The Words That Indicate Malicious Domain URLs 84
An anonymous reader writes: Researchers from AT&T have released research which improves the identification-rate of malicious URLs — such as those used for C&C servers or to distribute malware to redirected victims — by individuating words in the domain names. Though many of the words that Wei Wang and Kenneth Shirley were able to group as 'malign' are predictable, there is a strange recurrence of basketball-related words in the URL lexicon of malice, with 'bad' domains using names such as LeBron James, Kobe Bryant and Michael Jordan. By contrast 'golf' is least likely to be seen in a dangerous URL, along with state names, scenery and realty.
Clearly the solution is to ban basketball. (Score:2, Funny)
'nuff said.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
LOL ... well played! [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Just another Canadian LIE!
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
By contrast 'golf' is least likely to be seen in a dangerous URL
I don't know about "dangerous" but I get lots of spam for golf clubs. Seriously. I have never played golf and dislike anyone who does. It originates from constantly changing URLs that all contain "golf" in some way or another. So now I just block everything containing the word golf.
Re:Porn not included on the list! Yes!!! (Score:5, Funny)
You know, if you weren't waiting to post these stupid comments on Slashdot, you'd have more time to fap.
Re: (Score:3)
Unless that's the thing that gets him/her going.
Re: (Score:3)
So you only enjoy one of your two penises? That's only half the fun!
just pandering to their target derpagraphic (Score:3)
Seriously, it seems they know how to entice the befuddled masses in to clicking on their garbage.
Re:just pandering to their target derpagraphic (Score:4, Insightful)
Seriously, it seems they know how to entice the befuddled masses in to clicking on their garbage.
Most of the time when I've found a malicious website, it's been involved with searching for household items.
Recently I caught some on a site regarding garage door openers.
Then a few days ago when I was online looking for kitchen cabinet knobs.
Not the sort of knob job people think about normally providing malware.
LOL ... golf ... (Score:2)
Nobody expects gold to be sinister, that's just misdirection.
The real evil is in the golf.
Re: (Score:2)
*facepalm* Preview button.
Re: (Score:2)
Preview button or not...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Diminishing Returns (Score:4, Insightful)
This kind of research is almost self-defeating.
When you put out there a list of words that help flag a domain as "bad", you're just signaling to the malware makers to avoid those words.
Then you can make a new list of words. And then they'll avoid those words.
Eventually, the malware domains will be essentially indistinguishable from the real domains.
That's lose-lose for everyone.
Unfortunately, keeping the list secret does no good either. If it's truly secret, then no one can use it to fight malware. If it's only "secret" as in "not widely published", then the malware makers will still find it and use it.
There is no right choice.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This kind of research is almost self-defeating.
I feel the same way about stock market prediction.
Re: (Score:3)
Tip: Do not base any security or malware decision on what keywords are contained on a site / URL, what signatures exist (or don't) in a file or anything along similar lines.
It pissed me off when people say "You can tell if you have virus X because it create file Y or registry entry Z". Yes, and it takes a microsecond to produce an identical virus that DOESN'T.
Don't base your decision to visit a website on the keywords or URL. Base it on knowing that your browser will not ever execute any code from there
Self-defeating research? Maybe not... (Score:1)
The first studies that showed "password" "0000" "1234" etc. were among the most-common passwords/PINs was published so long ago that I don't remember when it was.
Studies since then and even recent ones keep showing similar results.
PS: It's time for me to change my /. password. I'm trying to decide between passw0rd and 1248, any advice?
A hyphen (Score:1, Interesting)
I cannot remember the last time I visited a legitimate website with a hyphen in the URL.
Re: (Score:1)
I cannot remember the last time I visited a legitimate website with a hyphen in the URL.
You've just opened one here : http://tech.slashdot.org/story... [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
I think he may have meant "domain" rather than "URL".
Re: (Score:2)
And right now, most remote services like their OWA servers, VPN and VoIP access still have hyphens in their URL.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
national-lottery.co.uk
(No, seriously... try the alternatives without the hyphen and it redirects to the hyphened domain).
Re: (Score:2)
Once upon a time, Experts Exchange (www.experts-exchange.com) *didn't* have a hyphen in its name. I think it looked a little more dodgy then....
Re: (Score:1)
http://www.barking-dagenham-sc... [barking-da...uts.org.uk]
Interesting, but doubt it's very effective (Score:5, Interesting)
The paper is interesting, but I doubt it's very effective. An awful lot of the malicious URLs we seen in our filters are legitimate web sites that have been compromised and had malicious content inserted. We have thousands of malicious URLs containing "wp-content", just to give you an idea...
Re: (Score:2)
Ladies and gentlemen, here we have APK pretending to be some kind-hearted supporter of himself, in a vain attempt to lend credence to his tenuous position. APK thinks so highly of this audience that he spams us and thinks we're retarded.
The real irony is his anti-advertising solution can't block his advertising. He's his own worst enemy, yet has no idea. Mental illness is a bitch.
Re: (Score:3)
www.goat-simulator.com
Unless you consider motivating people to wasting time to be malicious....
Note: google(url:goat) gives you many more of these insidious "goat" pages, including one that seems to be "non-vet" medical emergency services for goats.
Re: (Score:1)
The sounds sinister. That's enough.
Re: (Score:2)
Did the include the following? (Score:3, Insightful)
cnet.com and download.com
softpedia.com
"individuating"? (Score:1)
I can't believe that's a word...
Re: (Score:1)
I am not alone!!! Yay!
Anyhow, I did not say anything because I am too lazy to look and do not want to appear as stupid as I am.
North Korea's leader Kim Jung-un likes basketball (Score:1)
Coincidence?
And now, they will all change (Score:2)
Because thanks to this valuable research, all the "bad URL owners" will get different "bad" ones. I propose to go to soccer instead, with the FIFA serving as easy example why these are "bad".
Re: (Score:1)
There was some bot on here spamming (just last night it was here still) something about J Lebron in the URL but it went to a dead link in Turkey. I checked the site out and it seems you can volunteer to do some digging there with the archaeologists. I have always wanted to do that but this one looked way to complicated (like needing to apply nine months ahead)/
This faces the "Asimov's Foundation" problem (Score:2)
You can't tell people about this kind of research because then the malignant people change their words. The only benefit is in keeping it quiet.
Domain Shadowing goes nuclear .. (Score:2)
C&C?!? (Score:1)
There's a new Command and Conquer coming out? Hmm, or am I being scammed?