Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Robotics Technology

Pacific Northwest Lab's Sensor-Packed Fish Gauges Hydropower Facilities 28

coondoggie writes Sometimes it takes a fish to do a man's job. Scientists at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory have developed a sensor-laden, synthetic Sensor Fish that can be used to swim into hydropower facilities like dams to evaluate structures and other environmental systems. Using Sensor Fish, PNNL researchers say they can measure the various forces juvenile salmon experience as they pass through dams. The Sensor Fish initially was designed to evaluate dams equipped with a common type of turbine along the Columbia River, the Kaplan turbine. The pressure change, they found, is akin to traveling from sea level to the top of Mount Everest in blink of an eye.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Pacific Northwest Lab's Sensor-Packed Fish Gauges Hydropower Facilities

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 05, 2014 @02:07PM (#48319873)

    As a result, I have a very low opinion of their competencies. Even if RoboFish (TM) does provide accurate data, I have no reason to expect it will be analyzed correctly.

    As for the bit about the pressure change, they observed a change of roughly half an atmosphere in a (distance not disclosed) of (direction not disclosed) swimming. For those of you who swim, that is very similar to the difference from descending 5 feet. For some creatures, that would be fairly dramatic. For most sea-life, that's an evasive maneuver.

    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward

      From my scuba diving days, I recall that 1ATM of pressure is 33 feet in depth rather than 10.

    • by Fallon ( 33975 ) <Devin DOT Noel AT Gmail DOT com> on Wednesday November 05, 2014 @02:48PM (#48320167) Homepage Journal

      16.5 feet, not 5.

      You gain 1 atmosphere of pressure for every 33 feet (10 meters) you go down. That's nothing for scuba diving or free diving. Heck probably more common than not for anybody going off the high dive at a pool to hit 16.5 feet in the blink of an eye.

      • by Anonymous Coward

        Looks like a unit selection error. Probably safe to assume that it should've been 5 meters in the root post.

  • um (Score:5, Informative)

    by Charliemopps ( 1157495 ) on Wednesday November 05, 2014 @02:20PM (#48319969)

    So for those that don't measure pressure in Mt Everest's... It's 33% of sea level. So the turbine cuts the water pressure to 1/3rd

  • There's something fishy About it.
  • From the early days of the WWW... :-)

    http://www.tazerfish.com/ [tazerfish.com]

  • No problemo (Score:4, Funny)

    by ArcadeMan ( 2766669 ) on Wednesday November 05, 2014 @02:26PM (#48320015)

    The pressure change, they found, is akin to traveling from sea level to the top of Mount Everest in blink of an eye.

    That's not a problem since fishes can't blink.

  • So its like coming from 33ft deep to 11 feet deep water pressure in the blink of an eye. Any ichthyologists here? Is this a problem?
    • I haven't read the original article, but I'll display my ignorance anyway. There are two ways one could interpret moving from sea level to the top of Mt. Everest: as an absolute pressure change, or as a relative change. The atmospheric pressure at the top of Mt Everest is 33% of sea level (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Everest#Death_zone), which is a difference of 14.7psi*0.67 = 9.85psi. At the same time it's a relative change of 67%, i.e. the pressure at the top of Everest is 33% of the pressure at

  • Can't get much power without it.

    Wait a minute... Wouldn't they have known the pressure differential across various parts when they designed the dam? And like one of the above replies, the numbers mean little by themselves. You have to put bluetooth electrodes on the salmon's tiny little brain to see what he thinks about the dam while going through it and trying not being turned into chum.

  • At least it's not the force required to throw them to the top of Everest in the blink of an eye. Basically it's all relative.
  • I live in that neighborhood (PNNL is here); the "poor" Salmon folks are trying to break down a few damns, Bush
    even made a trip out to look at "Ice harbor" dam.

    The fish ladders allow the Salmon to migrate and been the main concern, this news is just bad.

    The Dams need to stay for the cheap energy they produce, and they are good places to visit at
    times (fish viewing window) to see the migration; a few fish to lots. 9-11 they blocked access to
    the viewing area, but are open now and a good place to take the kids.

    • The fish ladders allow the Salmon to migrate and been the main concern, this news is just bad.

      Except [sciencemag.org] they [scientificamerican.com] don't [internationalrivers.org]. That's the problem [yale.edu].
    • I for one hate the idea of having the snake and columbia rivers being navigable by anything larger than tom sawyer's raft. All that recreation, shipping, irrigation, and flood control stuff is just dumb.

    • by PPH ( 736903 )

      The Elwha dam removal [nps.gov] project may turn out to be a shot in the foot of all the fish people.

      For years, we have all been taught, and regulations and law have been made based upon the 'science' that salmon are unique to individual tributaries. In fact, the claim is that each local population is a unique species (because language in Endangered Species Act is set up to protect unique species). But then the Elwha dams came down. And the newly wild stretches of river are being repopulated by salmon. Not the same

  • "Users interact with the Sensor Fish via communication software developed at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, with the serial port configured to 921.6 kbps, 8 data bits, 1 start bit, 1 stop bit, and no parity."

    While I shouldn't complain about news reports that include specs, I'm not sure if I need every last detail into start / stop bits and parity of the communications protocol....

    • Great, this is like the worst parts of "Runaway" and "Leonard Part 6". We're looking at weapons-grade dumph here. We'll need to recall Leonard Parker to defeat Dr. Charles Luther's evil plot to h@xx0r the robot fish to kill us all.
      Dammit ScyFy, you better send me my royalties on this!
  • Who packed the fish gauge with sensors?

  • A fish comes along and mistakes it for food? Looks a hell of a lot like the swim baits we use to catch fish down here in the south west, except A LOT more $$$.

Do you suffer painful hallucination? -- Don Juan, cited by Carlos Casteneda

Working...