Chrome 47 Released (blogspot.ca) 61
LichtSpektren writes: Google Chrome version 47 is now available for download. This release features 41 security fixes, very tiny UI changes (except for the built-in PDF viewer, which was redone entirely), and the removal of the desktop notification center. The iOS version has added new keyboard shortcuts and support for 3D touch.
Slow news day? (Score:2)
>> yet another new "whole number" version of Chrome
Also, the sun rose again today.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Good riddance... (Score:3)
I don't think I saw anyone who liked the notification center.
It only took 300+ pages of negative comments and a couple years for Google to realize this was a feature that literally nobody wanted.
And one that was turned off, by as many people as possible, as soon as they could.
I stopped using Chrome because of system services. (Score:2)
People are beginning to dislike the increasing levels of control in the Chrome browser and in the Android operating system.
I stopped using Chrome because of the system services it installs.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. (Score:3, Interesting)
This new version of Chrome should be yet another reason for Mozilla to collectively shit its pants in fear.
Chrome consistently gets better with each release. So even if there isn't a new release of Firefox, Firefox has still gotten relatively worse compared to Chrome just by the fact that Firefox hasn't improved. It surely doesn't help that each release of Firefox has typically been seen as worse than the one before it, causing more problems and inconvenience for its ever-dwindling user base.
Just look at the recent browser usage stats [caniuse.com]. Firefox is only around 7% to 8% of the browser market now, across desktop and mobile platforms, and all versions. The desktop version of Chrome 46 alone has about 3.5 times the number of users than Firefox has. Chrome for Android has roughly 2.5 times as many users as all versions. Even Opera Mini almost has more users than Firefox has in total!
There should be nothing but panic at Mozilla right now when looking at those numbers. Then there should be even more panic when they realize that Firefox is the only product of theirs that sees much use. They're apparently looking to kill of Thunderbird, based on another recent Slashdot submission. Then their other projects, like Persona, Rust, Firefox OS, Servo, and Bugzilla don't have many users.
In my opinion, Mozilla's influence is dwindling as more and more users leave Firefox for greener pastures. At some point Mozilla will become completely irrelevant. None of the other browser vendors will give a damn what they think or want when they've only got 1% or maybe 2% of the market. When we see how quickly Firefox's share of the market has been dropping lately, the 2% mark will likely be hit sooner than a lot of people expected.
I think that Mozilla is reaching a fork in the road. One path leads directly to irrelevance. The other path leads to glory, but it involves going in a very different direction. This means the end to Firefox OS, Rust, Servo, and other failed projects. This means restoring Firefox's UI to what it once was. This means removing Pocket, Hello, and the ads from Firefox. This means listening to Firefox's users, rather than ignoring them, or worse, doing exactly what the users said they don't want to happen. I, for one, sure hope that Mozilla does not choose the current path that leads straight to irrelevance!
So *Firefox is dying? (Score:2)
There should be nothing but panic at Mozilla right now when looking at those numbers.
But what does Netcraft say about the numbers? I know it offers an anti-phishing extension for Firefox [mozilla.org], but has it released any news stories about Firefox's decline?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. (Score:4, Interesting)
It's also because there are a lot of idiots who are championing a browser by a fucking ad broker which sells your privacy.
Chrome: has telemetry on, Do-Not-Track off, etc. by default.
Firefox: has telemetry on, Do-Not-Track off, etc. by default. Also has built-in ads that read your browsing history.
Both are pretty bad here, but ironically, it's the "not-for-profit" browser that's more invasive of your privacy than the ad broker's browser.
Re: (Score:2)
Firefox: has telemetry on, Do-Not-Track off, etc. by default. Also has built-in ads that read your browsing history.
You're confused about telemetry:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Telem... [mozilla.org]
Also, the Do-Not-Track flag is an utter failure. No ad network listens to the DNT flag. If you don't want to be tracked, you need proactive browser support. Something like:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/... [eff.org]
And, for what it's worth, the in-browser advertising project ("tiles") in Firefox is being shut down, per a company-wide announcement sent out earlier today. Look for a public announcement soon.
Re: (Score:1)
Given the way the US treats ex-felons, it's arguable that letting them out is a worse punishment.
Re: (Score:2)
This new version of Chrome should be yet another reason for Mozilla to collectively shit its pants in fear.
Good. I hope they become irrelevant, simply due to what their attitude towards Opera users was ten years ago - and especially the attitude of Asa Dotzler, one of the most horrible trolls ever to have existed on the internet.
Soon enough, Mozilla will drop to Opera's market share. I'm going to laugh, oh how I'm going to laugh!
And then I'm going to start hoping that Opera falls from 2% to 0%, because they had an incredible browser and fucked it up exactly like Firefox did, by chromifying it entirely and aliena
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
--It's arguably too late for Firefox. If you like what FF *used* to be, switch over to Palemoon. Pre-Australis interface, continued support for Plugins, even has a 64-bit Linux version. Never looked back after switching.
Not interested. Bailed on chrome years ago. (Score:4, Interesting)
Thanks. I suspect some Chrome users will be interested, so this is News for Nerds and Stuff that Matters.
But I bailed on Chrome a couple years ago - installing and switching to Firefox on my account/machine at the consulting customer that used Chrome for their standard browser.
The precipitating incident: A typo had brought up a NSFW page, URL autocompletion kept suggesting it whenever its (common) first letter was typed, and both the documented and undocumented methods for removing such "helpful hints" weren't working in that version of Chrome.
But even before that they had broken several things I used in a "we know what you need better than you" interface change that couldn't be configured-away.
I'll stick to open stuff, even if it means I don't get the proprietary blazingly-fast rendering engine. Even when Netscape breaks things (like "delay image loading") I (or helpful netizens) have always been able to find a way to get it back, and in principle I could hack the code if it was REALLY important.
Re:Not interested. Bailed on chrome years ago. (Score:5, Informative)
RE: "I'll stick to open stuff" -- Chrome is almost entirely FLOSS. The only difference from the BSD-licensed Chromium browser is that Chrome adds in the auto-updater, Flash, and Widevine.
Re: (Score:2)
installing and switching to Firefox
I think we have drugs that can treat that now.
Re: (Score:2)
That's because Chrome on iPad isn't Chrome.
It's an old WebView.
Apple don't allow browsers to use their own rendering engines on iPad.
And there's a choice of old, unaccelerated WebView or new fancy QKView (or something like that), both of which use Safari-components to do the rendering.
Chrome on iPad is just Safari in a different skin.
Opera on iPad is just a remote VNC into a real computer running Opera.
Everything sux. (Score:3)
They all have flaws. Use one for this, another for that. One has neat add ons, the other has crap. 9 jillion browsers out there and none of them do a decent job.
The real question is: (Score:2)
I switched to FF after that and haven't looked back.
Chrome new version issues (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
NTLM is broken, use Chromium 49 or keep Chrome 46 (Score:2)
So the NTLM bug was fixed, but somehow made it into the release. It is fixed in the chromium releases. I'm using 49 at the moment perfectly.
Users could not authenticate to the squid proxies, and couldnt get out, and our entire shipping department couldnt reach fedex.
Bug @ https://code.google.com/p/chro... [google.com]
We had to push out a group policy for google chrome to turn off updates, but a few users already got smacked with it. We use google gmail/office enterprise, so this hit us pretty hard. Having employees u
Oh Joy. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Chrome 47 on linux breaks Amazon Prime video (Score:1)