually meant there ?
Re: (Score:2)
And Kontact PIM is still a mess.
Beg to disagree, have been using it as my main client with GMail/IMAP since 4.7.x, working well for that. With 4.9 (have been using the beta) Contacts/Task/Calendar sync with google is working very well too.
Search is still very flaky though, if I have a serious email search to do I drop back to Gmail.
Re: (Score:2)
I tend to agree, it is kludge at best.
The only part I like about it is the ability to select and copy text out of PDFs even when the PDF author explicitly turned that ability off. Some would view that as a bug, but people should be able to quote a portion of a PDF without having to retype the whole paragraph.
A few months ago (Score:2)
Been using KDE for years and years because I detest GNOME (though I say this and also happen to be wearing a Ximian shwag t-shirt, so go figure). Got a new machine at work a few months back, threw Kubuntu 11.10 on it. Woof.
This machine isn't a speed daemon but within 10-14 days all 10GB of RAM were used. Switching to another window resulted in 5-10 seconds of swapping and HDD light activity. And I'm only running a web b
Re: (Score:2)
I did a little reading and came to that conclusion as well. On the plus side, Xfce's tabbed term app isn't too bad. By default, Terminal wants you to use ctrl + Page Up/Page Down to move between tabs, which I find not intuitive in the least. So I remapped it. But it renders fonts much better than Konsole I thought. Disclaimer: the first thing i do to a fresh kde install is to disable nepomuk
Yeah, that didn't last long. I mean, a mysql install is necessary?! Just to
Re: (Score:3)
I'm a long time user who finally threw in the towel a few months ago. I like KDE as a window manager, but the "desktop" internals drive me crazy. Especially knotify4. That app has locked up more of my linux systems than any other piece of software out there. Finally got tired of flipping the power switch and now (after an adjustment period) I'm much happier with openbox/tint2. Not missing that semantic/nepomuk garbage either.
Re: (Score:2)
I remember 4.2; I wouldn't consider it as ready for prime time.
Re: (Score:2)
I want to like KDE again, I just cant get over the bells and whistles getting in my way and cluttering up my work spaces.
Re: (Score:2)
I want to like KDE again, I just cant get over the bells and whistles getting in my way and cluttering up my work spaces.
Most retarded comment ever, considering that all "bells and whistles" are optional and always have been.
Re: (Score:2)
That's what everyone said about 4.0 when it launched. People said 4.2 was far superior and far more stable than 4.0. I tried 4.2 and just could not get a usable desktop out of it.
4.3/4.4 was when KDE because usable again for me and I switched back from Gnome 2. Which I found really annoying for all the usual reasons Gnome is annoying, but it was stable at the time. Was happy to get to the end of that period, a kind of desktop dark ages.
Re: (Score:2)
I remember 4.2; I wouldn't consider it as ready for prime time.
4.2.0 had some unpleasant KWin bug. 4.2.1 fixed that. Overall 4.2 was great and widely praised by critics.
Activities? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Neither can I yet. It doesn't fit very well with how I use a desktop, but it seems to make a lot more sense when used together with the Netbook, Mobile or Tablet Plasma interfaces, where you can make specialized home- or notification-screens. Once I get KDE on one of those devices, I will try again, the idea sounds promising there.
Re:Activities? (Score:5, Interesting)
Activities have always been something of a niche feature, with most people being perfectly content to use multiple desktops
which have been available since the Pleistocene. Having tools on the desktop in the form of widgets or switching the entire look and feel based on when you stop work and start relaxing were just about the whole selling point of activities, but none of these were problems to begin with.
Unfortunately, the KDE team let one small group of designers (two people, as best as I can figure out) run away with the desktop for several releases trying to foist Activities on the userbase. In later releases, the bitch level got so high that the rest of the KDE team have pretty much got those individuals under control, and sanity has returned. You can pretty much avoid activities now entirely, or at least make them sit silently in the background managing nothing but wallpaper.
Re: (Score:2)
Right click your desktop some time.
I run XFCE on Arch, so I can't speak with authority, but I suspect Arch chose the option that hides activities all along.
Re: (Score:2)
Arch is all about vanilla packages. I installed Arch/KDE in February and Activities were in the default panel, whereas the Virtual Desktop Pager was not...
That was just about the first thing I "fixed". :)
Re: (Score:3)
Well, after that devastating /lib to /usr/lib cutover last month which bricked so many Arch machines I'm more than a little suspicious of some of Arch's commitment to either vanilla or integrity.
Re: (Score:2)
Arch is about vanilla packages. As in, compiled from the source as it is upstream. Why would that have anything to do with /lib vs /usr/lib?
Re: (Score:2)
Arch is about vanilla packages. As in, compiled from the source as it is upstream. Why would that have anything to do with /lib vs /usr/lib?
All distributions determine --prefix for packages and provide a '-base' package which specifies system layout.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, that was kinda my point - changing the default prefix does not make a package non vanilla relative to the source. It's only when you start applying source patches and such that it becomes true.
Re: (Score:2)
It used to be a reliable rolling release that you could just count on to work if you updated it once in a while (quarterly was fine).
Lately it can't be trusted to work after any given update. Some updates just fail to do anything, at least leaving you with a running system. But quite a few of the last several break things and leave you with something you have to hand patch at the console.
I've pretty much taken my data partitions from my Arch servers, and moved them to a LTS release of Ubuntu server edition
Re:Activities? (Score:4, Interesting)
The idea was that you could be using your IM, email, and a host of other applications and services all set up for your work environment (or any environment you desire, for that matter) - your IM contacts were your workmates, your email was work email, your browser had your work bookmarks and started up with your work webapps open, etc - THEN, with the click of a button, you could switch to 'home' or 'personal' or whatever and suddenly you'd be seeing your setup for that environment - your personal email, your personal IM contacts, your personal browser setup, your personal folders being displayed on the desktop with a pic of your dog, etc.
The power was with the user to set this up as they wished, you could have as many (or as few) activities as you desired. Perhaps a Music Creation activity that had all your perferred apps open for music creation + any other stuff you so desired to be configured, or perhaps an activity set up for your Development environment with folders on the desktop pointing directly to your files, etc. The list goes on.
The power of the idea streched even further to 'networked Activities'. The idea was that you could walk into a hotel for instance and KDE would inform you that there was an 'Activity' that the hotel was offering you to use. This could include things like links to common items in the browser, Icons on the desktop for the menu in the hotel's restaurant, IM contacts that were the hotel's helpdesk, a document explaining the local area and local attractions, etc.
When it comes down to it, the idea was actually very cool - your desktop environment could mould itself to suit your 'Activity' making access to the things you needed far, far easier and quicker. A great idea. But, the takeup has been bad, misinformation has been rampant and there has been no clear explination of the concept for user's benefit.
Personally, I'd still like to see it get a run - I love the idea.
Re: (Score:2)
"The idea was that you could be using your IM, email, and a host of other applications and services all set up for your work environment (or any environment you desire, for that matter) - your IM contacts were your workmates, your email was work email, your browser had your work bookmarks and started up with your work webapps open, etc - THEN, with the click of a button, you could switch to 'home' or 'personal' or whatever and suddenly you'd be seeing your setup for that environment - your personal email, y
Re: (Score:2)
Having said that, along the lines of what you're suggesting, it would be good if in the document
Re: (Score:2)
That's the problem with a lot of 'future proofed' tech, noone sees it as useful until everything ties together.
Agreed with your analysis - just wanted to point out here that the KDE process allowed the activities folks to steal one of the four screen corners (the most valuable screen real estate per Fitt's law) for a feature that's not really ready. Then again, the stupid acorn has another corner, and it's rarely needed, so maybe I shouldn't be so surprised.
Re: (Score:2)
I tend to agree though - its usefulness doesn't extend very far (for example, the same contextual menu can be accessed with a right-click). However, I think one of the main reasons behind the cashew was to allow access to that same contextual menu regardless of your desktop setup. For example, there are some 'desktop layouts' (found in Desktop Settings) that entirely change the behaviour of right-clicking on the desktop: the 'folder view' layout displays
Re:Activities? (Score:4, Insightful)
Don't worry, nobody can, except perhaps Siego. Activities are a solution looking for a problem.
Re: (Score:2)
"a solution looking for a problem"
Brilliant. I can think of that as well put in a large number of totally different scenarios.
Re:Activities? (Score:5, Insightful)
Think of it a groups of applications and desktop widgets between which you can switch.
For example, I find it convenient to have, say, an IDE, a web browser a couple consoles and relevant apps in an activity, and in another activity the word processor, another browser, perhaps a drawing programme.
I could do that on virtual desktops, but I like each group of apps spread over 3-4 virtual desktops. This is like a way of organising (in my case) 18 virtual desktops in 6 more manageable groups. Also, I don't want the twitter feed on all of them, and I want different directories on my desktop for each group.
Does it make sense?
Re:Activities? (Score:4, Interesting)
This is not how activities work: applications are attached to a desktop and an activity. Thus activities can be used group apps together, in a way which is orthogonal to desktops.
Changing activities is like changing virtual desktops, except you are changing groups of VDs (and also the widgets on them, but this is nice but to me secondary)
Re: (Score:2)
If you use a tiling WM like DWM or Awesome, you have a similar concept (as far as I can tell) with tags. Each window is assigned a tag, and you can have one or more tags in your current view.
Re: (Score:2)
Not the same: I have sets of widows, spread over VDs. I can switch independently between VDs and activities. For example:
activity Mail:
desktop 1 : mailer
desktop 2 : IM and image viewer
on all desktops, a folder view of important documents
activity Waste Of Time:
desktop 1 : slashdot and patience
desktop 2 : amarok
on all desktops folder view of cat pictures and twitter feed
Activity Writing Stuff
desktop 1 : wikipedia
desktop 2 : word pro
Re: (Score:2)
Ok, fair enough, although tags can still do *most* of that. I never really figured activities out. Tiling WMs are difficult to get used to, but you really can work more efficiently if you aren't having to move windows around. Getting windows in/out of view is just so easy in comparison, at least after you've been using it for a week or so.
I actually like KDE4, at least its more recent versions. It just takes too much memory. Also, I still have some persistent bugs, including one time where akonadi or whatev
Re: (Score:2)
I don't use it but I see a potential use, for example if you have a laptop that you use at work and at home you can have a work activity with all the documents and shortcuts to programs that you use at work on desktop and then have another home activity with games, photos and other crap on the desktop. Or you could have a boss activity where you switch when your boss is around and a slashdot activity with live feeds from slashdot on desktop and other such productive things :)
Re: (Score:1)
I had the same problem until just recently where I started working on several programs at once. Now I never close my IDE, profilers, file manager..., I just go to the next activity when I am done working on one project. I usually manage to fill up pretty much every virtual desktop in each activity. When I log in I hit super+tab until I am at the right activity that has everything open that I need to continue my work.
So right now I have an activity for my regular stuff like emails and browsing, several for m
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
But whenever you're overloaded with multitude of items, grouping may help you. And sometimes you can distinguish some non-overlapping groups of GUI components. These are activities.
Like: For staying up to date with life (my eMail client, my facebook page), for the project I am currently working on (my IDE, some folders of the project I am currently editing, GIThub page, various goo
Re: (Score:1)
I love KDE but I don't understand activities
I feel exactly the same - I have no idea what an activity is, what it's for, or how to use it. But I have figured out (I think) that you have to edit activity settings in order to change the wallpaper or screensaver ..... wait a minute, was that KDE 4.4, or KDE 4.8 ? Confused I am, quite a bit.
Still, at least in 4.8 you can now edit the window decoration theme for the KDM login dialog without having to know the arcane binary name of the 'System Settings' utility to run via KDESU.
One of the key missing comp
Re: (Score:2)
I've generally found myself getting used to them with two main problems left:
#1: No official way to bind activities to key combinations. I see an unofficial way of hacking this into Plasma, which seems to indicate high demand for this feature, but the developers have proven supremely uninterested in official support for it.
#2: No way to bind applications to activities. If I'm supposed to use activities to group applications, then why the fucking hell can't Plasma remember which activitiy an application was
Re: (Score:2)
My issue with this approach is that all this stuff needs to be loaded into RAM, and isn't that exactly the sort of thing portables are lacking compared to a dev workstation?
Good job (Score:1)
Many times I've tried to switch to linux from windows and many times I moved back because something doesn't work as it should or slow, etc. But recently I've installed Kubuntu 12.04 and I actually like it. It has been 2 weeks now and I'm not planning to get back to Windows. I still have windows to play games though. Anyway, good job KDE, keep up the good work!
Ubuntu 12.04? (Score:2)
Is it something worth doing?
Re: (Score:2)
If you intend to use the LTS released for actual long term support, I recommend against doing this.
If you want something closer to the edge, you should use Debian Unstable, Arch, etc.
I always laugh at the guys on ubuntu forums asking about how to install the current kernel on their 10.04 box...
Re: (Score:2)
Has anyone dared to install it through a backports PPA on Ubuntu?
Is it something worth doing?
Yes, I've done it - works fine. Backports now has the full 4.9 release.
Question for the devs: nepomuk (Score:3)
ssh -X otheruser@localhost kmail
Does it Just Work(TM)? Or does it still crash because akonadi / nepomuk / strigi / mysql / kitchensink haven't all been woken up at the same time to serve the urgent e-mail indexing needs of otheruser@localhost.
It's interesting to me that akonadi has such a nice and detailed self-test, but a pity that it seems to need it
Re: (Score:2)
What I'd like to know is if you can use kmail without having neopmuk even installed. Kmail is a great piece of software. Nepomuk is something that I don't need, so I don't have it. KDE works great without it, minus any of the PIM elements. So, I don't use the PIM elements.
Thanks to all involved with KDE (Score:2)
Upgrading to 4.9 was painless.
Plasma Desktop is the best DE out there since 4.2.
Improving KWin scripting makes it even better! Dolphin 2.1 rocks hard.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Who actually uses a file manager??
bash FTW.
Or, for complicated renames, emacs dired.
Re: (Score:1)
The next best thing would be if they made Dolphin look, feel, and behave like Thunar. Maybe better would be to throw Dolphin out the fucking window. The way it displays files and directories sucks shite (and NO, none of the Dolphin view options is worth a wet sack of monkey shit). Say what you will about the Windows Explorer look and feel, but Thunar is the most usable of any of the Linux GUI file managers
That's odd, I run XFCE and pop open Dolphin whenever I want some GUI file managment. 99% of the time,
Re: (Score:2)
Thunar looks like a dumbed down version of an open file dialog, and probably has less features.
Re: (Score:2)
I like Dolphin, but it has gone downhill on my current Arch install after 5 months of use.
2 big issues, maybe interrelated:
1. Directory views are frequently not longer "synced" after file operations. I have to use F5 to reload the tab before it displays the actual current contents. Files used to appear as they were copied or vanish as they were deleted, but that only happens sometimes now.
2. Certain directories with file previews turned on get "stuck" attempted to populate all the thumbnails, causing one
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, it's the man with the BRG (Big Rage Gun),
According to your post in "Cue The Trolls" on July 30th, you said and I quote:
Don't you wonder why people with the money are working on BSD based Macs instead of Linux? Wake up. How many mechanics get told to build a smelter when their ratchet is defective? None. They find another ratchet. I too have decided to use a different tool that doesn't require me to keep building smelters.
I took that to mean that you'd already left Linux far behind but here you are, onc
Re: (Score:2)
Hey fucktard, how's it going?
Maybe if people like you addressed the issues instead of beating up the people who make the complaints it really would be the year of the Linux desktop. But no, you would rather slag others who don't feel the same way as you. You need to see a psychiatrist and deal with your own insecurities before you are qualified to advise others.
I said I use Linux on a VM now. I still have to use it. Now go cry somewhere else. So sad you can't take it when someone dents your fanboyism. You s
Re: (Score:2)
Sonny, you really are wasting your time with the abuse you are levelling at me - I'm not going to repeat what I said to you in my last response in "Cue The Trolls" because it's all contained in there - read it or don't read it, the choice is yours.
But take the advice of an old man - any high ground you may think you have in any argument will be removed as soon as you resort to abuse and bad language - and when arguing with someone like myself, who is entirely capable of communicating clearly & succinctl
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
QT can't die. It's dual-licensed. There will always be the open-sourced version available.
May the fork be with us.
Re: (Score:1)
While that may be true for small libs, QT has such a massive usage base I can't imagine a team won't evolve to pick it up and continue it. I've no doubt some of the employees, some devs from KDE, some from other large projects may join in to carry its torch.
The KDE devs can't let it die--because their project depends on it--so they have a vested interest to maintain it even if it turns out no one else cares (which by itself is not likely).
Furthermore, it's for sale--not hovering /dev/null. Some other compan
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Pipe down Ballmer!
It's not Ballmer (Score:2)
-B
Re: (Score:2)
/. is news for nerds not news for Microsoft shills. Get your head straight!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Actually, you really can. KDE has been available on Windows for years, basically ever since 4.x was released (yes, including the pre-release-quality "releases" for x < 2).
Additionally, Windows has long had a registry value that specifies which process it should launch as a shell. Traditionally, this was used for creating kiosk systems that ran dedicated software and neither needed nore wanted Explorer running in the background. However, it's possible to do full shell replacement using the same tweak.
Re: (Score:2)
Serious question: Is the "best" KDE version still considered to be 3.5? Or have they un-broken the 4 with the newer updates?
Series 4 is totally great since 4.2.1.
Everything that requires the ARTS sound server can't be good. Ever.