Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Google Wireless Networking

Google Takes Over NYC's Free WiFi Project 68

Posted by Soulskill from the ok-google-get-me-some-wifi dept.
dkatana writes: Google's new Smart Cities venture Sidewalk Labs announced the purchase of Intersection, the new company behind the LinkNYC project. nGoogle wants to speed up the developing of free internet access to New York residents and visitors, as a way to gather more information about their activities. Users of the pylons will provide the company invaluable data about their habits, places they visit, and browsing activity.

As part of the original LinkNYC plan, Intersection is scheduled to start deploying the new ad-supported, locally manufactured, WiFi 'pylons' this fall, reaching all five boroughs of the city. It will be the largest and fastest free municipal WiFi system in the world. After that, the company plans to start rolling out similar initiatives in other U.S. cities, but details have not been made public yet.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Takes Over NYC's Free WiFi Project More

Google Takes Over NYC's Free WiFi Project

Comments Filter:

  • Soon Google will know everything about us all (Score:3)

    by NotDrWho ( 3543773 ) on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @09:30AM (#49977359)

    And double plus good it will be!

  • I hope it rolls out in more cities (Score:4, Funny)

    by psergiu ( 67614 ) on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @09:38AM (#49977423)

    I hope it rolls out in more cities until it reaches mine.

    Google can extract whatever habitual information he wants from my VPN connection over their free WiFi.
    I'll make sure to stream data from /dev/urandom while i'm not actively using the connection, so they can have more information about me.

    Thank You Google !

    • I see you're not using Android 4.4 devices, which have a VPN bug that prevents any useful connection to a VPN.

    • I'll make sure to stream data from /dev/urandom while i'm not actively using the connection, so they can have more information about me.

      Great! I can't wait for our public communications infrastructure to be saturated by your random bits because a few jackasses are afraid that someone might catch on that they're looking at porn.

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by psergiu ( 67614 )

        It's not "our public communications infrastructure", it's Google's.
        Or are you working for Google by any chance ? :-)

        • First, you seem to be missing the point in that your suggested behavior is the behavior of an asshole. This is why we can't have nice things.

          But besides that, this news story is about Google taking over LinkNYC, a project to provide free, public municipal WiFi to the NYC. So yeah, we're talking about public infrastructure, even if Google will be the contractor tasked with building and maintaining it.

          • Re: (Score:2)

            by psergiu ( 67614 )

            Ok,

            Then instead of random data, i'll just open a Torrent client to seed Linux & BSD distros and other free software.

            You cannot win, your free wifi bandwidth will be reduced to acoustic modem dialup speeds anyway. :)

            And please RTFA & TFL - it's not public infrastructure, the city will rent out locations for the pylons in exchange for $$$ - like any billboard. Only that those billboards will have touch-screens and Google-provided WiFi.

            "Through Titan's advertising network, Link could bring $500 million in ad revenue to the city over the next 12 years, according to Mayor Bill de Blasio's office."

            • it's not public infrastructure, the city will rent out locations for the pylons in exchange for $$$ - like any billboard.

              So they're selling ad space on the side of the equipment-- what's your point here? This is a scheme for providing municipal WiFi. Does the road stop being "public infrastructure" because billboards are setup alongside it? Does the subway stop being "public transportation" because there are ads in it?

              Go crawl back in your troll hole.

            • And please RTFA & TFL - it's not public infrastructure,

              The radio frequencies being used are license-free publicly-owned resources. WiFi doesn't work by magic, it takes bandwidth in the radio spectrum.

              When you are streaming random numbers just to be using the bandwidth, you are interfering with other users. Even other users who are not using Google's access points.

    • They will get your location data. They can leverage that to work out values for physical advertising in meat space.

      You will give them information whether you like it or not. ...and if I put on my tinfoil hat, someone is already snooping your "secure" VPN connection

  • Tin foil hat on. It came to me last week.

    Google has recently released Project Fi. A project/product (is project a codeword for beta now?) that will allow seamless transition between 2G/3G/LTE and *WiFi* for increased coverage and strength.

    Project Fi is bandwidth charged, independent of data link being used - so while the underlying carriers (T-Mobile & Sprint) may charge wholesale for data, google will effectively get the bandwidth at "Google WiFi" for free - meaning that the data charges are a lot mo

  • It is no longer a "free" WiFi project (Score:3)

    by QuietLagoon ( 813062 ) on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @10:10AM (#49977669)
    Users will be paying for it with google doing a wholesale collection of private data from those who use it.

    • Users will be paying for it with google doing a wholesale collection of private data from those who use it.

      Does it surprise you that it isn't 'free'? Sorry to burst your bubble but it wasn't 'free' before and nothing ever is.

    • All your base belong to us!

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by crtreece ( 59298 )
      Data analysis of traffic from user 59298: all we see is a stream of encrypted traffic to a known VPN provider.

  • Subway...? (Score:3)

    by nine-times ( 778537 ) <nine.times@gmail.com> on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @10:12AM (#49977689) Homepage

    As a NYC resident, I appreciate the idea of free WiFi. I especially like the idea of having some kind of free Internet access for people who can't afford it, since... really... it's getting more and more of a disadvantage to not have access. I think Internet access should be considered linked to issues of economic opportunity, of public safety, and of free speech rights (your freedom of speech is hindered by not having access to telecommunications infrastructure).

    But if I'm honest, the biggest thing I'd like to see for my own benefit is some kind of Internet access for the subway. Some subway stations get cell phone reception, depending on your carrier. Reception in the tunnels themselves is a bit of a rarity. Given that subway rides can take a couple of hours, it'd be nice to expect some kind of wireless access during that time.

    • Re:Subway...? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by tompaulco ( 629533 ) on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @10:20AM (#49977765) Homepage Journal

      your freedom of speech is hindered by not having access to telecommunications infrastructure

      Nope, your freedom of speech is not dependent upon any particular means of expression. You can stand on the street corner and express your views, but nobody is required to buy you a megaphone, or internet access, or Reuters.

      • Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)

        by nine-times ( 778537 )

        Your view is, to be honest, myopic if not willfully ignorant. Your "freedom of speech" is not specifically dependent on a particular means. However, saying, "You don't need to have access to the Internet in order to express yourself" is a bit like saying, "You don't need to have access to roads, trains, or planes in order to travel." Yes, I suppose that's true, but failing to have access to that travel infrastructure sure does hinder your ability to travel.

        It's also worth noting that the First Amendment

      • "Freedom of Speech" is nothing without access to information. If a person cannot get to the Internet, they are confined to commercial forms of information.

        In my opinion, if a person could only be informed by CNN, Fox and a Newspaper, they'd be better off not having an opinion at all.

        And have you TRIED dealing with any kind of public service or support system without the Internet these days? Paying utility bills?

        I think the concept some people have about going without the Internet is pretty old fashioned. Yo

    • I live near NYC and ride the subway weekly, and concur. But: Consider what we're asking for: we're in a metal box, rolling on metal rails, with a lot of high voltage and electric motors, UNDERGROUND . . . and we want radio reception. I'm amazed it works as well as it does! (Note - Some stations do have good wifi coverage, presumably installed because it has become part of the station infrastructure - not for critical sensors, I hope, but for information signs or advertising, and perhaps for video surve
      • Mostly because so many stations are close to the surface, in my experience. Much of NY subway is cut and cover and not far below surface level. More accident than design for the wifi, I think. NYC does not do 'nice things' for its residents. Every little bit has to be fought for, tooth and nail.

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by khr ( 708262 )

          No, they're adding quite a lot of communications infrastructure to many stations in Manhattan. It's all visible overhead, and they publish articles about which ones they've done so far and which ones are scheduled next.

          • That may be so. But they have a long, long way to go before signals are anything more than patchy. Still, I don't particularly want people yammering like idiots on their phones while I try to snooze on the way to work.

      • What you're listing are reasons why it's more difficult than providing wireless usually is, which is probably why it hasn't been done yet. However, it can be done. It should be done. We could debate how quickly and how extensively it should be done, but it should be done.

        Sort of like putting signs in the subway station that tells you when the next train is coming. I understand that there are some challenges, and it's great that they have it in a few stations now, but really it should have have been don

      • Cell reception, at least with T-Mobile, works quite well in Boston's subways.

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by OhPlz ( 168413 )

          Cell service in the subways is a curious thing. On the one hand, you can use your smart phones and other devices while riding. Yet on the other hand, the MBTA is constantly warning people against using expensive electronics on the subway because they're a ripe target for thieves.

    • yeah right...NYC - I love it but it sucks so bad in so many ways...
  • please no, no, no no.
  • I have fuck all money and so buy very little of anything apart from food. Will my local supermarket be Googlified in some way? Will I find myself suddenly drawn to a different aisle? I take the subway back and forth to and from the same stops. Will Google influence how I do this? The current free wi-fi is to be ignored at best. Fuck this shit.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by kqs ( 1038910 )

      I have fuck all money and so buy very little of anything apart from food. Will my local supermarket be Googlified in some way? Will I find myself suddenly drawn to a different aisle?

      Not unless you've had wifi implanted in your spinal cord. (Maybe that's after the self-driving car is released?)

      I take the subway back and forth to and from the same stops. Will Google influence how I do this?

      Only if you use google maps to determine which subways stops to use. Which I did last time I was in NYC; it worked great! Rather than worrying about how I would get from hotel -> dinner -> entertainment -> hotel, I just followed the directions to the appropriate station; the only difficulty was figuring out which direction train I should take.

Slashdot Top Deals

C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas l'Informatique. -- Bosquet [on seeing the IBM 4341]

Close