Uber Will Provide Transit Data To Cities

mpicpp notes that transportation company Uber will be sharing the transit data it collects with city governments in order to "provide new insights to help manage urban growth, relieve traffic congestion, expand public transportation, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions." The company's first partnership will be with Boston, where Uber and other ridesharing services have been formally recognized by the state. Mayor Walsh said, "[D]ata is driving our conversations, our policy making and how we envision the future of our city. We are using data to change the way we deliver services and we welcome the opportunity to add to our resources. This will help us reach our transportation goals, improve the quality of our neighborhoods and allow us to think smarter, finding more innovative and creative solutions to some of our most pressing challenges."

I can't wait to "big data" this stuff...

[xxxJonBoyxxx]

New York taxi details can be extracted from anonymised data, researchers say
http://www.theguardian.com/tec... [theguardian.com]

public feed?

[Anonymous Coward]

Why not publish the data wide open on the internet? (and if the government is interested, they can use it too)

Comment removed

[account_deleted]

Comment removed based on user account deletion

Re:public feed?

[Half-pint HAL]

Exactly. It's a bribe. It's not hugely valuable data (the city could get almost as much useful data from taxi firms really) but because the city officials don't really understand magical mystical computers, it seem like some kind of golden egg.

Re:

[Dunbal]

Or Waze...

Re:

[Half-pint HAL]

Good point. They should be chasing all the cities Uber targets to make a name for themselves....

Re:

[tlhIngan]

Exactly. It's a bribe. It's not hugely valuable data (the city could get almost as much useful data from taxi firms really) but because the city officials don't really understand magical mystical computers, it seem like some kind of golden egg.

Not to mention I don't think it's very valuable data. It's basically a self-selected survey of results, when a city really needs a general broad survey.

It's like cities that have apps where you could report problems along the road and other issues - they found that it

Re:

[Half-pint HAL]

And what's with Uber claiming to be an app company? That's like Microsoft claiming to be a hardware company - while true, it's but just a small part of their business unless Uber the App company is a separated entity from Uber the transportation provider.

It's along the same lines as YouTube claiming to be a dumb channel in order to get safe harbour protections. Truth doesn't come into it.

Re:

[Anonymous Coward]

I appreciate your concern for myself entering into a voluntary contract with another party. You and your ilk are so wise. Thank you for bestowing upon us mere mundanes your knowledge. Without the state protecting me I would be stabbing myself in the eye with pens.

Re:

[nbauman]

I appreciate your concern for myself entering into a voluntary contract with another party. You and your ilk are so wise. Thank you for bestowing upon us mere mundanes your knowledge. Without the state protecting me I would be stabbing myself in the eye with pens.

That's because every time we had an unregulated free market, starting at least in the 19th century, the competitors decided that instead of competing with each other in a free market, it was more profitable for them to merge and acquire each other,

Re:

[nbauman]

Why not publish the data wide open on the internet? (and if the government is interested, they can use it too)

Sure, I'd like to know which escort service Eliot Spitzer is using these days.

Andrew Cuomo too.

This just in

[Khyber]

Uber promises to share the likely ill-gotten data with politicians that run advertising businesses so they can make money.

Slashdot constantly shilling services that don't fit the description of this site at 9PM.

Back to you, Jones.

Re:

[billstewart]

It's not ill-gotten data at all. Uber is a database service - you tell it where you are and where you want to go, and they charge you for the trip, and they know when your request was made, when you were picked up, and when you were dropped off.

All perfectly reasonable, by itself - it's what they do with the data that's sensitive, and how well they anonymize it before giving it to governments. Zip Code is a reasonable granularity for most purposes (assuming it's 5-digit ZIPs and not 9-digit); hope they'l

The the obvious kind of irony

[robbiedo]

Isn't this the fascists wet dream of fusing corporate and government power?

Re:

[gstoddart]

You act like it's a new thing. And, I'm sorry, but the DMCA and most of the laws surrounding the copyright cartels is exactly this. Hell, the lawyers for the copyright cartels write the damned laws for government, who don't bother reading it or introducing checks and balances. Because they're being paid to pass them.

The people who write financial policy? They come in and out of government in a revolving door from Wall Street. The head of the FCC is a shill for the cable industry. The elected governmen

There is something which I clearly am at loss here

[ruir]

The technology is here to meet customers with professionals. Why people are insisting on migrating old world exploitation models to the Internet and give a significant chunk of their proceeding to sites like uber or elance? I am not really against the model per se, they are just being too greedy.

Right on schedule!

[fuzzyfuzzyfungus]

Back when Uber announced that they were 'limiting' "God View" in order to improve customer privacy, I advanced the not-especially-insightful hypothesis [slashdot.org] that this was more or less entirely about looking less like a bunch of egregious assholes, and would be at best irrelevant, and at worst actively damaging, to customer privacy.

Sure looks to me like this is one of those exciting new uses that they've found for the data, and likely not the last one, nor the most unpleasant.

Ridesharing services?

[Invalidator]

WTF? Does that mean that I have to also give rides to Uber chauffeurs? And since when do we have to pay for "sharing"?

How about an accurate description instead of what these greedy assholes want us to call them: car service. Not the first, not the only, but, I hope, the last.

.. allow us to think smarter ...

[Another, completely]

Won't somebody stop these phrases before they hurt somebody? Think of the children!

Uber Will Transit Data To Cities

[nitehawk214]

I read the title as "Uber Will Transit Data To Cities"

Obviously they will be using station wagons for this service.

OMG! Stop calling it RIDESHARE!

[eepok]

Uber and Lyft is NOT Rideshare!

Rideshare is transportation by carpool, vanpool, and, in many implementations, bus, train, bike, and walking. The term "Rideshare" has been in use for DECADES to describe the use of low-emissions/fuel consumption transportation! (http://goo.gl/DXTYul)

Uber and Lyft are taxi companies who try to use the term rideshare to get around taxi regulations and to convey a veneer of sustainability. Even the Associated Press has edited their Stylebook so as to instruct media agencies to c