Meet YouTube Gaming, Twitch's Archenemy 94
An anonymous reader writes: As expected Google has launched its answer to Twitch, YouTube Gaming available on the web, Android and iOS. Techcrunch reports: "We played with the Android app before the launch, and here's how it works. When you open the app, you are presented with a search bar at the top, a few featured channels at the top and then a feed of the most popular channels. The current featured channels don't focus on esports like most Twitch channels. Right now, you can find a 12-hour stream of NBA 2K15, and official stream of Metal Gear Solid V, a speed run of Until Dawn and an Eve Online live show."
Do not want. (Score:1)
For watching other people's game, not your own (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As for YouTube Gaming, I don't give it much of a chance. I'd say 25% chance it competes properly with Twitch, and about a 60% chance of it going the way of Google+. That leaves a quite-slim 15% chance of anything else, including, but not limited to, dethroning Twitch.
Or being an also-ran like Hitbox...
Re: (Score:2)
Go to Youtube and look up "vanossgaming" some time.
Re: (Score:2)
It's like Twitch, so yes. Sometimes those gaming videos are fun to watch for some unknown reason, and I find myself watching them. Some of it is a sneak peak, as in seeing if the game is worth $60 becuase you can never trust marketing or even word of mouth (because even your best friends will never have the same tastes you do). Some of it is watching someone screw up. Sometimes someone has a different strategy than you do and it's interesting. Or it's just funny (witness Felicia and Ryan Day playing ga
Re: (Score:3)
Imagine Twitch, only with YouTube commenters in the chat.
OMG!!! (Score:3)
It has a search function!!! Thats amazing!!!
Twitch has been doing this for years why have they never thought of that??
(Amazon owns Twitch yet fire tv has no search in twitch app)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Check out this amazon review of the fire tv version of twitch:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/custo... [amazon.com]
There is no search which is odd considering twitch is owned by amazon.
Why cripple your own app? It works fine on the roku and roku Doesn't own twitch.
Please prove me wrong.
Seriously I would like to be able to search twitch on my fire tv.
Re: (Score:2)
Check out this amazon review of the fire tv version of twitch:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/custo... [amazon.com]
There is no search which is odd considering twitch is owned by amazon.
Why cripple your own app? It works fine on the roku and roku Doesn't own twitch.
Please prove me wrong.
Seriously I would like to be able to search twitch on my fire tv.
who said anything about crippling? Silly people have this silly notion that corporations are less silly.
Who's sillier? The 'silly', or the 'silly' that 'sillies'...wait,what?
oh yeah, the Fire Phone. It had 4 cameras to... do silly things. Silly people at the top really have no freaking clue what silly people at the bottom do.
My point: statistically, attribute more to stupidity than malice.
It's like spectator sports (Score:2)
It's like spectator sports, but the audience may also be a player of the game.
I never got the appeal of spectator sports but I do like to watch someone skilled play a game, so that I can learn from it and become better myself.
Although frankly, I prefer watching stuff that's pre-recorded so I can skip through boring and mundane bits. At the cost of not being able to interact with the broadcaster. But let's face it, that never really happens in the really popular channels anyway, you just get drowned in the f
Re: (Score:2)
It's like spectator sports, but the audience may also be a player of the game.
Agreed. There is one streamer I follow on Twitch and he will get all of his followers together on one server or get them on a public server and play as a team. I have done that several times....watch for awhile, join the server he is on and play along for awhile, then go back to watching. Pretty fun!
How long will you keep repeating the same line? (Score:1)
How long are you going to repeat that same line even after Google has publicly said they've stopped integrating G+ and are actually going in the reverse direction? So "we" know it's not coming, and you should let the people paying you to repeat this line know as well.
Re:How long will this last? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Copyright in game streams (Score:2)
A video game is a copyrighted audiovisual work, and streaming a video game without permission from the game's publisher is copyright infringement [arstechnica.com]. How do Twitch and YouTube Gaming either obtain this permission or provide a means for members to apply to publishers to obtain this permission?
Re: (Score:2)
I forgot to disable the in-game radio for GTA V for livestream footage I posted to YouTube and was Content ID'd almost instantly, so whatever money I might have made (had I enabled monetization) is going to UMG now
Re: (Score:2)
It's free advertising that has amazing marketing data generation, and customer interaction levels on par with the Victoria's Secret fashion show they televise every year. If they don't already directly address copyright issues in their EULA now, they will soon. All of the major publishing houses have been promoting e-sports for a while and there have been close to zero takedowns based on game streaming.
I see the potential for conflict here, but in the last four years it has been a non-issue, and Go
Re: (Score:2)
A single frame is far more likely to favor the alleged infringer under the "amount and substantiality" factor of fair use than a playthrough of an entire level or, worse yet, a whole game.
Re: (Score:2)
That is one lawyers opinion, there is no legal precedent of this, and I would argue that the only legal precedent that exists is the one cited in the article, Allen v. Academic Games League of America. The playing of board games and video games are fundamentally similar that I believe that precedent would stand if a court case were filed.
Re: (Score:1)
Most companies don't actually have a problem with streamers as it's free advertising for their games. Although if it's negative they may use this angle to try to censor. Which can lead to the Streisand effect.
ContentID sometimes still triggers on the background music in some games.
Re: (Score:2)
A video game is a copyrighted audiovisual work, and streaming a video game without permission from the game's publisher is copyright infringement
Is it now? Thats "one" persons opinion. You are way way way to literal on things like this.
How do Twitch and YouTube Gaming either obtain this permission or provide a means for members to apply to publishers to obtain this permission?
They don't need to?
Look, the only company that really doesn't care for streaming is Nintendo, goes to show just how stuck in the past they are. Streaming is built right in to the PS4 and Xbox One.
N not the only publisher requiring stream royalty (Score:2)
Thats "one" persons opinion
Everything is one person's opinion until it's tested in a court of law. The article I linked states that such a case has been decided for board games, but not for video games.
Look, the only company that really doesn't care for streaming is Nintendo, goes to show just how stuck in the past they are.
From the article I linked: "Capcom can make you get a license for the 'public performance' of the game. In fact, that is exactly what Capcom does with for-profit tournaments" with games in the Street Fighter series. Blizzard likewise has tried to use copyright to give one Korean TV network exclusive rights to StarCraft II [wikipedia.org]. Sega at one
Re: (Score:2)
This Ars Technica article agrees. Is a licensee allowed to designate the entire game as such a scene? Apparently so, according to this Polygon article and this reddit post.
They "can" but don't, not for Twitch type streaming. The CoD and Minecraft examples you give are for "Share Play" which is different from Twitch/Ustream/Youtube streaming, or "game DVR". Share play lets some one over the internet, log into a "local" mulitplayer game, where they don't even have to own the game.
Holy crap (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
enjoy the pure HTML5 experience you've all been clambering for. oh wait, you mean HTML5 didn't turn out to magically efficient?!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
maybe. references?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
seriously, can you point me to any benchmarks that show flash is faster, more efficient?
when i google for this, the first three links show flash is ~2x better than HTML5 is animation and video.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I can't stand the lack of scroll bar on the webpage. They covered the normal scrollbar area with avatar circles and made it impossible to actually click on the scroll bar to scroll. Hope you have a scroll wheel on your mouse!
Re: (Score:2)
Glad I wasn't the only one to have that problem.
Re: (Score:2)
I have a scroll bar that the avatar circles don't cover, but if I move over to the scrollbar, a channels sidebar pops over with ANOTHER scrollbar just for it.
Re: (Score:2)
It IS a black empty page in older browsers (Opera 12.xx). Looking at the html this website has empty body element, its all garbage javascript the way google wants all the web to look like.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
"Dude, you have to check out xxyomgsexygamergirl's latest video on Youtube Gaming!"
Link? ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
Millions of people watching other people play Minecraft. May God have mercy on us.
Or even Hearthstone, or Dota2 (thousands on a single channel!), or old Sega games?? They pack them in over on Twitch.....
Will probably fail (Score:1)
Some people will probably use it, but it'll be hard to convince people to move away from Twitch, not because it is any better, but because Google isn't really offering any compelling reason to move.
It's like they assume that just because they are Google, people will immediately jump ship. And we all know how well that worked with Google plus...
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I can see two places where Google can fix things.
First is ads - twitch is freaking annoying to watch for me - 30 seconds of content, followed by 30 seconds of a
Re: (Score:2)
Not quite sure which stream you were watching on Twitch however:
* when ads run (apart from the initial page/stream load) is under control of the streamer, and any decent streamer will only run ads during appropriate breaks (some don't run any at all).
* Pay the very low cost for Turbo and never see an ad but have the streamer get the money as if you did and there is no interruption to what you are watching.
* If you are being cheap and don't want to pay then adblock works and streams don't interrupt.
There is
Re: (Score:2)
And forgot to say... Twitch is already moving to html 5...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Only relevant to 12 year olds and manchildren (Score:1)
Ooooooh, look at the big man, building his most perfect strawman to delineate what entertainment is societally acceptable.
Now I have seen the light! Time to go binge-watch some random shitty sitcom on Netflix!
Re: (Score:1)
XB1 and PS4 Integration? (Score:3)
Until there's an app on both of these platforms, this is going to be an also-ran.
Re: (Score:2)
Until there's an app on both of these platforms, this is going to be an also-ran.
I'm sure console integration is something they thought about. But in any case to me it feels like most of the big streaming games are either eSports-type multi-player titles (MOBAs, Starcraft, CS:GO) or indie PC let's plays. If you look on twitch, there are plenty of console games in the top 25, but not many console exclusives. I think the PC streaming market alone is big enough to sustain a competing PC-only service at least until Google can work out a deal with the console makers.
I think the bigger obs
Re: (Score:1)
YouTube is just about everywhere even on the Nintendo Wii U and 3DS.
If they don't get YouTube Gaming everywhere separately I’m sure they will just work it into their current apps.
Re: (Score:3)
Funny you mention the Wii U and 3DS apps. They are just wrapped, unoptimized webkit wrappers. Their webkit versions is old, which is good for the homebrew community; but bad for people that want to use it, since it's so slow and unresponsive.
You can ask any big Twitch partner about Youtube; the ones that bother to comment about it all agree:Ttwitch takes care of their partners better than Youtube. They only upload some content to Youtube because the Twitch VODs don't show up on the Google searches as high.
I
Re: (Score:2)
Until there's an app on both of these platforms, this is going to be an also-ran.
The PS4's next firmware release (which is in beta right now) will have Youtube Streaming support
http://www.vg247.com/2015/08/1... [vg247.com]
This is not even news (Score:1)
The copyright ID system is in full effect in REAL TIME on the YouTube Gaming platform, this makes it pointless from the get-go. Playing GTA5? Have fun getting your account dinged because the radio, full of licensed garbage, is playing. Anything by Nintendo? Flagged and muted, because Nintendo is anti-gamer. The list goes on and on. Nobody of any value, note, or worth will be using "YouTube Gaming."
The new porn. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Watching other people do it has always been popular, I just never thought that applied to banal and mundane activities. What's next, live streams of the commute to the office?
I've always thought spectator sports is like porn. Guys watching other guys do physical exercise, all excited and sweating, while they could be doing it themselves, but for some reason they don't.
Boring. (Score:1)
YT Gaming in HTML5 (Score:1)
Also, if they are only allowing high subscribed channels in to this then its not cool or useful and seems motr like another way to monetize other's content.
Re: (Score:2)
They can't stream simultaneously elsewhere. A number of twitch partners would switch to hitbox on the bad twitch days (e.g. CosmoWright).
Pretty lacking compared to Twitch (Score:2)
I watch a lot of spedrunners and the occasional eSports event on twitch/hitbox. I watched a friend try out youtube's streaming today, because he was excited about it. It seemed competent but not really a serious threat to twitch, at least for now.
First, the pros:
- They appear to offer lower quality re-encodes to all streams, whereas Twitch only provides them for partners and streams with a lot of viewers (because re-encodes cost them CPU). This is a nice perk for people who would like to stream at a high
Damn that UI (Score:2)
Looks like the people responsible for the new google maps UI also made this turd.
Twitch isn't pretty but at least navigating the site makes some sense.
YouTube Gaming on the other hand is cancer for the eyes. Fucking tablet UIs