The Uncanny Valley of Voice Recognition 83
An anonymous reader writes: We've often seen the term "uncanny valley" applied to the field of robotics — it's easy to get unsettled when robots act close to being human, yet fail completely in a few key ways. GitHub Engineer Zach Holman writes that we've now reached uncanny valley territory in speech recognition as well, though the results are more frustrating than they are disturbing. He says, "Part of this frustration is the user interface itself is less standardized than the desktop or mobile device UI you're used to. Even the basic terminology can feel pretty inconsistent if you're jumping back and forth between platforms.
Siri aims to be completely conversational: Do you think the freshman Congressman from California's Twelfth deserved to sit on HUAC, and how did that impact his future relationship with J. Edgar? Xbox One is basically an oral command line interface, of the form: Xbox (direct object). ...it's these inconsistencies that are frustrating as you jump back and forth between devices. And we're only going to scale this up."
Siri aims to be completely conversational: Do you think the freshman Congressman from California's Twelfth deserved to sit on HUAC, and how did that impact his future relationship with J. Edgar? Xbox One is basically an oral command line interface, of the form: Xbox (direct object). ...it's these inconsistencies that are frustrating as you jump back and forth between devices. And we're only going to scale this up."
y'all fixing to handle this problem? (Score:3)
I fail to see how it's any worse than other UIs (Score:5, Insightful)
I fail to see how the "inconsistency" of speech recognition UIs are any more earth-shattering that the inconsistency between graphical UIs. People learn to use what they have, no more, no less. Anyone who "expects" device Y to behave like device X when they're from different vendors is a fool.
Hell, even Android devices aren't consistent between vendors, and they start off with the same core code!
Re:I fail to see how it's any worse than other UIs (Score:5, Insightful)
Exactly. The problem isn't frustration with different interface schemes, the problem is that they don't fucking work. I use several different programs with buttons and menus in different arrangements, but when I click a button the button is bloody well clicked regardless of where exactly it is. Voice recognition on the other hand is simply too unreliable.
Re: (Score:1)
I think it's the same basic problem as handwriting recognition. The algorithms are still too primitive to handle the way people actually communicate.
If you talk like a computer with overly enunciated words and stick to common words the likelihood of the computer getting it right is substantially better than if you talk the way that people actually talk. I overly enunciate my Mandarin because I don't yet trust myself to make the tones if I don't, and the computer usually picks up exactly what I want most of
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly. Clicking a button is clicking a button no matter how someone moves the mouse or presses on it but even if we had 100% perfect voice recognition we'd still be stuck when it comes time to do something with that. There's an enormous number of ways to say the same thing in most languages, and often many phrases that can mean entirely different things depending on context.
Re:I fail to see how it's any worse than other UIs (Score:5, Funny)
-> Commander Riker is suddenly shot down by an automated defense phaser mounted on a security turret.
Picard: "What the..."
-> Computer: "Please restate your question"
Worf: "His death was without honor"
Re: (Score:2)
but when I click a button the button is bloody well clicked
Looks like you don't have much experience with cheap touch screens.
Re:I fail to see how it's any worse than other UIs (Score:5, Interesting)
but when I click a button the button is bloody well clicked
Looks like you don't have much experience with cheap touch screens.
Heh. You obviously haven't work with any of the more expensive ones. I have a small collection of different portable gadgets for web testing, and that statement about buttons definitely isn't true for the various Apple tablets or phones. Thus, there's a little "x" icon whose function is to close the tab/window. I've learned to just start tapping it about twice per second, and maybe by the 3rd or 4th or 6th or 10th tap, it'll close.
Of course, the little monster might know very well that I'm tapping it, but wants to see how serious I am about it.
Of course, Apple's gadgets aren't the only ones like this. They're just one of the worst of a bad lot. And often it's a good idea to not tap too fast, because when the window finally closes, it usually gets replaced with another that'll do something totally unexpected when you tap it in that newly-exposed spot.
Re: (Score:2)
I said click for a reason.
Re: (Score:3)
I just do not think you have had enough experiment with. delete that, delete that, dear mom let's set so double the killer delete select all
Re: (Score:3)
There's a standard for speech recognition already, as long as you're talking about "intelligent agents", which the Xbox One is certainly not: Natural English (or insert your language here) conversation. The gold standard, no pun intended, should be to phrase queries or commands in such a manner that any reasonably intelligent native speaker could easily understand your intent, and the computer should perform those tasks or retrieve that information for you.
At this point, the only reason there's jarring inc
Re: (Score:1)
As far as voice commands go, people are inconsistent too! someone from the deep south is going to have a bit of trouble talking to someone from the UK. Especially when using slang and idioms. People from different age groups say things differently as well!
Hell, even when people are from the same area and are same age they'll need to hear something more than once before they can make sense of what's being said.
It goes well beyond just accents though. phrasing, tone, cadence, context and a bunch of other thin
Re: (Score:2)
hah, I just watched "Expendables 3" again, and came across this bit:
Christmas: "Status of enemy?"
Drummer (over satphone): "What fuckin' language is that??"
Ross (slurred): "What's the status of the enemy?"
Drummer: "Local mostly..."
made I chuckle.
Re: (Score:2)
Anyone who "expects" device Y to behave like device X when they're from different vendors is a fool.
Not have as much of a fool as anyone who forgets that human beings aren't a collection of logic gates. However much we like to consider ourselves rational agents. Human beings generalise, which makes it difficult to remember whether the application your using uses shift-ctrl-z or ctrl-y for redo... which is why most programmers have standardise on shift-ctrl-z.
Penny Arcade's Extra Credits did a video a couple of years back on why Microsoft Kinect was the uncanny valley of input devices. (Kinect Disconnect [penny-arcade.com])
Re: (Score:1)
Ugh. creating reminders with Siri sucks, because I regularly set a reminder for two hours in the future, and saying "Remind me in two hours to..." generally results with Siri decoding "Remind me into to...", which results in an untimed reminder starting with "into to"
Re: (Score:3)
Depends on your accent. I get about 98% recognition. I still don't use it because its easier to type/swype.
More than the accent (Score:3)
Do you always get 98%? I've noticed that the recognition rate I get goes down about 2% for each increment of 0.01% of my blood alcohol content.
Re: (Score:1)
Getting 98% is as frustrating as 40% because those last 2% carry key meanings and ultimately can subtly fuck your communication. Like autoIncorrect for you iOS fans, shitty speech recognition will kill your spirit and friendships faster than you can type.
Re: (Score:2)
I my experience, the recognition rate appears to be about 2%.
Re: (Score:2)
Not to mention that in my experience pretty much no program offers "English, intl." option. I've done sales/customer support in English and have been commended for my English by native Brits. Still I do have an accent and voice commands are very much more (almost completely) miss than hit.
Now, when voice commands support my native Finnish I'll be seriously impressed, what with all the regional accents and spoken language being rather different from the written form. Not seeing that happening any time soon t
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
You would have few (if any) issues communicating with most people in English, especially in an urban area (Helsinki, Turku, Oulu etc) or somewhere with a large university. In more rural areas, YMMV (that is to say, mostly younger people will be OK, but older people not so much).
It was about 2 years (maybe even a little more) before I started getting to a point of communicating in reasonably coherent Finnish (syntax, tenses etc), but especially when I was beginning to learn (the first 6-12 months) a lot of p
Re: (Score:1)
Re:It's because they don't work... (Score:4, Interesting)
I speak standard BBC English, and I have often been described by people as "the easiest person to understand in the company" in many different companies.
I my experience, the recognition rate appears to be about 2%.
Not surprising; your "BBC English" and our "media English" over here in North America are basically artificial dialects developed by the broadcast industries starting back in the 1940s. They even managed to do some fairly scientific testing, assembling listeners with different native dialects, and counting their mistakes when listening to different proposed pronunciations of various words and phrases. Their intent was to to develop dialects that were easily understood by most of their target audiences, and they did a reasonable job of it.
This doesn't help the computers' voice recognition software very much, though, because few customers speak these "standard" artificial dialects well. The software people aren't working on making the customers understand the computer's speech; they're trying to get the computers to understand untrained humans speaking their native dialects. This requires rather different processing than what the broadcasters were trying to do, and is a much more difficult task for us humans, too. It doesn't help that the computers are often listening to humans who aren't totally awake and sober ...
That's not the uncanny valley (Score:2)
That is the problem that human language is very ambiguous and context-sensitive, which is the whole reason we invented programming languages instead of trying to express it in English. Either you limit yourself to a set of simple unambiguous commands or you try to parse what we're really trying to say, which is like giving the computer the business requirements document and tell it to program itself. Fortunately for our job security that "valley" won't be crossed any time soon, people imagine it'll be like
Re: (Score:3)
I guess we're making advances on answering trivia questions and adding appointments to the calendar, but it's not exactly ready to hold a conversation.
It's a good thing. If I have to start holding a conversation with my computer to get it to manage my calendar it will become higher maintenance than my secretary, who only needs a cheap gift basket on Secretary Day and a small smack on the butt when she remembers the extra espresso shot in my latte.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I find siri's lame attempts to be human annoying. (Score:2)
I find siri very annoying. It has a few tricks and tries to act cute but its cuteness means that it gives the wrong answer
half the time. For instance, a simple question like "Can you get chickenpox from chickens?" gets a reply of "Who, me?"
This is a simple question that a human can easily understand that it isn't directly addressed to them and Google voice
search, not trying to have a persona of its own, is smart enough to just do a search for an answer it doesn't know instead
of being a smart aleck. I've a
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Using an imprecise mechanism like language requires verification
If the 'user' wants to deride that verification, then they will get the same response as any ass-hat that demands instant response to ambiguous statements
Going beyond the uncanny valley will require both conversation and 'training' to the individual, just like any working relationship with a human
Re: (Score:3)
My kids ask me questions like this all the time. Most people with normal intelligence
realize that the "you" should really be replaced with the word "a person" as it refers
to an ambiguous you not a specific you. For many of my kids questions, I had
gotten used to just asking google before switching to an iphone last month and
quickly discovered that siri tried to be a smart aleck instead of just doing a search.
On a random side note, while on my android, my kids always used to ask me if I
was talking to siri e
Re: (Score:2)
Ummm, yeah,
Just asked Siri on my ipod "Can you get chickenpox from chickens" and all it did was come up with a list of ~15 websites, the top being WebMD, as well as ~15 images of chickenpox rashes.
So, tl;dr version, pretty much the same results as using Google voice search in my GNote2.
Re: (Score:2)
Ummm, yeah,
Just asked Siri on my ipod "Can you get chickenpox from chickens" and all it did was come up with a list of ~15 websites, the top being WebMD, as well as ~15 images of chickenpox rashes.
So, tl;dr version, pretty much the same results as using Google voice search in my GNote2.
Not sure how that works. I'm using a one month old iphone 6 so maybe siri varies some from platform to platform.
Variety (Score:2)
Variety is different from the Uncanny Valley.
Re: (Score:2)
Specifically, if this was an Uncanny Valley then people would prefer lower quality voice recognition.
Re: (Score:3)
The concept of the uncanny value is pseudoscience anyway.
Then think of it as a theoretical paradigm that gives us a useful conceptualisation until we have a better understanding.
My only beef with the uncanny valley is that too many analyses stop there. People investigating cartoons saw that there was a subtle interplay between drawing quality and animation quality: if the drawing quality is better than the animation quality, it looks fake, but the opposite is not true -- even simple stick men can look real when well animated. This was known decades ago, yet was c
Re: (Score:2)
Are there /. articles that are not click bait?
Ridiculous (Score:4)
It's hard to imagine anyone who's actually used Siri thinking that question could get a useful answer. Siri can't understand even far more basic English. It's not much more advanced than Dr. Sbaitso.
Re: (Score:2)
And why wouldn’t you just say “Nixon” instead of trying to trip up the parser?
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think that means what you think it means (Score:5, Informative)
As I understand it, the "Uncanny Valley" refers to things are that very close to human behavior--close enough that the mind shifts from this being an imperfect representation of a human to being an imperfect human.
Personally, I'm not sure there would really be an issue with "uncanny valley" in regards to speech recognition. It's good if it recognizes what you're saying. It's bad if it doesn't. There isn't really a middle ground where it's off in a way you can't really identify, which is where "uncanny valley" comes from.
What he seems to be talking about is the "personification" of "digital assistants" like Siri and Alexa (Amazon Echo) which will eventually create an "uncanny valley." But I'm not sure that it's really that big of an issue. Just because I call something by name doesn't mean I expect it to behave in a human fashion. I don't get frustrated with my dog when I say, "Fido, change the oil in my car" and the dog just lies there and licks his balls, so I don't expect I'll ever get that frustrated because Siri can't tell me what time the sun will set next Tuesday--or, if I do, my frustration will be aimed at the people at Apple who believe that sunrise and sunset is part of the weather.
Siri and Alexa have a long way to go before someone would mistake them for humans.
Re:I don't think that means what you think it mean (Score:5, Interesting)
I can kind of see what he means, although I think the comparison with the uncanny valley is a bit weak.
I've taken to using Google Now's voice commands to set timers while I'm cooking, so something like "Ok Google, set a timer for 20 minutes". I don't have to touch my phone and it works brilliantly even in the noisy environments of a kitchen.
I've gotten used to talking to it in a very naturalistic way, which is where the problems occasionally crop up, and when they do they can be quite jarring.
A good example was the last time I asked it to set a timer for "an hour and a half", which Now interpreted as 1:00:30s, i.e. an hour and a half *minute*.
The jarring effect is at this edge where we feel like the speech recognition system is understanding what we say, but really it's just trying to use lots of different rules and patterns that have been coded in. If you happen to just fall outside of one of those rules it fails completely, and it can seem very arbitrary.
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like the problem that has haunted overly "smart" user interfaces since day one, as their smarts invariably fail to account for all the variables and thus fail exactly when the user is at the most irritable (hello Clippy).
To me a UI works better when held static rather than trying to second guess the user. Then the user applies their "smarts" to integrate the UI into their tasks.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. Uncanny valley (a questionable, or perhaps cultural, phenomena at best) is about animatronics getting so close to human likeness that we take them for being severely ill or corpse-like, and thus setting off various safety related instincts.
It's time to shift the minimum of this valley (Score:2)
For me, the low-point on the curve was from some of the characters in late 90's-early 2000's video games. Think Ocarina of Time or Deus Ex. Once it got past that, I was perfectly comfortable.
As for voice, hell, I could sleep soundly with hal-9000, gladOS, or
Comcast is trying this how badly will it fail for (Score:1)
Comcast is trying this how badly will it fail for them?
Article is wrong about "Uncanny Valley" (Score:1)
The term "Uncanny Valley" has nothing to do with Pixar nor computer animation - it was originated by Masahiro Mori long before and is related to robotics.
Re: (Score:2)
The term "Uncanny Valley" has nothing to do with Pixar nor computer animation - it was originated by Masahiro Mori long before and is related to robotics.
The part about Campbells' Soup didn't give you much of a jump on things, did it?
Re: (Score:2)
We are in England, and Google repeatedly gives us directions to places in Edmonton, Ontario (several thousand miles away) instead of Edmonton, North London, 3 miles away. Often Austrialian places get listed too. York, Sierra Leone came up over York, England recently.
Surely it should be bloody obvious that the likelyhood of it being the correct answer is inversely proportional to the distance/travelling time.
Re: (Score:2)
which is bullshit because there is no "COPY" command in CP/M. It's "pip[]".
Results vary all the time (Score:2)
I don't trust voice commands to work when I need
Uncanny valley in recognition? (Score:2)
I find it hard to believe that there's an uncanny valley in voice recognition.
Did you mean voice synthesis?
Re: (Score:3)
Siri's Answer... (Score:2)
Me: Do you think the freshman Congressman from California's Twelfth deserved to sit on HUAC, and how did that impact his future relationship with J. Edgar?
Siri: I think, therefore I am. But let's not put Descartes before the horse.
I have a hard time believing that Siri knows about this Slashdot post yet (it will...) but that answer is still highly (uncannily?!) appropriate to the original article...
Re: (Score:2)
And its parsing probably stopped at "Do you think" and hit the canned response.
Re: (Score:2)
Could be. But then again, if you are starting a question to an automated information service with "Do you think...", you deserve whatever you get :)
[I have to say my favorite horribly bad Siri response so far is to "Siri, where is the closest bagel shop?"]
Re: (Score:2)
For task-based purposes, it's useful. Scheduling calendar events is much easier with voice control than by tapping (at least for me on Google Now). For sending a text while driving, your only choice is really voice control.