Missile Test Creates Huge Expanding Halo of Light Over Hawaii 93
The Bad Astronomer writes "A Minuteman III missile launch from California early Wednesday morning created a weird, expanding halo of light seen from the CFHT observatory on Hawaii's Mauna Kea. The third stage of the missile has ports that open and dump fuel into the near-vacuum. This cloud expands rapidly as a spherical shell, shock-exciting the air molecules and causing them to glow, creating the bizarre effect."
Is this how they are covering up airbursts? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Is this how they are covering up airbursts? (Score:5, Insightful)
You can't cover up an atmospheric nuke, you can hardly even cover up an underground one. people will find out. we're good at spotting the radiation and fallout and unique shockwave if it's underground.
the rest of the world wouldn't agree to stay quiet about things
Re: (Score:3)
The Experience Music Project [theinterrobang.com]? Yeah, people definitely notice - that building is pretty darn weird...
Re: (Score:2)
Missile defense test targets are launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility on Kauai, not from Vandenberg. Vandenberg is used for traditional missile systems testing, with a dummy warhead, and no THAAD/Aegis/GMD defensive testing. Also, when missile defense targets are launched, they don't use Minuteman III missiles, as they make up the current land-based nuclear deterrent force, they use mocked up missiles or decommissioned separating missiles that were part of the land-based force in the past.
Re: (Score:2)
Yet Another Alien Visit? (Score:5, Funny)
I've seen Stargate. I know this is just another lame government cover up of an alien visitation. Better check on your cows!!
Re: (Score:3)
It's ok, they were just jumping a meteor through the Earth... again...
Re:Yet Another Alien Visit? (Score:4, Funny)
I know this is just another lame government cover up
Don't be silly. This was the testing of a 50 year old missile platform causing a previously unseen anomoly thousands of miles from the launch site of said missile.
Re: (Score:2)
I know this is just another lame government cover up
Don't be silly. This was the testing of a 50 year old missile platform causing a previously unseen anomoly thousands of miles from the launch site of said missile.
Yes, but with really intense music!
Re: (Score:2)
I've seen Stargate. I know this is just another lame government cover up of an alien visitation. Better check on your cows!!
It is Valence-Time Day for space faring races. Your similar, but mangled, Valentines' day has you lopping off the reproductive parts of plants, our bonding ceremony is at the molecular level, the cow genitals are just party favors.
Re: (Score:2)
SG1 will save us...
Launch Rescheduled from Before? (Score:5, Informative)
Any bets that this is the same exercise as the launch we didn't do [slashdot.org] back in April? We wouldn't want to have North Korea have a hissy fit or anything.
Cheers,
Dave
Re: (Score:3)
SpaceX has its first west coast launch scheduled for July 9, launching a Canadian communications and research satellite [wikipedia.org] from Vandenberg. That's been pushed back from April, then June, to its current July 9 date. Word is it may slip again to July 20. Elon Musk has said they're going to try to execute a powered soft landing of the first stage into
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
There was some testing done back in I think the '80s to drop launch a Minuteman from a C5A. This was back when there was the huge debate over what was then called the MX and how to base it so that the Soviets couldn't take it out with a first strike, One idea was to have nuclear armed missiles loaded on airplanes flying around so there was no possibility of a first strike. Kind of an extension of "Looking Glass" to include the weapons, too.
Cheers,
Dave
Anyone wanna bet? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Test? (Score:2)
Why do they need to test a Minuteman III ?
Its not a new weapon, they have been operational for around over 40 years
Re: (Score:3)
"Its not a new weapon, they have been operational for around over 40 years."
Why do soldiers need to fire rifles? They aren't new weapons, they have been operational for decades.
Re: (Score:2)
Why do soldiers need to fire rifles? They aren't new weapons, they have been operational for decades.
The rifles might have been around for decades but the soldiers have not; even if they had humans need practice to remain skilled.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Test? (Score:5, Informative)
This is also one of the very few times that a crew actually gets to launch a live missile, so its an exciting exercise for them as well, so much so that the exercises are called "Glory Trip".
Anyway, pretty much everyone tests their stockpile of ICBMs and SLBMs to make sure they are working, otherwise deterrence starts to lose some of its credibility.
Furthermore, and a little dark, but think about how amazing it'd look to be in north central Canada if WW3 breaks out on a clear night and you have hundreds of these missiles going down range... The end of the world would be somewhat pretty.
Re: (Score:1)
The end of the world would be somewhat pretty.
...to the cockroaches and our new ape overlords.
Re: (Score:2)
I find it a little morbid that this would be considered a "glory" trip, when there really is no glory in wiping out millions of innocent civilians with nuclear weapons.
Absolutely agreed (Score:2)
I was thinking the same thing. America is the modern Rome, for a few more years maybe, and if I had had the mod points they would have been yours.
Re: (Score:1)
There is also no glory in PRETENDING to wipe out millions of innocent civilians with nuclear weapons.
Re: (Score:3)
What makes you think they were testing the missile? They could be testing ABM radar, satellite launch detection sensors, penetration aids... any number of things.
Usually however they combine tests whenever possible especially in this age of sequestration.
Re: (Score:2)
So they can track the performance and reliability of a forty year old weapon system and make statistical projections about the performance and reliability of the fleet as a whole.
Re: Test? (Score:2)
Cue conspiracies (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
0...: Chemspheres - a new and far more sinister threat.
Dump Fuel? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The key to making a solid fueled ballistic missile is the ability to turn it off. They do that by blowing out vents on the side of motor to vent the exhaust. AKA dumping the fuel.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I'm sure it doesn't work that way,
1 solid rocket motor fuel burns in a vacuum as well as in an atmosphere, rocket motor fuel has an oxidiser incorporated into the mixture,
2 pressure on the forward bulkhead from the combustion and no aft bulkhead would still produce thrust due to delta pressure, just not optimum thrust.
Re: (Score:2)
actually it does work that way. The decompression is so fast that it puts out the fuel.
Re: (Score:2)
True I was giving the quick explanation of what they mean.
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah, I caught that as well.
Third stage, at least, has dump ports. At precise time according to flight plan, charges open vents in side of can, venting combustion gases and this abruptly ends continued boost. (Yah, I know that first stage is called boost phase, so sue me.)
Guy who thought it was fuel being dumped maybe thinks solid-fuel rockets burn from one end to the other. Obviously he doesn't understand just what solid fuel means. He was certainly too lazy to look it up (that or had a five minute dead
Re: (Score:3)
The Minuteman III has ports in the third stage that can be blown to vent the motor case, slowing or stopping the burning of the grain, and essentially shutting down[1] the motor. It's this vented gas ("dumped fuel") that produced the halo. When the ports are blown the motor decelerates rapidly, so they use this to their advantage by simultaneously separating the bus, thus ensuring the third stage will be clear as the bus maneuvers to start releasing warheads.
This used to be a fairly common method of contr
I saw one of these (Score:5, Informative)
Re:I saw one of these (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Unlike Cape Canaveral which launches into an equatorial orbit to the east
Are you sure about that? Unless we're talking about GTO launches, an equatorial orbit is dfficult to reach from Cape Canaveral since you're actually not on the equator.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sure he was talking about an orbit with a low inclination in general, not one that was exactly zero. In any case, it does tend to launch to the east. If you wanted to launch from the east coast into a polar orbit it would probably be cheaper to do it at a more northern facility like Wallops Island.
Re: (Score:2)
In LA in the late 80s. I thought aliens were invading.
You know, had you actually watched Star Trek VI and the new episodes of Star Wars by the time you saw that, you would have known that an alien explosion would have made a 2D shockwave [wikimedia.org] and not a spherical one. If nothing else, we can at least thank Lucas for fixing this bit of general education.
Re: (Score:2)
Ditto in 1988 (IIRC). From a Florida launch. I was driving north of Atlanta though, so it looked like what could be an airburst over the city or some kind of Tunguska bang. It was definitely an Oh Shit hour and had me checking the radio news channels, which I figured would go down if there was an EMP or at least say something about it.
Directed by J.J. Abrams (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
The following is from Ted Molczan, an expert on satellites and launches and a major contributor to the seesat-l list. There's a good change of seeing a fuel dump from a Delta 4 medium if you're in the right place at the right time.
Re: (Score:2)
Did someone forget their meds again?
Not fuel, and not a Minuteman [CONSPIRACY!!!!] (Score:3, Insightful)
It's chemtrails. It's your government putting mind control chemicals into the atmosphere, and rainbows in your sprinklers [youtube.com].
Hah...
Re: (Score:1)
"That the simulant bacteria caused these infections and death has never been conclusively established. Nevin's son and grandson lost a lawsuit that they brought against the government between 1981 and 1983."
I'm sure a lot of them remember being abducted and probed by aliens, too.
I found it ironic... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
...and here's the Russian version (over Norway) (Score:1)
Something much weirder [slate.com] was seen over Norway when a Russian launch went wrong.
Sorry (Score:1)
...but this was not worth a Slashdot story.
You can see one yourself (Score:2)
The following is from Ted Molczan, an expert on satellites and launches and a major contributor to the seesat-l list. There's a good change of seeing a fuel dump from a Delta 4 medium if you're in the right place at the right time.
What is this guys other hobbies (Score:1)
seriously, ive had more interesting patterns in the foam of a mcdonalds cappucino
Don't Look Into The Light (Score:1)