'Pushback': Resisting the Life of Constant Connectivity 111
vinces99 writes "Researchers at the University of Washington have studied and named a trend lots of people can identify with: the desire to resist constant connectivity and step back from the online world. They call it 'pushback.' The researchers looked closely at instances of pushback against technology, reviewing 73 sources divided equally among three areas of online expression: personal blogs and websites, popular media sources and academic conferences and journals. Co-author Ricardo Gomez said they thought they'd find frustration with devices, costs or learning new technologies as key pushback motivations. Instead, the reasons were more emotionally based, with 'dissatisfaction' — the thought that users' needs are not really being met by technology — most often expressed, followed by political, religious or moral concerns. Other motivations were the wish to regain control of time and energy and fear of addiction to the technology. Among the least-often reported objections were worries about loss of privacy."
Evolution (Score:1)
Famous... (Score:1)
Last post!
Re: (Score:1)
Last post!
I wish this were true.
Re: (Score:1)
Lastest last post!
Sounds like probable cause (Score:2, Funny)
These people have something to hide. We should plant bugs in their houses and track their locations.
They call this ‘pushback,’” (Score:2, Insightful)
I call it 'get a life'
Re:They call this ‘pushback,’” (Score:5, Insightful)
I call it 'get a life'
You make me sick. Why 'get a life' when you can consume a premium lifestyle, defined by constant engagement with the most desired consumer goods and services, as modeled by the happy and attractive people on TV?
Re:Why invent a new word (Score:5, Informative)
No, Luddites were complaining about their livelihoods being taken away by industrial machinery. The supposed trend of pushback isn't about being anti-technology, just not being plugged into it every waking moment. You may miss some vapid messages. Is that a bad thing?
Re: (Score:1)
You may miss some vapid messages. Is that a bad thing?
No, indeed. And even when we are "plugged in", far too many websites have a ridiculously high-frequency autorefresh (via scripts that I haven't found a way to disable) that serve up exactly the same inane drivel that we were foolishly attempting to read in the first place. Serves us right, I suppose... :-|
Re: (Score:2)
if they are messages from work, and your boss, then its a good thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Why should I let my boss take over my free time?
Re: (Score:2)
I am pretty sure he means missing the messages is a good thing. Which I (and apparently you) agree with.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
if they are messages from work, and your boss, then its a good thing.
Wait, we're getting massages at work?
Cool!
Re: (Score:2)
Well, we now use "Luddite" more generally to refer to a person who opposes various, to use a politically neutral term, "updates" to our lifestyle. A Luddite by no means has to oppose everything modern (they might let the odd medical breakthrough off the hook), just enough so that people see them as being at odds with current trends.
"Luddite", as a word, has evolved beyond its original meaning, in much the same way we now use the word "irony" to mean something other than the rhetorical device of pretending t
Re: (Score:2)
Well, we now use "Luddite" more generally to refer to a person who opposes various, to use a politically neutral term, [technology related] "updates" to our lifestyle.
That's me. I love the irony of being a Luddite engineer.
Re: (Score:2)
"19th-century English textile artisans" "identified with: the desire to resist constant connectivity and step back from the online world."?
I can't but praise their forward thinking and foretelling skill.
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
We are not Luddites. Luddites believed that technology was taking work from them. We believe that technology is increasing our workload.
You spend your life on call. I'll be enjoying myself.
its 22:49 (Score:2)
Dude, or shall I say, typical wanker.
He posted here at 22:49, not exactly working hours.
Gawd, I hate dicks like you who say, "well waste your time here", well, hello, even during working hours, when I take a big SHIT, I still like to view slashdot. It makes the shit come out nicer.
Re: (Score:1)
Typical response -- you know, not EVERYONE lives in the UK. There are other countries out there. You should try visiting them.
Re: (Score:1)
when I take a big SHIT, I still like to view slashdot. It makes the shit come out nicer.
Yo dawg, I heard you like to view shit while you shit...
Re: (Score:1)
Merely being opposed to certain uses of a technology does not make one a Luddite.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure it does. See TheVelvetFlamebait's explanation of the evolution of the English language (above). I say we techies should embrace our inner Luddites!
Re: (Score:2)
It's called being a luddite [wikipedia.org].
Luddites had specifically economic motives, and were concerned with the technological changes in the means of production. This is about people with psychological motives concerned with technological changes largely outside of work (though I'm sure that people who realize that they weren't issued a company blackberry for their benefit probably count as well). Two totally different things.
disconnecting temporarily (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Same experience here. The thing I missed most was electric lights (hard to read by candlelight) and a way to keep my food from spoiling. Everything else? Not so much.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Sounds utterly boring, unless your utterly stonned and with a few hotties naked all weekend.
Even then you want lights, music, and ability to dial a pizza to be delivered.
Living like the 18th century , no thanks, im not armish.
Re: (Score:3)
good god man, how do you use your phone with no arms.
Re: (Score:2)
"We haven't even paid the phone bill in 300 years!"
Re: (Score:2)
Somehow, you survive being disconnected and it really is a refreshing change to "pushback"
I get disconnected when I'm scuba diving. I'd be ready to pay quite a sum to not be disconnected one of the few moments in my life where being stuck for half an hour could kill me.
I'd rather be physically connected at all times. I can use my own brain to disconnect if I want/need to.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
I too was one of the early cell phone users, but didn't use a phone for about 14 years, because it kept interrupting life.
Only got the iPhone 5 after getting an iPad 2 (did do some alpha and beta tests, but never wanted to buy before).
My favorite settings are:
1. Airplane Mode
2. Leave downstairs recharging turned off
Generally only use it when I go out where I might meet people, or during an event, but mostly the tools are off.
Tools are just that: Tools.
Somebody has to say the obvious (Score:5, Insightful)
Pushback starts by not reading Slashdot.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
...and definitely by not replying to snarky comments.
Re:Somebody has to say the obvious (Score:5, Funny)
I never read TFA, so I'm already halfway there!
Disconnectedness (Score:3)
The real cost of this is people who allow constant connectivity to take over their whole lives. The most obvious example I can think of right now is the mainstream media, which fell in love with Twitter a long time ago. It shapes their thoughts and they can't even think any more without applying a hashtag. The idea that there might be a world beyond is a foreign, strange idea.
Others stay glued to their phones and computers all day long and blithely use slang and jargon from whatever site they use most frequently in public. Nobody else can understand them, they can't figure out that it only makes sense in context. Nope, the whole world uses that slang, and if you don't understand, then how can you really be a person?
Re: (Score:1)
Others stay glued to their phones and computers all day long and blithely use slang and jargon from whatever site they use most frequently in public. Nobody else can understand them, they can't figure out that it only makes sense in context. Nope, the whole world uses that slang, and if you don't understand, then how can you really be a person?
It's called a "dialect". We've been having this "problem" for hundreds of years now, people who live in a particular geographic area modify or create their own phrases and words to better describe the things that are most important to them in their community. It's why Americans have trouble understanding English colloquialisms and vice versa.
The thing that is new and interesting is that dialects are now forming in virtual locations as well as the traditional physical ones. This has created a large number of
Re: (Score:2)
Acronyms, initialisms and abbreviations have long been widely used and accepted in English. However, bad spelling, punctuation and capitalization do not a dialect make.
Re: (Score:2)
bad spelling...[does] not a dialect make.
Yeah, the Brits have been saying that about "American English" for years! ;)
Re: (Score:2)
It was an issue for me long before the Internet and smart phones. I'd read a word or name, understand it, remember how to spell it, but have no idea how to pronounce it. The other day my wife corrected my pronunciation of "truculent". Since writing has been invented, I think we should abandon verbal communication.
Re: (Score:2)
mainstream media, which fell in love with Twitter a long time ago
Twitter is the ultimate in vapid communication. If there is a difference between a tweet and a brain fart, I don't know what it is. I've never used Twitter, any more than I've ever looked at Facebook.
From a business point of view though, it's clearly a handicap that I can't imagine anybody ever wanting something like this.
Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.
-- H. L. Mencken
its just the mystery trend, ala Bobby Dylan (Score:4, Insightful)
I see no reason to chase the mystery trend any more now than I did when I started working with computers in 1962.
It is not "technology," nor is it being a "luddite;" it is just being sensible about your life.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
"Its alabaster wall is a prison in which the inmates scrawl their wishes and dreams, announce their likes and disklikes, and pass the time with games and witty reparte while a recumbent warden looks on intently."
It's called a "timeline" now. Get it right.
Re: (Score:2)
No no, I think he just described slashdot!
Re: (Score:2)
To brand it as 'pushback' is condescending and offensive as it implies im somehow inappropriately stubborn, or creating an inconvenience or disservice to others in the pursuit of things like consumer capitalism.
Among the people who are hooked on social media, all of the above. At least in my little corner of the world Facebook has become the de facto way to tell your friends what's happening or what you're doing, I've heard many times now "Well, I/he/she/they posted it on Facebook..." and implying that if you're not there, not reading their Facebook feed perhaps you don't care about your friends. Likewise, nobody expects to have a conversation to know the news anymore they expect it to come delivered to them in th
Re: (Score:2)
The reason it is easily confused with arrogance might have something to do with:
Among the people who are hooked on social media, all of the above
Likewise, nobody expects to have a conversation to know the news anymore they expect it to come delivered to them in their Facebook stream.
Either way there's a huge amount of peer pressure and if I was younger and more impressionable ...
The fact that you look down upon people as lazy and having less mental fortitude than you because you refuse to use facebook is pretty arrogant. Demanding your friends jump through hoops to keep you in the loop is arrogant (amoung a few other things). That you view people that use facebook as impressionable or someway less than you is arrogant.
Heaven forbid people want a convenient place to bring together their interpersonal r
Re: (Score:2)
And your own radiant humility is a thing of joy. Thank you for sharing it with us.
But it's the latest thing! Everyone knows it's the latest thing! How can you dare to diss the latest thing! You're insulting my tribe, you're attacking my core beliefs! How can such mean, recalcitrant people be allowed to exist! Why can't everyone be reasonable like me?
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure I follow your ramblings but you seem to be insinuating that pointing out arrogance is arrogant or somehow lacking in humility. Is that correct? Parent poster seemed confused as to why people might find their views arrogant. I pointed out why- it's because they are arrogant.
That last bit is very confusing. Am I to take you that you believe I follow your parody? Because I would point out that many people enjoy centralised social interaction like church, mall, pub, school, facebook, etc. and
Re: (Score:2)
A lot of people want that stuff to exist forever. They want to go through their history and relive the memories, see old photos and laugh at old jokes.
You have every right not to use facebook. You are not entitled to act all indignant because someone didn't know or forgot that you refuse to use the same means of communication as so many others.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, but they're you're wrong. I do in fact have the right to do that. I have the right to not like the Yankees, I have the right to wish everyone would shut up about Miley Cyrus, I have the right to regard facebook junkies as short-sighted, cliquieish morons, and I have the right to regard you as an insufferable
Re: (Score:2)
Well I guess technically you do have the right to act like an indignant brat in much the same way as you have the right to run around screaming to the world you have the mental development of a six year old. Not many would consider it wise, intelligent or rational, however.
So let me get this straight: you brazenly announce that everyone whom doesn't think like you is a short-sighted, "cluiquish" moron simply because they don't think like you and are not part of your little clique? Is it really me that "ca
Re: (Score:2)
After spending decades with compilers that have no tolerance for ambiguity, I've often wondered if software developers have a higher preference for the Oxford comma.
freaky... (Score:2)
wow...about 9 months ago after a particularly inane SN issue, I realized that this shit has gone from being interesting and useful to being mindless and high-schooly...in fact it all seems pretty much like an lifelong extension of high school nowadays.
I had no real clue that I wasn't basically the only one who was experiencing this, much less that the phenomenon has been labeled and studied already.
FTA..." Instead, the reasons were more emotionally based, with “dissatisfaction” — the thoug
Re: (Score:2)
ZFS is exciting and useful.
However, things like Instagram are pointless to me. When I take photos, I want them stored privately until I choose to deal with them, and if I want to apply filters, I will do so with a local program, or if I need detailed editing, I just pull up Photoshop and do it right.
What I'm tired of is being viewed as a product, so I keep my use of services that are ad-served to a minimum. I try to pay a sub for sites I use frequently (if they offer that), my primary E-mail provider is p
The Forgotten User (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Much of the new technology, especially when discussing the internet, is no longer about the user
Indeed, in fact The Trend is to make sure the user knows that they're Owned.
I feel like that every time I start up Firefox and it wants to "check my addons" (it invariably disables at least one, unasked), and everytime I try to check on the status of a downlaod and find that the behavior of my browser has silently changed -- I needed to read slashdot to find out they were going to make it harder to shut of
Re: (Score:2)
Hello citizen, your phone appears to be off. Let us fix that for you...
Re: (Score:1)
FTFY
I recently lost my cell phone (Score:3)
It was nice, 5 days of no interruptions and the feeling i was back in charge of my life. I also try to vacation in places where there is no coverage ergo no intrusions. If cell phones wouldn't be so useful for emergencies and job searches I would ditch them in a minute.
Re: (Score:2)
I also find these new phones with the fixed batteries and no off switch a bit irritating. I've heard rumors that if you shop around you can find some phones that can be turned off. If all else fails, put it in the microwave. Blocks the signal nicely. You owe me a six pack for all the vacation money I just saved you.
And which magical "no off switch" devices are these?
Pushback? It's always been there. (Score:4, Interesting)
I'll open by repeating what others have said: this isn't being a Luddite, not by any means. If there's a tech toy / tool that makes my life easier, I'm all for it, whether it be physical goods or software.
But, similar to the "i love me" websites of the early days of the web, Twitter and Facebook, to me, are just another kind of dancing cat / hamster / chilli pepper: Utterly superfluous. I actively reject them, I have no FB or TW account. I don't want to know what my friends are doing 24x7. I don't want the world to know that I just had six blonde Oreos and two cups of non-name-brand non-trendy coffee that is still awesome due to careful preparation.
I'm sure this view is incomprehensible to some. To them I say: It's ok to sell yourself, if you don't mind being treated like a whore -- kept around only as long as you have value to the people "giving" you the serivce for "free." Myself, I'll make "them" work for their money: If you want my $, then you should make things that interest me. I'll hear about them, ads or no ads.
But to those making targeting decisions / algorithms with data obtained from my mere mousing around, I say "fuck off." I took off your logo'd t-shirts and polo shirts a decade ago. I stopped listening to your drivel on TV a decade ago. I block ads and do a few other interesting things, just so I don't have to see / hear your unrelenting patter.
Maybe y'all should look at it from that point of view: To them, your body is a billboard to display their ads, you are data, not a person. Deny them the use of your body, deny them the use of your data. Most everytime you click somewhere you just either made someone a fraction of a penny, or gave data to someone who will eventually make a mint aggregating your data to a massive data mine from which they "target" ads (or lately, as it turns out, "target" people directly)
Resistance to always-on isn't being a luddite, it's about being yourself, and keeping that self as private as possible. It's about not being a slave to the phone, but having the phone as a toy / tool: there for your use or amusement, not the other way 'round.
Re: (Score:2)
Resistance isn't just being a luddite, it is managing the technology, and not having it manage you. It is 100% healthy for the phone to be powered off at times.
It is an addiction for some. When RV-ing, a RV park could be perfect in every way, but if they don't have a good Wi-Fi signal, they get one-starred. Sometimes it is good to leave the devices in the car and actually do something that doesn't consist of using a computer HID, be it a touch screen, mouse, keyboard, or Siri.
My wife and I have zero-tech times (Score:3, Insightful)
My wife and I set aside several hours every day as "zero-technology" times. We use this time to read, play with our dogs, have meals together, work on hobbies, and hang out with friends and neighbors.
Everything gets powered down - no phones ringing, no "notification" sounds, no nothing. It's pretty amazing how it feels to be disconnected - like the old days before constant connection invaded and took over society.
The most annoying part are the phone calls about "OMG where have you been!?!?!?" that inevitably come after things get turned back on.
Re: (Score:1)
That's bad if there is an emergency and someone needs to contact you.
I was almost out of gas the other night and for some reason my card didn't work. Luckily I was able to contact someone even though it was late.
It was an emergency that you were almost out of gas?
Somehow the human race survived these things before cell phones.
Re: (Score:1)
I am the last person anyone should be calling in an emergency. I am not a firefighter, paramedic, doctor, or anything else that would be helpful in an emergency. There is no emergency out there that anyone should be calling me about.
Then again, as a society, we seem to have changed the definition of "emergency" to "anything that is the slightest bit inconvenient."
As another poster said, the human race survived thousands of years without being constantly connected to each other.
Different hobby (Score:2)
dug (Score:2)
So you're saying "Everything in moderation"? Gee, let me write that down somewhere...
I don't see (Score:1)
How some people get anything done, I know several people I can't have a 5 minute conversation with them with out there phone chirping, and that chirp, it's like Pavlov's bell, or perhaps a Pavlovian Gong be cause *nothing* is more important than the phone.
The worst part of this is when my phone chirps in the car I have this immediate desire to answer right then, really took me a while to learn how to just relax and wait.
It's odd but sometimes people that are always on their phones seem like the phones bitch
The bit about "connection" in the article (Score:2)
The part about feeling a loss of "connection" in the article intrigued me. I've been struggling to understand the underlying cause behind behavior like demanding organic food over GMO's, urban chicken farming, environmentalism, being a boho, etc. To me, the term "pushback" could be applied to all the environmentalist/vegetarian-vegan/bicycle culture/anti-GMO/anti-globalism movements. Every cause that pushes back against modern society, but why? What is the underlying cause of that kind of rebellion? What if
Re: (Score:1)
As a crunchy granola type, let me help you.
Organic food tends to be a (sometimes mistaken) attempt to eat healthier. Bike culture, at least the dominant strain that I see, tends to be about sustainability, health, convenience and/or cost. Environmentalism tends to stem from concerns about sustainability or preserving what we have. Anti-GMO tends to stem from distrust of science or of big corp. Vegetarian/vegan tends to be people who like animals too much to eat them (with some "health" vegs also existin
I've been ... (Score:3)
I push back because... (Score:2)
-- I don't like to be leashed. I don't even like my cell phone. I find calling someone on a phone to be very demanding. When I hear the phone ring, I hear "TALK TO ME, TALK TO ME!" which would be appropriate if it extremely important to do so, but it rarely is. I prefer a text message to which I can respond when the time is appropriate or an email through which I can convey well-thought-out messages.
-- I am not an exhibitionist. I value my privacy and, more accurately, the intimacy of being able to be vulne
Re: (Score:2)
-- I don't like to be leashed. I don't even like my cell phone. I find calling someone on a phone to be very demanding. When I hear the phone ring, I hear "TALK TO ME, TALK TO ME!" which would be appropriate if it extremely important to do so, but it rarely is. I prefer a text message to which I can respond when the time is appropriate or an email through which I can convey well-thought-out messages.
A lot of people agree with you there. I'm 23 and in the past year I think there's probably only been one person my age or younger that I talked to on the phone -- that being my (now ex) girlfriend. People older than me though seem to much prefer phone calls. I think they're the single most obnoxious communication method.
-- I don't like the focus of the smartphone. The smartphone, in my opinion, should be first and foremost a phone. With the billions of dollars put into R&D and infrastructure, one would think that a cell phone call would be at least as clear as talking on an intercom... but that's far from the case. Instead, cellular voice tech has taken back seat to video media quality so that you can watch really high quality Netflix videos in your palm, but you can't talk to someone in the same confidence of communication that could by using a 40-year old telephone.
Anything that discourages voice calls is AWESOME as far as I'm concerned!
-- I am not a voyeur. I am not particularly interested by the day-to-day happenings of people. I usually don't care about what you ate for lunch unless you've eaten for a week at a restaurant that's new to you and you think that I would personally enjoy eating at the same place. And if that's the case, send me a message-- don't tag me on your Facebook wall so that I have to visit the shrine you've built to your exhibitionist self.
As you have discovered, social networking sites are only as good as your social network. If the content is crap, it p
Not against technology (Score:2)
There are appropriate times to turn off (Score:2)
I routinely turn off my gadgets when I'm spending time with my family. I don't want to be distracted during the small amount of time my work schedule allows me to focus on non-work life. When I'm with my family, the only people who legitimately need to be able to reach me in an emergency are right there with me.
Sorry I took so long to comment on this (Score:1)
I had my iPhone on Airplane mode so nobody would bug me while I was studying. ... now, what were you saying?
Does it count...? (Score:2)
Does it count that I still rock a katana flip phone (much to the annoyance of my carrier)? I mean that seems to cut down on the majority of bloops and beeps when I am not on a PC.. I think I am pushing back!