Google Fiber To Come To Provo, Utah 92
An anonymous reader writes "Google announced today that they intend on purchasing the existing iProvo fiber network to make Provo the third U.S. city to have Google Fiber. If approved by the city council, implementation would begin later in 2013. 'As a part of the acquisition, we would commit to upgrade the network to gigabit technology and finish network construction so that every home along the existing iProvo network would have the opportunity to connect to Google Fiber.'" Also at SlashCloud
Re: (Score:1)
With such bandwidth they should be able to beam themselves straight from their transporter room to your MMORPG..
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Multi-Mormon Online Real Proselytizing Game?
Coming next -faster Comcast!!!! (Score:2)
Funny timing with CISPA vote today... (Score:1)
Funny that Google (one of the backers of CISPA) announces something that will catch everyone's eyes and ears on the same day CISPA goes to the Senate floor for a vote.
Re: (Score:2)
Canadians can at least try to do something about it:
http://www.leadnow.ca/stop-fipa-vote [leadnow.ca].
Not fair to call it Google fiber (Score:3, Informative)
AFAICT, Google hasn't laid a single foot of fiber themselves. They've just been buying up existing fiber that has already been laid by earlier projects and calling it Google fiber.
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Google, Microsoft and Apple do the same thing. If it's something bought from someone else, they re-brand it. Examples include Google Fiber, MS-DOS and Siri.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Siri wasn't re-branded. It was always called Siri, named after the original company, Siri Inc, which was spun off from SRI International (Stanford Research Institute) - a company created by Stanford to commercialize Stanford's research.
Of course, there were dozens of other things that were re-branded. Like Thunderbolt (though Apple licensed the trademark
Re: (Score:2)
You're right about Siri, my mistake. In the case of Thunderbolt, AFAIK it was developed jointly with Intel, so apart from the different name I don't think it's anything like Google Fiber.
I guess OS X would be a better example, since Apple bought NeXT and used its OS as the basis for OS X.
Even then... (Score:2)
I guess OS X would be a better example, since Apple bought NeXT and used its OS as the basis for OS X.
I don't know, it still shares the "X"... :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe that's why they called it "X" instead of "10".
Re: (Score:3)
All the Thunderbolt rights, including trademark, belong to Intel. Apple registered the trademark initially, but then gave it to Intel sometime in 2011
Re: (Score:1)
Google is connecting fiber lines directly to people's homes. They've laid plenty of fiber.
Re: (Score:2)
AFAICT, Google hasn't laid a single foot of fiber themselves. They've just been buying up existing fiber that has already been laid by earlier projects and calling it Google fiber.
The difference here being Gigabit speeds, or free 5Mbit for those that don't need the speed. Both of which will probably be a big hit in a college town, and weren't previously offered by iProvo.
Re: (Score:2)
Google has been buying up [voip-news.com] existing "dark fiber" networks since 2005. They've made little secret of it.
How is it not fair to call it Google Fiber? (Score:5, Insightful)
You know what, most airlines have never built an airplane themselves, either, they just buy up (actually, I think "lease" is the more common model now) existing airplanes and slap their names on them. So what?
Since when is it "not fair" to use your company's name on a service you sell, just because some key pieces of equipment used in providing that service were either purchased or leased from someone else? Is it unfair for the (very many) companies selling services built on top of, e.g., Amazon's cloud infrastructure (who haven't even bought the infrastructure from Amazon, but are renting it dynamically based on usage) to use their own name rather than Amazon's for their services?
Re: (Score:2)
AFAICT, Google hasn't laid a single foot of fiber themselves
That's funny, half the rage over google fiber in Kansas was them getting permission to use power poles for stringing up fiber. Not sure what everyone was up in arms about if all that fiber was already there.
Re: (Score:2)
if that's what it takes....
Re: (Score:1)
Google is laying tons and tons of fiber.
Google does buy up dark fiber capacity, for backbones, but that has nothing to do with the Google Fiber project in KC, Austin, and Provo.
Tons of fiber has been installed in KC. I'm not sure about the situation in Austin. In Provo, Google is taking over the unfinished government fiber project and finishing/upgrading it.
Re: (Score:3)
Stop taunting us! (Score:2, Funny)
When will Google Fiber come to my city! Yes, I'll give up all my privacy to Google! You know the truth? If Google demanded I send them nude pictures so I could have gigabit Internet, I'd do it! Anything for gigabit Internet! PLEASE!!! NOW!!! PLEASE!!!
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
The trouble with crowdsourcing naked pictures is that there are a lot of people out there I don't want to see naked.
Perhaps that's their business model - pay us, or we send you more pictures of 14/f/cali guy.
Re: (Score:3)
Ditto. I will show off my sexy abdomen, stinger, thorax, etc. ;)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
When will Google Fiber come to my city!
Every time I have to talk to AT&T tech support, I make sure I mention that I really, really, really hope that Google Fiber comes to my area so I can drop AT&T.
Recently, my UVerse modem died, requiring a replacement. After it was installed, I had to call tech support to get my static IP address reinstated. At one point, I said I was using Linux, and AT&T said they would have to stop the tech support call right there. I then said I was running Windows XP, and the tech support guy resumed being
Re:Stop taunting us! (Score:4, Funny)
Google FIber: The cure for a constipated telecom monopoly. No, seriously -- just one dose, and entrenched ISPs start running :)
At this rate (Score:2)
Google Fiber will engulf the US in a mere 4,378 years!
Re:At this rate (Score:4, Interesting)
Maybe because Kansas City is being installed as fast as they want and they figure they can have teams in different locations going at max safe speed for install without conflicts. It could also be due to what the cable/media companies are doing with Caps and Cable subscription requirements to access content on hulu which goes inverse to the point of hulu. How best to shake things up then to have multiple sites being implemented forcing companies to upgrade networks or risk a google takeover of all customers.
Why not work in parallel in different cities? (Score:4, Insightful)
Because fiber deployment (both actual fiber laying and establishing service) in different cities is something that parallelizes quite well providing that you have sufficient capital, so there is no reason to hold off starting work in other cities just because you haven't finished in the first one you started in.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Google Fiber will engulf the US in a mere 4,378 years!
Which when compared to cable providers will be 100x quicker than their scheduled upgrade to Gigabit. (and 250x quicker than telcos.)
And don't forget, even when cable companies get to the Gigabit threshold, they will still have a 250Mb/month usage cap. (which will only be waived if you are in an area where they do not have a monopoly and fear you may leave for the competition.)
Can't wait (Score:4, Informative)
As a current iProvo fiber user, I can't wait to welcome my new Google overlords.
Re: (Score:3)
iProvo wa
Re: (Score:2)
You meant $300 install fee, right? (Though I see that for the higher priced ones, they even have the install fee officially listed as waived, like I had read about in other news stories.)
Even if you do have to pay $300 install fee, that's at worst equivalent to 1 year of DSL (using AT&T's price for naked DSL.. The $14.95/month ads require you to have a phone line)⦠then free. Seems like a great deal to me.
Re: (Score:2)
It's a $30 activation fee [blogspot.com] for those already on iProvo. My bet is that new customers pay a $300 install fee for the free service, just like elsewhere, but no news on that yet.
Re:Can't wait (Score:5, Informative)
It's true that this is basically a "take this away from Veracity" move.
iProvo was a great idea. It was killed by politics.
The extreme right-wing folks who think there should be no public services managed to force Provo to not provide services directly ("retail model") but rather to cut corporate middlemen in on the deal ("wholesale model"). That privatized all the profits while socializing all the costs. Unsurprisingly, it failed.
Given the political realities in Utah right now, I suppose the Google Fiber deal is the best we could hope for. But we would have had something at least as good way back in 2006 if it weren't for idiotic politicians.
Indeed (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Porn (Score:2, Funny)
Just imagine how much faster the porn will download in Utah! Wait....
Re: (Score:2)
Big cities?? (Score:2)
Re:Big cities?? (Score:5, Insightful)
Now imagine how long people in Shawinigan, Québec, Canada will have to wait.
Re: (Score:2)
Shawinigan is in the service area of Bell Canada, who are deploying fiber to the home (in general, not necessarily currently in Shawinigan) at a pretty decent pace, although their speeds top out at 175 Mbps symetrical for several times more than Google charges.
Re: (Score:2)
And since it's Bell, that 175 Mbps will be useless after about an hour or two of downloading. They have some of the worst monthly caps I've ever heard of.
Re: (Score:2)
They have unlimited for $10/mth extra, although I'm not sure if they're still allowing people to sign up for it.
Re:Big cities?? (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm getting the impression that LA, Chicago and NY are going to have a long wait for this.
Of course they will. Do those cities also have a municipal fiber setup that Google could snatch up for $1?
When Google is looking at the FIBER_ROLLOUT_CITIES table, they aren't doing an ORDER BY population DESC. More like ORDER BY cost, legal_difficulties ASC.
Re: (Score:2)
Google doesn't use SQL, they use GQL (Score:1)
So the result for this would be a failure due to no index. Ugh. BigTable.
acceleration (Score:2)
Awesome!
Re: (Score:2)
Danger, Will Robinson! Danger! Danger! (Score:1)
Looks like ISP's better watch their collective back. Google coming to screw telecom monopolies over and give the customer what they truly want in an obscure city somewhat near you...
Re: (Score:1)
logs what I do, injects ads, hijacks DNS, and prevents me from accessing ThePirateBay
Citation?
Re: (Score:2)
Google and Facebook have yet to support CISPA.
Re: (Score:3)
Which for that matter has nothing to do with collecting your personal information and injecting ads.
Re: (Score:2)
Is UTOPIA Next? (Score:2)
Google, buy UTOPIA!
Re: (Score:1)
Yup - and sign up West Jordan....
History repeats (Score:3)
Why choose Provo? (hint: lookup Bluffdale, Utah) (Score:2, Interesting)
Just wanted to float the slightly unobvious fact that Provo is only one county away from Bluffdale, Utah where the NSA's new data facility (capable of storing the entirety of the Internet for the next 1000 years) is located..
*wink wink...say no more, say no more*
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Pop Star! (Score:2)