Syria Drops Off the Internet Grid 156
hypnosec writes "Amidst the ongoing civil war, Syria has gone off the Internet as of a few hours ago, with all the 84 IP block within the country unreachable from the outside. Renesys, a research firm keeping tabs on the health of the Internet, reported at about 5:25 ET that Syria's Internet connectivity has been shut down. The internet traffic from outside to Syrian IP addresses is going undelivered, and anything coming from within the country is not reaching the Internet. Akamai has tweeted that its traffic data supports what Renesys has observed."
Reader trickstyhobbit adds a report from Slate that the connection "appear[s] to have been knocked off line by heavy fighting earlier this morning. They are also reporting that the shutdown may have been intentional to aid in a government operation."
Did someone say... IP Block? (Score:5, Funny)
Maybe Syria doesn't need to come back, or if it does, maybe not with a full block. IPv4 addresses are valuable!
Re: (Score:1)
That was what I was thinking. We might as well force them to upgrade.
Re: (Score:3)
Maybe Syria doesn't need to come back, or if it does, maybe not with a full block. IPv4 addresses are valuable!
They just didn't want this news to get around:
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/inpictures/2012/11/201211271842890427.html [aljazeera.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Surely a Class C would be enough for them? How many working PCs can they have ffs?
Re:Dibs! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
.. spit out my banana cream pie at my waitress.
At the cheesecake factory?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Would their network be as barbaric as I'd expect? (Score:1)
Time to unplug the router, wait a few seconds, and plug it in again.
Re: (Score:2)
As we all know, (Score:5, Funny)
A communication disruption can only mean one thing.
Re:As we all know, (Score:5, Funny)
A communication disruption can only mean one thing.
It must be IT's fault.
Re:As we all know, (Score:4, Funny)
A communication disruption can only mean one thing.
It must be IT's fault.
They were trying to google the capitol of Syria to get past the Bridge of Death, came back with the wrong answer and they've all been cast into the Gorge of Eternal Peril.
Re:As we all know, (Score:5, Funny)
At least they weren't using Apple Maps, they'd have invaded Sri Lanka instead.
Re: (Score:3)
It must be IT's fault.
Obviously you've never felt horror at the sound of a backhoe firing up.
Re:As we all know, (Score:5, Funny)
Hello?
Yes.
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
A communication disruption can only mean one thing.
Aliens!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Seriously? You quoted the worst of the three worst Star Wars movies?
Seriously? I recognized that quote?
Re: (Score:2)
This is why no one takes the Elders of the Internet seriously.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDbyYGrswtg
Re: (Score:2)
A communication disruption can only mean one thing.
What, that Lucasfilm is in full steam, to make us cry again?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Porn? Rule 34? What??
What is the meaning of a communication disruption?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
They finally managed to kill the sysadmin [xkcd.com] somehow?
Re: (Score:1)
they did: Div/0 ?
Mark my words: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The eponymous fight?
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
The fight other fights are named after. Yes, this is the worst misuse of the word "eponymous" on the internet. Congratulations are in order.
Re: (Score:2)
But then I tend to give people the benefit...
Re: (Score:2)
Assad (the person for whom the war is named
I didn't say it was a good and/or especially clever stretch, but I certainly didn't think that eponymous meant sad...that would be dolorous.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Or the Symbionese Libation Army?
Re: (Score:2)
goddamn
Re:Mark my words: (Score:4, Insightful)
Some of whom may be heavily bearded men who think that democracy is filth.
Democracy is filth - people cannot be trusted to run a non-corrupt one (c.f. The Law [learnoutloud.com]). Of course, Theocracy is not better.
Re: (Score:1)
This has nothing to do with the form of government. It doesn't matter. Democracy, dictatorship, theocracy, hell even anarchy all suffer from the same problem. They are all made up of human beings. Human beings are inherently evil. They excel at dominating over others whenever the opportunity exists to selfishly indulge in their incessent need to have more than the other guy. In my opinion democracy is the least harmful option. It's held in check by a wider group of individuals who don't like to be sc
Re: (Score:1)
Which is why man's right to swing their fist ends at another man's nose. Collectivism/Democracy is corrupt because it dictates the use of force against a minority.
True democracy is not compatible with freedom, which is why we do not have a true democracy in the United States. The government is supposed to be there to defend the freedoms of man.
Re: (Score:1)
Deus Ex (and quite similarly, Douglas Adams) has provided the most important insight into politics. Anyone who desires power is unfit to have it.
In Deus Ex, the solution was to have an overkill-grade AI run the menial tasks and act as a form of uninvolved arbiter to a (up to) planet-wide direct democracy (depending on the scope of the disagreement).
In the Hitchhiker's Guide, the solution was to erase the memories of anyone who manages to get elected president of the galaxy.
Re:Mark my words: (Score:4, Insightful)
“It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.”
-Winston Churchill
Re: (Score:3)
"It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried."
Yes, the trick is how to get people to be allowed to try other methods when all the land on Earth is claimed by groups that profess exclusive ownership.
The Tannehills [freekeene.com] had some intriguing proposals in the 1970's. Bob Murphy has expanded on some of those.
They might not all work, but one thing is for sure - if nobody is allowed to try other methods, a superior method will never be found. Many people s
Re: (Score:1)
Asking democracies to democratically give up democracy is a logical paradox.
No, it isn't. How do you think Hitler got into power? You need to learn what a logical paradox actually is.
Re: (Score:3)
i'm sorry, but that's some really ignorant crap you believe
the only valid form of government is a form of government that submits itself to the will of the people it rules. self rule. it doesn't get better than that. now there can be a better KIND of democracy, i buy that, like say virtual democracy. virtual democracy has problems, but i'm willing to believe there's still a better form of democracy out there
but what i don't buy are these bullshit concepts where government is somehow dissolved and everything
Re: (Score:2)
Wow, you're really so angry you can't hit the shift key, aren't you?
Maybe that's a sign that you're arguing from a position of weakness, defending a belief rather than a defensible system?
If you truly believe that there must always be majorities who oppress minorities, then surely that is a sad outlook (or psychopathic, depending on how Psych101 one wants to get). People need governance, but aggression-based governments do that really poorly. Ponder the distinction.
Try specific critiques of the Tannehills
Re: (Score:2)
if you have to deal with enough morons like you, it gets very tedious
i'm not going to argue with you, because it's like arguing with a creationist. same fervent belief and desire in the impossible and willful ignorance of the most basic concepts of reality
just shut up, please, for your own sake
Space habitats, sealabs, and virtual realities (Score:2)
See especially JP Hogan's Voyage From Yesteryear: http://www.jamesphogan.com/books/info.php?titleID=29&cmd=summary [jamesphogan.com]
BTW, some social semantic desktop ideas to consider for Tonika (but in Java): https://github.com/pdfernhout/Pointrel20120623 [github.com]
Something to cosider on social organziation: http://www.t0.or.at/delanda/meshwork.htm [t0.or.at]
"To make things worse, the solution to this is not simply to begin adding meshwork components to the mix. Indeed, one must resist the temptation to make hierarchies into villains and me
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is, the Internet does provide significant advantages for those countries when it is not actively being used to foment rebellion. What happens is that it is great for the regime right up to the point where the video or the news stories come in that set off the rebellion, and by then it is too late to shut it off to stop the rebellion. That's why China is trying it's best to censor the hell out of the Internet, instead of just shutting it off.
At this point, if it was turned off, and not just kno
route around it? (Score:5, Insightful)
For those of you who think the internet is some magically self-healing construct immune to accidental or intentional disconnection of nodes and subnetworks, this should serve to show that if you aren't in charge over the physical infrastructure, you are at the mercy of those who are.
Re: (Score:2)
it's okay, the internet can recover from a nuclear attack. As soon as somebody uses a nuke the internet will heal itself.
Re: (Score:2)
That already happened once. Remember skynet?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:route around it? (Score:5, Insightful)
It was supposed to be that, but through a combination of governments that can't seem to keep their fingers off and corporations determined to bill for every penny's worth even if it costs a dollar to do it, the net has been turned into a series of single points of failure.
Re: (Score:1)
No, because of people's gullibility and preference for short term convenience over long term security and reliability, people have repeatedly chosen centralised services provided via the internet over distributed services that the internet used to be built upon.
Intersite email has been replaced with gmail and conglomerate isp services, distributed news and mailing lists (usenet etc) have lost against facebook, slashdot and other shite. Uucp, ftp, and internet nfs have all been abandoned in favor of services
Re: (Score:2)
It doesn't matter one whit if services are centralized or distributed if you're cut off into a little island of networks. People in Syria won't be looking at your flickr pages today. You also won't be emailing them your pictures today. You can post 'em on usenet if you like, but nobody in Syria is going to see them until the single point of failure is fixed. You won't be seeing any pictures they post up to a local usenet server either.
The distributed services model WOULD work better iff there actually was a
Re: (Score:2)
one or two co-located cables is the weakness. multiple connections in multiple places (ie redundancy) is key to that self-healing effect.
Re: (Score:2)
Yup. If there's only one line going in or out of the country, it's easy to sever that and cut it off completely. Same if you have only two, or three, or ten.
Well, what if you have hundreds, or thousands? Good luck shutting all those down!
(Of course, you can also ruin things by polluting DNS and BGP.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Cell (sail) around it? (Score:4, Funny)
Cellular is just a last mile solution to reach the mobile devices. The actual infrastructure that carries data between cells is primarily a physical network, generally fiber, with some copper to older towers. It's not going to do much to get data in and out of the country if Syrian Telecommunications has shut off the network.
Unless you were just trying to make a joke. In that case, keep trying. Eventually you might.
Re: (Score:3)
When I hear talk about the U.S. wanting a "kill switch" for the internet (in case of cyber attacks), I think of situations like this.
Maybe the U.S. isn't going to have a revolution anytime soon, people should not allow their governments to cut them off from the rest of the world. If the government wants to protect itself in the event of cyber attacks, then create a kill switch for *essential* government connection to the internet. The private sector and smaller less essential government organizations shou
Re: (Score:1)
Having a kill switch embedded in commercial backbones saves the lives of the people who work there. the alternative is not no-killswitch, but an explosive kill switch in the form of rocket strikes at key backbone infrastructure locations.
I'm good with that. It makes turning off the internet a much less trivial task. They can always just drive out to the common chokepoints and turn them off themselves. Probably quicker and more effective than missiles anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
So, you expect U.S. military personnel to go along with missile strikes to domestic civilian locations?
Re: (Score:1)
Yes. There are only a handful of Tier-1 providers [wikipedia.org] globally. How hard would it be to the USG to have them all shut down if it really wanted to?
Re: (Score:2)
And how many ISPs would suddenly get a lot more open in their peering policies if the option of using a teir 1 as a route of last resort went away?
I think to really "shut down the internet" the US would at least have to get the europeans to play along.
Re: (Score:2)
But the internet does route around Syria.
Re: (Score:2)
Or rather it didn't route through it in the first place.
In europe and north america we have networks of overland fibers because we have sufficient political stability that people aren't worried that their links run through intervening countries. If germany or france (or even the netherlands) shut down all internet links it would cause a LOT of pain for internet users in europe and to a lesser extent across the world but noone is seriously worried about that happening.
OTOH in less stable parts of the world
which reminds me (Score:4, Funny)
of my favorite (most hated) phrase: "The [I]nternet is down(1!1!)".
I usually think to myself "yes, the entire Internet. Gone. The bastards finally did it".
Re: (Score:2)
Dig out those Dialup Modems (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I'm no HAM operator, logic goes to say that some smart HAM operator in the 21st century should have figured out ethernet over HAM. too lazy to google.
Re:Dig out those Dialup Modems (Score:4, Informative)
Packet radio is plenty common and widely used (well for Amateur Radio definitions of widely). Usually you do SLIP not ethernet, as that would be lots of extra overhead pushing ether frames back and forth for no good reason.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Been a long time coming... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
No internet makes it easier to recreate the success of the 1981 attack on Hama [abovetopsecret.com] again if they think it is needed, while suppressing news about it. You may want to recall Hama the next time you read some claim about how ruthless the Israelis are for killing a dozen Arabs trying to blow them up.
DAMMIT! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:DAMMIT! (Score:5, Informative)
funny enough, that's a real site.
http://lolgoats.net/ [lolgoats.net]
Re: (Score:2)
Sattelite (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Just give it a moment. (Score:2)
Oh Noes! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. It is assad day for all involved.
The IT guys in charge of Syrian connectivity were overheard saying:
"We didn't want to, damascus do it!"
Intentional (Score:3, Informative)
Rebal attack? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
random chance? Yeah right! (Score:2)
Was Thinking Today... (Score:2)
Still might be worth thr
Netcraft confirms it... (Score:2)
Syrian internet is dead!
(Ok, I know it's overused... but in this case it could actually apply!)
The Internet Society on Syria’s Internet Shu (Score:2)
From their email of 1600 yesterday...
Re: (Score:1)
Who is to say everyone had it? I could be that just that some of the elite did.
They do have government and some level of commerce, and a few wealthy families ( tied into both most likely ). I'm sure those segments did have internet, and running water..
Re:Syria has the internet? (Score:5, Informative)
Syria isn't Afghanistan. They may not be Europe or the US, but they do have urban centers with modern amenities. Those amenities simply don't penetrate very far outside those areas.
Re: (Score:3)
The whole of the Middle East and Most of Africa are in the slow zone.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
It was encoded into the very Internet. That will teach them to try and mess with artifacts in the Low Transcend that they don't understand.
Re: (Score:2)
There's a mythos you don't expect to see much anymore. Even Vinge himself mocked it, in Rainbows End. Though he mocked the whole thing, including Tines. Tines definitely never took hold, but the Zones of Thought sure proliferated for a while. It's too bad the contents of Orion's Arm really can't be turned into a game. An MMO in that universe could have been interesting, if it wasn't for the fact that all the interesting parts can't be depicted.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Do you prefer to wear your tin-foil hat as a helmet, or as a tricorn with a jaunty feather in the band?