Ferrari Unveils World's Fastest (and Most Expensive) Hybrid 222
Hugh Pickens writes writes "Fred Meier reports that Ferrari has unveiled its fastest car ever, a nearly 1000 hp. gas-electric hybrid dubbed LaFerrari that does 0-62 mph in less than 3 seconds, 0-124 in less than 7 seconds, 0-186 mph in 15 seconds. "We chose to call this model LaFerrari," says Ferrari's President, Luca di Montezemolo, "because it is the maximum expression of what defines our company – excellence. ...Aimed at our collectors, this is a truly extraordinary car which encompasses advanced solutions that, in the future, will find their way onto the rest of the range." LaFerrari is the company's first hybrid and has a system that incorporates technology developed for the Scuderia Ferrari Formula One race car's KERS (kinetic energy recovery system) setup. In LaFerrari, the hybrid (HY-KERS) version uses a 6.26-liter, non-turbo, V-12 gas engine rated at 800 hp coupled with a 163 hp. electric motor for a combined rating of 963 hp. A second, separate electric motor drives the power accessories."
Can't wait. (Score:2)
Can't wait until I pull onto a freeway with one of these, driven by an idiot, suddenly is spotted in my rear view mirror fish-tailing and spinning towards me as the driver attempts to slow down and miss me. It'll be the experience of a lifetime. Of course I may not see this for the rest of my life.
Re:Can't wait. (Score:5, Funny)
Can't wait until I pull onto a freeway with one of these, driven by an idiot, suddenly is spotted in my rear view mirror fish-tailing and spinning towards me as the driver attempts to slow down and miss me. It'll be the experience of a lifetime. Of course I may not see this for the rest of my life.
If you do see it, it's likely to be for the rest of your life.
Re:Can't wait. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Can't wait. (Score:4, Insightful)
Massively overpowered cars don't fishtail and spin anymore
That depends on how much cough syrup Justin Bieber and his pals have been chugging.
Many massively overpowered cars suffer from the mechanical fault of a loose nut behind the steering wheel, where the drivers have more money than driving skills.
Re: (Score:3)
Don't you talk bad about Justin Bieber.
Re: (Score:3)
Assuming that the steering wheel is (eventually) mechanically connected to the tie rods, and that the electronics cannot add unrequested throttle: Any car can suffer from throttle-lift-induced oversteer in a long turn, or the beginning sequence of the Scandinavian Flick, and unexpectedly be flung wildly out of control with an unprepared driver.
I dare say that this is do-able on any surface, even with the most front-heavy FWD car you can get your hands on.
It really has nothing at all to do with being massiv
Re:Can't wait. (Score:4, Informative)
Any car can suffer from throttle-lift-induced oversteer in a long turn, or the beginning sequence of the Scandinavian Flick, and unexpectedly be flung wildly out of control with an unprepared driver.
Nope, they route torque to the front wheels and it will understeer instead. Braking induced oversteer/spinouts is non-existent as well, because the moment the back starts sliding out the brakes are released to bring it back in. And all of this is happening hundreds of times a second, so that little patch of gravel/oil/dirt isn't going to cause an issue either. You have to try pretty hard if you want to spin out a car with full 4WD/ESP/ABS/ACRONYM.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Any car can suffer from throttle-lift-induced oversteer in a long turn, or the beginning sequence of the Scandinavian Flick, and unexpectedly be flung wildly out of control with an unprepared driver.
The car knows that the driver is flicking the wheel left, so it brakes the right-rear wheel to compensate. All vehicles sold in developed nations now must legally be equipped with ABS, traction control, and yaw control. Even some years ago it was said that with all the computers on you pretty much could not get the new Corvette to spin out. You could still drive it off a road if you went too fast, but that's something else.
Re:Can't wait. (Score:5, Funny)
Can't wait until I pull onto a freeway with one of these, driven by an idiot
So you claim to be an idiot then?
Re: (Score:2)
You've heard that Porsche owners are compensating for something.
Perhaps driving a Ferrari on the freeway turns you into an idiot, just as owning a Porsche makes your dick fall off at the very moment that you finish up the paperwork.
(I would not want to be the person responsible for picking up all of the cast-off penises at the Porsche dealer, but if I were I'd not own anything better than a Chevy, just to be safe.)
Re: (Score:2)
I've never heard that, but I have heard that people who drive trucks: pickups, SUVs etc are compensating for the size of their equipment. People with small cars don't seem to compensating for anything.
Re: (Score:2)
I think folks with ridiculous and useless pickups (useless around here, anyway: this is flat country), with lift kits and silly-huge tires, and exhaust stacks run up through the bed suffer from a different sort of malady: Their equipment might be fine, but they're so obese that they haven't been able to see it for themselves in years.
Re: (Score:2)
'Small penis' has been the standard throwaway shot for as long as man has had words for 'small' and 'penis'.
It is indeed thrown around in relation to any expensive or large car being compensation. Expensive small cars definitely fall into that category.
IMHO all brand new cars fall into that category.
Re: (Score:2)
Not true, the Greeks saw having a small penis as a sign of virility.
Re: (Score:2)
There's also a group of men who drive "plain" cars because they are absolutely terrified at being called out on having a small penis. They'd rather avoid the whole situation and not call attention to themselves.
Then there are the people who have normal dicks but are obsessed with penises. They think it's the only thing that counts, and that every other type of competition is actually a sham to avoid direct penis competition (which they think about all the time). Men compete to look better in whatever way th
Re: (Score:2)
There are few things as dreary as a repressed homosexual.
Re: (Score:2)
I've never heard that, but I have heard that people who drive trucks: pickups, SUVs etc are compensating for the size of their equipment. People with small cars don't seem to compensating for anything.
BCSD: big car, small dick. Personally, I drive a Mini.
Old joke.
Re: (Score:2)
"Aimed at our collectors.." (Score:5, Insightful)
..nuff said.
1000 hp of Postage Stamp, disappearing under a dustsheet in some collectors exclusive lockup garage near you soon.
Re: (Score:2)
Collectors
Who are they kidding? This might as well be a one-off for Jay Leno.
Re:"Aimed at our collectors.." (Score:4, Funny)
I am sure we'll see a few pictures of these crashed by spoiled sons of Russian oligarchs and Saudi princes.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm going to be checking http://www.wreckedexotics.com/ [wreckedexotics.com] weekly.
Gas mileage (Score:5, Funny)
Odd that neither linked story tells us what kind of gas mileage to expect. I'd hate to buy one of these and then find out I can't afford to drive it.
Cheers,
Dave
Re: (Score:2)
When I first heard about this, I googled a news report that said 16mpg (cannot remember if Yank or British mpg). I cannot be arsed to find the link now, though.
Re:Gas mileage (Score:5, Interesting)
16MPG? That sounds fairly excellent for such a beastly machine that can actually generate downforce (which can never happen for free).
Even cooling this thing must be a drag (literally), and the big tires themselves eat huge amounts of energy just in overcoming rolling resistance. Everything about the car (including the hybrid aspect, which seems more about performance than economy) seems to indicate that it should be very, very thirsty.
For a totally unfair comparison: My old straight-6 BMW averages about 20MPG with somewhat-spirited mixed driving, and gets about 26 on the highway (it used to be a bit better on the highway, but the diff gearing is currently "wrong" due to other changes). It's got a reasonable drag coefficient, doesn't generate meaningful downforce, cooling it is fairly easy since there is nowhere near as much waste heat, the tires are not so big nor nearly so sticky, and it has far less than half as many functional moving parts (and around 1/5th the power of the Ferrari).
At 16MPG, if that is indeed the number, it sounds like they've done a wonderful job with efficiency: It is certainly not a concept that was cast to the wind when they designed it.
Re: (Score:2)
If you can afford 1 of the 499 that they are planning on producing, I'm pretty sure you don't give a rats behind what the gas mileage is.
Re: (Score:2)
Ferrari's hypercars are super exclusive. If you were buying one of the 499 that they're making, they would have already contacted you to let you know ;)
Incidentally, IIRC, this isn't like a regular hybrid in that you can let it run on the electric motor alone, that would turn the engine off which would defeat the point of a V12 Ferrari. It's basically just an upgraded F1-KERS system. I guess the engine might turn off in stop-start traffic, but other than that, no.
Re: (Score:2)
Lifetime ownership costs of cars like this are approximately $1/km. Might have been $1/mile, it was a while since I read it.
Fuel cost is negligible compared to that.
Re: (Score:2)
your gas costs would be like one sixth of the insurance...
That whooshing sound... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, so I guess getting some snow tires is probably out of the question. Too bad. We just got about 8 inches of snow on Saturday.
Maybe I could keep for summer driving. I wonder if there is an option for a trailer hitch....
Cheers,
Dave
Re: (Score:2)
Do you happen to know how hard it is to mount a cargo rack on the roof? Some of the newer cars don't allow you to just use a generic rack, you have to buy a special one from the factory for like 400 bucks. If the Ferrari is like that, I'm definitely not getting it.
Re: (Score:2)
Joke about roof boxes, but here's an image of a Lamborghini with one:
http://www.baikbike.com/wp-content/uploads/lightning.jpg [baikbike.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If you can afford this car, you can probably afford someone to go to the store for you in their own Volvo 200
Brenda Lee coming on strong (Score:2)
The road has got me hypnotized. ...
(one more radar lover gone).
combined rating (Score:2)
so um for them to be combined they have to work in tandem right?
for a computer analogy (since the article is on cars) its like saying my 2GHZ server on the other side of the house combined with my 4Ghz quad core means I have a 6Ghz computer, even though my server is working its ass off on demand, while my quad core sits there with a thumb up its ass showing a copy dialog box
Re: (Score:2)
And no, your analogy isn't quite right. HP is a measure of power, just like FLOPs ( not GHZ). It would be equivalent to saying you have a 1 TFLOP server, and a 2 TFLOP server, and given a task that has a combined output for both (like the rear wheels) have 3TFLOP of computing power.
Re: (Score:2)
wrong dude, that electric motor is not assisting 100% of the time, neither is the gas motor
its in stages
so you get X hp from the electric, and Y from the gas
if they were both on at the same time THEN you would get a combined HP, but they are not, its marketing bullshit, something I would think an ultra premium brand is above as it treats their customers as utterly stupid
Re: (Score:2)
You can get them both working together in bursts, just not continuously.
Re: (Score:2)
kers is all about saving energy from braking to be emptied when you need fast acceleration...
Re: (Score:2)
Both motors will open wide if traction permits. This will almost never happen. That doesn't mean it won't happen. The customers of that ultrapremium brand can afford to pay someone to understand the car for them.
Obligatory Car analogy (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
well yeah, except that you can actually use the motors in parallel to make the car accelerate faster to solving a straight line problem that can't be parallelized. though it might leave you paralyzed faster.
gaming the rules.... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They can. They have to in F1.
This, the P1 and the new Porsche 918 use electrics because of the insane torque... They are upfront about it, a Ferrari is about performance, not green.
Not Green (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Can I drive this ... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The looks (Score:2)
Why is it that people making hybrids usually seem to need to make them look stupid?
Re:Not a gas-hybrid (Score:5, Insightful)
I know this site has an international audience, but did anyone really think that this thing ran on some non-specific, presumably flammable "gas"? In the US, "gas" is the most common way to refer to gasoline/petrol. We would call a CNG vehicle a "natural gas" car, and propane or hydrogen would be referred to as just propane or hydrogen.
Re:Not a gas-hybrid (Score:5, Funny)
We should also make clear that this is an automobile. The term "car" is ambiguous and may give rise to the misconception that this vehicle must be pushed or pulled, perhaps in series, by a locomotive.
Additionally, the term "hp" as used in the story refers to "horsepower", not "hit points". This is not to imply that 1000hp means that the automobile will be pushed or pulled by one thousand actual horses; merely that the power is roughly comparable.
If you can imagine the resources necessary to stable and feed one thousand horses, this is an incredible engineering feat indeed! Not to suggest that engineering alone was responsible for the construction of this automobile -- indeed, one can imagine mathematics, robotics, welding, and any number of other disciplines were involved in harmony. But likely not music theory, regardless of the ambiguous term "harmony" I employed mere seconds ago.
Re: (Score:2)
Jeremy Charles Robert Clarkson? Is that you?
Re: (Score:2)
Additionally, the term "hp" as used in the story refers to "horsepower", not "hit points".
Hit points are capitalized as "HP" not "hp"
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I would say you're probably right about you can get from a horse for a few minutes or maybe a little longer but a "horsepower" is probably accurate for the work you can expect from a horse over the course of it's shift. Remember Horse where literately the engines of industry. You can gallop a horse for a while but he'll take you further if you let it trot. So I think Watts guessed pretty well for what he was going for which how many horses one of his engines could replace.
Re: (Score:3)
WTF.
The original horse use to set the standard was a pit pony - very small so that they could go down coal mines (which was the environment where the people who invented steam engines lived/worked).
Re: (Score:2)
I was about to say the same thing. I assumed it was hydrogen or something like that.
In any case it looks like hybrids are the new performance frontier for cars, with EV like acceleration.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Depending on your level of mechanical aptitude and finances you want between a 3 and 20 year old Honda Civic. Parts are cheap, easiest to work on in the history of cars. Tuner parts are also cheap, if your into that sort of thing.
VWs are hell to work on. You definitely _don't_ want one of those in it's maintenance prone years.
Re: (Score:2)
VWs are hell to work on. You definitely _don't_ want one of those in it's maintenance prone years.
What year are those. I definitely want to avoid them on my 1998 and 2003 that I've had no problems with. (282k mi and 152k mi, respectively).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.metalnerd.com/cat09.htm [metalnerd.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Meh, don't care if its a Honda or VW myself as I'll never give up my Ford Ranger. Its a gas pig but built like a tank and on the Ranger forums I've been told the Vulcan V6 can easily rack up 300k-400k before needing a rebuild and then you can get another 300k easily.
My 7.3 ford has an aftermarket turbo kit and 360k on it. It runs like a mad bastard. I get up to 20 mpg on the freeway, but not on the mud tires I'm running now. It is pathetic that we don't have small pickups with small diesels in them.
No way in hell I could go back to riding so damned low to the ground, every time I ride in a car it feels like I'm in a damned go-cart after 24 years of driving trucks, just no way I could go back to driving cars
Going back and forth between a lifted F250 and a stock 300SD is quite an eye-opener. The visual range is nice, but being in comfort is much nicer. Where I live, though, if you drive anything but a classic Mercedes you're gonna have a bad time. You need handling to dodge the
Re: (Score:2)
Otherwise, to this non-American, you just look like a child playing with a Tonka toy.
Re: (Score:2)
VWs are hell to work on. You definitely _don't_ want one of those in it's maintenance prone years.
Most people won't work on their own car anyway. What they want is a TDI built in Wolfsberg. VW built in Mexico equals shit. VW built in Germany equals quality. I don't claim to know why this is, but it is a fact.
Re: (Score:2)
There is about 20% more carbon (energy/emissions) in diesel than is gasoline. This means that you have to deflate diesel fuel economy by the same to get an even carbon comparison.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You know that Canada only gets 1 engine for the TDI, the same one that America gets.
The 'new golf' TDI gets 74.3 mp imperial gallon and 85 mp imperial gallon ( 3.3L/ 100 km) highway.
Combined the Prius gets 72.4 mp imperial gallon.
It gets even better when you compare the Prius to the Polo (which has a more comparable interior space), it gets 80.7 mp imperial gallon combined.
Considering how much of most people’s driving is city rather than highway, that’s not even close.
Gross generalization there?
Re:Not a gas-hybrid (Score:5, Interesting)
Uhhh...you expect grammar nazis to care about logic? Really? You must be new here.
As for TFA frankly ALL hybrids might as well be toys for the rich because if you remove all the government subsidies? The math just doesn't work. The problem is we haven't had a real breakthrough in battery tech in years and the lithium batteries just don't make economic sense. From the tests I've seen depending on where you live and whether you own a climate controlled garage (because of differences in temps affecting battery life) you are looking at 5-7 years on the battery. Now from what I read the batteries in something like the Leaf or Prius cost around $20,000 to replace yet thanks to government subsidies these cars only cost $24k-$39k depending on feature set so already you have a car that is gonna be practically worthless on the used car market (because the battery costs more than the used car is worth)
Unfortunately, you seem to be reading "studies" put out by FUD-spewing shills. Most of the "facts" in your analysis are simply incorrect.
(A) "the lithium batteries just don't make economic sense": the Prius and Honda hybrids use NiMH batteries, not Lithium tech (which is coming into use in newer vehicles, e.g. Tesla and Chevy Volt); focusing on Lithium while bashing the Prius shows your ignorance of the subject.
(B) "you are looking at 5-7 years on the battery," "practically worthless on the used car market": the Prius was introduced in Japan in 1997, and on the world market in 2000. They aren't dropping dead on the road --- real life longevity/reliability is quite high, with a decade and a half of data to back it up. Feel free to check actual used car prices to see whether a Prius is "practically worthless."
(C) "...batteries in something like the Leaf or Prius cost around $20,000 to replace yet thanks to government subsidies these cars only cost $24k-$39k": many ridiculous (and intentionally deceptive) estimates of "OMG huge gov subsidies" are floating around with no basis in fact. They are usually based on highly faulty economics, e.g. dividing (Gov. subsidy for building big new factory)/(# of batteries produced per year) to produce "scary" numbers, while ignoring that the factory will continue producing batteries for decades. Actual Prius battery replacement from Toyota is ~$4k, and might need to be done (if ever) after ~300,000 miles.
Re: (Score:3)
I'd concur with most of that ...
We have a decent number of Prius taxis in my part of the world ... with heavy city driving and hence a lot of battery cycling, the battery seem to last between about 200,000 and 350,000 miles - I'd say 300,000 miles is a fair estimate of average life ... very much in line with a typical gasoline engine anyway
Replacement costs seems to be even less than $4k ... often under $3k
Overall running costs (fuel and maintenance) is said to be roughly half of the typical large sedans us
Re: (Score:2)
You must be a big fan of TV news programs then.
Re: (Score:2)
God, I love watching some pretentious anonymous get make aspirations to entertainment value
????
*bag of wine gums*
Re: (Score:2)
Bacon dipped in maple syrup.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I replaced my 2001 Prius battery pack at 9 years for $1,500. That was me taking out the back seat, disconnecting the battery, unbolting it, screwing it to a pallet and telling them it's ready.....then the opposite. The dealership wanted $3,000 but would have provided the old battery design while the one I received was rebuilt from new generation battery cells.
I've heard over and over the outrageous claims of $10K+ for a new battery by the clueless. Toyota since 2004 has a 10yr warranty on the batteries in
Re: (Score:3)
[...] and any economist will tell you its the used car market that seriously hurts our fossil fuel numbers, currently the USA averages 14MPG and that is because of all the poor folks in used cars on the road.
Where do you get your numbers from?
I found a NY Times article [nytimes.com] that said this:
"The average on-road fuel economy of all vehicles in 1923 was 14 m.p.g., the report said, compared with 17.4 m.p.g. as recently as 2008."
Now, the only reason for low fuel economy averages are large trucks/SUVs.
They drag the averages down for everyone, though the new 6-cylinder models have lessened that effect.
Re: (Score:2)
Uany economist will tell you its the used car market that seriously hurts our fossil fuel numbers, currently the USA averages 14MPG and that is because of all the poor folks in used cars on the road.
No, its because of all the trucks, SUVs and otherwise inefficient cars on the road. I just bought a used 1996 Toyota Carolla with 230k miles on it. I checked my gas mileage (mixed city/freeway) at 26 MPG on my last fill up.
My friend who drives a 2008? BMW M3 told me gets 23 MPG.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
First of all, even 2002 priuses are still doing well on original batteries according to this AOL auto article.
http://autos.aol.com/article/toyota-prius-reliability/ [aol.com]
Second of all achieving 38MPG in a truck sounds impossible unless it was the size of an old volkswagen caddy. An F-150 with a highly tuned diesel might get 25 combined, if lucky.
That being said diesel is excellent technology. Strong (electric) hybrids are too. Hydraulic hybrids even better, due to the lack of materials harvested in extremely envi
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If you want to say something like "I just have half a tank of gas" or "step on the gas", this would be inferred by most English speakers anywhere to refer to whatever fuel the vehicle runs on, probably "gasoline", "petrol" or whatever you want to call it, even though its not widely used outside of America. In British and British-like English dialects, gas-powered u
Re: (Score:2)
But when you're talking about what fuel an exotic engine runs on, then using "gas" to mean "gasoline" is just as completely wrong in American English as it is in any other dialect.
No it isn't. We all go to the "gas station" here. When you are talking cars in America, gas is gasoline. We do have CNG, LPG, and LNG cars here (and trucks - most UPS trucks, for instance), but no one would call those "gas powered".
Re: (Score:2)
The story seemed to be saying that they'd developed something radically new, so yes, it did seem that they were talking about a car running on natural gas. The word "gas" as a replacement for "petrol" is so uncommon that that wasn't the first thought that crossed me mind.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The summary was translated into American, as were the performance figures (of course most slashdoters should know that 186 miles is 300 kilometres because of c
The thing is can you plug it in and use it for short distances on just electric?
Re: (Score:2)
The thing is can you plug it in and use it for short distances on just electric?
No, now go back and RTFA.
Re: (Score:2)
It doesn't use batteries, it uses a kinetic (ie. flywheel) system of energy storage.
Re: (Score:2)
Its a grey area, but I'd call it a hybrid due to:
The 60 kilogram battery pack in the cabin floor is charged during braking and also when the gas engine is producing more torque than needed to move the car, in which case that torque is converted to energy and stored.
It is not just KERS and it is electrical not mechanical ... IMHO, a hybrid but barely so ... although i understand other peoples definitions given it cant run electric only
Re: (Score:2)
For a 6.2 Litre engine, that is not thirsty.
We're going to see a few more of these soon, Honda are releasing a hybrid NSX and Toyota are releasing a hybrid Supra. Its kind of sad to see these venerable sports cars being turned into hybrids.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Why? Seems to me to be a good idea- electric motors have gobs of torque even at standstill (Hence the use in locomotives) Why not put a second engine in that performs best where the V12 is at its worst? So long as you can keep the weight of the system down enough it should be a big win.
Because sports cars are meant to be light and have good handling. Sports cars typically have low torque because of their low weight.
Re: (Score:2)
Ferrari hasn't built a sports car in years. They only build supercars and hypercars now. You have to go back in time to get a sports car out of them. The F40 was the last car which at least straddled the line, it was really stripped down for pure sports.
Re: (Score:2)
Then you haven't driven any sports cars then.
A supercharged/turbocharged (such as a TSI) will accelerate a lot faster. Hell, even naturally aspirated engines will hold their own.
Not to mention the cost of the increased weight on handling. But you compared muscle cars to sports cars, there's a world of difference between the two. Muscle cars are designed to go fast in a straight line but you can forget about corners, sports cars are designed for speed and hand
Re: (Score:2)
Accelerate faster? Are you on crack? You get instant torque from 0 RPM. No power band. No time lost on shifting gears. No vibration, no reciprocating components about to fail at any moment.
Don't tell me electric cars have less torque:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_drag_racing#Cars.2C_1.2F4_mile [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
They should all be banned by IP address. Their accounts deleted.