Video It's Not a Car, It's a Self-Balancing Electric Motorcycle (Video) 218
Timothy Lord: James, we are standing next to this interesting looking vehicle here. Can you tell us a little bit about what it is?
Ryan James: Sure. So we are Lit Motors. We are a start-up electric vehicle company based here in San Francisco. This is our main vehicle, currently codenamed C-1. It is a self-balancing two-wheeled vehicle. It brings together the romance and the efficiency of a motorcycle with the safety and the comfort of a car.
Tim: Let’s talk about the hardware that’s in this vehicle here, what do you have starting from the front and kind of going back for the control electronics?
Ryan: Well, we’ve got a lot of both custom and off-the-shelf parts. This one is an earlier very low budget proof of concept prototype. So a lot of the components that are here doesn’t actually reflect what will be in the production vehicle. Some of it had to be compromised for lower price and some of it we just kind of figured out on the fly. But this is a functional proof of concept prototype—this one actually does balance at 0 miles an hour and drives up to about 20, 25 miles an hour.
Tim: What do we have as far as driving parts?
Ryan: We’ve got an off-the-shelf motorcycle wheel—it’s actually a rear wheel—and then a center-hub steering system. All of the linkages here are totally custom. The production model will have similar linkages, but made in a much more robust manner. The shell is actually steel, AKDQ steel, the same as pretty much every car on the road, and we hand-formed that. Just the start-up costs for stamps and dies, to try to stamp this out, would have been about $3 million. Rather than spend that, we spent about $10,000 and bought an English wheel, a shrinker, a stretcher, and a bead roller and just made it all ourselves—it was totally insane! It took about a month and a half of complete insanity. But we made it happen and we ended up with a hand-formed steel body.
Tim: Did you look at wind tunnel testing to arrive at the shape?
Ryan: Not yet. That is actually something that we are working on right now, quite a bit of virtual wind tunnel testing.
Tim: Let’s look at the inside of it.
Ryan: Sure. So the interior on this prototype is extremely rough. This was made to be much more of an engineering prototype, but you can see the custom carbon fiber seat that we made. We needed a seat and carbon is actually a pretty easy material to work with so you might as well make it out of that—everyone loves carbon. Off-the-shelf steering wheel, somewhat custom steering system, but the steering system is not indicative at all of what the production one will be—this one is purely mechanical. Production will be a drive-by-wire steering system which is enabled by our stabilization technology that I’ll come back to in a minute. The rest of the dash is just sort of for looks—it doesn’t really do all that much. We’ve got batteries along the floor, so lower center of gravity from that. And just behind the batteries you can see the first part of our core technology. We’ve got this right here and an identical one just behind it--these are a pair of control moment gyroscopes that form our gyroscopic stabilization system. We’re using two gyros, counter-rotating, counter-processing on actuated gimbals. That is how the vehicle is able to stay in control of its tilt or lean at all times. So what that means for the driver is: You’re in a fully enclosed vehicle, you can’t put your legs down or anything like that. You pull up to a red light and it just stands there. There are no legs that come down, nothing like that—it just stays upright. As if you’re on four wheels. That same system is actually powerful enough that in most collisions the vehicle will also stay upright. So if you’re driving along and somebody T-bones you, rather than fall over or roll or flip like a motorcycle would, it will actually stay upright and slide sideways. Just like a four-wheeled car does.
And then that also enables a drive-by-wire steering system. That means that the driver doesn’t need to know anything about how motorcycles handle, how they work, anything like that. Anyone can drive it, like if you can drive a car you can drive our vehicle. So although the vehicle has the turning dynamics of a motorcycle that is to say, it leans into turns, the vehicle takes care of all of that for you—it’s smart enough to know as you turn the steering wheel right what that means at 5 miles an hour, what that means at 50 miles an hour, what that means at 100 miles an hour. And it does all that for you.
Tim: What sort of computing power has it got in here?
Ryan: On this prototype, off-the-shelf stuff. We’re running in a LabVIEW environment. We have since moved beyond that and everything in the prototype that we’re building right now and for the production vehicle, it’s all custom boards that we designed and had fabricated, custom OS that we made ourselves and created ourselves. Yeah, everything is totally custom now.
Tim: Let’s talk about timelines, availability and price.
Ryan: Sure. So the price is going to be approximately $24,000. We are actually taking pre-orders right now on our website, litmotors.com/reserve. We’ve been taking pre-orders for the past two and a half years. We’re seeing a really, really strong response with that—we’ve sold many hundreds of pre-orders so far. And production, we are aiming to begin production by the end of this year, by the end of 2014.
Tim: One more thing, a lot of people with any kind of alternative vehicles these days, electric in particular, have, I think, a very legitimate fear of running out of fuel.
Ryan: Sure.
Tim: Talk about the batteries you’ve got in here—how long do they last?
Ryan: Yeah, sure. So some basics specs for this, these, of course, we’re still prototyping so these are best estimates: Top speed should be over 100 miles an hour, so you can take it anywhere, you can take it on the freeway. The range will be up to about 200 miles per charge. What’s really interesting about that is we’re doing that on a much smaller battery pack than you would expect. Because it’s such a small lightweight vehicle and so aerodynamic. For a comparison, a Tesla Model S the 60-kwh version of that gets a 200-mile range—we’re able to get that same range on a 10-kwh hour battery pack—so one sixth of the size.
Tim: Now you don’t have much room at the moment for groceries or a passenger back here. What’s the status of all this electronics that is going to be miniaturized quite a bit?
Ryan: Exactly, yes. So like I said this stuff is all off-the-shelf. This is oriented in here for ease of work rather than for any kind of compact package. The custom boards and electronics and everything that we’ve made thus far have already shrunk that down to about a quarter of this size. In the production vehicle, this back space will be completely open. So there actually will be room for a passenger, there will be an actual seat back here for a passenger. Or for about as much stuff as you can carry on a plane.
No (Score:2, Insightful)
It's not a car.
That's a cage. That's a car.
Re: (Score:3)
which is easier on the driver's legs than putting a foot down the way you do while riding most motorcycles.
First all motorcycles. Not most. Second. Who the hell ever pulled up to a stop while riding and thought "Fuck. I have to put my feet down again!"?
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:No (Score:5, Interesting)
Not only is it NOT A MOTORCYCLE! the person talking about it has never ridden a motorcycle.
which is easier on the driver's legs than putting a foot down the way you do while riding most motorcycles.
First all motorcycles. Not most. Second. Who the hell ever pulled up to a stop while riding and thought "Fuck. I have to put my feet down again!"?
Not all. Like it or not "trikes [harley-davidson.com]" are considered and labelled motorcycles. As such, your statement is not accurate.
Second, I know a number of people who dislike it due to weaker legs/ankle injuries/etc (and thus, are attracted moreso to the trikes, which, for the record, I HATE).
Re:Trikes (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
All motorcycle riders know that is not a motorcycle. It is in fact a 2 wheeled car. The DMV can lic it however they want though.
Re: (Score:2)
Again, every AC post I've ever seen has been 100% wrong on facts.
Re: (Score:3)
You people have ruined this site.
I posted the truth. You lied. Yes, I ruined the Internet by calling out a lying AC on their lying lies.
Re: (Score:3)
Not only is it NOT A MOTORCYCLE! the person talking about it has never ridden a motorcycle.
It is a motorcycle if the DMV* says it is.
*... or whatever government agency is responsible for vehicle licensing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
California Vehicle Code Section 400 and 405.
400. (a) A "motorcycle" is a motor vehicle having a seat or saddle
for the use of the rider, designed to travel on not more than three
wheels in contact with the ground.
https://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d01/vc400.htm [ca.gov]
405. A "motor-driven cycle" is any motorcycle with a motor that displaces less than 150 cubic centimeters.
https://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d01/vc405.htm [ca.gov]
Unless the law is amended, this thing is a "motor-driven cycle" and will require an M1 license.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: I have to put my feet down again! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's actually not even possible to do that, because if you shift your body to the left, the motorcycle will tilt to the right and the center of mass will be on the exact same vertical line as it was before, exactly above the wheels. You balance by steering. If you get a crosswind from the left, you'll steer to the right slightly, moving the center of mass a tad to the right, but the point of contact with t
Re: (Score:2)
What is going on with the "Strange" way a motorcycle steers is gyroscopic precession [wikipedia.org].
That big spinning wheel in the front of the motorcycle is acting as a gyroscope.
Re: (Score:2)
Also, the gyroscopic precession effect plays a large part with big wheeled motorcycles, but plays little to no part on mo
Re: (Score:2)
and countersteering (Score:3)
Don't forget countersteering too!
Re: (Score:2)
Why? (Score:3)
The gyos add complexity, and dropping a third wheel doesn't save that much space. See Riley's classic http://www.amazon.com/Alternat... [amazon.com] or just search for some of his existing designs.
As a previous owner of a Sparrow, I wish these guys luck. Unfortunately, I need a three seater ...my trusty (actual) motorcycle sits idle since I've too often got to worry about hauling two kids these days.
Re:Why? (Score:4, Interesting)
The gyos add complexity, and dropping a third wheel doesn't save that much space. ...
You must be thinking of something like the Peraves MonoTracer [wordpress.com], but my impression of it is that it takes some getting used to. The C-1 will be much, much easier to deal with (not to mention better looking). As for the added complexity, the gyos make it easier to drive and don't make it prohibitively expensive ($24k, v. $104k for the monotracer), so who cares? As long as it works.
Re: (Score:3)
The gyos add complexity, and dropping a third wheel doesn't save that much space.
The gyro might add more stability than a third wheel.
Re: (Score:3)
The gyos add complexity, and dropping a third wheel doesn't save that much space.
The gyro might add more stability than a third wheel.
It almost certainly does. Three-wheelers are notoriously unstable [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Reminds me of the Carver and the Venture One:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C... [wikipedia.org]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
But those tilted with the turn, I wonder how it feels taking a turn when the gyros want to keep this thing upright?
Not as original as they claim (Score:3)
They are not as original as they claim. There was a similar concept in kit car magazines in the 90's. There is a Youtube video (Yes, it is Flash but so is the video on the story)- https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Not as original as they claim (Score:5, Interesting)
They are not as original as they claim. There was a similar concept in kit car magazines in the 90's. There is a Youtube video (Yes, it is Flash but so is the video on the story)- https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Yes, and over 30 years before that there was the Ford Gyron [wikipedia.org], which was much more like a car, and even it was not original. However, nothing like that has ever made it into production. If the C-1 does, it'll be the first gyroscopically stabilized vehicle ever to make it to market. And I figure it has a good chance of success, because $24k is hardly unaffordable.
Re:Not as original as they claim (Score:5, Interesting)
Shilovsky's Gyrocar 1914 ftw.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G... [wikipedia.org]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
There is a Youtube video (Yes, it is Flash
It's 2014. You can disable your Flash plugin and it plays just fine.
My next car (Score:2)
I don't need a new car, and probably won't for a few years. But this will be my next car when I'm ready to buy one.
Video has no action (Score:2)
I wish I didn't wait through the advert just to hear the guy speak. What's the point of a video of a vehicle that's not moving?
Déjà vu? (Score:2)
I think I've seen that design somewhere before, but I can't remember where/when.
Re: (Score:2)
Top Gear. Can't remember if it was the Carver or the EcoBike, but that's where I saw it.
Hard to forget the image of Jeremy Clarkson stuffing himself in that tiny, tiny back seat...
Re: (Score:3)
Are you remembering this?
http://cobbsblog.com/gyro/gyro... [cobbsblog.com]
(I remember reading that Science & Mechanics article in the day.)
Suspension? (Score:2)
The wheels are very close to the chassis. I wonder whether the vehicle has any suspension at all.
Re: (Score:2)
The wheels are very close to the chassis. I wonder whether the vehicle has any suspension at all.
Yeah, I saw that too. But, remember that the one in the video is only a prototype. I have little doubt that any production version will have more suspension travel. For example, I suspect that the latter will have slightly smaller wheels.
Self-balancing -- finally! (Score:3)
self balancing when stopped (Score:3)
The key to this one is that you don't need to put feet down when stopped, so it can be recumbant and fully-enclosed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
On a side note, the video mentions the final version will be drive-by-wire. In theory, such a vehicle could be fully automated, like those google cars.
Re: (Score:3)
This is incredible, really: motorcycles are much easier to balance at higher speeds. They made the most difficult part of riding a bike trivial.
I'm curious how much mass they had to add to the bike to make it self-balance like that, and how well it balance with a 200lb rider (driver? I guess it'd be driver, since it's got a cage). And on corners, as well - presumably the gyros/inclinometer or whatever feeds the steering data.
I want one of these without the cage and a gas motor, personally. 50mpg+ for a road
I prefer more tires for more contact with the road (Score:2)
I like it when my brakes stop me before I slide into something.
(I ride a motorcycle, I find riding in the rain to be unpleasant for a variety of reasons)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Riding in the raid is a state of mind. It helps if you have a warm shower and dry towels at the end of your ride.
If it's cold or torrential, that's a different story.
Re: (Score:2)
raid->rain
2 wheels allows them to avoid a tonne of regs (Score:3)
4 wheels is a car. Cars have a metric shit-load of regulations associated with production, testing, warranty. Many of these are specific barriers to entry to prevent new car companies from entering the market.
2 wheels allows them to avoid all that and build something that is ultra-light and efficient and can be brought to market. Bravo for them.
Re:I prefer more tires for more contact with the r (Score:4, Insightful)
I like it when my brakes stop me before I slide into something.
Motorcycles are actually better at stopping than most cars. Ever heard of a stopee?
(I ride a motorcycle, I find riding in the rain to be unpleasant for a variety of reasons)
Yes, because if you manage to get your motorcycle's front wheel to slide, it usually means you fall will over. But, that's exactly one of the reasons why the C-1 is so cool: it's gyroscopically stabilized, so if it slides for whatever reason it won't fall over. In that respect it will behave much like a car.
This is Awesome (Score:2)
Once the electronics are miniaturized (Score:3)
Wonder if you could have a two-seater?
Yes. The video shows a prototype with a rack of control circuitry behind the driver's seat, but near the end he mentions how they've miniaturized the circuitry enough since this prototype was built to replace it with a second seat.
Re: (Score:2)
It is a two-seater, if you can bring yourself to call that tiny bit of fabric in the back a "seat."
Re: (Score:2)
Does it come with air conditioning? Wonder if you could have a two-seater?
See this FAQ [litmotors.com]. I was told a while back that the C-1 will also include air-conditioning, cruise-control, and even a head-up display (HUD), but I wonder how much of that will make it into the final production version. However, they also wanted to make many of its parts upgradeable, so perhaps it will be possible to add some of those bells and whistles later on. It will be possible to take a passenger, but they say you will only want to do that for relatively short distances (whether this is due to excessive ba
Falls over when it runs out of juice? (Score:2)
So, if you take the thing to its limits, you'd better remember to get out before the battery completely dies. Because when the gyro stops turning, you can't put your feet down (since there is a vehicle body in the way) to keep the thing from falling over.
Not that I think the idea is a bad one in general.
I saw a Kickstarter campaign just the other day using this concept to replace training wheels in kids' bikes (a gyro goes in the front wheel). Personally, I think it was a better idea in the kids' bike tha
Re: (Score:2)
If you run out of battery juice the vehicle is likely to stop moving forward long before the gyro's spin down all the way. Besides which it would be trivially easy for them to implement a kill switch for motor power at some low battery level to make sure you still had enough power for control mechanisms and such.
wow....200 whole orders??? (Score:4, Interesting)
200 pre orders?? Screw that. The Elio has 20,000 pre-orders, and it's not built yet, has a nice low (projected) cost of $6800 and gets 84mpg. And I'd much rather have the Elio than the C-1 (although for a brief moment, I considered the C-1)... But for the long range I need, the Elio fits my requirements better.
http://www.eliomotors.com/ [eliomotors.com]
Re:wow....200 whole orders??? (Score:4, Informative)
they all have same thing in common - they dont exist, but take preorders
Re: (Score:2)
200 pre orders?? Screw that. The Elio has 20,000 pre-orders, and it's not built yet, has a nice low (projected) cost of $6800 and gets 84mpg. And I'd much rather have the Elio than the C-1 (although for a brief moment, I considered the C-1)... But for the long range I need, the Elio fits my requirements better. http://www.eliomotors.com/ [eliomotors.com]
An interesting concept, and at less than a 3rd of the price of a C-1 I can see why this is a popular idea. However, the Elio is still a gasoline-driven vehicle and even if it were possible to get 85 MPG all the time, that would not even be twice as efficient as my old Honda Civic and nowhere near as efficient as will be possible with the C-1 (0.6 cents per mile). In fact, the C-1 is so much more efficient, that here in the Netherlands it could mean saving the cost difference between an Elio and a C-1 within
Turns? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I thought about that too but I bet that they slow the gyros as the vehicle speed increases.
Re: (Score:3)
1 year later (Score:2)
and its still neither a motor cycle nor a car
slashdot your number one source to find out what was new and cool last year
smoke and mirrors (Score:2)
How about a BICYCLE with this tech? (Score:3, Interesting)
The gyro would be a flywheel to store some of the power of downhills and flat pedaling, to be expended as a booster on uphills. And because a storage flywheel of this kind would at most times be at maximum speed at signals and stops on the flat, cyclists would no longer have an excuse to not follow traffic controls. Your feet could remain firmly in the pedal clips when you stop at the Stop sign.
huh? (Score:3)
Seems like overkill to me. I have ridden some good sized bikes and, I mean, this was an issue for a little while, until I realized that I didn't really need to hold up that much weight. You know the bike, it has this big wheels....they can take the bike's weight, leave it on them. You don't need to take that much weight on your leg to keep stable.
Once in motion, the bike has two big rubber flywheels that do a great job of "self balancing". Overall I think the MSF course is probably a better buy than a bike with an extra flywheel. I actually learned on my own in a parking lot before I took the course and had to break myself of a bunch of bad habits, including how I sat at a stop.
recumbant and enclosed (Score:3)
Being able to put feet down requires a more upright and open riding position.
Removing that requirement enables a recumbant seating position (for better aerodynamics) and a fully-enclosed cabin. Making the cabin fully-enclosed allows for better protection from weather, better soundproofing, air conditioning, etc.
FF Motorcycle Solved? (Score:3)
The main problem with attempts made to date has been the one of staying upright when stationary. Some designs had open sides so you could use your feet, but that obviously compromises bad-weather comfort. Others have pop-down stabilisers but that's inelegant and difficult to make work at the right moment. If this has solved that problem and truly allows an enclosed cabin, they might have actually finally done it. I think this could well have a significant market, but probably not one with existing die-hard motorcyclists. I like it; it's pretty cool and I wish them well.
While batteries are at the energy densities they are, this size of vehicle makes a lot more sense than an SUV-sized behemoth. I've done the maths, and excellent performance and range are perfectly doable with LiPO4 technology, 20kW of power at a gross vehicle weight of 400kg. I think it definitely has a future.
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know - I think I might prefer to pay the energy penalty for the (now defunct) Aptera two seater and avoid the whole gyro thing.
Re:Why does this make me think of... (Score:5, Insightful)
Because the internet has programmed us to communicate entirely by pop culture references and oblique sexualized insults, leaving no room for actual critical examination of anything.
Re:Why does this make me think of... (Score:4, Funny)
Looks like Kyle has some sand in his vagina again.
Re: (Score:2)
Martok with his mind blown.
It never occurred to me that that episode was a dire prediction of our future.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Guaranteed Death (Score:5, Insightful)
Guaranteed death in a car accident -- what's not to love?
That doesn't stop all the motorcyclists and bicyclists out there; they have even less protection than this offers.
Plus in this you don't have to wear stifling leather clothing, and you can drive in the rain without getting soaked.
I think there is a market for this.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'll give up wind in my hair to avoid gravel in my scalp but goddamn, more places need to allow lane splitting.
Re: (Score:2)
No. It's dangerous both to the rider and everyone around them.
Don't be so impatient.
OR...
Get a dual-sport/enduro bike. That way you can go off-road and not put the safety of other motorists at risk.
Re: (Score:2)
That only applies to states that allow both lane splitting and don't have helmet laws. I'm not even sure if California applies.
You are correct. CA is the only State that allows lane sharing (splitting - but the CHP prefers sharing), and it requires helmets. All other States - including the no-helmet ones - ban lane splitting.
Re: (Score:2)
And the stifling leather clothing.
Re:Guaranteed Death (Score:5, Insightful)
the appeal behind motorcycles is gotta go fast
There are 200,000 Harley buyers a year that disagree with you.
Re: (Score:2)
The leather is half the fun, baby.
Re: (Score:2)
Plus in this you don't have to wear stifling leather clothing, and you can drive in the rain without getting soaked.
I think there is a market for this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_(automobile)
And it doesn't require touchy gyros, can fit a passenger, and a little bit of cargo.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, and don't forget that "loud pipes save lives" around typical inattentive drivers. This thing is silent but deadly.
whatever. (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, and don't forget that "loud pipes save lives" around typical inattentive drivers. This thing is silent but deadly.
A coworker of mine thought that.
He was STILL clobbered because of a dingbat driving her well sound insulated white SUV - and drove off; never to be caught for hit and run.
He's pretty screwed up but can still program.
As for me, walking on the side fo the road to have some narcissistic assholes cruising along at 10MPH - twisting their throttle - VROOM! VROOM! VROOM! - with their fat guts and gray hair hanging out of their over priced leather outfits, just has me putting my fingers in my ears, shaking my head
Re: (Score:3)
Guaranteed death in a car accident -- what's not to love?
That's an unfair comparison. You're thinking of it as a very, very small car, which in the case of a collision involving almost any four-wheeled vehicle can never offer its occupants an equal chance of emerging unscathed (the reason why a friend of mine always preferred that his wife drive a Cadillac). Instead, think of the C-1 as a greener, much safer and more comfortable version of a motorcycle that also has a cost per mile of 0.6 cents.
Re: (Score:2)
Guaranteed death in a car accident -- what's not to love?
Three major wrecks while riding a motorcycle. I still ride, and I am apparently alive as well. However, if you have have figured out a way to get out of this life without dieing, I am all ears!
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
According to these stats [tc.gc.ca] for Canada in 2009, car drivers suffered about 1173 deaths and 5393 serious injuries while among motorcyclists there were 194 deaths and 1271 serious injuries. If you add these up and look at the percentage chance of death if involved in a collision severe enough for serious injuries than you'll see an 18% chance of death for the car drivers and 13% for the motorcyclists.
Care to share your source for "guaranteed death"?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Let's be honest here. Would you like to compare % death rates for MILES TRAVELED instead? I'm a motorcyclist. It's dangerous out there. And how long is the riding season in most of Canada, 5 months?
It's not guaranteed death by any means. But it's dangerous.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You have made a false claim because you are terrible at statistics. Deaths divided by serious injuries is a nonsensical metric.
Hint: Go find the total miles driven in cars and motorcycles.
Lies, damn lies. and statistics. (Score:4, Informative)
According to these stats for Canada in 2009, car drivers suffered about 1173 deaths and 5393 serious injuries while among motorcyclists there were 194 deaths and 1271 serious injuries.
According to the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), in 2006, 13.10 cars out of 100,000 ended up in fatal crashes. The rate for motorcycles is 72.34 per 100,000 registered motorcycles. Motorcycles also have a higher fatality rate per unit of distance travelled when compared with automobiles. Per vehicle mile traveled, motorcyclists' risk of a fatal crash is 35 times greater than a passenger car. In 2004, figures from the UK Department for Transport indicated that motorcycles have 16 times the rate of serious injuries compared to cars, and double the rate of bicycles.
Additional data from the United States reveals that there are over four million motorcycles registered in the United States. Motorcycle fatalities represent approximately five percent of all highway fatalities each year, yet motorcycles represent just two percent of all registered vehicles in the United States. One of the main reasons motorcyclists are killed in crashes is because the motorcycle itself provides virtually no protection in a crash. For example, approximately 80 percent of reported motorcycle crashes result in injury or death; a comparable figure for automobiles is about 20 percent.
Motorcycle safety [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Cup holders.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Gyrocars are nothing new. ... What makes this one so special and why do they think this gyrocar will succeed where others have failed?
Thanks to the fact that the C-1 is electric and makes use of modern computer technology, it's simpler, lighter and cheaper to produce than its conceptual predecessors and has the potential to be much more reliable. Oh, and a gyrocar in production... that would be something new.
Re: (Score:2)
Sad as it may be, I think websites that lack flash videos are the ones sliding into irrelevance. Forget using words to convey an idea - even still images are passé - if it can be said it can be shown in a video or animated gif. At least that's how it feels on 90% of the web.
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously? Flash is dying if not already dead. HTML5 supports video, so every site potentially has video.
Re: (Score:3)
Here, let me read the FAQ for you:
Q: Didn't BMW already use the name 'C-1'?
A: Yep, they did (as did Chevrolet, Citroën, and a variety of others). 'C-1' is just a working name for our vehicle; it will change as we near production.