Advanced Chatbot Could Help With Social Awkwardness 84
mikejuk writes "Researchers at MIT Media Lab are working on an automated personal-computer-based system designed to help people improve interpersonal and conversational skills. The software is called MACH, short for My Automated Conversation coacH (pdf). It makes use of a computer-generated onscreen face to simulate interactive conversations. It performs facial, speech, and behavior analysis and synthesis to emulate human-to-human responses. At the end of the session it provides the user with feedback on their performance. Using a webcam the program can analyze facial expressions, including smiling and head gestures while its voice recognition system analyzes not only what you say but also how you say it and notes non-verbal vocalizations. As feedback you watch the video side-by-side with the analysis of your behavior — see the video of it in action. It has already been shown to improve job interview techniques and other potential uses are coaching in public speaking and dating."
Re: (Score:1)
Lighten up, Francis.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Talking to girls is only possible if the girls also want to talk to you. Which is only the case if you already have sufficient interpersonal and conversational skills.
It's like with learning a language. If you are sufficiently fluent in a foreign language, it helps a lot to talk to native speakers of that language to improve your language skills. However if you don't understand the language at all, talking to a native speaker is simply not possible.
Wrong (Score:1)
There's only 1 requirement.
Don't be unattractive.
Re: (Score:3)
There's only 1 requirement.
Don't be unattractive.
I'm unattractive, a bit eccentric, a tiny bit awkward, but even I manage to strike up interesting conversations with women sometimes. The truth is, it's really as simple as not making them feel awkward or threatened, and coming off as confident.
You don't have to be an alpha male, follow a technique, a jerk, or any of the things people sometimes say you have to do to talk to women. You don't even be "normal". Many women will respond positively to you simply being comfortable with yourself, and not doing s
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Piece of advice from someone who has "studied pickup" (yes, I confess to reading numerous pirated ebooks and watching in-field hidden camera videos) and consequently actually getting success with girls: If you really are so shy that you can't say anything to girls, you should start practicing by talking to girls that are obliged to respond positively. That is, go to (clothing) stores and talk to shop assistants - ask for advice because you need to buy a gift for your mother or your sister. Don't have the ob
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Also, don't hog the conversation.
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
False. This will never work. That acronym is an abomination. I'm serious.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Vocabulary (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Well, a dictionary of facial expressions could indeed be helpful.
Somehow this reminds me... (Score:5, Interesting)
I guess some social skill is better than none, especially for those with serious disorders. This could have benefits.
Yet, somehow this reminds me of Comcast's CableCard activation line. Every time I've called it, I get someone sounding exactly the same... an guy with a truly bizarre, unplaceable and somewhat feminine accent and an equally WTF speech pattern.
Some outsourced call center is training every one of their employees to sound exactly the same, to the point that I've called from multiple time zones, at all hours of the day, and from different numbers/accounts and am still not entirely sure if they have more than a single sleepless extraterrestrial behind the phone. Creepy as hell. And this type of app sounds like just the thing to do that.
Re: (Score:1)
Not unlike historical switchboard operators who were given standardized elocution training and all used to sound much the same.
Re:Somehow this reminds me... (Score:5, Informative)
Some outsourced call center is training every one of their employees to sound exactly the same, to the point that I've called from multiple time zones, at all hours of the day, and from different numbers/accounts and am still not entirely sure if they have more than a single sleepless extraterrestrial behind the phone.
Close, but they aren't intentionally training them to speak that way.
Let me introduce you to IELTS [wikipedia.org], the International English Language Testing System.
American companies like Comcast and the company I work for have call centers in other countries. Because of the language barrier, language testing is a big part of the hiring process. For my company, employees are also retested yearly and approximately 30% of their pay rate is a "language bonus" which they lose if they don't pass that test. This is not uncommon.
Training in written and spoken English is up to the employee. The company may provide some reimbursement for the expense, but they generally won't provide the courses.
English courses come in two types; one where you actually learn English and the other where you learn to pass the test. The latter is cheaper, so lots of people will go for it. Those are the people with the bizarre, unplaceable and someone feminine accent and equally WTF speech patterns.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure you're not speaking to an AI? Or maybe one person handling many conversations through text-to-speech interfaces?
Talking to chatbots is socially awkward (Score:3, Funny)
Just saying....
Re:Talking to chatbots is socially awkward (Score:5, Funny)
What about talking to chatbots is socially awkward makes you feel that way?
Re: (Score:1)
I do not understand what about talking to chatbots is socially awkward makes you feel that way.
Late to the party, but thanks for the Eliza reference!
Chatbot? (Score:3)
If these geeks want dates, I think they'd get more benefit out of a Bathbot.
Re: (Score:2)
Bathbot's are for hipsters. Geeks require something more...unique.
Re:Chatbot? (Score:4, Interesting)
Should be tested against placebo recording (Score:3)
I have no doubt that making a practice speech and then watching yourself on camera can help. People were doing it for ages. Question is if this 'bot' bolted on top of simple visual/audio feedback loop adds any value (or maybe it makes it worse then trying to analyse your performance without hindrance).
how does it cope with b**chy resting face? (Score:2, Funny)
The paper has a diagram showing a graph of % smile over time. Is this calibrated for those of us who suffer from b**chy resting face / resting a**hole face [youtube.com]?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
That's not social awkwardness. That's being a sarcastic misanthropic shit. Stop seeing the world like it's made up of machines. Inside each of these "zombies" lives a real human like yourself. Next time you go out to shop try to make their lives a little bit brighter and stop making it all about what you want. You'll be surprised at the results.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
No, he's right. Zombie apocalypse has broken out where he lives. He survived because the zombies couldn't recognize him as human, thanks to his awkward behaviour. They always think he's already one of them.
Re: (Score:2)
Sales training (Score:2)
This is an automated form of sales training. That could be quite marketable.
Comment removed (Score:3)
DR SBAITSO is the only one for me (Score:2)
DR SBAITSO, by creative labs, please enter your name: fuck
hello fuck,
I am here to help you. say whatever is on your mind freely. our conversation will be kept in strict confidence. memory contents will be wiped off after you leave. So, tell me about your problems.
>fuck.
I will get parity error if you keep talking in this asdf way.
>fuck
BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP
PARITY
>lets talk about sexy stuffs.
How old are you?
>13
wait a few more years kid..
Re: (Score:2)
Fuck it, we're over. (Score:2)
Now, instead of just communicating with each other -- sometimes awkwardly, I guess -- humans are going to be taught by a computer how to talk to other humans.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I'll take awkward people and situations over people practiced to honed efficiency for maximal human interaction by a machine, any day. One is real. The other is fake. One is someone with a bit of oddness to them (or even just inefficiency, I suppose) and the other is a glossy car salesmen. One is honest human interaction and the other is a practiced manipulative sociopath.
I only see a couple places where this would actually be useful without being gross. One is where people have very severe communication pr
The only downside is (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
That is the only way to save the planet at this point.
captcha: tracked LOL.
Re: (Score:2)
That is the only way to save the planet at this point.
I get it; sort of like Bán Tre [wikipedia.org]:
"It became necessary to destroy the town to save it," a United States major said today.
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't that a good thing? We need more geeks to bite chickens' heads off. ;)
Blind leading the blind (Score:5, Funny)
Socially awkward nerds build machine for socially awkward nerds to learn to be less awkward.
Re: (Score:3)
No. They are trying to apply a technological solution to a social problem.
Solution looking for a problem (Score:1)
There are plenty of unemployed sociologist grads. So why does this need automating? Focus on making a bot that does dishes first.
Re: (Score:1)
You mean a dishwasher? I'm pretty sure that already exists.
Re: (Score:1)
Good counseling takes skill.
MyAutomatedConversationCoach (Score:1)
Is MACH available for me to use?
We would love to make the system available to the general mass for free. Here are the caveats.
MACH was developed as part of a PhD thesis consisting of more than half a million lines of code. The current prototype works on a personal laptop. However, it is an extremely complicated system that we were able to put together with 2 years of effort.
In order to make a public release with seamless interaction experience, we would need to do more testing.
It is possible to make MACH work in a computer browser and make it widely accessible. However, that will require hiring 2-3 full time software engineers with 6-12 months of development and test period. Currently, we are looking for resources to make that happen. If you are in a position to support our work, or know of any funding agencies who might be interested to fund us, please do get in touch (mehoque at media dot mit dot edu) with us. In the mean time, please feel free to write/tweet to AutismSpeaks, NLMFF, Autism Science Foundation
I am remote and I would like to participate in your studies.
Recruiting participants is the most challenging part of our research and we appreciate your interest. However, with our current experimental set up, it makes it very difficult for us to recruit participants unless they are local. We hope to address this issue by developing an online version of our system.
I would like to be notified when the system becomes available to public.
Please sign up here. http://goo.gl/LDwb8 [goo.gl]
News for Nerds! (Score:3)
second life? (Score:2)
Same idea, but with real people behind the avatar.
irony (Score:2)
No, not moleys. (Score:1)
The Mole Man creating an entire underground society of fake humans in which to hang out doesn't sound so stupid now, does it John Byrne!
Did you see that ludicrous display last night? (Score:2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKHyqjHqQLU [youtube.com]
If you need real human interaction... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think the point is that if you are too shy to talk to a real person,
at least you can "talk" to the bot and not be embarrassed by how badly you suck at conversation.
If it helps anybody, I'm all for it.
it works (Score:1)
Forced conformity (Score:2)
I happen to prefer it when people fidget and look at their feet during a conversation. It gives me the impression that they're more emotionally involved in the conversation. It demonstrates a natural respect for my opinion.
Just because the extroverts on tv have conversations with eye contact doesn't mean it's the "correct" approach.