Google Glass Will Identify People By Clothing 115
recoiledsnake writes "This article notes, 'A new technology built into Google Glass, dug up by New Scientist, takes Google Glass from interesting to down right creepy. Google Glass can now pick a person out of crowd based on their fashion style. The system, InSight, developed in partnership with Google, will take a nice little moment to assess the clothing in frame, and then point out exactly where your friends are in busy settings like a bar, concert, or sporting event. It could probably point you out in a protest, or shopping mall too.' We previously discussed the disorienting effects on the wearer of the device."
Goodbye Anonymity (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
At least Google will. I wonder how long until they gain the ability to determine how close your friends are to you, and who's offended by what. Then: automated blackmail. "User invid, it looks like you haven't cleared friend google to remove 15 future credits from your account this month, would you like your browser history from the date of July 10th, 2017 forwarded to your mother?"
Re:Goodbye Anonymity (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I've been wondering if Google has a Financial arm/division that makes a lot of money from this sort of thing.
Being able to figure what a lot of investors/speculators are going to buy/sell can make you a lot of money.
Re: (Score:2)
I work at Google, and have no idea where you came up with your claims.
i hear from acquaintances who work in Google that the algorithms they run on emails do something much like this. among other things, they know when you are thinking of taking another job almost before you do.
While I cannot disprove that HR is running sentiment analysis, we have company-wide surveys every year that they could use, biannual reviews by co-workers, and quarterly short reviews from managers. All of those probably have much higher signal/noise ratio than rummaging through peoples' email. Also, they type of people who can do that kind of NLP are probably better off working on NLP-related areas that help the company such as Android
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
So we'll not only have to undergo Alpha Legion cosmetic surgery, but also all dress the same?
Re: (Score:2)
I am Alpharius.
Haha (Score:3)
As long as people are either metallers or candy ravers.
I have a doubt or two about the efficacy of this technology.
Re:Goodbye Anonymity (Score:4, Funny)
It still works for google's targeted advertising (Score:2)
It's not going to work on me. I don't have any fashion style.
It may not work for your friend hoping to recognize you in the crowd but it still works for google and their delivery of targeted ads to you. Unless you are wearing homespun somebody is selling what you are wearing, fashionable of not.
Re: (Score:1)
And I can't hit a guy with glasses when he continues to stare at me. We're screwed.
Re: (Score:2)
And I can't hit a guy with glasses when he continues to stare at me. We're screwed.
Just don't hit him in the face. Kneecapping works wonders.
Re:Goodbye Anonymity (Score:4, Interesting)
I have a feeling these things are going to be relying heavily on Google's cloud storage services. I also have a feeling that black market short-range pocket-sized mobile phone frequency jammers are going to become a hot commodity. :)
so fracking cool (Score:5, Funny)
first foursquare told me where all my friends are
now google tells me who my friends are and i don't have to look at their face
Meh. (Score:3)
If it can't detect facecrime, I'm just not interested.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:It'll never spot me. (Score:4, Funny)
Finally ... Anonymous Coward revealed!!
Re: (Score:2)
For some reason, the captcha that followed that comment made me laugh.
so now my friends are like my girlfriend (Score:3)
i don't have to look at their faces when i see them
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately, Google Glass can only augment reality as seen through the glasses; it can't actually place labeled boxes around the wearer or other wearers nearby.
Re:Great for avoiding, bad for privacy (Score:5, Interesting)
I really think we need a different word for "people's desire for public interactions to be mostly ephemeral" than "privacy".
I'm not saying its not an increasingly important concern (a fairly novel one raised by the increased ease of recording, analyzing, storing, and indexing information about public interactions), its just not the same thing as the traditional notion of "privacy", because it largely rests in things that are deliberately exposed publicly.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not so sure. I mean I agree that a dedicated word could help clarify the conversation, but at the root we're still talking about privacy. By rendering your public actions non-ephemeral it makes it possible to composite the data and gain considerable insight into your non-public actions. Anyone who has lived in a really small town has seen the "light" version in action - the pool of available gossip is shallow enough that available data gets shared around and almost everyone knows almost everything ab
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The problem then becomes this: Everyone will be racing to block all their friends first so that they can survive. Eventually, the human race will be distilled down to a few individuals that remain after the Great Google+ Block. These users will be then forced outside their circles (since they no longer exist) and will form a
You still gets ads even if you have no style (Score:2)
What if I have no fashion style?
Then google will target you with ads from vendors offering clothes with no style.
Google Glass feature that no one is talking about (Score:5, Interesting)
This is a great read: http://creativegood.com/blog/the-google-glass-feature-no-one-is-talking-about/ [creativegood.com]
From the article:
Re: (Score:2)
Taking out your smartphone in a restaurant while you are in company is bad style. Taking out your smartphone while in restaurant to photograph your food is bad style.
Walking around with those glasses is akin to a tourist walking around with their Canon fuck-off photobrick dangling from their neck. Annoying but non-threatening.
We already have a functioning etiquette for stuff like this. Let's just stick to it.
That could be one of the f
Doesn't seem that bad (Score:2)
The real fun will start... (Score:4, Interesting)
...when the malware hits these things.
So why not by face? (Score:2)
I thought that the proportion between eyes and all that type of stuff was more pretty accurate. Also faces don't tend to change in a short period of time. Note that I'm not against two or more different methods being used to identify someone.
Already can be creeper sorry creepy (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyone remember a furor not too long ago about assorted "creepershot" forums on Reddit? Google Glass will make creepershots trivial - at least now it's (generally) obvious if you're following people around photographing them.
Re: (Score:1)
Imagine future incantations of this that could put an overlay of flesh over clothing simulating everyone you're looking at as being nude in real time.
Re: (Score:1)
It's all voodoo.
A closet full (Score:2)
So do they think that real life is like cartoons, where people usually wear the same outfit every day?
Oh well... (Score:1)
Do Not Track Fashion Line (Score:3, Insightful)
Do not track option for clothing. Coming soon
Useful (Score:5, Insightful)
This is very useful to me; I often have trouble picking my wife out of a crowd. Mom, who has prosopagnosia (unable to identify faces) will also appreciate it. This kind of task, supplementing human failings, is exactly what we need. Many people don't need it; I'm sure most people will be as good or better than Glass at seeing friends in a crowd. But for those of us who are not? Useful!
I don't need a calculator to figure out which package of rice is the best-per-pound at the supermarket (when it is not labeled clearly), while my wife does. Should I say calculators are useless or stupid, just because I don't need them for that use case?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Should I say calculators are useless or stupid, just because I don't need them for that use case?
Your comparison of the calculator and the Google gadget is flawed, as one is made for a specific purpose (calculator) and the other have additional benefits (which I hope work out for those in needed of them). It would be more prudent to compare the calculators additional purposes. For instance the calculator can be used as a dildo, but like the Google gadget, doing so in public will make you look like a freak.
The problem is not the gadget in itself, but the way it works and who controls the data, and how i
Re: (Score:2)
This is very useful to me too. Now I can finally find out where Waldo was hiding all this time...
Does no one actually read the articles? (Score:5, Informative)
The article explains that the application works like this: you have to start off by IDing your friend to it. It then analyzes the clothing they're wearing and their dimensions. When you want to look for them, it scans for a match, and picks out the person (or what could potentially be the person) for you.
The article goes on to mention a couple of reasons that they chose to do it this way: one is to protect privacy! By not using facial recognition, they make sure that the app can't easily be pre-loaded with a database of people and look for them all the time. For another, humans are already good at facial recognition. If you can see your friend's face, there's a good chance that you'll recognize them. This, however, helps when you're scanning the crowd and their back might be to you.
Honestly, it sounds like a good idea to me. Sure, it's going to have problems if you're surrounded by identically-dressed people, but you're not left any worse off by that than you were without it. Since it uses their bodily dimensions as well, it may still be of some use. And I know from times that I've been shopping with my wife and was looking for her that I, personally, have a horrible memory for what people are wearing. If I see her face, sure, I'll recognize her - but I often find myself remembering not the outfit she was wearing today, but the one she was wearing yesterday, or the one she was wearing when I met her for lunch.....
Re: you have to start off by IDing your friend... (Score:2)
.
Ha. I misread your "IDing" as "iDing" ( or more clearly: "I-D-ing" as "i-Ding" ) as if it were a new electronic interactive way to ping or ding somebody. That would really be a cool new thing to trademark and create: iDing which pings and dings someone in real life, and if they're physically close enough to you IRL then you can hear the little submarine "ping" come out of their cell phone! Quick, Robin, off to the App-Mobile (TM, moi) to write this
Re: (Score:1)
The article explains that the application works like this: you have to start off by IDing your friend to it. It then analyzes the clothing they're wearing and their dimensions. When you want to look for them, it scans for a match, and picks out the person (or what could potentially be the person) for you.
I'll need to see the source code to be sure, and this is only the first generation of these glasses.
Re: (Score:1)
1. Change
2. No longer be your friend.
Re: (Score:1)
Agreed. The problem is with the second link to the science-ficulation of an obvious Mac fanboy, not the most unbiased source. For the benefit of those with (chiefly mobile) browsers that hide links, here's the naked url of the blog post that puts a negative spin on the largely positive New Scientist article:
http://www.macgasm.net/2013/03/08/creepier-the-minute-google-glass-will-identify-people-clothing-choices/
This fashion ID technology sounds less creepy to me than the tracking already being done by the wi
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Wrong.
It works like this: Google makes you scan several of your friends in several outfits and tag them.
Now Google has a database of, your friends and social circle; your friends faces; your friends cloth shopping habits for direct ad targeting
And you have nothing because this feature will probably only work 5% of the time
Re: (Score:2)
Wrong.
It works like this: Google makes you scan several of your friends in several outfits and tag them.
Now Google has a database of, your friends and social circle; your friends faces; your friends cloth shopping habits for direct ad targeting
The original sources in the TFA don't agree with you:
This fingerprint is constructed by a smartphone app which snaps a series of photos of the user as they read web pages, emails or tweets. It then creates a file – called a spatiogram – that captures the spatial distribution of colours, textures and patterns (vertical or horizontal stripes, say) of the clothes they are wearing. This combination of colour, texture and pattern analysis makes someone easier to identify at odd viewing angles or over
It's not part of Project Glass... (Score:4, Interesting)
...It's technology that Google has had a hand in funding. The Project Glass connection is because the researchers used Project Glass as an example in their paper. Google may be able to use the technology, but it has not been included in the Glass software.
Google Funds Fashion Recognition Research
http://www.informationweek.com/security/privacy/google-funds-fashion-recognition-researc/240150399 [informationweek.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Technology is getting smarter, but... (Score:1)
Not that far fetched... (Score:3)
I have partial facial blindness, and over the years I have gotten better at identifying people based off their cloths and hair style. Even when people do not intend it, many people stick to certain colour types and cuts, and it is not unusual to pick people out based off those patterns, or be really confused when they do something out of character. I have never really been sure _what_ the patterns are, but something in the back of my brain has built up some rules that work better then pure chance.
Kinda brings new importance to the question (Score:1)
"You wouldn't punch a guy with glasses on would you?"
Bounty Hunting App (Score:4, Interesting)
I know how to foil this evil design. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No kit could survive the sheer onslaught, nay, stampede of
Or at least put filters on YouTube!
I will have to pour bleach on my eyes to get rid of that particular mental image.
Fashion ID (Score:1)
Prosopagnosia (Score:2)
lol (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, ma'am. I like the fit and the pattern. I'll take 20. And about those pants: do you deliver? I'm not sure I can fit them into my car.
I once was taken shopping during lunch break by one of my female coworkers. For my sins, I reckon. She won't do THAT to me any time soon. I bought 3 shirts, 2 pairs of trousers, new shoes and lotsa socks within 30 minutes. She was struggeling with the decision between two sweaters.
None of my girlfriends went shopping for clothes with me
What if I wear blue jeans, black turtleneck (Score:2)
But on a serious note, I'm really curious about the output for people with similar clothes. Specially if you work in Japan, with all these salaryman in black suits or in any hospital with all doctors and nurses using nearly the same outfit(or any workplace that requires an uniform). Artists and celebrities may do their best to use different outfits in front of the cameras, but in the real world there is quite a significant overlap of clothing even between different people.
Re: (Score:2)
What exactly... (Score:2)
What exactly isn't downright creepy in those Google Glasses?
Re: (Score:2)
What exactly isn't downright creepy in those Google Glasses?
A cute bunny wearing Google Glasses?
sifi clothing (Score:1)
This is the real reason for those jumpsuits common in depictions of the future.
If everyone looks the same they won't be as easily tracked.
Woah Momma!! (Score:1)