Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Intel Technology

Intel Demos Optical Data Transfer For Servers 71

angry tapir writes "Intel is taking the first steps to implement thin fiber optics that will use lasers and light as a faster way to move data inside computers, replacing the older and slower electrical wiring technology found in most computers today. Intel's silicon photonics technology will be implemented at the motherboard and rack levels and use light to move data between storage, networking and computing resources. The new rack architecture with silicon photonics is a result of more than a decade of research in Intel's laboratories, Intel CTO Justin Rattner said. It could enable communication at speeds of 100Gbps and transfer data at high speeds while using less power than copper cables. The technology could also consolidate power supplies and fans in a data center, reducing component costs."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Intel Demos Optical Data Transfer For Servers

Comments Filter:
  • Re:but (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 17, 2013 @06:51AM (#42615019)

    copper wires cause electromagnetic interference. Every single copper wire at those frequencies start to act as an antenna which causes problems. Light does not have this problem hence you can work with way much higher frequencies.

  • Re:but (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 17, 2013 @06:55AM (#42615031)

    It is not the speed but the bandwidth that is used. Light wavelengths don't cause interference like electronics do.

  • Re:but (Score:5, Informative)

    by NettiWelho ( 1147351 ) on Thursday January 17, 2013 @07:19AM (#42615101)

    Speed of electromagnetic waves on copper are close to the speed of light (95 - 97%). []

    Speed of light in optical fibre is approx 2/3 the speed of light []

    Propagation speed is affected by insulation, so that in an unshielded copper conductor ranges 95 to 97% that of the speed of light, while in a typical coaxial cable it is about 66% of the speed of light.[1]

  • Re:but (Score:5, Informative)

    by smpoole7 ( 1467717 ) on Thursday January 17, 2013 @09:05AM (#42615503) Homepage

    > Don't electrical pulses along a copper wire go at the speed of light already?

    That's not the problem, it's propagation effects and timing issues. As someone else here pointed out, these high-frequency signals are essentially radio waves and behave like radio waves. You have interference issues from other, nearby signals. The copper traces on your current motherboard must be carefully routed and kept at equal lengths (because they're essentially transmission lines), or you'll have some bits arriving later than others. Chaos. Using optical eliminates that problem.

    (This is also why, if you've ever tried to repair a damaged motherboard, you probably weren't successful. Even if you could successfully identify all the damaged traces -- not easy, what with the "sandwich" layered design -- when you use little jumper wires to bridge the gaps, it just won't work reliably.)

    By the way, these propagation effects are the reason why (counter intuitively) SATA and USB can more easily be made faster than older-style parallel connections. Once you get into the 100 megabit range, interference and the precise arrival time of the parallel bits becomes very hard to control. If it's a bit stream, even though it's several orders of magnitude faster, it's just easier to predict and control.

  • Re:but (Score:3, Informative)

    by Luuseens ( 1422579 ) on Thursday January 17, 2013 @09:52AM (#42615783) Homepage
    You'll find that electrons will need a whole lot of time to 'travel from power supply to the motherboard'. As per [] : "These speeds are on the order of millimeters per hour." It's the pulse (wave) that electron movement creates that is close to lightspeed, not the speed of electrons themselves.
  • Re:but (Score:5, Informative)

    by LordLimecat ( 1103839 ) on Thursday January 17, 2013 @10:15AM (#42615977)

    So are pulses of light in a fiber medium.

    If you do the math, copper is actually around 10-25% lower transit latency. As has been pointed out, fiber wins because it suffers less interference and can go longer distances; that means fewer hops, higher frequencies, etc.

Our business in life is not to succeed but to continue to fail in high spirits. -- Robert Louis Stevenson